Acoustic characterization of silica nanoparticle-impregnated Kevlar fabric

Abstract

Silica nanoparticle-impregnated Kevlar (SNK) fabric has better specific ballistic performance in comparison to its neat counterparts. For multifunctional structural applications using lightweight composites, combining this improved ballistic functionality with an acoustic functionality is desirable. In this study, acoustic characterization of neat and SNK samples is conducted using the normal-incidence impedance tube method. Both the absorption coefficient and transmission loss (TL) are measured in the 60–6000 Hz frequency range. The influence of parameters such as number of layers of neat or treated fabric, percentage by weight of nanoparticle addition, spacing between fabric layers, and residual porosity is examined. It is found that while absorption decreases with an increase in nanoparticle addition for frequencies above about 2500 Hz, increasing the number of layers shifts peak absorption to lower frequencies. By introducing an air-gap behind the fabric layer, dominant low-frequency (1000–3000 Hz) absorption peaks are obtained that correlate well with natural modes of mass-equivalent thin plates. Examining the influence of residual porosity by laminating the SNK samples reveals that it contributes to about 30–50% of the total absorption. Above about 1500 Hz, 3–5 dB of TL increase is obtained for SNK samples vis-à-vis the neat samples. TL is found to increase beyond that of the neat sample above a threshold frequency when an air-gap is introduced between two SNK layers. With an increase in the weight of nanoparticle addition, measured TL tends to be closer to mass law predictions. This study demonstrates that SNK fabric could provide improved acoustic performance in addition to its ballistic capabilities, making it suitable for multifunctional applications and could form the basis for the development of simplified models to predict the structural acoustic response of such nanoparticle–fabric composites.

Keywords

Kevlar fabric silica nanoparticles acoustics absorption transmission loss multifunctional

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dong Z Manimala JM Sun CT . Mechanical behavior of silica nano-particle impregnated Kevlar fabrics. J Mech Mater Struct 2010 ; 5: 529–548.

Khodadadi A Liaghat Gh Vahid S

et al.

Ballistic performance of Kevlar fabric impregnated with nanosilica/PEG shear thickening fluid. Compos B Eng 2019 ; 162: 643–652.

Manimala JM Sun CT . Investigation of failure in Kevlar fabric under transverse indentation using a homogenized continuum constitutive model. Text Res J 2013; 84: 388–398.

LaBarre ED Calderon-Colon X Morris M

et al.

Effect of a carbon nanotube coating on friction and impact performance of Kevlar. J Mater Sci 2015; 50: 5431–5442.

Tan VBC Tay TE Teo WK . Strengthening fabric armor with silica colloidal suspensions. Int J Solid Struct 2005; 42: 1561–1576.

Park Y Baluch AH Kim Y , et al. High velocity impact characteristics of shear thickening fluid impregnated Kevlar fabric. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 2013; 14: 140–145.

Obradović V Stojanović DB Heinemann R

et al.

Ballistic properties of hybrid thermoplastic composites with silica nanoparticles. J Eng Fiber Fabric 2014; 9: 97–107.

Dong Z Sun CT . Testing and modeling of yarn pull-out in plain woven Kevlar fabrics. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2009; 40: 1863–1869.

Lee YS Wetzel ED Wagner N . The ballistic impact characteristics of Kevlar woven fabrics impregnated with a colloidal shear thickening fluid. J Mater Sci 2003; 38: 2825–2833.

10.

Shoshani Y Rosenhouse G . Noise absorption by woven fabrics. Appl Acoust 1990; 30: 321–333.

11.

Monaragala RM . Knitted structures for sound absorption. Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2011, pp. 262–286. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857090621.3.262

12.

Shoshani Y . Noise absorption by combinations of woven and nonwoven fabrics. J Text Inst 1991; 82: 500–503.

13.

Shoshani Y Yakubov Y . Use of nonwovens of variable porosity as noise control elements. Nonwov Res J 2001; 10: 23–28.

