Stereotype threat is a widely supported theory for understanding the racial achievement gap in college grade performance. However, today’s minority college students are increasingly of immigrant origins, and it is unclear whether two dispositional mechanisms that may increase susceptibility to stereotype threat are applicable to immigrants. We use survey data to examine whether and how negative-ability stereotypes affect the grades of 1,865 first-, second-, and third-generation or higher (domestic) minority students at 28 selective American colleges. Structural equation model results indicate that first-generation immigrants are highly resistant to both dispositional identity threat mechanisms we consider. Second-generation immigrants experience only certain dispositional elements of identity threat. Drawing on research in social psychology, we suggest immigrants tend to resist stereotype threat in part due to the primacy of their immigrant identities and their connectedness to the opportunity structure of mainstream society.
BankstonCarl L.2004. “Social Capital, Cultural Values, Immigration, and Academic Achievement: The Host Country Context and Contradictory Consequences.” Sociology of Education77(2):176-79.
2.
BarreraMario. 1980. Race and Class in the Southwest: A Theory of Racial Inequality. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
3.
BeanFrankStevensGillian. 2003. America’s Newcomers: Immigrant Incorporation and the Dynamics of Diversity. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
4.
BennettPamela R.LutzAmy. 2009. “How African American Is the Net Black Advantage? Differences in College Attendance among Immigrant Blacks, Native Blacks, and Whites.” Sociology of Education82(1):70-99.
5.
BollenKenneth A.1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York, NY: Wiley Press.
6.
BrunsmaDavid L.2005. “Interracial Families and the Racial Identification of Mixed-race Children: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study.” Social Forces84(2):1131-57.
7.
CharlesCamille Z.2003. “The Dynamics of Residential Segregation.” Annual Review of Sociology29:167-207.
8.
CharlesCamille Z.FischerMary J.MooneyMargaritaMasseyDouglas S.2009. Taming the River: Negotiating the Academic, Financial, and Social Currents in Selective Colleges and Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
CharlesCamille Z.TorresKimberly C.BrunnRachelle J.2008. “Black Like Who? Exploring the Racial, Ethnic and Class Diversity of Black Students at Selective Colleges and Universities.” Pp. 247-65 in Racism in Post-race America: New Theories, New Directions, edited by GallagherC. A.New York, NY: Social Forces Publishing.
10.
ColemanJames S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” The American Journal of Sociology94:95-120.
11.
ConzenK. N.GerberD. A.MorawskaE.PozzettaG. E.VecoliR. J.1992. “The Invention of Ethnicity: A Perspective from the U.S.A.” Journal of American Ethnic History1(1):3-41.
12.
CornellStephenHartmannDouglas. 2007. Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World. London: Pine Forge Press.
13.
CrockerJenniferLutskeyN.1986. “Stigma and the Dynamics of Social Cognition.” In The Dilemma of Difference, edited by AinlayS. C.BeckerG.ColemanL. M.New York, NY: Plenum Press.
14.
CrockerJenniferMajorBrendaSteeleClaude M.1998. “Social Stigma.” Pp. 504-53 in Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed.Vol. 2, edited by GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.GardnerL.Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
15.
DeauxKay. 1996. “Social Identification.” Pp. 777-98 in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, edited by HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W.New York, NY: Guildford Press.
16.
DeauxKay. 2006. To Be an Immigrant. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
DowneyDouglas B.2008. “Black/white Differences in School Performance: The Oppositional Culture Explanation.” Annual Review of Sociology34(1):107-26.
18.
DowneyDouglas B.AinsworthJames W.QianZhenchao. 2009. “Rethinking the Attitude-achievement Paradox among Blacks.” Sociology of Education82(1):1-19.
19.
Fernandez-KellyM. Patricia. 1995. “Social and Cultural Capital in the Urban Ghetto: Implications for the Economic Sociology of Immigration.” Pp. 213-47 in The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays in Network, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship, edited by PortesA.New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
Fernandez-KellyM. PatriciaSchaufflerRichard. 1994. “Divided Fates: Immigrant Children in a Restructured Economy.” International Migration Review28:662-89.
21.
FiskeSusan T.1998. “Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination.” Pp. 504-53 in The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed.Vol. 2, edited by GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
22.
GansHerbert J.1992. “Second-generation Decline: Scenarios for the Economic and Ethnic Futures of the Post-1965 American Immigrants.” Ethnic and Racial Studies15(2):173-92.
23.
GrasmuckSherri. 1984. “Immigration, Ethnic Stratification, and Native Working Class Discipline: Comparison of Documented and Undocumented Dominicans.” International Migration Review18:692-713.
24.
GrasmuckSherriPessarPatricia. 1991. Between Two Islands: Dominican International Migration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25.
HagyAlison P.Ordovensky StaniecJ. Farley. 2002. “Immigrant Status, Race, and Institutional Choice in Higher Education.” Economics of Education Review21(1):381-92.
26.
HarrisDavid R.SimJeremiah J.2002. “Who Is Multiracial? Assessing the Complexity of Lived Race.” American Sociological Review67(4):614-27.
27.
IcelandJohnWeinbergDaniel H.SteinmetzErika. 2002. Racial and Ethnic Residential Segregation in the United States: 1980-2000. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office, U.S. Census Bureau.
28.
JencksChristopherPhillipsMeredith. 1998. The Black-white Test Score Gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
29.
KaoGrace. 2004. “Social Capital and Its Relevance to Minority and Immigrant Populations.” Sociology of Education77(2):172-75.
30.
