Fine hemp fibers (cottonized hemp) were processed using steam explosion. The quantification of the defibration rate was performed by image processing. Based on this method, the hemp defibration was optimized using a response surface methodology based on three-variable central composite design for the production of elementary fibers with low variability. Optimal parameters for the steam processes were as follows: time = 4.1 min; temperature = 191℃. Biomass was impregnated with a solution of NaOH (8%) before treatment, leading to a defibration rate of 91.2%, which is producing ≈50% fibers with length <3 mm, in good agreement with the experimental data. Damaged fibers originating from the conjugated effect of steam explosion and alkali hydrolysis were also observed.
JacquetNManietGVanderghemCet al.Application of steam explosion as pretreatment on lignocellulosic material: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res2015; 54: 2593–2598.
2.
ShahzadA. Hemp fiber and its composites - a review. J Compos Mater2012; 46: 973–986.
3.
BismarckAMishraSLampkeTPlant fibers as reinforcement for green composites. In: MohantyAMisraMDrzalL (eds). Natural fibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites, Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, 2005, pp. 37–108.
4.
BrodeurGYauEBadalKet al.Chemical and physicochemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: a review. Enzyme Res2011; 2011: 1–17.
5.
Amigó V, Salvador MD, Sahuquillo O, et al. Valorización de residuos de fibras vegetales como refuerzo de plásticos industriales. In: I Simposio Iberoamericano de Ingeniería de Residuos, http://www.upv.es/VALORES/Publicaciones/REDISA08_Fibras_naturales.pdf (2008, accessed 2 September).
BonoPLe DucALozachmeurMet al.Les nouveaux champs de recherche et développement pour la valorisation des fibres végétales techniques (lin fibres et chanvre). OCL2015; 22: D613–D613.
8.
Garcia-JaldonCDupeyreDVignonMR. Fibres from semi-retted hemp bundles by steam explosion treatment. Biomass Bioenerg1998; 14: 251–260.
9.
DasongDFanM. Characteristic and performance of elementary hemp fibre. Mater Sci Appl2010; 1(6): 336–342.
10.
FanM. Characterization and performance of elementary hemp fibres - factors influencing tensile strength. Bioresources2010; 5: 2307–2322.
11.
IlczyszynFCherouatAMontayG. Caractérisation des propriétés mécaniques de fibres de chanvre. Mater Tech2012; 100: 451–457.
12.
MwaikamboLYAnsellMP. The effect of chemical treatment on the properties of hemp, sisal, jute and kapok for composite reinforcement. Angew Makromol Chem1999; 272: 108–116.
13.
PlacetV. Characterization of the thermo-mechanical behaviour of Hemp fibres intended for the manufacturing of high performance composites. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40: 1111–1118.
14.
SutkaAKukleSGravitisJet al.Chemical and physical modification of hemp fibres by steam explosion technology. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2013; 49: 12053–12053.
15.
ThomsenABThygesenABohnVet al.Effects of chemical–physical pre-treatment processes on hemp fibres for reinforcement of composites and for textiles. Ind Crops Prod2006; 24: 113–118.
16.
ThomsenABBohnVNielsenKVet al.Effects of chemical-physical pre-treatment processes on hemp fibres. Bioresour Hemp2000; 13: 1–6.
17.
GeorgeMMussonePGAbboudZet al.Characterization of chemically and enzymatically treated hemp fibres using atomic force microscopy and spectroscopy. Appl Surf Sci2014; 314: 1019–1025.
18.
GeorgeMMussonePGBresslerDC. Surface and thermal characterization of natural fibres treated with enzymes. Ind Crops Prod2014; 53: 365–373.
19.
HimmelsbachDSKhaliliSAkinDE. The use of FT-IR microspectroscopic mapping to study the effects of enzymatic retting of flax (Linum usitatissimum L) stems. J Sci Food Agric2002; 82: 685–696.
20.
DreyerJMüssigJKoschkeNet al.Comparison of enzymatically separated hemp and nettle fibre to chemically separated and steam exploded hemp fibres. J Ind Hemp2002; 7: 43–59.
21.
CaraCRuizEBallesterosMet al.Production of fuel ethanol from steam-explosion pretreated olive tree pruning. Fuel2008; 87: 692–700.
22.
KaarWEGutierrezCVKinoshitaCM. Steam explosion of sugarcane bagasse as a pretreatment for conversion to ethanol. Biomass Bioenerg1998; 14: 277–287.
23.
SiposBKreugerESvenssonS-Eet al.Steam pretreatment of dry and ensiled industrial hemp for ethanol production. Biomass Bioenerg2010; 34: 1721–1731.
KesslerRWBeckerUKohlerRet al.Steam explosion of flax - a superior technique for upgrading fibre value. Biomass Bioenerg1998; 14: 237–249.
26.
CherianBMPothanLANguyen-ChungTet al.A novel method for the synthesis of cellulose nanofibril whiskers from banana fibers and characterization. J Agric Food Chem2008; 56: 5617–5627.
27.
AbrahamEDeepaBPothanLAet al.Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: a novel approach. Carbohydr Polym2011; 86: 1468–1475.
28.
ThomasMGAbrahamEJyotishkumarPet al.Nanocelluloses from jute fibers and their nanocomposites with natural rubber: preparation and characterization. Int J Biol Macromol2015; 81: 768–777.
29.
VignonMRDupeyreDGarcia-JaldonC. Morphological characterization of steam-exploded hemp fibers and their utilization in polypropylene-based composites. Bioresour Technol1996; 58(2): 203–215.
30.
LavoieJ-MBeauchetR. Biorefinery of Cannabis sativa using one- and two-step steam treatments for the production of high quality fibres. Ind Crops Prod2012; 37: 275–283.
31.
SutkaAKukleSGravitisJet al.Chemical and physical modification of hemp fibres by steam explosion. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2013; 49: 12053–12054.
32.
SutkaAKukleSGravitisJet al.Characterization of cellulose microfibrils obtained from hemp. Conf Pap Mater Sci2013; 2013: Article ID 171867–Article ID 171867.
33.
JacquetNQuiévyNVanderghemCet al.Influence of steam explosion on the thermal stability of cellulose fibres. Polym Degrad Stab2011; 96: 1582–1588.
34.
HendriksATWMZeemanG. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol2009; 100: 10–18.
