One potentially underestimated aspect of resource inequity in U.S. public schools is access to social capital in external organizational environments. This research examines partnerships among 211 New York City high schools and 918 partner organizations from 2001 to 2005 as sources of external school social capital providing resources that can strengthen organizational capacity to improve educational opportunities and outcomes. The findings, based on an innovative analysis combining content analysis, social network analysis, and multilevel modeling, demonstrate that four partnership characteristics are important in this context: (1) how long partnerships last versus how many there are, (2) partners concentrating resources in a particular area versus across diverse complementary areas, (3) partners being densely connected to other schools and partners rather than being central in the overall school–partner network, and (4) partners conveying instructional resources versus other kinds of resources. Hence, educational research and policy should more broadly conceptualize how schools’ external organizational environments matter for educational equity and the role particular kinds of partnerships can play.
BakerBruce D.2021. Educational Inequality and School Finance: Why Money Matters for America's Students. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
2.
BerneRobert. 1994. “Educational Input and Outcome Inequities in New York State.” Pp. 1–23 in Outcome Equity in Education, edited by BerneR.PicusL.. Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press Inc.
3.
Booher-JenningsJennifer. 2005. “Below the Bubble: `Educational Triage’ and the Texas Accountability System.” American Educational Research Journal42(2):231–68.
4.
BorgattiStephen P.EverettMartin G.FreemanLinton C.2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis 6.0. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
BourdieuPierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 241–58 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by RichardsonJ. G.New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Bridwell-MitchellEbony N.2017. “Them That's Got: How Tie Formation in Partnership Networks Gives High Schools Differential Access to Social Capital.” American Educational Research Journal54(6):1221–55.
9.
Bridwell-MitchellEbony N.2018. “Too Legit to Quit: Institutional Perspectives on the Study of School Organizations.” Pp. 139–55 in SAGE International Handbook on School Organization, edited by ConnollyM.Eddy SpicerD.JamesC.KruseS. D.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
BrykAnthonySchneiderBarbara. 2002. Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement. New York, NY: The Russell Sage Foundation.
11.
BurtRonald. 1997. “A Note on Social Capital and Network Content.” Social Networks19:355–73.
12.
CaldasStephen J.1993. “Reexamination of Input and Process Factor Effects on Academic Achievement.” Journal of Educational Research86:206–14.
13.
ChildDennis. 2006. Essentials of Factor Analysis. New York, NY: Continuum.
14.
CoburnCynthia E.PenuelWilliam R.2016. “Research–Practice Partnerships in Education: Outcomes, Dynamics, and Open Questions.” Educational Researcher45(1):48–54.
15.
CoburnCynthia E.SteinMary Kay, eds. 2010. Research and Practice in Education: Building Alliances, Bridging the Divide. Lanam, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
16.
ColemanJames. 1988. “Social Capital and the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology94:S95–120.
17.
CovelliLaurenEngbergJohnOpperIsaac M.2022. “Leading Indicators of Long-Term Success in Community Schools: Evidence from New York City.” EdWorkingPaper: 22–669. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute.
18.
DacinTinaOliverChristineRoyJean Paul. 2007. “The Legitimacy of Strategic Alliances: An Institutional Perspective.” Strategic Management Journal28:169–87.
19.
DavisLaura A.WolniakGregory C.GeorgeCasey E.NelsonGlen R.2019. “Demystifying Tuition? A Content Analysis of the Information Quality of Public College and University Websites.” AERA Open5(3):2332858419867650. doi:10.1177/233285841986.
20.
DiMaggioPaulPowellWalter. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48:147–60.
21.
EdmondsonJeffZimpherNancy L.2014. Striving Together: Early Lessons in Achieving Collective Impact in Education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
FarrellCaitlin C.CoburnCynthia E.ChongSeenae. 2019. “Under What Conditions Do School Districts Learn from External Partners? The Role of Absorptive Capacity.” American Educational Research Journal56(3):955–94.
