Status transmission theory argues that leading educational institutions prepare individuals from privileged backgrounds for positions of prestige and power in their societies. We examine the educational backgrounds of more than 2,900 members of the U.S. cultural elite and compare these backgrounds to a sample of nearly 4,000 business and political leaders. We find that the leading U.S. educational institutions are substantially more important for preparing future members of the cultural elite than they are for preparing future members of the business or political elite. In addition, members of the cultural elite who are recognized for outstanding achievements by peers and experts are much more likely to have obtained degrees from the leading educational institutions than are those who achieve acclaim from popular audiences. By focusing on the extent to which industries and cultural domains depend on quickness and facility in the absorption and manipulation of complex and sophisticated symbolic media, our analysis leads to an important specification of the role of highly selective colleges and universities in elite formation.
AstinAlexander W.1999. “How Liberal Arts Colleges Affect Students.”Daedalus128(1):77–100.
2.
BabcockPhilip S.MarksMindy. 2011. “The Declining Time Cost of College: Evidence from a Half Century of Time Use Data.”Review of Economics and Statistics93:468–78.
3.
BaltzellE. Digby. 1964. The Protestant Establishment: Aristocracy and Caste in America. New York: Vintage.
4.
BartonAlan H.1980. “Fault Lines in American Elite Consensus.”Daedalus109(3):1–24.
5.
BillsDavid B.2003. “Credentials, Signals, and Screens: Explaining the Relationship between Schooling and Job Assignment.”Review of Educational Research73:441–70.
6.
BinderAmy J.DavisDaniel B.BloomNick. 2016. “Career Funneling: How Elite Students Learn to Define and Desire ‘Prestigious’ Jobs.”Sociology of Education89:20–39.
7.
BoudreauJohn W.BowsellWendy R.JudgeTimothy A. 2001. “Effects of Personality on Executive Career Success in the United States and Europe.”Journal of Vocational Behavior58:53–81.
8.
BourdieuPierrePasseronJean-Claude. 1977. Reproduction in Economy, Society, and Culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
BrintSteven. 2018. Two Cheers for Higher Education: Why American Universities Are Stronger than Ever—And How to Meet the Challenges They Face. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BrintStevenCarrCyntha E. 2017. “The Scientific Productivity of U.S. Research Universities, 1980–2010: Continued Dispersion, Increasing Concentration or Stable Inequality?”Minerva55:435–57.
11.
BrintStevenYoshikawaSarah R. K. 2017. “The Educational Backgrounds of American Business and Government Leaders: Status Reproduction, Open Elite, or Sector Variation?”Social Forces96:561–90.
12.
BurrisVal. 2004. “The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in Ph.D. Exchange Networks.”American Sociological Review69:239–64.
13.
CampbellCorbin M.JimenezMarisolArrazolArlene Christine N. 2018. “Education or Prestige? The Teaching and Rigor of Courses in Prestigious and Non-prestigious Institutions in the United States.”Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-01 8-0297-3.
14.
ClarkBurton R.1987. The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Princeton University Press.
15.
EdmondConstantiniCraikKenneth H. 1980. “Personality and Politicians: California Party Leaders, 1960–1976.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology38:641–61.
16.
CooksonPeter W.PersellCaroline H. 1989. Preparing for Power: America’s Elite Boarding Schools. New York: Basic Books.
17.
DomhoffG. William. 1967. Who Rules America?Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
DyeThomas R.1976. Who’s Running America? Institutional Leadership in the U.S. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
DyeThomas R.2006. Who’s Running America? The Bush Era. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
EspenshadeThomas J.RadfordAndrea Walton. 2009. No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Gaztambide-FernandezRuben A.2009. The Best of the Best: Becoming Elite at an American Boarding School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
GrossNeil. 2013. Why Are Professors Liberal—And Why Do Conservatives Care?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
HermanowiczJoseph C.1998. The Stars Are Not Enough: Scientists—Their Passions and Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
KadushinCharles. 1974. The American Intellectual Elite. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
25.
KanterRosabeth M.1987. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
26.
KarabelJerome. 2005. The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
KarenDavid. 1991. “‘Achievement’ and ‘Ascription’ in Admission to an Elite College: A Political-Organizational Analysis.”Sociological Forum6:349–80.
29.
KuhGeorge D.PascarellaErnest T. 2004. “What Does Institutional Selectivity Tell Us about Educational Quality?”Change36(5):52–59.
30.
KhanShamus R.2010. Privilege: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul’s School. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
LaddEverett C.Jr.LipsetSeymour Martin. 1976. The Divided Academy: Professors and Politics. New York: Norton.
32.
LamontMichele. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
LichterS. RobertRothmanStanleyLichterLinda. 1986. The Media Elite: The New Power Brokers. Chevy Chase, MD: Adler & Adler.
34.
MacCrimmonKenneth R.WehrungDonald A. 1990. “Characteristics of Risk Taking Executives.”Management Science36:422–35.
35.
MalkielNancy W.2016. “Keep the Damned Women Out”: The Struggle for Coeducation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
MedvetzThomas. 2012. Think Tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
MillsC Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
MoscaGaetano. 1939. The Ruling Class. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2017. Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
40.
NgThomas W. H.EbyLillian T.SorensenKelly L.FeldmanDaniel C. 2005. “Predictors of Objective and Subjective Career Success: A Meta-analysis.”Personnel Psychology58:367–408.
41.
PolodnyJoel M.BaronJames N. 1997. “Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace.”American Sociological Review77:999–1022.
42.
PosseltJulie R.2016. Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit, Diversity, and Faculty Gatekeeping. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
PutnamRobert D.1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44.
RiveraLauren A.2012. “Hiring as Cultural Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms.”American Sociological Review77:999–1022.
45.
RiveraLauren A.2015. Pedigree: How Elite Students Get Elite Jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
SoaresJoseph A.2007. The Power of Privilege: Yale and America’s Elite Colleges. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47.
SpenceMichael. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.”Quarterly Journal of Economics87:355–74.
48.
SteinbergJacques. 2002. The Gatekeepers: Inside the Admissions Process of a Premier College. New York: Penguin.
49.
StevensMitchell L.2007. Creating a Class: College Admissions and the Education of Elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
TorcheFlorencia. 2011. “Is a College Degree Still the Great Equalizer? Intergenerational Mobility Across Levels of Schooling in the United States.”American Journal of Sociology117:763–807.
51.
UseemMichaelKarabelJerome. 1986. “Pathways to Top Corporate Management.”American Sociological Review51:184–200.
52.
ZuckermanHarriet. 1977. The Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: Routledge.
53.
ZunzOlivier. 2011. Philanthropy in America: A History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
ZweigenhaftRichard L.Domhoff.G. William.2006. Diversity in the Power Elite: Have Women and Minorities Reached the Top?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
