Students in the United States change schools often, and frequent changes are associated with poor outcomes along numerous dimensions. These moves occur for many reasons, including both promotional transitions between educational levels and nonpromotional moves. Promotional student mobility is less likely than nonpromotional mobility to suffer from confounding due to unobserved factors. Using panel data from students enrolled in grades 3 to 8 in the Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools during the implementation of a major change in school attendance policies, this article investigates the potential influence of four types of school changes—including promotional student mobility—on test score growth in reading and mathematics. All types of changes are associated with lower achievement growth during the year the enrollment change occurred, representing approximately 6 percent of expected annual growth, or 10 days of instruction. This incremental deficit is particularly concerning for disadvantaged students since they change schools more frequently. The results suggest that being new to a school does influence student achievement net of other factors; they also imply that important social ties are ruptured when students change schools.
AlexanderKarl L.EntwisleDoris R.DauberSusan L.1996. “Children in Motion: School Transfers and Elementary School Performance.” Journal of Educational Research90(1):3-12.
2.
AnBrianGamoranAdam. 2009. “Trends in School Racial Composition in the Era of Unitary Status.” Pp. 19-47 in From the Courtroom to the Classroom: The Shifting Landscape of School Desegration, edited by SmrekarC. E.GoldringE. B.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AshenfelterOrley. 1978. “Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings.” Review of Economics and Statistics60(1):47-57.
4.
AstoneNan MarieMcLanahanSara S.1994. “Family Structure, Residential Mobility, and School Dropout: A Research Note.” Demography31(4):575-84.
5.
BurkamDavid T.LeeValeriaDwyerJulie. 2009. “School Mobility in the Early Elementary Grades: Frequency and Impact from Nationally Representative Data.” Prepared for the Workshop on the Impact of Mobility and Change on the Lives of Young Children, Schools, and Neighborhoods, June 29-30, Washington, DC. Retrieved July 19, 2010 (http://www.bocyf.org/children_who_move_burkam_paper.pdf).
6.
ByrnesVaughanRubyAllen. 2007. “Comparing Achievement between K-8 and Middle Schools: A Large-scale Empirical Study.” American Journal of Education114(1):101-35.
7.
ColemanJames S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology94(Supplement):S94-120.
8.
DeLucaStefanieRosenblattPeter. 2010. “Does Moving to Better Neighborhoods Lead to Better Schooling Opportunities? Parental School Choice in an Experimental Housing Voucher Program.” Teachers College Record112(5):1443-91.
9.
DowneyDouglas B.von HippelPaul T.HughesMelanie. 2008. “Are ‘Failing’ Schools Really Failing? Using Seasonal Comparison to Evaluate School Effectiveness.” Sociology of Education81(3):242-70.
10.
DunnMichelle C.KadaneJoseph B.GarrowJohn R.2003. “Comparing Harm Done by Mobility and Class Absence: Missing Students and Missing Data.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics28(3):269-88.
11.
EngecNecati. 2006. “Relationship between Mobility and Student Performance and Behavior.” Journal of Educational Research99(3):167-78.
12.
GasperJosephDeLucaStefanieEstacionAngela. 2010. “Coming and Going: Explaining the Effects of Residential and School Mobility on Adolescent Delinquency.” Social Science Research39(3):459-76.
13.
GoldringEllenCohen-VogelLoraSmrekarClaireTaylorCynthia. 2006. “Schooling Closer to Home: Desegregation Policy and Neighborhood Contexts.” American Journal of Education112(3):335-62.
14.
GrumanDiana H.HarachiTracy W.AbbottRobert D.CatalanoRichard F.FlemingCharles B.2008. “Longitudinal Effects of Student Mobility on Three Dimensions of Elementary School Engagement.” Child Development79(6):1833-52.
15.
HanushekEric A.KainJohn F.RivkinSteven G.2004. “Disruption versus Tiebout Improvement: The Costs and Benefits of Switching Schools.” Journal of Public Economics88(9/10):1721-46.
16.
HastingsJustine S.Van WeeldenRichardWeinsteinJeffrey. 2007. “Preferences, Information, and Parental Choice Behavior in Public School Choice.”Working Paper No. 12995, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
17.
HinzElizabethKappLucySnappSarah. 2003. “Student Attendance and Mobility in Minneapolis Public Schools.” Journal of Negro Education72(1):141-49.
18.
HofferThomas. 2009. “Perspectives on Private Schools.” Pp. 429-66 in Handbook of Research on School Choice, edited by BerendsM.SpringerM. G.BallouD.WalbergH. J.New York: Routledge.
19.
