Utilizing the High School Longitudinal Study, a nationally representative sample of U.S. high school students, this study investigates the factors that predict different beliefs about gendered math ability and the potential consequences for students’ choices to enter gender-segregated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors in college. Among other results, analyses reveal that while about 25 percent of students report a traditionally stereotypical belief in male superiority, about 20 percent report a counter-stereotypical belief in female superiority; among female students, such beliefs are more common among black students. Further, models reveal a robust association between holding counter-stereotypical beliefs and the likelihood that women choose biological science majors, which are female dominated, compared to non-STEM fields. Among men, holding counter-stereotypical beliefs is associated with a lower likelihood of majoring in physical science, computer science, math, and engineering fields, which are strongly male dominated, versus non-STEM fields. Implications for gender inequality in STEM fields are discussed.
BeilockSian L.GundersonElizabeth A.RamirezGerardoLevineSusan C.2010. “Female Teachers’ Math Anxiety Affects Girls’ Math Achievement.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107(5):1860–63.
3.
BemSandra Lipsitz. 1981. “Gender Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account of Sex Typing.” Psychological Review88(4):354–64.
4.
BianLinLeslieSarah-JaneCimpianAndrei. 2017. “Gender Stereotypes about Intellectual Ability Emerge Early and Influence Children’s Interests.” Science355(6323):389–91.
5.
BlantonHartChristieCharleneDyeMaureen. 2002. “Social Identity versus Reference Frame Comparisons: The Moderating Role of Stereotype Endorsement.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology38(3):253–67.
6.
BrandellGerdStabergElse-Marie. 2008. “Mathematics: A Female, Male or Gender-Neutral Domain? A Study of Attitudes among Students at Secondary Level.” Gender and Education20(5):495–509.
7.
BrownChristia SpearsLeaperCampbell. 2010. “Latina and European American Girls’ Experiences with Academic Sexism and Their Self-Concepts in Mathematics and Science during Adolescence.” Sex Roles 63(11/12):860–70.
8.
CimpianJoseph R.LubienskiSarah T.TimmerJennifer D.MakowskiMartha B.MillerEmily K.2016. “Have Gender Gaps in Math Closed? Achievement, Teacher Perceptions, and Learning Behaviors across Two ECLS-K Cohorts.” AERA Open2(4):2332858416673617.
9.
CoffmanKatherine B.KlinowskiDavid. 2020. “The Impact of Penalties for Wrong Answers on the Gender Gap in Test Scores.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(16):8794–8803.
10.
CorrellShelley J.2001. “Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assessments.” American Journal of Sociology106(6):1691–1730.
11.
CroizetJean-ClaudeDesprésGérardGauzinsMarie-EveHuguetPascalLeyensJacques-PhilippeMéotAlain. 2004. “Stereotype Threat Undermines Intellectual Performance by Triggering a Disruptive Mental Load.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30(6):721–31.
12.
CvencekDarioMeltzoffAndrew N.GreenwaldAnthony G.2011. “Math-Gender Stereotypes in Elementary School Children.” Child Development82(3):766–79.
13.
DavisShannon N.GreensteinTheodore N.2009. “Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Sociology35(1):87–105.
14.
DeemerEric D.ThomanDustin B.ChaseJustin P.SmithJessi L.2014. “Feeling the Threat: Stereotype Threat as a Contextual Barrier to Women’s Science Career Choice Intentions.” Journal of Career Development41(2):141–58.
15.
DennerJillLaursenBrettDicksonDanielHartlAmy C.2018. “Latino Children’s Math Confidence: The Role of Mothers’ Gender Stereotypes and Involvement across the Transition to Middle School.” Journal of Early Adolescence38(4):513–29.
DiPreteThomas A.JenningsJennifer L.2012. “Social and Behavioral Skills and the Gender Gap in Early Educational Achievement.” Social Science Research41(1):1–15.
18.
DoyleRandi A.VoyerDaniel. 2016. “Stereotype Manipulation Effects on Math and Spatial Test Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Learning and Individual Differences47:103–16.
19.
EaglyAlice H.NaterChristaMillerDavid I.KaufmannMichèleSczesnySabine. 2019. “Gender Stereotypes Have Changed: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of U.S. Public Opinion Polls from 1946 to 2018.”American Psychologist75(3):301–315.
20.
EcclesJacquelynne. 2011. “Gendered Educational and Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices.” International Journal of Behavioral Development35(3):195–201.
21.
EcclesJacquelynne S.BarberBonnieJozefowiczDebra. 1999. “Linking Gender to Educational, Occupational, and Recreational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices.” Pp. 153–92 in Sexism and Stereotypes in Modern Society: The Gender Science of Janet Taylor Spence, edited by SwannW. B.LangloisJ. H.GilbertL. A.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
Else-QuestNicole M.HydeJanet Shibley. 2016. “Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research: I. Theoretical and Epistemological Issues.” Psychology of Women Quarterly40(2):155–70.
23.
EvansAshley B.CoppingKristine E.RowleyStephanie J.Kurtz-CostesBeth. 2011. “Academic Self-Concept in Black Adolescents: Do Race and Gender Stereotypes Matter?”Self and Identity10(2):263–77.
