This article presents a critique of a teacher quality agenda promoted by a network of elitiste organizations in the United States. Network leaders posit that gaps in teacher quality cause achievement gaps. Their solution is to incentivize the graduates of the nation’s most selective colleges to teach in hard-to-staff schools. Summarizing prior results from secondary mathematics, this article argues that selective college graduates do not make particularly effective teachers and, given their high rates of attrition, do more harm than good. It concludes with the recommendation to invest instead in the development of community teachers to teach core subjects like mathematics.
AchinsteinB.AguirreJ. (2008). Cultural match or culturally suspect: How new teachers of color negotiate sociocultural challenges in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 110(8), 1505–1540.
2.
AchinsteinB.OgawaR.SextonD.FreitasC. (2010). Retaining teachers of color: A pressing problem and a potential strategy for “hard-to-staff” schools. Review of Educational Research, 80(1), 71–107.
3.
AcostaM. M. (2018). “No time for messin’ around!” Understanding Black educator urgency: Implications for the preparation of urban educators. Urban Education, 53(8), 981–1012.
4.
AdamsonF.Darling-HammondL. (2012). Funding disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: Evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(37). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1053
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2005, August). Teacher attrition: A costly loss to the nation and to the states. (Issue Brief). Washington, DC: Auth.
7.
AuW. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62.
8.
AuW.FerrareJ. (2014). Sponsors of policy: A network analysis of wealthy elites, their affiliated philanthropies, and charter school reform in Washington State. Teachers College Record, 116(8), 1–24.
9.
AugusteB.KihnP.MillerM. (2010). Closing the talent gap: Attracting and retaining top-third graduates to careers in teaching: An international and market research-based perspective. McKinsey. http://mckinseyonsociety.com/closing-the-talent-gap/
BarnesG.CroweE.SchaeferB. (2007). The cost of teacher turnover in five school districts: A pilot study. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
12.
BoydD.GrossmanP.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216.
13.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113–132.
BrantlingerA.CooleyL.BrantlingerE. (2010). Families, values, and class relations: The politics of alternative certification. In AppleM.BallS.GandinL. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education: Critical research for social justice (pp. 179–189). Routledge.
16.
BrantlingerA.GriffinM. (2019). Review of “The effectiveness of secondary math teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows programs” (Institute of Education Sciences, September 2013). National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/thinktank/tfa
17.
BrantlingerA.MillerJ.GrantA.CooleyL.VivianiW.GriffinM. (under review). Maintaining the gaps: A program theory evaluation of mathematics teacher training in the New York City Teaching Fellows program. Education Policy Analysis Archives.
18.
BrantlingerA.SmithB. (2013). Alternative teacher certification and the new professionalism: The preparation of mathematics teachers in the New York City Teaching Fellows Program. Teachers College Record, 115(7), 1–44.
BrooksD. (2010). Bobos in paradise: The new upper class and how they got there. Simon and Schuster Press.
21.
BrownB.BodaP.LemmiC.MonroeX. (2019). Moving culturally relevant pedagogy from theory to practice: Exploring teachers’ application of culturally relevant education in science and mathematics. Urban Education, 54(6), 775–803.
22.
CarpenterT.LehrerR. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In FennemaE.RombergT. (Eds.), Classrooms that promote mathematical understanding (pp. 19–32). Lawrence Erlbaum.
ChazanD.BrantlingerA.ClarkL.EdwardsA. (2013). What mathematics education might learn from the work of well-respected African American mathematics teachers in urban schools. Teachers College Record, 115(2), 1–40.
ClarkM.ChiangH.SilvaT.McConnellS.SonnenfeldK.ErbeA.PumaM. (2013). The effectiveness of secondary math teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows programs (NCEE 2013-4015). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20134015/pdf/20134015.pdf
28.
CollinsC. (2011). “Ethnically qualified”: Race, merit, and the selection of urban teachers, 1920–1980. Teachers College Press.
CooleyL.BrantlingerA.Hannaford-SimpsonS.ShahidR. (2019). Presumed proficiencies, credentialism, and the pedagogy of poverty: Mathematics teachers from selective alternative route programs. Journal for Mathematics Teacher Education. Advance online publication. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10857-019-09449-w
31.
CreminL. (1964). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1876–1957. Vintage Books.
32.
CurtisR.WurtzelJ. (2010). Teaching talent: A visionary framework for human capital in education. Harvard Education Press.
Darling-HammondL.HoltzmanD. J.GatlinS. J.HeiligJ. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach For America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n42.2005
35.
DeeT. (2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 195–210.
36.
deMarraisK.WennerJ.LewisJ. (2013). Bringing Teach For America into the forefront of teacher education: Philanthropy meets spin. Critical Education, 4(11), 1–27.
37.
DenvirD. (2014, September24). How to destroy a public-school system. The Nation, 299(15), 20–26.
38.
DeresiewiczW. (2014). Excellent sheep: The miseducation of the American elite and the way to a meaningful life. Simon and Schuster Press.
EastonB. (2014). Changing course on school reform: Strategic organizing around the New York City mayoral election. Voices in Urban Education, 39, 6–13.
43.
EgaliteA.KisidaB.WintersM. (2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 45, 44–52.
44.
FerrareJ.ReynoldsK. (2016). Has the elite foundation agenda spread beyond the Gates? An organizational network analysis of nonmajor philanthropic giving in K–12 education. American Journal of Education, 123(1), 137–169.
45.
FooteM.BrantlingerA.HaydarH.SmithB.GonzalezL. (2011). Are we supporting teacher success? Insights from an alternative route mathematics teacher certification program for urban public schools. Education and Urban Society, 43(3), 396–425.
