The effects of moisture on the thermal protective performance of firefighter protective clothing under medium intensity radiant exposure

Abstract

Current firefighter protective clothing is composed of multilayer fabric systems. The outer shell fabrics inevitably become wet in the process of firefighters performing their duties, and sweat may also increase moisture in the inner layers of protective clothing. In this study, two kinds of outer shell fabrics (aramid IIIA fabric and aramid 1313 and flame-retardant viscose-blended fabric) and two kinds of thermal liner fabrics with different thicknesses were selected. Three wetness conditions were simulated for the outer shell fabric, thermal liner fabric and both fabrics together. A modified thermal protective performance (TPP) tester was applied to assess TPP provided by these wetted fabrics; in addition, second-degree skin burn time was predicted and absorbed energy indexes were calculated. The regression method was employed to create fitting curves for absorbed energy and second-degree burn time in different configurations and the Pearson correlation was established to analyze their relationship, in which the lowest R² value could reach 0.9122 and p-values were all much less than 0.05. Performance results for both wet conditions indicated that outer shell moisture and a thicker thermal liner have a positive and increased negative effect, respectively, on fabric TPP. When the sample S-3-D (aramid 1313 and flame-retardant viscose-blended fabric, moisture barrier and the thin thermal liner) was both wetted in the outer shell and thermal liner, its second-degree burn time was improved by 12.8% over performance in dry conditions. These findings may have important applications for the design and manufacture of optimal protective performance clothing systems.

Keywords

thermal protective clothing moisture medium intensity second-degree skin burn heat flux

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Song

Cao

Gholamrza

. Analyzing stored thermal energy and thermal protective performance of clothing. Text Res J 2011; 81: 1124–1138.

. Analyzing the transmitted and stored energy through multilayer protective fabric systems with various heat exposure time. Text Res J 2016; 86: 235–244.

Song

Paskaluk

Sati

et al.

Thermal protective performance of protective clothing used for low radiant heat protection. Text Res J 2010; 81: 311–323.

Song

Ackerman

et al.

A new protocol to characterize thermal protective performance of fabrics against hot liquid splash. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2013; 46: 37–45.

Song

. A novel approach for fit analysis of thermal protective clothing using three-dimensional body scanning. Appl Ergon 2014; 45: 1439–1446.

Wang

Shi

et al.

Effects of moisture content and clothing fit on clothing apparent ‘wet’ thermal insulation: a thermal manikin study. Text Res J 2016; 86: 57–63.

Lawson

. Fire fighters' protective clothing and thermal environments of structural firefighting. ASTM Special Technical Publication 1997; 127: 334–335.

Keiser

Becker

Rossi

. Moisture transport and absorption in multilayer protective clothing fabrics. Text Res J 2008; 78: 604–613.

Chitrphiromsri

Kuznetsov

. Modeling heat and moisture transport in firefighter protective clothing during flash fire exposure. Heat Mass Transfer 2005; 41: 206–215.

10.

Zhu

. A model of coupled liquid moisture and heat transfer in porous textiles with consideration of gravity. Numer Heat Tr A Appl 2003; 43: 501–523.

11.

Rossi

Indelicato

Bolli

. Hot steam transfer through heat protective clothing layers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2004; 10: 239–245.

12.

Abbott

Schulman

. Protection from fire: nonflammable fabrics and coatings. J Ind Text 1976; 6: 48–62.

13.

Hoschke

. Standards and specifications for firefighters’ clothing. Fire Safety J 1981; 4: 125–137.

14.

Lee

Barker

. Effect of moisture on the thermal protective performance of heat-resistant fabrics. J Fire Sci 1986; 4: 315–331.

15.

Foster

Roberts

. Measurements of the firefighter environment-summary report. Fire Eng J 1995; 55: 30–55.

16.

Keiser

Rossi

. Temperature analysis for the prediction of steam formation and transfer in multilayer thermal protective clothing at low level thermal radiation. Text Res J 2008; 78: 1025–1035.

17.

Lawson

Crown

Ackerman

et al.

Moisture effects in heat transfer through clothing systems for wildland firefighters. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2004; 10: 227–238.

18.

Lee

Barker

. Thermal protective performance of heat-resistance fabrics in various high intensity heat exposures. Text Res J 1987; 57: 123–132.

19.

Barker

Guerth-schacher

Grimes

et al.

Effects of moisture on the thermal protective performance of firefighter protective clothing in low-level radiant heat exposures. Text Res J 2006; 76: 27–31.

20.

et al.

The effect of air gaps in moist protective clothing on protection from heat and flame. J Fire Sci 2013; 31: 99–111.

21.

Song

. The effect of moisture and air gap on the thermal protective performance of fabric assemblies used by wildland firefighters. J Text I 2016; 8: 1030–1036.

22.

Cui

Wan

Zhang

. Thermal protective performance and moisture transmission of firefighter protective clothing based on orghogonal design. J Ind Text 2010; 39: 347–356.

23.

Song GW, Mandal S and Rossi R. Thermal protective clothing for firefighters, a comprehensive review: NO. 189. Boston: Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles, 2016, pp.63-64.

24.

Weng

Yuan

. Quantitative investigation of air gaps entrapped in multilayer thermal protective clothing in low-level radition at the moisture condition. Fire Mater 2016; 40: 179–189.

25.

Weng

Han

. Effects of moisture transfer and condensation in protective clothing based on thermal manikin experiment in fire environment. Proc Eng 2013; 62: 760–768.