Nuance in “No Excuses”: Unexpected Progressive Pedagogy and Policy

Abstract

“No Excuses” charter schools are at the center of many debates in education policy. First, what accounts for their test success, excellent learning environments or merely test preparation? Second, are strict behavior policies necessary to create efficient learning environments or are they harmful to students and their ability to navigate authority? This study uses classroom observations, student surveys, and interviews of administrators, teachers and students to understand the dynamics of pedagogy and discipline in two high-performing charter schools in New York City. Surprisingly, what makes these top “no excuses” schools successful is what distances them from the “no excuses” standard definitions. The schools displayed progressive mathematics pedagogy, reflective and abridged discipline practices, and strong school cultures that retained both students and teachers. These findings suggest that there are more nuances in the “no excuses” model than previously known and which need to be understood before continued replication.

Keywords

charter schools educational reform urban education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algar

(2016). Charter schools now serve 10 percent of all NYC students. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2016/09/07/charter-schools-now-serve-10-percent-of-all-nyc-students/

Anyon

(1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179509

Arum

(2005). Judging school discipline. Harvard University Press.

Baumrind

(1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030372

Ben-Porath

(2013). Deferring virtue: The new management of students and the civic role of schools. Theory and Research in Education, 11, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513485172

Bernstein

(1961). Social structure, language and learning. Educational research, 3(3), 163–176.

Boaler

(2006). How a detracked mathematics approach promoted respect, responsibility, and high achievement. Theory Into Practice, 45, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4501_6

Boaler

(2015). The brain and mathematics learning – Chapter 1. In Boaler

(Ed.), Mathematical mindsets (pp. 1–10). John Wiley & Sons.

Boaler

Chen

Williams

Cordero

(2016). Seeing as understanding: The importance of visual mathematics for our brain and learning. Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics, 5, 5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9679.1000325

10.

Boaler

Selling

S. K.

(2017). Psychological imprisonment or intellectual freedom? A longitudinal study of contrasting school mathematics approaches and their impacton adults’ lives. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(1), 78–105.

11.

Boaler

Sengupta-Irving

(2012). Nature, neglect and nuance: Changing accounts of sex, gender and mathematics. In Skelton

Francis

Smulyan

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and education (pp. 207–220). SAGE Publications.

12.

Boyd

Maranto

Rose

(2014). The softer side of “no excuses”. Education Next, 14(1), 48–53.

13.

Brophy

(1987). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership.

14.

Calarco

J. M.

(2018). Negotiating opportunities: How the middle class secures advantages in school. Oxford University Press.

15.

Cheng

Hitt

Kisida

Mills

J. N.

(2015). No excuses charter schools: A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence on student achievement (EDRE Working Paper Series No. 2014–11). EDRE. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

16.

Cohen

E. G.

Lotan

(2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. Teachers College Press.

17.

Dobbie

Fryer

R. G.

(2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem children’s zone. American Economic Journal Applied Economics, 3, 158–187. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.3.158

18.

Ferguson

A. A.

(2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of Black masculinity. University of Michigan Press.

19.

Golann

J. W.

(2015). The paradox of success at a no-excuses school. Sociology of Education, 88(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714567866

20.

Golann

J. W.

Torres

A. C.

(2020). Do no-excuses disciplinary practices promote success? Journal of Urban Affairs, 42, 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1427506

21.

Goodman

J. F.

(2013). Charter management organizations and the regulated environment: Is it worth the price? Educational Researcher, 42(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12470856

22.

Green

(2016). Beyond the viral video: Inside educators’ emotional debate about ‘no excuses’ discipline. https://ny.chalkbeat.org/2016/3/8/21103270/beyond-the-viral-video-inside-educators-emotional-debate-about-no-excuses-discipline

23.

Gross

DeArmond

(2010). Parallel patterns: Teacher attrition in charter vs public schools. Center on Reinventing Public Education.

24.

Jack

A. A.

(2016). (No) Harm in asking: Class, acquired cultural capital, and academic engagement at an elite university. Sociology of Education, 89(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040715614913

25.

Keierleber

(2017). At Philadelphia’s Mastery Charter Network, Culture Is Key to Turning Around Failing Schools. Retrieved February 18, 2022, from https://masterycharter.org/news/at-philadelphias-mastery-charter-network-culture-is-key-to-turning-around-failing-schools/

26.

KIPP Foundation. (2015). The promise of college completion: KIPP’s early successes and challenges. Author.

27.

Lareau

(2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life, with an update a decade later. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84887663310&partnerID=tZOtx3y1

28.

Larson

M. R.

Kanold

T. D.

(2016). Balancing the equation: A guide to school mathematics for educators and parents. Solution Tree Press.

29.

Lemov

(2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college. John Wiley & Sons.

30.

Lewis

A. E.

Diamond

J. B.

(2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.

31.

Milner

H. R.

(2013). Scripted and narrowed curriculum reform in urban schools. Urban Education, 48(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913478022

32.

Miron

Applegate

(2007). Teacher attrition in charter schools. Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice.

33.

Schoenfeld

A. H.

(2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x031001013

34.

Shorser

(1999). Bloom’s taxonomy interpreted for mathematics. University of Victoria.

35.

Sondel

(2015). Raising citizens or raising test scores? Teach for America, “no excuses” charters, and the development of the neoliberal citizen. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(3), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1064505

36.

Stanton-Salazar

R. D.

Valenzuela

(2001). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Contemporary Sociology, 30, 210. https://doi.org/10.2307/2655442

37.

Torre

(2013). Charter schools and the process of “counseling out”. Theory, Research and Action in Urban Education, 2(1). https://traue.commons.gc.cuny.edu/issue-2-fall-2013/torre/

38.

Torres

A. C.

Golann

J. W.

(2018). NEPC review: Charter schools and the achievement Gap. National Education Policy Center.

39.

Walker

J. M. T.

(2009). Authoritative classroom management: How control and nurturance work together. Theory Into Practice, 48, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840902776392

40.

Ware

(2006). Culturally responsive teaching that supports a culture of achievement. Urban Education, 41(4), 427–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906289710

41.

White

(2015). Charter schools: Demystifying whiteness in a market of “no excuses” corporate-styled charter schools. In Picower

Mayorga

(Eds.), What’s race got to do with it? (pp. 121–145). Peter Lang.

42.

Whitman

(2008). An appeal to authority: The new paternalism in urban schools. Education Next, 8(4), 52–59.