A modified resistance to compression (RtC) test for evaluation of natural fiber softness

Abstract

Comfort is a key feature of any clothing that relates significantly to softness of the fiber, yarn and fabric from which is it constructed. A known softness assessment method for fibers is the resistance to compression test. This traditional test only provides a single force value for the resistance of a loose fiber sample using a fixed mass under compression. In this research, a modified resistance to compression test was introduced to show the effects of repeated compression, providing more information about the softness and resilience of selected fibers. Three different natural fiber types, including wool, cotton and alpaca were compared using this new approach. The results showed compression profiles were quite different for different fiber types as well as for the same fibers with different diameters. While the diameters of the wool and alpaca samples were similar (18.5 μm), the modified resistance to compression values were significantly higher for wool (with a peak value at 9.5 kPa compared to 2.1 kPa for alpaca). Cotton was different from wool and alpaca but showed a similar modified resistance to compression value (10.4 kPa) to wool. During cycles of compression, modified resistance to compression peak values decreased slightly and then tended to be constant. Even though the structures of wool, cotton and alpaca were quite different, there was no significant difference in the magnitude of decline in modified resistance to compression peak values. This means that the modified resistance to compression test is able to provide additional information on the resilience characteristics of different natural fibers, and can reveal the resistance behavior of fiber samples during cyclic compression.

Keywords

Comfort softness resistance to compression natural fibers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sinclair R. Textiles and fashion: materials, design and technology. Reprint ed. Cambridge, UK. Elsevier; 2014..

Ozturk MK, Berkalp O and Nergis B. Design of a light weight fabric from natural cellulosic fibers with improved moisture related properties. In: 17th World Textile Conference AUTEX 2017-IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; 29-31, May, 2017; Corfu, Greece. IOP Publishing; 2017.

Byrne

Cotgreave

The effect of fiber type on the handle of fabric for sportshirts. J Consum Stud Home Econ 1994; 18: 141–149.

Slater

Human comfort. Springfield: CC Thomas, 1985.

Yoon

Sawyer

Buckley

Improved comfort polyester. Part II: Mechanical and surface properties. Text Res J 1984; 54: 357–365.

Raj

Sreenivasan

Total wear comfort index as an objective parameter for characterization of overall wearability of cotton fabrics. J Engineered Fibers Fabrics 2009; 4: 29–41.

Chan

Jiang

Liew

, et al. Evaluation of mechanical properties of uniform fabrics in garment manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 2006; 174: 183–189.

Behery H. Effect of mechanical and physical properties on fabric hand. 1st ed. Ireland. Elsevier; 2005..

Wang

Mahar

Hall

Prediction of the handle characteristics of lightweight next-to-skin knitted fabrics using a fabric extraction technique. J Text Inst 2012; 103: 691–697.

10.

Tester

McGregor

Staynes

Ultrafine wools: comfort and handle properties for next-to-skin knitwear and manufacturing performance. Text Res J 2015; 85: 1181–1189.

11.

Madeley

Postle

Mahar

Physical properties and processing of fine merino lamb's wool. Part I: Wool growth and softness of handle. Text Res J 1998; 68: 545–552.

12.

Hillbrick

LK.

Fibre properties affecting the softness of wool and other keratins . PhD thesis, Deakin University, Australia, 2013.

13.

McGregor

Doughty

Thompson

, et al. Effects of variation in wool fiber curvature and yarn hairiness on sensorial assessment of knitted fabrics. Text Res J 2015; 85: 1153–1166.

14.

Shah

Whiteley

Influence of fibre characteristics on tactile appraisal of loose wool 1. J Text Inst 1971; 62: 361–374.

15.

Stevens D and Mahar T (eds). The beneficial effects of low fibre crimp in worsted processing and on fabric properties and fabric handle. In: 9th International Wool Textile Research Conference, 1995, Biella, Italy. CSIRO Research Publications Repository.

16.

Yu W and Liu Y. Softness evaluation of keratin fibers based on single-fiber bending test. Journal of applied polymer science 2006; 101(1): 701–707.

17.

Liu

Wang

Resistance to compression behavior of alpaca and wool. Text Res J 2004; 74: 265–270.

18.

Liu

Wang

Evaluating the softness of animal fibers. Text Res J 2004; 74: 535–538.

19.

Kim

Slaten

BL.

Objective evaluation of fabric hand. Part I: Relationships of fabric hand by the extraction method and related physical and surface properties. Text Res J 1999; 69: 59–67.

20.

Kawabata

Kawashima

Yamashita

, et al. Apparent elastic modulus of scale estimated from bending property of single wool fiber. J Text Engng 2004; 50: 21–24.

21.

McGregor

Properties, processing and performance of rare and natural fibres: a review and interpretation of existing research results. Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), 2012.

22.

Roberts N. The effect of fibre thickness, length and crimp on worsted spinning limits, yarn irregularity and handle. Wool Technol Sheep Breeding 1961; 8(2): 27–36.

23.

Bishop

Fabrics: sensory and mechanical properties. Text Progr 1996; 26: 1–62.

24.

Chaudri

Whiteley

The influence of natural variations in fiber properties on the bulk compression of wool. Text Res J 1968; 38: 897–906.

25.

de McCarty

Dusenbury

On the bulk compression characteristics of wool fibres.

Text Res J 1955; 25: 875.

26.

Demiruren

Burns

Resilience of scoured wool. Text Res J 1955; 25: 665–675.

27.

Cottle

Baxter

BP.

Wool metrology research and development to date. Text Progr 2015; 47: 163–315.

28.

Aqua-Calc. Density of Wool (material). https://www.aqua-calc.com/page/density-table/substance/wool (accessed 28 July 2020).

29.

Barnhardt Purified Cotton. Properties of Cotton. https://barnhardtcotton.net/technology/cotton-properties/ (accessed 28 July 2020).

30.

Wang

Liu

Wang

Changes in fibre curvature during the processing of wool and alpaca fibres and their blends. In: TIWC 2004: Proceedings of The Textile Institute 83rd World Conference, Shanghai, China, 2004, pp. 1–6. The Textile Institute and Donghua University.