The aim of this study was to investigate the physical properties of yarns made with different blend ratios of meta-aramid, para-aramid, flame-resistant (FR) viscose, and antistatic nylon fibers, as well as the tensile strengths and burning behaviors of fabrics made from these yarns. For this purpose, 10 different yarns of two different linear densities were produced using five different blend ratios, which are commonly used in the production of fire-resistant fabrics, and knitted fabrics were produced from these yarns, with the same knitting machine and the same production parameters. Physical properties of the yarns and tensile properties and burning characteristics of the knitted fabrics were measured according to commonly applied standards, and the results obtained were evaluated using the SPSS statistical program. The findings of this study are that the blend ratios of meta-aramid, para-aramid, FR viscose, and antistatic nylon fibers have statistically significant effects on the unevenness, humidity, and tenacity of the yarns, as well as on the tensile properties and burning characteristics of the fabrics. It was found that, with an increase of the aramid fiber ratio in the blend, the tensile values of the yarns and fabrics increased. The lowest moisture contents were recorded for 100% para-aramid yarns but the highest moisture contents were recorded for yarns whose blends contained FR viscose fibers. The yarns whose blends contained antistatic nylon fibers exhibited the greatest unevenness and the most thin and thick places and neps.
BajajP.Heat and flame protection. In: HorrocksARAnandSC (eds.) Handbook of technical textiles. The Textile Institute.
Cambridge England:
Woodhead publishing Limited, 2000, pp. 223–259.
2.
KalınMB.Improving fire retardancy specify of textile surfaces. Master’s Thesis, KahramanMaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversity, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, 2008.
3.
ÖmeroğullarıZKutD.Tekstilde güc tutusurluk (In Turkish). Uludag University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering. 2012;
17(1): 27–40. DOI: 10.17482/uujfe.22122 (In Turkish).
4.
LiuXShaoQCaoJ, et al.
Superamphiphobic and flame-resistant cotton fabrics for protective clothing. Cellulose2022;
29: 619–632. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-04212-y.
5.
FangYSunWLiJ, et al.
Eco-friendly flame retardant and dripping-resistant of polyester/cotton blend fabrics through layer-by-layer assembly fully bio-based chitosan/phytic acid coating. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules2021;
175: 140–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.023.
6.
KokolVVivodVPeršinZ, et al.
Screen-printing of microfibrillated cellulose for an improved moisture management, strength and abrasion resistant properties of flame-resistant fabrics. Cellulose2021;
28: 6663–6678. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-03915-6.
7.
WuWYangCQ.Comparison of different reactive organophosphorus flame retardant agents for cotton. Part II: Fabric flame resistant performance and physical properties. Polymer Degradation and Stability2006;
92(3): 363–369. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.12.005.
8.
GuanJChenG.Flame resistant modification of silk fabric with vinyl phosphate. Fibers and Polymers2008;
9(4): 438–443. DOI: 10.1007/s12221-008-0070-9.
9.
HarrisJAArthurJCJr, andGoynesWRJr.Flame resistant cotton fabrics prepared by radiation-initiated polymerization with vinyl phosphonate oligomer and N-methylolacrylamide. Journal of Applied Polymer Science1979;
23(9): 2555–2565. DOI: 10.1002/app.1979.070230902.
10.
LiuYZhaoWZhangJ, et al.
Inspired by sodium alginate: amino acids cooperating with sodium ions to prepare phosphorus-free flame retardant lyocell fabric. Cellulose2022;
29: 5339–5358. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-022-04596-5.
11.
MaZZhangZZhaoF, et al.
A multifunctional coating for cotton fabrics integrating superior performance of flame-retardant and self-cleaning. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials2022;
5: 2817–2833. DOI: 10.1007/s42114-022-00464-9.
ChengXShiLFanZ, et al.
Bio-based coating of phytic acid, chitosan, and biochar for flame-retardant cotton fabrics. Polymer Degradation and Stability2022;
199: 109898. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109898.
14.
XuFZhangGWangP, et al.
Durable and high-efficiency casein-derived phosphorus-nitrogen-rich flame retardants for cotton fabrics. Cellulose2022;
29: 2681–2697. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-022-04430-y.
15.
LokhandeKDBhakareMABondardePM, et al.
Bio-derived efficient flame-retardants for cotton fabric. Cellulose2022;
29(6): 3583–3593. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-022-04478-w.
16.
QiLQiuSXiJ, et al.
Construction of super-hydrophobic, highly effective flame retardant coating for cotton fabric with superior washability and abrasion resistance. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science2022;
607: 2019–2028. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.10.021.
17.
ZhaoZDiYGaoL, et al.
Characterization of flame-retardant performance of polyester/flame-retardant viscose blended yarn. Journal of Industrial Textiles2020;
49(10): 1304–1316. DOI: 10.1177/1528083718813527.
18.
VasiljevićJČolovićMJermanI, et al.
