This paper presents some of the findings from two national research projects which focussed on Ph.D. research in Britain. Through interviews with graduate students, supervisors and department heads, it explores the characteristic structures which index natural science and social science doctoral study in both single and multi/inter-disciplinary fields. By comparing and contrasting a `research group approach' to Ph.D. research with the `one-to-one' model, the research findings highlight ways in which doctoral study can be organised to minimise some of the problems routinely faced by graduate students.
Ashmore, M., Myers, G. and Potter, J. 1992. `Discourse, Rhetoric, Reflexivity: Seven Days in the Library', in S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, T. Pinch and J. Peterson (eds.) Handbook of Science, Technology and Society. London: Sage.
2.
Atkinson, P. A. 1983. `The Reproduction of the Professional Community', in R. Dingwall and P. Lewis (eds.) The Sociology of the Professions. London: Macmillan.
3.
Atkinson, P. A. 1985. Language, Structure and Reproduction: An Introduction to the Sociology of Basil Bernstein. London: Methuen.
4.
Atkinson, P. A.1991. `Decoding Bernstein'. Sociological Review39:647-654.
5.
Beecher, T.1988. `Physicists on Physics'. Studies in Higher Education15:3-21.
6.
Bourdieu, P.1975. `The Specifity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason'. Social Science Information14:19-47.
7.
Bourdieu, P. and Passeron J. C. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.
8.
Collins, H. M. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Delamont, S. and Atkinson, P.1985. `Socialization into Teaching: The Research which Lost its Way'. British Journal of The Sociology of Education6:307-321.
10.
Delamont, S.1987. `Three Blind Spots: A Comment on the Sociology of Science by a Puzzled Outsider'. Social Studies of Science17:163-170.
11.
Getzels J. W. and Jackson, P. W. 1963. `The Highly Intelligent and Highly Creative Adolescent', in C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (eds.) Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development. London: Wiley.
12.
H.M.S.O.1993. `Realizing Our Potential'. White Paper on Science and Technology. CM 2250.
13.
Kuhn, T. S. 1970. `The Essential Tension: Tradition and Innovation in Scientific Research' in L. Hudson (ed.) The Ecology of Human Intelligence. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
14.
Parry, O., Atkinson, P. and Delamont, S. 1994. `Disciplinary Identity and Doctoral Work', in R. Burgess (ed.) Postgraduate Education and Training in the Social Sciences. London: Jessica Kingsley.
15.
Parry, O.1991. `The Production and Reproduction of News: Broadcast Students at Journalism School'. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education4:215-230.
16.
Parry, O. 1992. `Making Sense of the Research Setting and Making the Research Setting Make Sense', in R. Burgess (ed.) Studies in Qualitative Education. Vol 3. London: JAI Press.
17.
Parry, O.1993. `The Reproduction of an Occupation'. British Journal of Education and Work. 6:45-46.
18.
Robbins, D. 1991. The Work of Pierre Bourdieu. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
19.
Winfield, G. 1987. The Social Science Ph.D.: The ESRC Inquiry on Submission Rates. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
