Using a sociopolitical perspective to understand the alignment of community values and school policies, we conducted focus groups in three geographically close but economically varied neighborhood in one Midwest urban area. The article presents findings related to constituent values, social capital, and school policies, including charter school policy, NCLB, and busing.
BelenkyM.ClinchyB.GoldbergerN.TaruleJ. (1986). Womens’ ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
2.
BerkmanM. B.PlutzerE. (2005). Ten thousand democracies: Politics and public opinion in America’s school districts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3.
BjorkL.LindleJ. (2001). Superintendents and interest groups. Educational Policy, 15(1), 76-91.
4.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM. (2007). Charter schools: Hope or hype?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
ColemanJ. (1988, January). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 95-120.
7.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8.
EricksonF. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
9.
FineM.WeisL.WeseenS.WongM. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations and social responsibilities. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 107-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
GutmannA. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
HirschmanA. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
LabareeD. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39-81.
14.
MalenB.CochranM. V. (2008). Beyond pluralistic patterns of power: Research on the micropolitics of schools. In CooperB. S.CibulkaJ. G.FusarelliL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 148-178). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
MarshallM. (2004). Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the coproduction of local public schools. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 231-244.
16.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
17.
NarayanD. (1999). Bonds and bridges: Social capital and poverty (Policy Research Working Paper No. 2167). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
18.
PeshkinA. (1988, October). In search of subjectivity—One’s own. Educational Researcher,17-21.
19.
PutnamR. (2001). Bowling alone. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
20.
RenzulliL. A.EvansL. (2005). School choice, charter schools, and White flight. Social Problems, 52, 398-418.
21.
SarisW. E.SnidermanP. M. (2004). Studies in public opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
SchensulJ. J.LeCompteM. D. (1999). The ethnographer’s toolkit. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
23.
SchwartzS. H.BilskyW. (1990). Toward a theory of universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.
24.
WoolcockM.NarayanD. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Research Observer,15, 225-249.