Recent advances in production of flame retardant polyamide 6 filament yarns. Tekstilec2018;
61(2): 136–148. DOI: 10.14502/Tekstilec2018.61.136-148.
19.
ErtekinMKırtayE.Burning behaviour and mechanical properties of fabrics woven with ring spun aramid and flame retardant polyester yarns. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon2014;
24(3): 286–290.
20.
SuCILuoGS.High performance flame-retardant composite yarns with oxidized fiber. Fibers and Polymers2010;
11(7): 1049–1054. DOI 10.1007/s12221-010-1049-x.
21.
JiHChenKSongM, et al.
Effect of flame retardant on the microfine structures and creep behavior of polyester industrial yarns. The Journal of The Textile Institute2022;
113(2): 273–280. DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2020.1870329.
22.
NdlovuLSiddiquiQOmolloE, et al.
Physical properties of plain single jersey-knitted fabrics made from blended and core-spun polysulfonamide/cotton yarns. Textile Research Journal2015;
85(3): 262–271. DOI: 10.1177/0040517514542145.
23.
GültekinBCAkalınM, andYükseloğluSM.The study of flame retardancy and thermal properties of SeaCell® fabrics. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon2013;
23(2): 107–112.
24.
ŞardağSTürkM.Thermo-physiological properties and burning behaviours of automotive upholstery fabrics woven with aramid and wool yarns. Journal of Industrial Textiles2021;
51(3): 486–510. DOI: 10.1177/1528083720974042.
25.
SoneeNAroraC, andParmarMS.Burning behavior of aramid and FR viscose blended fabrics. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research2019;
44(2): 238–243. DOI: 10.56042/ijftr.v44i2.18714.
26.
ErkutD.Farklı karışım oranlarında güç tutuşur özelliğe sahip liflerden elde edilen iplik ve kumaş özelliklerinin incelenmesi (in Turkish). Master's Thesis, Bursa Uludag University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Bursa, Turkey, 2020. Council of higher education, thesis center, 618456.
27.
DIN EN ISO 6330:2013. Textiles. Domestic washing and drying procedures for textile testing.
28.
BS EN ISO 139:2005+A1:2011. Standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing.
29.
EN ISO 2060:1994. Textiles. Yarn from packages. Determination of linear density (mass per unit length) by the skein method.
30.
EN ISO 2061:2015. Textiles. Determination of twist in yarns. Direct counting method.
31.
ISO 2062:2009. Textiles. Yarn from packages. Determination of single-end breaking force and elongation at break using constant rate of extension (CRE) tester.
32.
ISO 6741-1:1989. Textiles. Fibres and yarns. Determination of commercial mass of consignments. Part 1: Mass determination and calculations.
33.
ISO 13938-2:2019. Textiles. Bursting properties of fabrics. Part 2: Pneumatic method for determination of bursting strength and bursting distension.
34.
BS EN ISO 12947-3:1998. Textiles. Determination of the abrasion resistance of fabrics by the Martindale method. Part 3: Determination of mass loss.
GoswamiBCMartindaleJG, andScardinoFL.Textile yarns: technology, structure, and applications.
New York:
Wiley, 1977, p. 141.
39.
BivainytėAMikučionienėD.Investigation on the air and water vapour permeability of double-layered weft knitted fabrics. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe2011;
3(86): 69–73.
40.
GünADBodurA.Kumaşların su buharı geçirgenliği. Tasit Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi2014;
8(3): 20–34 (In Turkish).
41.
KissaE.Wetting and wicking. Textile Research Journal1996;
66(10): 660–668. DOI: 10.1177/004051759606601008.
42.
ÖzkanETKaplangirayBM.Investigating moisture management properties of weaving military clothes. Uludag University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering2015;
20(1):51–63. DOI: 10.17482/uujfe.83284.
43.
AvcıH.Comfort properties of socks produced with new fibers. Master’s Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Science, İstanbul, Turkey, 2007.
44.
MarmaralıAKretzschmarSDÖzdilN, et al.,
Giysilerde ısıl konforu etkileyen parametreler. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon2006;
16(4): 241–246 (In Turkish).
45.
DemiryürekOKiliçA.Pamuk/viskon karişimli ring ipliklerin düzgünsüzlük, tüylülük ve sürtünme özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Tekstil Ve Mühendis2016;
23(102): 94–99. DOI: 10.7216/1300759920162310202 (In Turkish).
46.
BarellaA.The hairiness of yarns. Textile Progress. 1993;
24(3):1–46. DOI: 10.1080/00405169308688860.
47.
CanYKırtayE.Pamuk ipliklerinde iplik tüylülüğü ve tüylülüğe etki eden faktörler (kaynak taramasi). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi2003;
9(3): 379–385 (In Turkish).
48.
MujumdarAMukhopadhyaySYadavR, et al.
Properties of ring spun yarns made from cotton and regenerated bamboo fibres. Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research2011;
36 (March): 18–23.