24.
FlorePaulette C.WichertsJelte M.2015. “Does Stereotype Threat Influence Performance of Girls in Stereotyped Domains? A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of School Psychology53(1):25–44.
25.
ForgaszHelenMarkovitsZvia. 2018. “Elementary Students’ Views on the Gendering of Mathematics.” European Journal of Educational Research7(4):867–76.
26.
ForgaszHelen J.LederGilah C.KloostermanPeter. 2004. “New Perspectives on the Gender Stereotyping of Mathematics.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning6(4):389–420.
27.
GansenHeidi M.2017. “Reproducing (and Disrupting) Heteronormativity: Gendered Sexual Socialization in Preschool Classrooms.”Sociology of Education90(3):255–72.
28.
GaspardHannaWilleEikeWormingtonStephanie V.HullemanChris S.2019. “How Are Upper Secondary School Students’ Expectancy-Value Profiles Associated with Achievement and University STEM Major? A Cross-Domain Comparison.” Contemporary Educational Psychology58:149–62.
29.
GhavamiNeginPeplauLetitia Anne. 2013. “An Intersectional Analysis of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypes: Testing Three Hypotheses.” Psychology of Women Quarterly37(1):113–27.
30.
GibbsBenjamin G.2010. “Reversing Fortunes or Content Change? Gender Gaps in Math-Related Skill throughout Childhood.” Social Science Research39(4):540–69.
31.
GreenwaldAnthony G.BanajiMahzarin R.RudmanLaurie A.FarnhamShelly D.NosekBrian A.MellottDeborah S.2002. “A Unified Theory of Implicit Attitudes, Stereotypes, Self-Esteem, and Self-Concept.” Psychological Review109(1):3–25.
HydeJanet Shibley. 2014. “Gender Similarities and Differences.” Annual Review of Psychology65(1):373–98.
34.
IngelsSteven J.PrattDaniel J.HergetDeborah R.DeverJill A.Burns FritchLauraOttemRandolphRogersJames E.KitmittoSamiLeinwandSteve. 2013. High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09) Base Year to First Follow-Up Data File Documentation. Appendixes. NCES 2014-361. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
35.
KnightCarly R.BrintonMary C.2017. “One Egalitarianism or Several? Two Decades of Gender- Role Attitude Change in Europe.” American Journal of Sociology122(5):1485–1532.
36.
KoenigAnne M.2018. “Comparing Prescriptive and Descriptive Gender Stereotypes about Children, Adults, and the Elderly.” Frontiers in Psychology9:1086. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01086.
37.
KulikLiat. 2002. “The Impact of Social Background on Gender-Role Ideology: Parents’ versus Children’s Attitudes.” Journal of Family Issues23(1):53–73.
38.
LegewieJoschaDiPreteThomas A.2014. “The High School Environment and the Gender Gap in Science and Engineering.” Sociology of Education87(4):259–80.
39.
LeslieSarah-JaneCimpianAndreiMeyerMeredithFreelandEdward. 2015. “Expectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender Distributions across Academic Disciplines.” Science347(6219):262–65.
40.
LubienskiSarah T.RobinsonJoseph P.CraneCorinna C.GanleyColleen M.2013. “Girls’ and Boys’ Mathematics Achievement, Affect, and Experiences: Findings from ECLS-K.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education44(4):634–45.
41.
MarksJaime L.LamChun BunMcHaleSusan M.2009. “Family Patterns of Gender Role Attitudes.” Sex Roles61(3):221–34.
42.
MartinCarol LynnRubleDiane. 2004. “Children’s Search for Gender Cues: Cognitive Perspectives on Gender Development.” Current Directions in Psychological Science13(2):67–70.
43.
MartinotDelphineDésertMichel. 2007. “Awareness of a Gender Stereotype, Personal Beliefs and Self-Perceptions Regarding Math Ability: When Boys Do Not Surpass Girls.” Social Psychology of Education10(4):455–71.
44.
MasterAllisonCheryanSapnaMoscatelliAdrianaMeltzoffAndrew N.2017. “Programming Experience Promotes Higher STEM Motivation among First-Grade Girls.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology160:92–106.
45.
MillerDavid I.NollaKyle M.EaglyAlice H.UttalDavid H.2018. “The Development of Children’s Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-Analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-a-Scientist Studies.” Child Development89(6):1943–55.
46.
MustoMichela. 2019. “Brilliant or Bad: The Gendered Social Construction of Exceptionalism in Early Adolescence.” American Sociological Review84(3):369–93.
47.
MuzzattiBarbaraAgnoliFranca. 2007. “Gender and Mathematics: Attitudes and Stereotype Threat Susceptibility in Italian Children.” Developmental Psychology43(3):747–59.
48.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2019. “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019.” Special Report NSF 19-304. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.
49.
NoonanRyan. 2017. Women in STEM: 2017 Update. ESA issue brief no. 06-17. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
50.
