Social capital is broadly beneficial, but parents reap particular benefits from network ties. Schools are key organizations through which parents develop ties. In this article, we examine school-based networks that provide valuable resources. What factors are associated with greater access to key resources such as child care, parenting advice, and educational information? Using network data from mothers of eighth graders, we employ qualitative comparative analysis to examine mothers’ status and network characteristics associated with two types of resource access—basic access, where resources are accessed through a single parent, and robust access, where resources are accessed through multiple parents. We find that particular combinations of status and network characteristics are critical. A wide range of mothers attain basic access, but race and socioeconomic status constrain robust access. These findings raise important questions about relational patterns and resource access for parents within a racially and socioeconomically diverse school.
AjrouchKristine J.BlandonAlysia Y.AntonucciToni C.2005. “Social Networks among Men and Women: The Effects of Age and Socioeconomic Status.”The Journals of Gerontology60(6):S311–17.
2.
AralSinan. 2016. “The Future of Weak Ties.”American Journal of Sociology121(6):1931–39.
3.
BianYanjie. 1997. “Bringing Strong Ties Back in: Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and Job Searches in China.”American Sociological Review62(3):366–85.
4.
BourdieuPierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 241–58 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by RichardsonJ. G.New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
5.
BurtRonald S.2000. “The Network Structure of Social Capital.”Research in Organizational Behavior22:345–423.
6.
BurtRonald S.2004. “Structural Holes and Good Ideas.”American Journal of Sociology110(2):349–99.
7.
CampbellKaren E.MarsdenPeter V.HurlbertJeanne S.1986. “Social Resources and Socioeconomic Status.”Social Networks8:97–117.
8.
CochranMoncrieffGunnarssonLars. 1990. “The Social Networks of Married Mothers in Four Cultures.” Pp. 86–104 in Extending Families: The Social Networks of Parents and Their Children, edited by CochranM.LarnerM.RileyD.GunnarssonL.HendersonC. R.JrNew York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CochranMoncrieffNiegoStarr. 2002. “Parenting and Social Networks.” Pp. 123–48 in Handbook of Parenting: Volume 4, Social Conditions and Applied Parenting, edited by BornsteinM. H.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
ColemanJames S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.”American Journal of Sociology 94(Suppl.):S95–120.
11.
CornwellErin YorkCornwellBenjamin. 2008. “Access to Expertise as a Form of Social Capital: An Examination of Race- and Class-Based Disparities in Network Ties to Experts.”Sociological Perspectives51(4):853–76.
12.
CrockenbergSusan. 1988. “Social Support and Parenting.” Pp. 67–92 in Theory and Research in Behavioral Pediatrics. Vol. 4, edited by FitzgeraldH.LesterB. M.YogmanM. W.New York, NY: Springer.
13.
CucchiaraMaia B.2013. Marketing Schools, Marketing Cities: Who Wins and Who Loses When Schools Become Urban Amenities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
CucchiaraMaiaSteinbuglerAmy. Forthcoming. “‘The Books Make You Feel Bad’: Expert Advice and Maternal Anxiety in the 21st Century.”Sociological Forum.
15.
DalyAlan J.FinniganKara S.2011. “The Ebb and Flow of Social Network Ties between District Leaders under High-Stakes Accountability.”American Educational Research Journal48(1):39–79.
16.
DuaAdrian. 2019. “Critical Tension: Sufficiency and Parsimony in QCA.”Sociological Methods & Research. doi:10.1177/0049124119882456.
17.
EcclesJacquelynne S.HaroldRena D.1996. “Family Involvement in Children's and Adolescents’ Schooling.” Pp. 3–34 in Family-School Links: How Do They Affect Educational Outcomes? edited by BloomA.DunnJ. F.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
EllisonNicole B.SteinfieldCharlesLampeCliff. 2007. “The Benefits of Facebook ‘Friends:’ Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4):1143–68.
19.
FeldScott L.1981. “The Focused Organization of Social Ties.”American Journal of Sociology86(5):1015–35.
20.
FischerClaude S.1982. To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
FletcherAnne C.BridgesTracey H.HunterAndrea G.2007. “Managing Children's Friendships through Interparental Relationships: Roles of Ethnicity and Friendship Context.”Journal of Marriage and Family69(5):1135–49.
22.
GranovetterMark S.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.”American Journal of Sociology78(6):1360–80.