23.
FeuersteinAbe. 2001. “Selling Our School? Principals’ Views on Schoolhouse Commercialism and School- Business Interactions.” Educational Administration Quarterly37(3):322–71.
24.
FiglioDavid N.1999. “Functional Form and the Estimated Effects of School Resources.” Economics of Education Review18(2):242–52.
GalaskiewiczJoseph. 1985. “Interorganizational Relations.” Annual Review of Sociology11:281–304.
27.
GoodnoughAbby. 2003. “A Living Lab for the City's New Curriculum.” The New York Times, March10, Page 1, Column 4, National Desk, Section A.
28.
GreenwaldRobHedgesLarry V.LaineRichard D.1996. “The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement.” Review of Educational Research66(3):361–96.
29.
GrissomJason ALoebSusanna. 2011. “Triangulating Principal Effectiveness: How Perspectives of Parents, Teachers, and Assistant Principals Identify the Central Importance of Managerial Skills.” American Educational Research Journal48(5): 1091–123.
30.
GulatiRanjay. 1998. “Alliances and Networks.” Strategic Management Journal19(4):293–317.
31.
HanushekEric A.1997. “Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An Update.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis19(2):141–64.
32.
HanushekEric A.2020. “Education Production Functions.” Pp. 161–70 in The Economics of Education, edited by S. Bradley and C. Green. Elsevier.
33.
HawkinsJ. DavidBrownEric C.OesterleSabrinaArthurMichael W.AbbottRobert D.CatalanoRichard F.2008. “Early Effects of Communities That Care on Targeted Risks and Initiation of Delinquent Behavior and Substance Use.” Journal of Adolescent Health43(1):15–22.
34.
HeckmanJames. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica47(1):153–61.
35.
HerszenhornDavid M.2003. “City English Scores in Statewide Testing Show Marked Gain.” The New York Times, May21, Page 1, Column 1, Metropolitan Desk, Section A.
36.
HonigMeredith I.2004. “The New Middle Management: Intermediary Organizations in Education Policy Implementation.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis26(1):65–87.
37.
HorvatErin McNamaraWeiningerElliot B.LareauAnnette. 2003. “From Social Ties to Social Capital: Class Differences in the Relations between Schools and Parent Networks.” American Educational Research Journal40(2):319–51.
38.
JacksonC. KiraboJohnsonRucker C.PersicoClaudia. 2016. “The Effects of School Spending on Educational and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from School Finance Reforms.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics131(1):157–218.
39.
JenningsJennifer L.DemingDavidJencksChristopherLopuchMayaSchuelerBeth E.2015. “Do Differences in School Quality Matter More Than We Thought? New Evidence on Educational Opportunity in the Twenty-First Century.” Sociology of Education88(1):56–82.
40.
KokaBalajiPrescottJohn. 2002. “Strategic Alliances as Social Capital: A Multidimensional View.” Strategic Managemnt Jounral23:795–816.
41.
KrippendorfKlaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
LandisJ. RichardKochGary G.1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics33:159–74.
43.
LeeJung-SookBowenNatasha K.2006. “Parent Involvement, Cultural Capital, and the Achievement Gap among Elementary School Children.” American Educational Research Journal43(2):193–218.
44.
LeiJingZhaoYong. 2007. “Technology Uses and Student Achievement: A Longitudinal Study.” Computers & Education49(2):284–96.
45.
LinNan. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
MalenBettyRiceJennifer KingMatlachLauren K. B.BowsherAmandaHoyerKathleen MulvaneyHydeLaura H.2015. “Developing Organizational Capacity for Implementing Complex Education Reform Initiatives: Insights from a Multiyear Study of a Teacher Incentive Fund Program.” Educational Administration Quarterly51(1):133–76.
47.
MarsdenPeter V.CampbellKaren E.1984. “Measuring Tie Strength.” Social Forces63(2):482–501.
48.