NowickiElizabeth A.LopataJoel. 2017. “Children’s Implicit and Explicit Gender Stereotypes about Mathematics and Reading Ability.” Social Psychology of Education20(2):329–45.
51.
O’BrienLaurie T.BlodornAlisonAdamsGlennGarciaDonna M.HammerElliott. 2015. “Ethnic Variation in Gender-STEM Stereotypes and STEM Participation: An Intersectional Approach.” Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology21(2):169–80.
52.
PassolunghiMaria ChiaraFerreiraTania Irene RuedaTomasettoCarlo. 2014. “Math-Gender Stereotypes and Math-Related Beliefs in Childhood and Early Adolescence.” Learning and Individual Differences34:70–76.
53.
PlanteIsabellede la SablonnièreRoxaneAronsonJoshua M.ThéorêtManon. 2013. “Gender Stereotype Endorsement and Achievement-Related Outcomes: The Role of Competence Beliefs and Task Values.” Contemporary Educational Psychology38(3):225–35.
54.
PlanteIsabelleThéorêtManonFavreauOlga Eizner. 2009. “Student Gender Stereotypes: Contrasting the Perceived Maleness and Femaleness of Mathematics and Language.” Educational Psychology29(4):385–405.
55.
ProninEmilySteeleClaude M.RossLee. 2004. “Identity Bifurcation in Response to Stereotype Threat: Women and Mathematics.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology40(2):152–68.
56.
Purdie-VaughnsValerieEibachRichard P.2008. “Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities.” Sex Roles59(5):377–91.
57.
RidgewayCecilia L.2009. “Framed Before We Know It: How Gender Shapes Social Relations.” Gender & Society23(2):145–60.
58.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender & Society18(4):510–31.
59.
RismanBarbara J.2004. “Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism.” Gender & Society18(4):429–50.
60.
RowleyStephanie J.Kurtz-CostesBethMistryRashmitaFeagansLaura. 2007. “Social Status as a Predictor of Race and Gender Stereotypes in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence.” Social Development16(1):150–68.
61.
RubinDonald B.1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.
62.
SansoneDario. 2019. “Teacher Characteristics, Student Beliefs, and the Gender Gap in STEM Fields.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis41(2):127–44.
63.
ScarboroughWilliam J.SinRayRismanBarbara. 2019. “Attitudes and the Stalled Gender Revolution: Egalitarianism, Traditionalism, and Ambivalence from 1977 through 2016.” Gender & Society33(2):173–200.
64.
SchmaderToni. 2002. “Gender Identification Moderates Stereotype Threat Effects on Women’s Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology38(2):194–201.
65.
SchmaderToniJohnsMichaelBarquissauMarchelle. 2004. “The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences: The Role of Stereotype Endorsement in Women’s Experience in the Math Domain.” Sex Roles50(11):835–50.
66.
SettlesIsis H.2004. “When Multiple Identities Interfere: The Role of Identity Centrality.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30(4):487–500.
67.
ShafferEmily S.MarxDavid M.PrislinRadmila. 2013. “Mind the Gap: Framing of Women’s Success and Representation in STEM Affects Women’s Math Performance under Threat.” Sex Roles68(7):454–63.
68.
ShaumanKimberlee A.XieYu. 2003. “Explaining Sex Differences in Publication Productivity among Postsecondary Faculty.” Pp. 175–208 in Equal Rites, Unequal Outcomes: Women in American Research Universities, Innovations in Science Education and Technology, edited by HornigL. S.Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
69.
SteeleJennifer. 2003. “Children’s Gender Stereotypes about Math: The Role of Stereotype Stratification.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology33(12):2587–2606.
70.
SteinkeJocelynLapinskiMaria KnightCrockerNikkiZietsman-ThomasAlettaWilliamsYaschicaEvergreenStephanie HigdonKuchibhotlaSarvani. 2007. “Assessing Media Influences on Middle School–Aged Children’s Perceptions of Women in Science Using the Draw-a-Scientist Test (DAST).” Science Communication29(1):35–64.
ThomanDustin B.WhitePaul H.NiwakoNiwakowKoishiHirofumi. 2008. “Variations of Gender- Math Stereotype Content Affect Women’s Vulnerability to Stereotype Threat.” Sex Roles58(9):702–12.
73.
TurnerKelly L.BrownChristia Spears. 2007. “The Centrality of Gender and Ethnic Identities across Individuals and Contexts.” Social Development16(4):700–19.
74.
VoyerDanielVoyerSusan D.2014. “Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin140(4):1174–1204.
75.
WaltonGregory M.CohenGeoffrey L.2003. “Stereotype Lift.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology39(5):456–67.
76.
WangMing-TeDegolJessica. 2013. “Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy-Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields.” Developmental Review33(4):304–40.
77.
Wonch HillPatriciaMcQuillanJuliaTalbertEliSpiegelAmyGauthierG. RobinDiamondJudy. 2017. “Science Possible Selves and the Desire to Be a Scientist: Mindsets, Gender Bias, and Confidence during Early Adolescence.” Social Sciences6(2):55. doi:10.3390/socsci6020055.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