23.
HeidlerRichardGamperMarkusHerzAndreasEßerFlorian. 2014. “Relationship Patterns in the 19th Century: The Friendship Network in a German Boys’ School Class from 1880 to 1881 Revisited.”Social Networks37:1–13.
24.
HorvatErin M.WeiningerElliot B.LareauAnnette. 2003. “From Social Ties to Social Capital: Class Differences in the Relations between Schools and Parent Networks.”American Educational Research Journal40(2):319–51.
25.
JacksonGrace L.KennedyDavidBradburyThomas N.KarneyBenjamin R.2014. “A Social Network Comparison of Low-Income Black and White Newlywed Couples.”Journal of Marriage and Family76(5):967–82.
26.
LareauAnnetteMuñozVanessa L.2012. “‘You’re Not Going to Call the Shots’: Structural Conflicts between the Principal and the PTO at a Suburban Public Elementary School.”Sociology of Education85(3):201–18.
27.
LareauAnnetteShumarWesley. 1996. “The Problem of Individualism in Family-School Policies.”Sociology of Education 69(Extra Issue):24–39.
28.
LareauAnnetteWeiningerElliot B.CoxAmanda Barrett. 2018. “Parental Challenges to Organizational Authority in an Elite School District: The Role of Cultural, Social, and Symbolic Capital.”Teachers College Record120(1):1–46.
29.
LewisAmandaDiamondJohn. 2015. Despite the Best Intentions: Why Racial Inequality Thrives in Good Schools. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
LewisKevinKaufmanJasonGonzalezMarcoWimmerAndreasChristakisNicholas. 2008. “Tastes, Ties, and Time: A New Social Network Dataset Using Facebook.Com.”Social Networks30(4):330–42.
31.
LiAngranFischerMary J.2017. “Advantaged/Disadvantaged School Neighborhoods, Parent Networks, and Parent Involvement at Elementary School.”Sociology of Education90(4):355–77.
32.
LinNan. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnBrashearsMatthew E.2006. “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades.”American Sociological Review71:353–75.
34.
MizruchiMark S.StearnsLinda Brewster. 2001. “Getting Deals Done: The Use of Social Networks in Bank Decision-Making.”American Sociological Review66(5):647–71.
35.
Posey-MaddoxLinnMcDonough KimelbergShelleyCucchiaraMaia. 2016. “Seeking a ‘Critical Mass’: Middle-Class Parents’ Collective Engagement in City Public Schooling.”British Journal of Sociology of Education37(7):905–27.
36.
QuinnRandCoxAmanda BarrettSteinbuglerAmy. 2020. “Social Position or School Participation? Access and Mobilization of Social Capital in a School-Based Network.”Educational Researcher49(2):44–55.
37.
RaginCharles C.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38.
RaginCharles C.2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
RaginCharles C.2006. “Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage.”Political Analysis14:291–310.
40.
RaginCharles C.2012. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA).” Pp. 87–121 in Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, edited by RihouxB.RaginC. C.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
RaginCharles C.SonnettJohn. 2005. “Between Complexity and Parsimony: Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis.” Pp. 180–97 in Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
42.
ReardonSean F.OwensAnn. 2014. “60 years afterBrown: Trends and Consequences of School Segregation.”Annual Review of Sociology40(1):199–218.
43.
SchneiderCarsten Q.WagemannClaudius. 2010. “Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets.”Comparative Sociology9(3):397–418.
44.
SheldonSteven B.2002. “Parents’ Social Networks and Beliefs as Predictors of Parent Involvement.”The Elementary School Journal102(4):301–16.
45.
ShojiMegan N.HaskinsAnna R.RangelDavid E.SorensenKia N. (2014). The emergence of social capital in low-income Latino elementary schools. Early Childhood Research Quarterly29(4):600–13.
46.
SmallMario Luis. 2009. Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
SmallMario Luis. 2017. Someone to Talk to. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
UseemElizabeth L.1992. “Middle Schools and Math Groups: Parents’ Involvement in Children's Placement.”Sociology of Education65(4):263–79.
49.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
50.
WelnerKevin G.2001. Legal Rights, Local Wrongs: When Community Control Collides with Educational Equity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
51.
WellmanBarryWortleyScott Norman. 1990. “Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support.”American Journal of Sociology96(3):558–88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