MeyerJohn W.BrianRowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremonies.” American Journal of Sociology83(2):340–62.
49.
MitsuhashiHitoshiGreveHenrich R.2009. “AMatching Theory of Alliance Formation and Organizational Success: Complementarity and Compatibility.” Academy of Management Journal52(5):975–95.
50.
MohrJohn W.BogdanovPetko. 2013. “Introduction—Topic Models: What They Are and Why They Matter.” Poetics41(6):545–69.
51.
OcasioWilliam. 1997. “Toward an Attention-Based View of the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal18:187–206.
52.
PennebakerJ.FrancisM.BoothR.2001. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). 2nd ed.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53.
PfefferJefferySalancickGerald. 1979. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
54.
PortesAlejandro. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Revie of Sociology24:1–24.
55.
PuhaniPatrick. 2000. “The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique.” Journal of Economic Surveys14(1):53–68.
56.
Rabe-HeskethSophiaSkrondalAnders. 2012. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. 3rd ed., Vol. 2. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
57.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
RichardL.McGill-FranzenAnne M.2021. “Reading Volume and Reading Achievement: A Review of Recent Research.” Reading Research Quarterly56: S231–S38.
59.
RosenbluthGideon. 1955. “Measures of Concentration.” Pp. 57–59 in Business Concentration and Price Policy, edited by National Bureau of Economic Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
RussellJennifer LinBrykAnthony S.DolleJonathan R.GomezLouis M.LemahieuPaul G.GrunowAlicia. 2017. “A Framework for the Initiation of Networked Improvement Communities.” Teachers College Record119(5):1–36.
61.
SabatiniFabio. 2009. “Social Capital as Social Networks: A New Framework for Measurement and an Empirical Analysis of Its Determinants and Consequences.” The Journal of Socio-Economics38(3):429–42.
62.
SampsonRachelle C.2007. “R&D Alliances and Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation.” Academy of Management Journal50(2):364–86.
63.
SandersMavis G.2006. Building School-Community Partnerships: Collaboration for Student Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
64.
SimonsKate AndersonCurtisPatrick A.2007. “Connecting with Communities: Four Successful Schools.” Young Children62(2):12–18, 20.
65.
SmithJoannaWohlstetterPriscilla. 2006. “Understanding the Different Faces of Partnering: A Typology of Public-Private Partnerships.” School Leadership and Management26(3):249–68.
66.
SmithLeann V.BlakeJamilia J.GravesScott L.Jr.Vaughan-JensenJessicaPulidoRyneBanksCourtney. 2016. “Promoting Diversity through Program Websites: A Multicultural Content Analysis of School Psychology Program Websites.” School Psychology Quarterly31(3):327–39.
67.
SowellEvelyn J.1989. “Effects of Manipulative Materials in Mathematics Instruction.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education20(5):498–505.
68.
StevensJames P.2012. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. 5th ed.New York, NY: Routledge.
69.
SunMinPenuelWilliam R.FrankKenneth A.GallagherH. AlixYoungsPeter. 2013. “Shaping Professional Development to Promote the Diffusion of Instructional Expertise among Teachers.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis35(3):344–69.
70.
TsangKwok-Kuen. 2009. “School Social Capital and School Effectiveness.” Education Journal37(1–2):119–36.
71.
TumaAndrea Prado. 2020. “The Organizational Landscape of Schools: School Employees’ Conceptualizations of Organizations in Their Environment.” American Journal of Education126(2):231–63.
72.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
WindscheidLeonBowes-SperryLynnJonsenKarstenMornerMichèle. 2018. “Managing Organizational Gender Diversity Images: A Content Analysis of German Corporate Websites.” Journal of Business Ethics152(4):997–1013.
75.
YarnallLouiseShechtmanNicolePenuelWilliam R.2006. “Using Handheld Computers to Support Improved Classroom Assessment in Science: Results from a Field Trial.” Journal of Science Education and Technology15(2):142–58.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
