The authors ask whether choice-driven education systems, with comprehensive schools and mass education at the secondary and tertiary level, represented in this article by England and Sweden, provide educational opportunities for ethnic minorities. In studying educational attainment, the authors make a theoretical distinction between mechanisms connected with school performance on the one hand (primary effects) and educational choice, given performance, on the other (secondary effects). Using large national data sets and recently developed methods, they show that performance effects tend to depress the educational attainment of most, although not all, ethnic minorities, whereas choice effects increase the transition rates of these students. This pattern is repeated at the transition to university education. These results are true for many immigrant categories in both England and Sweden, although immigrant students are a heterogeneous group. Black Caribbean students in England and children of Turkish and South American descent in Sweden fare worst, while several Asian groups do extremely well. The authors conclude that it may be a generic feature of choice-driven school systems in Western societies to benefit non-European immigrants, and they discuss some possible explanations for this.
BeckerBirgit. 2009. “The Transfer of Cultural Knowledge in the Early Childhood: Social and Ethnic Disparities and the Mediating Role of Familial Activities.” European Sociological Review26:17-29.
2.
BeckerGary S.TomesNigel. 1986. “Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families.” Journal of Labor Economics4/3:S1-S39.
3.
BoudonRaymond. 1974. Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality. New York: John Wiley.
4.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BreenRichardGoldthorpeJohn H.1997. “Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory.” Rationality and Society9:275-305.
6.
BreenRichardJonssonJan O.2000. “Analyzing Educational Careers: A Multinomial Transition Model.” American Sociological Review65:754-72.
7.
BrinbaumYaëlCebolla-BoadoHector. 2007. “The School Careers of Ethnic Minority Youth in France.” Ethnicities7:445-74.
8.
BuisMaarten L.2010. Direct and Indirect Effects in Logit Models, Stata Journal10:11-29.
9.
CarlssonMagnusRothDan-Olof. 2007. “Evidence of Ethnic Discrimination in the Swedish Labor Market Using Experimental Data.” Labour Economics14:716-29.
10.
CheungSin-YiHeathAnthony. 2007. “Nice Work if You Can Get It: Ethnic Penalties in Great Britain.” Pp. 507-50 in Unequal Chances. Ethnic Minorities in Western Labour Markets, edited by HeathA.CheungS.-Y.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11.
ChiswickBarry R.1988. “Differences in Education and Earnings across Racial and Ethnic Groups: Tastes, Discrimination, and Investments in Child Quality.” Quarterly Journal of Economics103:571-597.
EriksonRobert. 1996. “Explaining Change in Educational Inequality—Economic Security and School Reforms.” Pp. 95-112 in Can Education Be Equalized? edited by EriksonR.JonssonJ. O.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H.1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
15.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H.JacksonMichelleYaishMeirCoxD. R.2005. “On Class Differentials in Educational Attainment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102:9730-33.
16.
EriksonRobertJonssonJan O., eds. 1996. Can Education Be Equalized?Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17.
EriksonRobertRudolphiFrida. 2010. “Change in Social Selection to Upper Secondary School—Primary and Secondary Effects in Sweden.” European Sociological Review26:291-305.
18.
FairlieRobert W.2005. “An Extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition Technique to Logit and Probit Models.” Journal of Economic and Social Measurement30:305-16.
19.
FekjaerSilje Noack. 2007. “New Differences, Old Explanations: Can Educational Differences between Ethnic Groups in Norway Be Explained by Social Background?” Ethnicities7:367-89.
20.
GlickJennifer E.Hohmann-MarriottBryndl. 2007. “Academic Performance of Young Children in Immigrant Families: The Significance of Race, Ethnicity, and National Origins.” International Migration Review41:371-402.
21.
GoyetteKimberlyXieYu. 1999. “Educational Expectations of Asian American Youths: Determinants and Ethnic Differences.” Sociology of Education72:22-36.
22.
HalseyA. H., ed. 1961. Ability and Educational Opportunity. Paris: OECD.
HeathAnthonyCheungSin-Yi, eds. 2007. Unequal Chances: Ethnic Minorities in Western Labour Markets. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
25.
HeathAnthony F.RothonCatherineKilpiElina. 2008. “The Second Generation in Western Europe: Education, Unemployment, and Occupational Attainment.” Annual Review of Sociology34:211-35.
26.
HusénTorsten. 1960. “Loss of Talent in Selective School Systems: The Case of Sweden.” Comparative Education Review4:70-74.
27.
