The influence of two types of functional particles on the electromagnetic properties and mechanical properties of double-layer coated basalt fiber fabrics
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2022
The influence of two types of functional particles on the electromagnetic properties and mechanical properties of double-layer coated basalt fiber fabrics
The double-layer coated basalt fiber fabric was prepared using polyurethane as the matrix and adopting a coating technology on the basalt fiber fabric. Firstly, the influence of two types of functional particles, graphite and graphene, on the dielectric properties (the real and imaginary parts and the loss tangent value), shielding effectiveness and mechanical properties of the double-layer coated basalt fiber fabric was analyzed. Then, the double-layer coated basalt fiber fabric of two types of structures, graphite/fabric/graphite and graphene/fabric/graphite, were prepared. Secondly, the influence of the contents of graphite and graphene on the electromagnetic properties and mechanical properties of the double-layer coated basalt fiber fabric using the method of controlling variables was studied. The results showed that the polarizing ability, the loss ability, the attenuating ability and the shielding ability of the double-layer coated basalt fiber fabric for the graphene coating were all superior to those of the graphite coating. Within the range of 0–1100 MHz, when the graphite content was 20%, the polarizing ability, the loss ability and the attenuating ability of the double-layer fabric were the strongest. When the graphene content was 20%, the polarizing ability to electromagnetic waves of the double-layer fabric was the strongest; when the graphene content was 15%, both the loss ability and attenuating ability to electromagnetic waves of the double-layer fabric were the strongest; and when the graphene content was 5%, the shielding ability to electromagnetic waves of the double-layer fabric was the strongest. When the graphite content was 20% and the graphene content was 10%, the displacement was within the range of 0–4.7 mm, and the load was 3411.1 N.
MarciniakKGrabowskaKEStempienZ, et al.
Shielding of electromagnetic radiation by multilayer textile sets. Text Res J2019;
89: 948–958.
2.
LiuYJZhaoXMXiaoT.Study of graphite/silicon carbide coating of plain woven fabric for electrical megawatt absorbing properties. J Text I2017;
108: 483–488.
3.
DadaltiMTDDa CunhaAJLA, De Araujo MC, et al.
Electromagnetic interference of endodontic equipments with cardiovascular implantable electronic device. J Dent2016;
46: 68–72.
4.
Diaz-OrtizAPrietoPDe La HozA.A critical overview on the effect of microwave irradiation in organic synthesis. Chem Rec2019;
19: 85–97.
5.
VenkataramPSHermannJTkatchenko, et al.
Phonon-polariton mediated thermal radiation and heat transfer among molecules and macroscopic bodies: nonlocal electromagnetic response at mesoscopic scales. Phys Rev Lett2018;
121: 045901.
6.
ZhouEZXiJBGuoY, et al.
Synergistic effect of graphene and carbon nanotube for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding films. Carbon2018;
133: 316–322.
7.
SushmitaKMenonAVSharmaS, et al.
Mechanistic insight into the nature of dopants in graphene derivatives influencing electromagnetic interference shielding properties in hybrid polymer nanocomposites. J Phys Chem C2019;
123: 2579–2590.
8.
ZhangHLLiuJZhangTH, et al.
Nonlinear dynamic and electromagnetic interference coupled-field analysis in a semi-active suspension system with magneto-rheological damper. Int J Appl Electrom2018;
58: 41–55.
9.
AbbasiHAntunesMVelascoJI.Recent advances in carbon-based polymer nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding. Prog Mater Sci2019;
103: 319–373.
10.
JiangDWMurugadossVWangY, et al.
Electromagnetic interference shielding polymers and nanocomposites—a review. Polym Rev2019;
59: 280–337.
11.
GuHBZhangHYLinJ, et al.
Large negative giant magneto resistance at room temperature and electrical transport in cobalt ferrite-polyaniline nanocomposites. Polymer2018;
143: 324–330.
12.
GreckaMArtamonovsOBlumsJ, et al.
Electromagnetic shielding properties of metal yarns fabrics with graphite coating. Key Eng Mater2017;
721: 138–142.
13.
SainiLPatraMKDhakaMK, et al.
Ni/graphitic carbon core-shell nanostructure-based light weight elastomeric composites for Ku-band microwave absorption applications. CrystEngComm2018;
20: 4630–4640.
14.
LiuYJZhaoXMTuoX.The research of EM wave absorbing properties of ferrite/silicon carbide/graphite three-layer composite coating knitted fabrics. J Text I2016;
107: 483–492.
15.
MochaneMJMotaungTEMotloungSV.Morphology, flammability, and properties of graphite reinforced polymer composites. Systematic review. Polym Compos2018;
39: E1487–E1499.
16.
JosephNVargheseJSebastianMT, et al.
Graphite reinforced polyvinylidene fluoride composites an efficient and sustainable solution for electromagnetic pollution. Compos B Eng2017;
123: 271–278.
17.
WangJFJinXXLiCH, et al.
Graphene and graphene derivatives toughening polymers: toward high toughness and strength. Chem Eng J2019;
370: 831–854.
18.
SattarT.Current review on synthesis, composites and multifunctional properties of graphene. Top Curr Chem2019;
377: 10.
19.
ZengZHWangCXZhangYF, et al.