KaoGraceRutherfordLindsay Taggart. 2007. “Does Social Capital Still Matter? Immigrant Minority Disadvantage in School-specific Social Capital and Its Effects on Academic Achievement.” Sociological Perspectives50(1):27-54.
31.
KaoGraceThompsonJennifer S.2003. “Racial and Ethnic Stratification in Educational Achievement and Attainment.” Annual Review of Sociology29:417-42.
32.
KaoGraceTiendaMarta. 1995. “Optimism and Achievement: The Educational Performance of Immigrant Youth.” Social Science Quarterly76(1):1-19.
33.
KaoGraceTiendaMarta. 1998. “Educational Aspirations of Minority Youth.” American Journal of Education106(3):349-84.
34.
KasinitzPhilip. 2008. “Becoming American, Becoming Minority, Getting Ahead: The Role of Racial and Ethnic Status in the Upward Mobility of the Children of Immigrants.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science620(1):253-69.
35.
KasinitzPhilipMollenkopfJohn H.WatersMary C.HoldawayJennifer. 2008. Inheriting the City: The Children of Immigrants Come of Age. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
36.
MasseyDouglas S.CharlesCamille Z.LundyGarvey F.FischerMary J.2003. The Source of the River: The Social Origins of Freshmen at America’s Selective Colleges and Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
MasseyDouglas S.FischerMary J.2005. “Stereotype Threat and Academic Performance: New Findings from a Racially Diverse Sample of College Freshmen.” Du Bois Review2(1):45-68.
38.
MasseyDouglas S.MooneyMargarita A.CharlesCamille Z.TorresKimberly C.2007. “Black Immigrants and Black Natives Attending Selective Colleges and Universities in the United States.” American Journal of Education113(2):243-71.
39.
MenjívarCecilia. 2000. Fragmented Ties: Salvadoran Immigrant Networks in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
MertonRobert K.1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
41.
MorganStephan L.MehtaJal D.2004. “Beyond the Laboratory: Evaluating the Survey Evidence for the Disidentification Explanation of Black-white Differences in Achievement.” Sociology of Education77(1):82-101.
42.
OmiMichaelWinantHoward. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
OwensJayantiMasseyDouglas S.2010. “Stereotype Threat and College Academic Performance: A Latent Variables Approach.” Social Science Research40:150-66.
44.
OysermanDaphna. 2008. “Racial-ethnic Self-schemas: Multidimensional Identity-based Motivation.” Journal of Research in Personality42:1186-198.
45.
OysermanDaphnaBybeeDeborahTerryKathy. 2003. “Gendered Racial Identity and Involvement with School.” Self & Identity2(4):307-24.
46.
OysermanDaphnaSwimJanet K.2001. “Stigma: An Insider’s View.” Journal of Social Issues57(1):1-14.
47.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRubén G.2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
48.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRubén G.2006. Immigrant America: A Portrait. 3rd ed.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
49.
RongXue LanBrownFrank. 2001. “The Effects of Immigrant Generation and Ethnicity on Educational Attainment among Young African and Caribbean Blacks in the United States.” Harvard Educational Review71(3):536-68.
50.
SandersJimy M.2002. “Ethnic Boundaries and Identity in Plural Societies.” Annual Review of Sociology28:327-57.
51.
SteeleClaude M.1988. “The Psychology of Self-affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self.” Pp. 261-302 in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 21, edited by BerkowitzL.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
SteeleClaude M.1998. “A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance.” Pp. 202-33 in Confronting Racism: The Problem and the Response, edited by EberhardtJ. L.FiskeS. T.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
54.
SteeleClaude M.AronsonJoshua. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology69(5):797-811.
55.
Suarez-OrozcoMarcelo M.Suarez-OrozcoCarola. 2001. Children of Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
TajfelHenri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. London: Cambridge University Press.
58.
TellesEdward E.OrtizVilma. 2008. Generations of Exclusion: Mexican Americans, Assimilation, and Race. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
59.
TurneyKristinKaoGrace. 2009. “Barriers to School Involvement: Are Immigrant Parents Disadvantaged?” Journal of Educational Research102(4):257-71.
60.
WaldingerRogerFelicianoCynthia. 2004. “Will the New Second Generation Experience ‘Downward Assimilation’?” Ethnic and Racial Studies27(3):376-402.
61.
WatersMary C.1996. “Ethnic and Racial Identities of Second Generation Black Immigrants in New York City.” In The New Second Generation, edited by PortesA.New York: Russell Sage.
62.
WatersMary C.1999. Black Identities: West Indian Immigrant Dreams and American Realities. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
63.
WoolleyMichael E.Grogan-KaylorAndrewGilsterMegan E.KarbRebecca A.GantLarry M.ReischlThomas M.AlaimoKatherine. 2008. “Neighborhood Social Capital, Poor Physical Conditions, and School Achievement.” Children & Schools30(3):133-45.
64.
ZhouMin. 1997a. “Segmented Assimilation: Issues, Controversies, and Recent Research on the New Second Generation.” International Migration Review31(4): 975-1008.
65.
ZhouMin. 1997b. “Growing Up American: The Challenge Confronting Immigrant Children and the Children of Immigrants.” Annual Review of Sociology23:63-95.
66.
ZhouMinBankstonCarl L.III. 1998. Growing up American: How Vietnamese Children Adapt to Life in the United States. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
67.
ZhouMinLeeJenniferVallejoJody AgiusTafoya-EstradaRosauraXiongYang Sao. 2008. “Success Attained, Deterred, and Denied: Divergent Pathways to Social Mobility in Los Angeles’s New Second Generation.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science620(1):37-61.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