JacksonMichelle, forthcoming. Determined to Succeed? Performance, Choice and Education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
JacksonMichelle. Forthcoming(b). “Bold choices. How ethnic inequalities in educational attainment are suppressed.” Oxford Review of Education.
29.
JacksonMichelleEriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H.YaishMeir. 2007. “Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment: The Transition to A-level Courses in England and Wales.” Acta Sociologica50:211-29.
30.
JacksonMichelleJonssonJan O., forthcoming. “Why Does Inequality of Educational Opportunity Vary across Countries? Primary and Secondary Effects in Comparative Context” in Determined to Succeed? Performance, Choice and Education, edited by JacksonM.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31.
JarvisLindseyExleySoniaTippingSarah. 2003. Youth Cohort Study: Survey of 16 Year Olds (Cohort 11 Sweep 1). Technical Report. London: National Centre for Social Research.
32.
JonssonJan O.2007. “The Farther They Come, the Harder They Fall? First- and Second-Generation Immigrants in the Swedish Labour Market.” Pp. 451-505 in Unequal Chances: Ethnic Minorities in Western Labour Markets, edited by HeathA.CheungS.-Y.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
33.
JonssonJan O.RudolphiFrida. 2011. “Weak Performance–Strong Determination: School Achievement and Educational Choice among Children of Immigrants in Sweden.” European Sociological Review. European Sociological Review27:487-508.
34.
KaoGraceThompsonJennifer S.2003. “Racial and Ethnic Stratification in Educational Achievement and Attainment.” Annual Review of Sociology2:417-42.
35.
KloostermanRianneRuiterStijnde GraafPaul M.KraaykampGerbert. 2009. “Parental Education, Children’s Performance and the Transition to Higher Secondary Education: Trends in Primary and Secondary Effects over Five Dutch School Cohorts.” British Journal of Sociology60:377-98.
36.
KristenCornelia. 2005. School Choice and Ethnic School Segregation: Primary School Selection in Germany. Munster, Germany: Waxman.
37.
KristenCorneliaDollmannJörg. 2010. “Sekundäre Effekte der ethnischen Herkunft: Kinder aus türkischen Familien am ersten Bildungsübergang.” Pp. 117-44 in Vom Kindergarten bis zur Hochschule. Die Generierung von ethnischen und sozialen Disparitäten in der Bildungsbiographie, edited by BeckerB.ReimerD.Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
38.
LindahlErica. 2008. “Comparing Teachers’ Assessments and National Test Results—Evidence from Sweden.” Pp. 56-73 in Empirical Studies of Public Policies within the Primary School and the Sickness Insurance (Economic Studies 111), edited by LindahlE.Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Economics, Uppsala University.
39.
LutzAmy. 2007. “Barriers to High-School Completion among Immigrant and Later-Generation Latinos in the USA: Language, Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.” Ethnicities7:323-42.
40.
ModoodTariq. 2004. “Capitals, Ethnic Identity and Educational Qualifications.” Cultural Trends13:87-105.
41.
MorganStephen L.2005. On the Edge of Commitment: Educational Attainment and Race in the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42.
MorganStephen L.SpillerMichael W.ToddJennifer J.Forthcoming. “Origins, High School Graduation, and College Entry in the United States” in Determined to Succeed? Performance, Choice and Education, ed. JacksonM.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43.
NekbyLenaVilhelmssonRogerÖzcanGülay. 2007. “Do Host Country Educations Even out the Playing Field? Immigrant–Native Labor Market Gaps in Sweden.” Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies6:168-96.
44.
OECD. 2008a. Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
45.
OECD. 2008b. International Migration Outlook. Annual Report. Paris: OECD.
46.
OgbuJohn U.1992. “Understanding Cultural Diversity and Learning.” Educational Researcher21(8):5-14.
47.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRuben G., eds. 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
PortesAlejandroZhouMin. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences530:74-96.
49.
RiachPeter A.RichJudith. 2002. “Field Experiments of Discrimination in the Market Place.” Economic Journal112:F480-F518.
50.
SchneiderBarbaraColemanJames S.1993. Parents, Their Children, and Schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
51.
StørenLiv AnneHellandHåvard. 2009. “Ethnicity Differences in the Completion Rates of Upper Secondary Education: How Do the Effects of Gender and Social Background Variables Interplay?” European Sociological Review26:585-601.
52.
van de WerfhorstHerman G.van TubergenFrank. 2007. “Ethnicity, Schooling, and Merit in the Netherlands.” Ethnicities7:416-44.
53.
van OursJan C.VeenmanJustus. 2003. “The Educational Attainment of Second Generation Immigrants in the Netherlands.” Journal of Population Economics16:739-53.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
