Examining work and community relations in one Texas school district, this study explores intensifying managerialism under performance accountability (PA) pressures. Reports, press releases, and media accounts are combined with ethnographic study from one elementary school to explore the enactment of school district reforms. Locating PA within a broader public sector reform approach termed New Public Management (NPM), the article looks at the influence of accountability relations informed by these logics on work and community relations. In contrast to rhetorical promises of improved responsiveness to client concerns, the findings suggest more centralized decision making and control as district administrators respond to state targets. Implications for reform logics that invoke and reinforce an antidemocratic managerialism are discussed in light managerial practice that deflect community activism and discipline teacher work.
Anderson, G.L. ( 1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 59, 249-270.
2.
Anderson, G.L. ( 1990). Toward a critical constructivist approach to school administration: Invisibility, legitimation and the study of non-events. Education Administration Quarterly, 26(1), 38-59.
3.
Anderson, G.L. ( 1998). Towards authentic participation: Deconstructing the discourses of participatory reforms in education. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 571-603.
Ball, S.J. ( 1990). Management as moral technology. In S. J. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge (pp. 153-167). New York: Routledge.
6.
Ball, S.J. ( 2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity . Education Policy, 18, 215-228.
7.
Black, W.R. ( 2006). Constructing accountability performance for English language learner students. Educational Policy, 20, 197-224.
8.
Bottery, M. ( 1996). The challenge to professionals from the new public management: Implications for the teaching profession. Oxford Review of Education, 22, 179-197.
9.
Bottery, M. ( 2003). The leadership of learning communities in a culture of unhappiness. School Leadership and Management, 23, 187-207.
10.
Bush, G.W. ( 2001). No child left behind. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
11.
Campbell, M.L., & Gregor, F.M. ( 2004). Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography (U.S. ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
12.
Cibulka, J. ( 1997). Two eras of urban schooling: The decline of the old order and the emergence of new organizational forms. Education and Urban Society, 29, 317-341.
13.
Cibulka, J., & Derlin, R. ( 1998). Accountability policy adoption to policy sustainability: Reforms and systemic initiatives in Colorado and Maryland. Education and Urban Society, 30, 502-515.
14.
Cook, B.J. ( 1998). Politics, political leadership and public management . Public Administration Review, 58, 225-230.
15.
Devault, M.L., & McCoy, L. ( 2002). Institutional ethnography: Using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 751-776). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Fairclough, N. ( 1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language . New York: Longman.
17.
Fearon, J.D. ( 1998). Deliberation as discussion. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 1-16). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Foley, D.E. ( 2002). Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 469-490.
19.
Foster, W.P. ( 1980). Administration and the crisis in legitimacy: A review of Habermasian thought. Harvard Educational Review, 50, 496-505.
20.
Foucault, M. ( 1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 87-104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Fullan, M. ( 1995). The school as a learning organization: Distant dreams . Theory Into Practice, 34, 230-235.
22.
Fullan, M. ( 2006). Turnaround leadership. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
23.
Gavey, N. ( 1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459-475.
24.
Grissmer, D.W., Flanagan, A., Kawata, J., & Williamson, S. (2000). Improving student achievement: What state NAEP test scores tell us. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
25.
Group urges equity for black students. (2001 , November 1, 2000). City Paper, p. 1.
26.
Habermas, J. ( 1975). Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.
27.
Halverson, R. ( 2003). Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(7).
28.
Haney, W. ( 2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41).
29.
Hill, P.T., Pierce, L.C., & Guthrie, J.W. ( 1997). Reinventing public education: How contracting can transform America’s schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Hood, C. ( 1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
31.
Hood, C., & Peters, G. ( 2004). The middle aging of the new public management: Into the age of paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 267-282.
32.
House, E.R. ( 1972). The dominion of economic accountability. Educational Forum, 37(1), 13-24.
33.
The Institute for Learning. (2003). The Learning Walk. Retrieved August 8, 2003, from http://www.instituteforlearning.org
34.
Kaboolian, L. ( 1998). The new public management: Challenging the boundaries of the management vs. administration debate. Public Administration Review, 58, 189-193.
35.
Kelley, R.M. ( 1998). An inclusive democratic polity, representative bureaucracies, and the new public management. Public Administration Review , 58, 201-207.
36.
Klein, S., Hamilton, L., McCaffrey, D., & Stecher, B. ( 2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us?Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
37.