JacksonC. Kirabo. 2009. “Student Demographics, Teacher Sorting, and Teacher Quality: Evidence from the End of School Desegregation.” Journal of Labor Economics27(2):213-56.
20.
KaneThomas J.RieggStephanie K.StaigerDouglas O.2006. “School Quality, Neighborhoods, and Housing Prices.” American Law and Economics Review8(2):183-212.
21.
KerbowDavid. 1996. “Patterns of Student Mobility and Local School Reform.” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk1(2):147-69.
22.
KerbowDavidAzcoitiaCarlosBuellBarbara. 2003. “Student Mobility and Local School Improvement in Chicago.” Journal of Negro Education72(1):158-64.
23.
LareauAnnette. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
LashAndrea A.KirkpatrickSandra L.1990. “A Classroom Perspective on Student Mobility.” Elementary School Journal91(2):177-91.
25.
MehanaMajisaReynoldsArthur J.2004. “School Mobility and Achievement: A Meta-analysis.” Children and Youth Services Review26(1):93-119.
26.
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools. 1998. “School Board Minutes, January 28.” Unpublished manuscript.
27.
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools. 2009. MNPS Annual Report 2008-2009. Nashville, TN: Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools. Retrieved March 21, 2010 (http://www.mnps.org/AssetFactory.aspx?did=40318).
28.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. 2010. Student Mobility: Exploring the Impact of Frequent Moves on Achievement: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
29.
NicholsJoe D.NicholsGet W.2002. “The Impact of Looping Classroom Environments on Parental Attitudes.” Preventing School Failure47(1):18-25.
30.
OffenbergRobert M.2004. “Inferring Adequate Yearly Progress of Schools from Student Achievement in Highly Mobile Communities.” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk9(4):337-55.
31.
PribeshShanaDowneyDouglas B.1999. “Why Are Residential and School Moves Associated with Poor School Performance?” Demography36(4):521-34.
32.
ReynoldsArthur J.ChenChin-ChihHerbersJanette E.2009. “School Mobility and Educational Success: A Research Synthesis and Evidence on Prevention.” Prepared for the Workshop on the Impact of Mobility and Change on the Lives of Young Children, Schools, and Neighborhoods, June 29-30, Washington, DC. Retrieved July 19, 2010 (http://www.bocyf.org/children_who_move_reynolds_paper.pdf).
33.
RockoffJonah E.LockwoodBenjamin B.2010. “Stuck in the Middle: Impacts of Grade Configuration in Public Schools.” Journal of Public Economics94(11-12):1051-61.
34.
RubensteinRossSchwartzAmy EllenStiefelLeannaZabelJeffrey. 2009. “Spending, Size, and Grade Span in K-8 Schools.” Education Finance and Policy4(1):60-88.
35.
RumbergerRussell W.2003. “The Causes and Consequences of Student Mobility.” Journal of Negro Education72(1):6-21.
36.
RumbergerRussell W.LarsonKatherine A.1998. “Student Mobility and the Increased Risk of High School Dropout.” American Journal of Education107(1):1-35.
37.
RumbergerRussell W.ThomasScott L.2000. “The Distribution of Dropout and Turnover Rates among Urban and Suburban High Schools.” Sociology of Education73(1):39-67.
38.
SouthScott J.HaynieDana L.2004. “Friendship Networks of Mobile Adolescents.” Social Forces83(1):315-50.
39.
SouthScott J.HaynieDana L.BoseSunita. 2007. “Student Mobility and School Dropout.” Social Science Research36(1):68-94.
40.
StrandSteve. 2002. “Pupil Mobility, Attainment, and Progress During Key Stage 1: A Study in Cautious Interpretation.” British Education Research Journal28(1):63-78.
41.
StrandSteveDemieFeyisa. 2006. “Pupil Mobility, Attainment, and Progress in Primary School.” British Educational Research Journal32(3):551-68.
42.
SwansonChristopher B.SchneiderBarbara. 1999. “Students on the Move: Residential and Educational Mobility in America’s Schools.” Sociology of Education72(1):54-67.
43.
TempleJudy A.ReynoldsArthur J.1999. “School Mobility and Achievement: Longitudinal Findings from an Urban Cohort.” Journal of School Psychology37(4):355-77.
44.
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1994. Elementary School Children: Many Change Schools Frequently, Harming Their Education. GAO/HEHS-94-45. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
45.
U.S. General Accounting Office. 2010. K-12 Education: Many Challenges Arise in Educating Students Who Change Schools Frequently. GAO-11-20. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
46.
WooldridgeJeffrey M.2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
WrightDan. 1999. “Student Mobility: A Negligible and Confounded Influence on Student Achievement.” Journal of Educational Research92(6):347-53.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