Ultralight and highly elastic graphene/lignin-derived carbon nanocomposite aerogels with ultrahigh electromagnetic interference shielding performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018;
10: 8205–8213.
20.
NaveenJJawaidMZainudinES, et al.
Effect of graphene nanoplatelets on the ballistic performance of hybrid Kevlar/Cocos nucifera sheath-reinforced epoxy composites. Text Res J2019;
89: 4349–4362.
21.
LinJZhangPPZhengC, et al.
Reduced silanized graphene oxide/epoxy-polyurethane composites with enhanced thermal and mechanical properties. Appl Surf Sci2014;
316: 114–123.
22.
LiuYJYuYTZhaoXM.Research on the electromagnetic property of the single-layer graphene-coated fabrics. J Text I2021;
112: 255–263.
23.
ChangCYueXHaoB, et al.
Direct growth of carbon nanotubes on basalt fiber for the application of electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon2020;
167: 31–39.
24.
KarvanisKRusnakovaSKrejciO, et al.
Preparation, thermal analysis, and mechanical properties of basalt fiber/epoxy composites. Polymers2020;
12: 1785.
25.
LiuYJYangYFYangZH, et al.
Influence of the thickness of graphene coating on the electromagnetical and mechanical properties of double-layer coated basalt fibre fabrics. Fibres Text East Eur2020;
28: 69–74.
26.
LiuYJLiuYCZhaoXM.The influence of pyrrole concentration on the dielectric properties of polypyrrole composite material. J Text I2017;
108: 1246–1249.
27.
LiuYJLiuYCZhaoXM.The influence of dopant on the dielectric properties of flexible polypyrrole composites. J Text I2017;
108: 1280–1284.
28.
LiuYJLiuYCZhaoXM.The research of EM wave absorbing properties of ferrite/silicon carbide double coated polyester woven fabric. J Text I2018;
109: 106–112.
29.
LiuYJZhaoXM.Experimental studies on the dielectric behaviour of polyester woven fabrics. Fibres Text East Eur2016;
24: 67–71.
30.
LiuYJLiuBCZhaoXM.The influence of the type and concentration of oxidants on the dielectric constant of the polypyrrole-coated plain woven cotton fabric. J Text I2018;
109: 1127–1132.
31.
LiuYJZhaoXM.The influence of dopant type and dosage on the dielectric properties of polyaniline/nylon composites. J Text I2017;
108: 1628–1633.
32.
SykamNRaoGM.Lightweight flexible graphite sheet for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Mater Lett2018;
233: 59–62.
33.
ChungDDL.A review of exfoliated graphite. J Mater Sci2016;
51: 554–568.
34.
GaoYWangCZLiJ, et al.
Adjustment of dielectric permittivity and loss of graphene/thermoplastic polyurethane flexible foam: towards high microwave absorbing performance. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019;
117: 65–75.
35.
LiHLJingLNgohZL, et al.
Engineering of high-density thin-layer graphite foam-based composite architectures with superior compressibility and excellent electromagnetic interference shielding performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018;
10: 41707–41716.
36.
DuanHJZhuHXYangYQ, et al.
Facile and economical fabrication of conductive polyamide 6 composites with segregated expanded graphite networks for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. J Mater Sci Mater Electron2018;
29: 1058–1064.
37.
VarshneySDhawanSK.Improved electromagnetic shielding performance of lightweight compression molded polypyrrole/ferrite composite sheets. J Electron Mater2017;
46: 1811–1820.
38.
BhawalPGangulySDasTK, et al.
Superior electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness and electro-mechanical properties of EMA-IRGO nanocomposites through the in-situ reduction of GO from melt blended EMA-GO composites. Compos B Eng2018;
134: 46–60.
39.
LiuYHZengJHanD, et al.
Graphene enhanced flexible expanded graphite film with high electric, thermal conductivities and EMI shielding at low content. Carbon2018;
133: 435–445.
40.
LiXYBandyopadhyayPKshetriT, et al.
Novel hydroxylated boron nitride functionalized p-phenylenediamine-grafted graphene: an excellent filler for enhancing the barrier properties of polyurethane. J Mater Chem A2018;
6: 21501–21515.
41.
ArdimasPutsonC.Enhanced dielectric and electrical properties in polyurethane composites with graphene nanosheets. Mater Sci Forum2018;
917: 117–121.
42.
KenanakisGVasilopoulosKCViskadourakisZ, et al.
Electromagnetic shielding effectiveness and mechanical properties of graphite-based polymeric films. Appl Phys A2016;
122: 802–809.
43.
RamRKhastgirDRahamanM.Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness and skin depth of poly (vinylidene fluoride)/particulate nano-carbon filler composites: prediction of electrical conductivity and percolation threshold. Polym Int2019;
68: 1194–1203.
44.
NistalAGarciaEPerez-CollD, et al.
Low percolation threshold in highly conducting graphene nanoplatelets/glass composite coatings. Carbon2018;
139: 556–563.
45.
MamunyaYMatzuiLVovchenkoL, et al.
Influence of conductive nano- and microfiller distribution on electrical conductivity and EMI shielding properties of polymer/carbon composites. Compos Sci Technol2019;
170: 51–59.