14.

Yan Z Pu Z Haijun F , et al. Experiment study on sound properties of carbon fiber composite material. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2019; 542. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/542/1/012001

15.

Kalebek

NA.

Sound absorbing polyester recycled nonwovens for the automotive industry.

Fibre Text East Eur 2016; 24–1: 107–113.

16.

Berardi U Iannace G . Acoustic characterization of natural fibers for sound absorption applications. Build Environ 2015; 94: 840–852.

17.

Zheng ZY Li Y Yang WD . Absorption properties of natural fiber-reinforced sandwich structures based on the fabric structures. J Reinf Plast Compos 2013; 32: 1561–1568.

18.

Rwawiire S Tomkova B Gliscinska E

et al.

Investigation of sound absorption properties of bark cloth nonwoven fabric and composites. AUTEX Res J 2015; 15. https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2015-0010

19.

Jiang N Che JY Parikh DV . Acoustical evaluation of carbonized and activated cotton nonwovens. Bioresour Technol 2010; 100: 6533–6536.

20.

Na Y Lancaster J Casali J , et al. Sound absorption coefficients of micro-fiber fabrics by reverberation room method. Text Res J 2007; 77: 330–335.

21.

Fouladi MH, Ayub Md and Mohd Nor MJ. Analysis of coir fiber acoustical characteristics. Appl Acoust 2011; 72: 35–42.

22.

Sung G Hyeun Kim J . Influence of filler surface characteristics on morphological, physical, acoustic properties of polyurethane composite foams filled with inorganic fillers. Compos Sci Technol 2017; 146: 147–154.

23.

Lee J Kim G Ha C . Sound absorption properties of polyurethane/nano-silica nanocomposite foams. J Appl Polym Sci 2011; 123: 2384–2390.

24.

Morse PM.

Some aspects of the theory of room acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1939; 11: 205.

25.

Scott RA . The propagation of sound between walls of porous material. Proc Phys Soc 1946; 58: 358–368.

26.

Delany ME Bazley EN . Acoustical properties of fibrous absorbent materials. NPL Aero Report, Ac37, 1969.

27.

Attenborough K Walker LA . Scattering theory for sound absorption in fibrous media (part 1). J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49. https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.1912505

28.

Allard JF Champoux Y . New empirical equations for sound propagation in rigid frame fibrous materials. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91. https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.402824

29.

Shoshani Y Yakubov Y . Generalization of Zwikker and Kosten theory for sound absorption in porous materials with variable parameters. J Computat Acoust 2000; 8: 415–441.

30.

Johnson DL Koplik J Dashen R . Theory of dynamic permeability and tortuosity in fluid saturated porous media. J Fluid Mech 1987; 176: 379402.

31.

Sun F Banks-Lee P Peng H . Sound absorption in an anisotropic-periodically layered fluid-saturated porous medium. Appl Acoust 1993; 39: 65–76.

32.

Barburski M Blaszczak JR Pawliczak Z . Influence of designs of weaves on acoustic attenuation of fabrics. J Ind Text 2019; 49: 33–45.

33.

Shoshani Y Yakubov Y . Numerical assessment of maximal absorption coefficients for non-woven fiber webs. Appl Acoust 2000; 59: 77–87.

34.

Liu X, Liu J Su X . Simulation model for the absorption coefficients of double layered nonwovens. Fibre Text East Eur 2012; 20–4: 102–107.

35.

ASTM E1050-12:2016. Standard test method for impedance and absorption of acoustical materials using a tube, two microphones and a digital frequency analysis system.

36.

E2611-09:2017. Standard test method for measurement of normal incidence sound transmission of acoustical materials based on the transfer matrix method.

37.

Leissa AW . Vibration of plates. NASA Technical Report No. SP-160, 1969.

38.

Blackstock DT . Fundamentals of physical acoustics. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2000. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Fundamentals+of+Physical+Acoustics-p-9780471319795