46.
FrankT. (2018). Teaching our kids: Unpacking an African-American mathematics teacher’s understanding of mathematics identity. Journal for Multicultural Education, 12(2), 144–160.
GiridhadarasA. (2018). Winner takes all: The elite charade of changing the world. Alfred A. Knopf.
49.
GoldenD. (2007). The price of admission: How America’s ruling class buys its way into elite colleges-and who gets left outside the gates. Broadway Books.
50.
GoldenD. (2017). Spy schools: How the CIA, FBI, and Foreign Intelligence secretly exploit America’s universities. Henry Holt.
51.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. Lawrence and Wishart.
GutiérrezR. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 357–364.
HalberstamD. (1972). The best and the brightest. Modern Library.
56.
HammernessK.CraigE. (2016). “Context-specific” teacher preparation for New York City: An exploration of the content of context in Bard College’s Urban Teacher Residency program. Urban Education, 51(10), 1226–1258.
57.
HarveyD. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
HenryG.BastianK.SmithA. (2012). Scholarships to recruit the “best and brightest” into teaching: Who is recruited, where do they teach, how effective are they, and how long do they stay?Educational Researcher, 41(3), 83–92.
61.
HessF. (2005). The predictable, but unpredictably personal, politics of teacher licensure. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 192–198.
62.
HessF. (2007). The case for educational entrepreneurship: Hard truths about risk, reform, and reinvention. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(1), 21–30.
63.
HoK. (2009). Liquidated: An ethnography of Wall Street. Duke University Press.
64.
HowardT.MilnerH. (2014). Teacher preparation for urban schools. In MilnerR.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 199–216). Routledge.
65.
HumphreyD.WechslerM.HoughH. (2008). Characteristics of effective alternative teacher certification programs. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 1–63.
66.
JacobsenR.WhiteR.ReckhowS. (2016). Cultivating political powerhouses: TFA corps members’ experiences that shape local political engagement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(18). https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1924
67.
KaneT.RockoffJ.StaigerD. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615–631.
68.
KavanaghK.DunnA. (2013). The political spectacle of recruiting the “best and the brightest.”Critical Education, 4(11), 48–66.
KleinJ. (2011, June). The failure of American schools. The Atlantic, 307(5), 66–77.
71.
KoppW. (1994). Teach for America: Moving beyond the debate. The Educational Forum, 58(2), 187–192.
72.
KoppW. (2001). One day, all children: The unlikely triumph of Teach For America and what I learned along the way. Public Affairs.
73.
LabareeD. (2010). Teach for America and teacher Ed: Heads they win, tails we lose. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 48–55.
74.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A critical race theory perspective. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 211–247.
MaierA. (2012). Doing good and doing well: Credentialism and Teach for America. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(1), 10–22.
77.
MartinD. (2007). Beyond missionaries or cannibals: Who should teach mathematics to African American children?The High School Journal, 91(1), 6–28.
78.
MartinD. (2013). Race, racial projects, and mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 316–333.
79.
MartinD.LarnellG. (2013). Urban mathematics education. In MilnerR.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 373–393). Routledge.
80.
MeadS.ChuongC.GoodsonC. (2015). Exponential growth, unexpected challenges: How Teach for America grew in scale and impact. Bellwether Educational Partners. http://bellwethereducation.org/
81.
MeagherM.BrantlingerA. (2011). When am I going to learn to be a mathematics teacher? A case study of a novice New York City Teaching Fellow. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 4(2), 96–130.
82.
MilnerH. R.IV (2010). Start where you are, but don’t stay there: Understanding diversity, opportunity gaps, and teaching in today’s classrooms. Harvard University Press.
83.
MilnerH. R.IVHowardT. (2013). Counter-narrative as method: Race, policy and research for teacher education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(4), 536–561.
84.
MulliganT. (2017). Justice and the meritocratic state. New York, NY: Routledge.
85.
The New Teacher Project. (2005). Teaching for student achievement (TfSA) guidebook.
PhilipT. (2011). An “ideology in pieces” approach to studying change in teachers’ sensemaking about race, racism, and racial justice. Cognition and Instruction, 29(3), 297–329.
91.
RavitchD. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. Vintage.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.
96.
RotherhamA. (2008). Achieving teacher and principal excellence: A guidebook for donors. Philanthropy Roundtable.
97.
SaltmanK. (2009). The rise of venture philanthropy and the ongoing neoliberal assault on public education: The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation. Workplace, 16, 53–72.
SondelB. (2015). Raising citizens or raising test scores? Teach for America, “no excuses” charters, and the development of the neoliberal citizen. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(3), 289–313.
101.
TamirE. (2009). Choosing to teach in urban schools among graduates of elite colleges. Urban Education, 44(5), 522–544.
TischM. (2005). A case study of school-university collaboration in the implementation of alternative certification [Doctoral dissertation]. Teachers College, Columbia University.
104.
TrujilloT.ScottJ.RiveraM. (2017). Follow the yellow brick road: Teach for America and the making of educational leaders. American Journal of Education, 123(3), 353–391.
WysongE.PerrucciR.WrightD. (2013). The new class society: Goodbye American dream?Rowman & Littlefield.
113.
YaniskoE. J. (2016). Negotiating perceptions of tracked students: Novice teachers facilitating high-quality mathematics instruction. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(2), 153–184.
114.
YoungM. D. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy. Transaction Publishers.
115.
ZeichnerK.Peña-SandovalC. (2015). Venture philanthropy and teacher education policy in the US: The role of the New Schools Venture Fund. Teachers College Record, 117(6), 1–24.