Lortie, D.C. ( 1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Loveless, T. ( 1998). Uneasy allies: The evolving relationship of school and state. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(1), 1-8.
39.
Malen, B. ( 2003). Tightening the grip? The impact of state activism on local school systems. Education Policy, 17, 195-216.
40.
Malen, B., & Ogawa, R.T. ( 1988). Professional and patron influence on site-based governance: A counfounding case study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10, 251-270.
41.
Maxcy, B.D. ( 2006). Policy commentary and book review: Leaving children behind . Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 256-284.
42.
Maxcy, B.D., & Nguyen, T.S.T. (2006). The politics of distributing leadership: Reconsidering leadership distribution in two Texas elementary schools. Educational Policy, 20, 169-196.
43.
Maxcy, B.D., Rorrer, A., & Aleman, E. ( 2009). The case of Texas. In B. C. Fusarelli & B. S. Cooper (Eds.), The rising state: How state power is transforming the nation’s schools. Albany: SUNY Press.
44.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. ( 1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
45.
New committee to advise "Texas ISD" schools. (2001, January 9, 2002). City Paper, p. 7.
46.
Nguyen, T.S.T. ( 2006). "They don’t even know what Vietnam is!" The production of space through hybrid place-making and performativity in an urban public elementary school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
47.
Noguera, P. ( 2004). Racial segregation and the limits of local control in Oakland. Teachers College Record, 106, 2146-2170.
48.
Ogawa, R.T. ( 1996). Bridging and buffering relations between parents and schools. UCEA Review, 37(2), 2-13.
49.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. ( 1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
50.
Osborne, S.P., & McLaughlin, K. (2002). The new public management in context. In K. McLaughlin, S. P. Osborne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management: Current trends and future prospects (pp. 7-14). New York: Routledge .
51.
Painter, M. ( 2006). Thanksinisation or managerialism? Reforming the Thai bureaucracy. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 36(1), 26-47.
52.
Pollitt, C. ( 1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
53.
Pollitt, C. ( 2003). The essential public manager. Philadelphia : Open University Press.
54.
Research Group on Ethnic and Race Relations in "Texas ISD." (2001). Ethnic community views of the "Texas Independent School District" (Policy Research Report). San Marcos: State University.
55.
[The Reverend’s] new mission. (2001, January 12, 2001). City Weekly.
56.
Rhodes, R.A.W. ( 1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65, 138-151.
57.
Scott, W.R. ( 1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58.
Sebring, P.B., Hallman, S., & Smylie, M. ( 2003, April). When distributed leadership is called back. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
59.
Sipple, J., Kileen, K., & Monk, D. ( 2004). Adoption and adaptation: School district responses to state imposed learning and graduation requirements. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 143-168.
60.
Skrla, L., Scheurich, J.J., Johnson, J.F.J., & Koschoreck, J.W. (2001). Accountability for equity: Can state policy leverage social justice? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 237-260.
61.
Sloan, K. ( 2005). Playing to the logic of the Texas accountability system: How focusing on "ratings"-not children-undermines quality and equity. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving Children Behind: How Texas-style accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 153-178). Albany: SUNY Press.
62.
Smith, D.E. ( 1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology . Boston: Northeastern University Press.
63.
Smith, D.E. ( 2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
64.
Terry, L.D. ( 1998). Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the public management movement. Public Administration Review, 58, 194-200.
65.
Texas Education Agency. (1996). The development of accountability systems nationwide and in Texas (Statewide Texas Educational Progress Study No. 1). Austin: Texas Education Agency.
Valencia, R.R., Valenzuela, A., Sloan, K., & Foley, D.E. ( 2001). Let’s treat the cause, not the symptoms: Equity and accountability in Texas revisited. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 318-323.
68.
Valenzuela, A. ( 1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: SUNY Press.
69.
Valenzuela, A. ( 2002). High-stakes testing and U.S.-Mexican youth in Texas: The case for multiple compensatory criteria in assessment. Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy, 14, 97-116.
70.
Valenzuela, A. (Ed.). (2005). Leaving Children Behind: How Texas-style accountability fails Latino youth . Albany: SUNY Press.
71.
Weiler, H.N. ( 1990). Comparative perspectives on educational decentralization: An exercise in contradiction? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 433-448.
72.
Young, M. ( 1999). Multifocal educational policy research: Toward a method for enhancing traditional educational policy studies. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 677-714.
