Significant attention has been given to how students become grouped or “tracked” through the courses they share in common. However, this work has yet to be connected to a targeted analysis of the way in which courses are grouped with other courses through the students they co-enroll. Drawing on insights from field theory, the author examines this duality with special attention to the social organization of courses and the curricular discourses they contain. Multidimensional scaling and multiple correspondence analysis are used to analyze course-taking data for a cohort of students (2005-2009, n = 494) at a comprehensive high school in the midwestern United States. The results illustrate a “field” of courses that are distributed vertically according to a principle of status that opposes different forms of curricular discourse and horizontally according to oppositions between symbolic and material forms, artistic and technical skills, and the “inner” work of the household to the “outer” work of certain occupations. While the vertical dimension of courses is associated with a racial and social class hierarchy of students, the horizontal dimension passes through a division of the sexes.
BernsteinBasil B.1977. Class Codes and Control Volume 3: Towards a Theory of Educational Transmissions. 2nd ed.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2.
BernsteinBasil B.2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Rev. ed. London and Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
3.
BorgIngwerGroenenPatrick J. F.2005. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer.
4.
BorgattiStephen P.EverettMartin G.FreemanLinton C.2002. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
5.
BourdieuPierre. 1993a. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BourdieuPierre. 1993b. Sociology in Question. London: Sage.
7.
BourdieuPierre. 1996. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Translated by L. C. Clough. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
BourdieuPierre. 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Translated by R. Nice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BreigerRonald L.1974. “The Duality of Persons and Groups.” Social Forces53:181-90.
10.
FieldSamFrankKenneth A.SchillerKathrynRiegle-CrumbCatherineMullerChandra. 2006. “Identifying Positions from Affiliation Networks: Preserving the Duality of People and Events.” Social Networks28:97-123.
11.
FrankKenneth A.1995. “Identifying Cohesive Subgroups.” Social Networks17:27-56.
12.
FrankKenneth A.MullerChandraSchillerKathryn. 2008. “The Social Dynamics of Mathematics Coursetaking in High School.” American Journal of Sociology113:1645-96.
13.
FriedkinNoah E.ThomasScott L.1997. “Social Positions in Schooling.” Sociology of Education70:239-55.
14.
GamoranAdam. 1987. “The Stratification of High School Learning Opportunities.” Sociology of Education60:135-55.
15.
GamoranAdam. 1989. “Measuring Curriculum Differentiation.” American Journal of Education97:129-43.
16.
GamoranAdam. 2010. “Tracking and Inequality: New Directions for Research and Practice.” Pp. 213-28 in The Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education, edited by AppleM. W.BallS. J.GandinL. A.London and New York: Routledge.
17.
GowerJohn C.1985. “Measures of Similarity, Dissimilarity, and Distance.” Pp. 397-405 in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. Vol. 5, edited by KotzS.JohnsonN. L.New York: Wiley.
18.
GreenacreMichaelBlasiusJörg, eds. 1994. Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
HeckRonald H.PriceCarol L.ThomasScott L.2004. “Tracks as Emergent Structures: A Network Analysis of Student Differentiation in a High School.” American Journal of Education110:321-53.
20.
HotchkissLawrenceDorstenLinda E.1987. “Curriculum Effects on Early Post High School Outcomes.” Pp. 191-219 in Sociology of Education and Socialization, edited by CorwinR. G.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
21.
KellySean. 2004. “Do Increased Levels of Parental Involvement Account for Social Class Differences in Track Placement?” Social Science Research33:626-59.
LucasSamuel R.1990. “Course-based Indicators of Curricular Track Locations.” Master’s thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI.
24.
LucasSamuel R.GamoranAdam. 1993. Race and Track Assignment: A Reconsideration with Course-based Indicators of Track Locations. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
25.
MartinJohn Levi. 2011. The Explanation of Social Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
MohrJohn W.DuquenneVincent. 1997. “The Duality of Culture and Practice: Poverty Relief in New York City, 1888-1917.” Theory and Society26:305-56.
27.
NussbaumMartha C.2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
28.
OakesJeannie. [1985] 2005. Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. 2nd ed.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
OakesJeannieGamoranAdamPageReba. 1992. “Curriculum Differentiation: Opportunities, Outcomes, and Meanings.” Pp. 570-608 in Handbook of Research on Curriculum, edited by JacksonP. W.New York: Macmillan.
30.
O’ConnorCarlaMuellerJenniferLewisR. L’HeureauxRivas-DrakeDeborahRosenbergSeneca. 2011. “‘Being’ Black and Strategizing for Excellence in a Racially Stratified Academic Hierarchy.” American Educational Research Journal48:1232-57.
31.
RawlingsCraig M.BourgeoisMichael D.2004. “The Complexity of Institutional Niches: Credentials and Organizational Differentiation in a Field of U.S. Higher Education.” Poetics32:411-37.
32.
RummelRudolph J.1965. “A Field Theory of Social Action with Application to Conflict within Nations.” General Systems10:183-211.
33.
SkvoretzJohnFaustKatherine. 1999. “Logit Models for Affiliation Networks.” Sociological Methodology29:253-78.
34.
SorensenAage B.HallinanMaureen T.1986. “Effects of Ability Grouping on Growth in Academic Achievement.” American Educational Research Journal23:519-42.
