This paper investigates the electromechanical performance of textile fabric with conductive yarn elements for data transmission capabilities. Electromechanical experiments were conducted to evaluate the electrical response of copper yarn elements stitched axially to the textile fabric, while assessing the mechanical response of the system during tensile tests under axial loading. The results indicated that the yarn element exhibited low electricomechanical coupling below 1.5% strain, making it suitable for consistent electrical performance during low mechanical strain conditions. Computational models were also developed and correlated with the experimental results of the conductive yarn. The computational model was then expanded to investigate the effect of the braiding angle in the braiding system, providing insights into how these parameters influence the system’s performance. Overall, this research contributes valuable insights into the electromechanical behavior of textile fabric with conductive yarn elements, and presents a framework for optimizing data transfer capabilities in e-textiles and smart textile applications. The findings open opportunities for further advancements in the design and engineering of functional textiles for a wide range of applications.
Hughes-RileyTDiasTCorkC.A historical review of the development of electronic textiles. Fibers2018;
6: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib6020034.
2.
ShirakawaH, JLouisE GMacDiarmidA.et alSynthesis of electrically conducting organic polymers: halogen derivatives of polyacetylene, (CH) x Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications 1977: 578–580. https://doi.org/10.1039/C39770000578
3.
De RossiD.Electronic textiles: a logical step. Nat Mater2007;
6: 328–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat1892.
4.
LocherIKirsteinTTrösterG. Routing methods adapted to e-textiles. In: Proceedings of 37th international symposium on microelectronics (IMAPS), Long Beach 2004 Nov., pp. 14–18
5.
CottetDGrzybJKirsteinT, et al.
Electrical characterization of textile transmission lines. IEEE Trans Adv Packag2003;
26: 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/TADVP.2003.817329.
6.
CochraneCKoncarVLewandowskiM, et al.
Design and development of a flexible strain sensor for textile structures based on a conductive polymer composite. Sensors2007;
7: 473–492. https://doi.org/10.3390/s7040473.
7.
DiasTRatnayakeA.5 – Integration of micro-electronics with yarns for smart textiles. In: DiasT (ed.) Electronic Textiles.
Oxford:
Woodhead Publishing, 2015, pp. 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100201-8.00006-0.
8.
ZengWShuLLiQ, et al.
Fiber-based wearable electronics: a review of materials, fabrication, devices, and applications. Adv Mater2014;
26: 5310–5336. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400633.
ViswanathanS.
E-Textile and its Applications. International Journal of Engineering Science2019 Mar; 20174–20176.
11.
EdmisonJJonesMNakadZ, et al. Using piezoelectric materials for wearable electronic textiles. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Wearable Computers. Seattle, WA, USA: IEEE, 10 October 2002, pp. 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2002.1167217.
12.
MattanaGKinkeldeiTLeuenbergerD, et al.
Woven temperature and humidity sensors on flexible plastic substrates for e-textile applications. IEEE Sensors J2013;
13: 3901–3909. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2013.2257167.
13.
StoppaMChiolerioA.Wearable electronics and smart textiles: a critical review. Sensors2014;
14: 11957–11992. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140711957.
PageT.Embedded electronics in textiles and wearable technology. I-Manag J Embed Syst2014;
3: 1–18.
17.
MarculescuDMarculescuRZamoraNH, et al.
Electronic textiles: a platform for pervasive computing. Proc IEEE2003;
91: 1995–2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2003.819612.
JansenKMB.Performance evaluation of knitted and stitched textile strain sensors. Sensors2020;
20: 7236. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247236.
23.
WatsonASunMPendyalS, et al.
TracKnee: Knee angle measurement using stretchable conductive fabric sensors. Smart Health2020;
15: 100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhl.2019.100092.
24.
VuTDDurvilleDDaviesP.Finite element simulation of the mechanical behavior of synthetic braided ropes and validation on a tensile test. Int J Solids Struct2015;
58: 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.12.022.
25.
ChaudharyBMatosHDasS, et al.
Multifunctional composite structures with embedded conductive yarns for shock load monitoring and failure detection. Smart Mater Struct2024;
33: 037001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ad1e8c.
26.
QuadfliegTStolyarovOGriesT.Carbon rovings as strain sensors for structural health monitoring of engineering materials and structures. J Strain Anal Engng Design2016;
51: 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324716655058.
27.
ChaudharyBMatosHDasS, et al.
Multifunctional carbon/epoxy composites with power transmission capabilities. Mater Today Commun2023;
35: 105665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105665.
28.
HaqueRIFarineP-ABriandD.Electrically conductive fabric based stretchable triboelectric energy harvester. J Phys: Conf Ser2016;
773: 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/773/1/012005.
29.
ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Tension and Elongation of Elastic Fabrics (Constant-Rate-of-Extension Type Tensile Testing Machine). 2022. https://www.astm.org/d4964-96r20.html (accessed 15 August 2022).
30.
ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. 2022. https://www.astm.org/d3039_d3039m-08.html (accessed 1 May 2022).
31.
WanchooPChaudharyBLiH-W-X, et al.
Blast failure and energy analysis of rubber-modified carbon-fiber vinyl-ester composite laminates. Mech Mater2023;
183: 104685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104685.
ReddyJN (ed.). Introduction to the Finite Element Method, 4th ed.
India:
McGraw-Hill Education, 2019.
36.
MatosMASTagarielliVLBaiz-VillafrancaPM, et al.
Predictions of the electro-mechanical response of conductive CNT-polymer composites. J Mech Phys Solids2018;
114: 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.02.014.
37.
YangPChowdhurySNeithalathN.Strain sensing ability of metallic particulate reinforced cementitious composites: experiments and microstructure-guided finite element modeling. Cement Concrete Compos2018;
90: 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.04.004.
38.
NayakSDasS.A microstructure-guided numerical approach to evaluate strain sensing and damage detection ability of random heterogeneous self-sensing structural materials. Comput Mater Sci2019;
156: 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.09.035.
39.
NayakSDasS.Strain sensing efficiency of hierarchical nano-engineered smart twill-weave composites: evaluations using multiscale numerical simulations. Compos Struct2021;
255: 112905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112905.
40.
LiuMPuXJiangC, et al.
Large-area all-textile pressure sensors for monitoring human motion and physiological signals. Adv Mater2017;
29: 1703700. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703700.
41.
XuLMXieXMFanH.Polycrystalline aggregates in the thin-wire configuration. J Appl Phys2011;
110: 084909. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3653254.
42.
LongFGuoXSongK, et al.
Synergistic strengthening effect of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and titanium diboride (TiB2) microparticles on mechanical properties of copper matrix composites. J Mater Res Technol2020;
9: 7989–8000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.036.
