What Methods Do Social Scientists Use to Study Disasters? An Analysis of the Social Science Extreme Events Research Network

Abstract

Methods matter. They influence what we know and who we come to know about in the context of hazards and disasters. Research methods are of profound importance to the scholarly advancement of the field and, accordingly, a growing number of publications focus on research methods and ethical practices associated with the study of extreme events. Still, notable gaps exist. The National Science Foundation-funded Social Science Extreme Events Research (SSEER) network was formed, in part, to respond to the need for more specific information about the status and expertise of the social science hazards and disaster research workforce. Drawing on data from 1,013 SSEER members located across five United Nations (UN) regions, this article reports on the demographic characteristics of SSEER researchers; provides a novel inventory of methods used by social science hazards and disaster researchers; and explores how methodological approaches vary by specific researcher attributes including discipline, professional status, researcher type based on level of involvement in the field, hazard/disaster type studied, and disaster phase studied. The results have implications for training, mentoring, and workforce development initiatives geared toward ensuring that a diverse next generation of social science researchers is prepared to study the root causes and social consequences of disasters.

Keywords

social sciences census research methods natural hazards disasters

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

W. A.

(1990). Nurturing the next generation of hazards researchers. Natural Hazards Observer, 15(2), 1-2.

Anderson

W. A.

Mattingly

(1991). Future directions. In Drabek

T. E.

Hoetmer

G. J.

(Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. 311-335). International City Management Association.

Andrulis

D. P.

Siddiqui

N. J.

Gantner

J. L.

(2007). Preparing racially and ethnically diverse communities for public health emergencies. Health Affairs, 26(5), 1269-1279. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1269

Battaglia

(2011). Convenience sampling. In Lavrakas

P. J.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 149-150). Sage.

Bennett

Agyepong

I. A.

Sheikh

Hanson

Ssengooba

Gilson

(2011). Building the field of health policy and systems research: An agenda for action. PLoS Medicine, 8(8), e10001081. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001081

Browne

K. E.

Peek

(2014). Beyond the IRB: An ethical toolkit for long-term disaster research. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 32(1), 82-120.

Cutter

S. L.

(2018). Compound, cascading, or complex disasters: What’s in a name? Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 60(6), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2018.1517518

DeRouen

Smith

(2020). Reflective listening visualization: Enhancing interdisciplinary disaster research through the use of visualization techniques. Risk Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13464

Drabek

T. E.

(1970). Methodology of studying disasters: Past patterns and future possibilities. American Behavioral Scientist, 13(3), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427001300303

10.

Dynes

(1994). Some comments on the research enterprise studying disaster: Cautions on fieldwork. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.

11.

Dynes

(1997). Disasters, collective behavior, and social organization. University of Delaware Press.

12.

Dynes

Tierney

K. J.

(Eds). (1994). Disasters, collective behavior, and social organization. University of Delaware Press.

13.

Elsevier. (2017). A global outlook on disaster science. https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence/research-initiatives/disasterscience2017

14.

Frailing

Van Brown

(2020). Introduction to methods matter in disaster research. American Behavioral Scientist, 64, 1047-1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220938111

15.

Fuchs

Kuhlicke

Volker

(2011). Editorial for the special issue: Vulnerability to natural hazards: The challenge of integration. Natural Hazards, 58(2), 609-619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9825-5

16.

Gaillard

J. C.

Peek

(2019). Disaster-zone research needs a code of conduct. Nature, 575, 440-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03534-z

17.

Gharaibeh

Oti

Meyer

Hendricks

Van Zandt

. (2019). Potential of citizen science for enhancing infrastructure monitoring data and decision-support models for local communities. Risk Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13256

18.

GRID. (2017). Global report on internal displacement. Norwegian Refugee Council, Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre.

19.

Gruntfest

(2018). Weather and society: Toward integrated approaches. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118525913

20.

Harper

D. W.

Frailing

(Eds.). (2016). Crime and criminal justice in disaster (3rd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.

21.

Henderson

Liboiron

(2019). Compromise and action: Tactics for doing ethical research in disaster zones. In Kendra

Knowles

S. G.

Wachtendorf

(Eds.), Disaster research and the second environmental crisis (pp. 295-318). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04691-0_15

22.

Institute of Medicine. (2015). Enabling rapid and sustainable public health research during disasters. The National Academies Press.

23.

Kelman

(2005). Operational ethics for disaster research. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 23(3), 141-158. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e7ec/68de698c9fdc749827c93802d11a8f34ec14.pdf

24.

Kendra

J. M.

Wachtendorf

(2016). American Dunkirk: The waterborne evacuation of Manhattan on 9/11. Temple University Press.

25.

Lee

A. C. K.

Booth

Challen

Gardois

Goodacre

(2014). Disaster management in low- and middle-income countries: Scoping review of the evidence base. Emergency Medicine Journal, 31(1), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-203298

26.

Lindell

M. K.

Murray-Tuite

Wolshon

Baker

E. J.

(2019). Large-scale evacuation: The analysis, modeling, and management of emergency relocation from hazardous areas. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315119045

27.

Lindell

M. K.

Perry

R. W.

(2012). The Protection Action Decision Model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x

28.

Louis-Charles

Dixon

(2015). A blueprint for change: An emerging initiative paves the way for increased diversity in hazards mitigation. Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado Boulder. https://hazards.colorado.edu/article/a-blueprint-for-change-an-emerging-initiative-paves-the-way-for-increased-diversity-in-hazards-mitigation

29.

McHugh

M. L.

(2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biochemical Medicine, 23(2), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018

30.

McNutt

M. K.

(2017). Convergence in the geosciences. GeoHealth, 1(1), 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GH000068

31.

McPhillips

L. E.

Chang

Chester

M. V.

Depietri

Friedman

Grimm

N. B.

Kominoski

J. S.

McPhearson

Mendez-Lazaro

Rosi

E. J.

Shiva

J. S.

(2018). Defining extreme events: A cross-disciplinary review. Earth’s Future, 6(3), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000686

32.

Meyer

(2018). Social capital in disaster research. In Rodríguez

Donner

Trainor

(Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (2nd ed., pp. 263-286). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_14

33.

Mileti

D. S.

(1987). Sociological methods and disaster research. In Dynes

de Marchi

Pelanda

(Eds.), Sociology of disasters: Contributions of sociology to disaster research (pp. 57-69). Franco Angeli.

34.

Mileti

D. S.

(1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press.

35.

Mohammad

Peek

(2019). Exposure outliers: Children, mothers, and cumulative disaster expsoure in Louisiana. Journal of Family Strengths, 19(1), Article 4. https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/jfs/vol19/iss1/4/

36.

Moseley

(2004). Educational needs for disaster management. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 19(4), 28-31. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUJlEmMgmt/2004/54.pdf

37.

Munich

RE.

(2018). Hurricanes cause record losses in 2017: The year in figures. https://www.munichre.com/topics-online/en/climate-change-and-natural-disasters/natural-disasters/2017-year-in-figures.html

38.

Nateghi

Sutton

Murray-Tuite

(2019). The frontiers of uncertainty estimation and communication in interdisciplinary disaster research and practice. Risk Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13337

39.

National Research Council. (2006). Facing hazards and disasters: Understanding human dimensions. The National Academies Press.

40.

National Research Council. (2014). Convergence: Facilitating transdisciplinary integration of life sciences, physical sciences, engineering, and beyond. The National Academies Press.

41.

Neal

(2000). Developing degree programs in disater management: Some reflections and observations. International Journal of Mass Emergencines and Disasters, 18(3), 417-437.

42.

Norris

F. H.

Galea

Friedman

M. J.

Watson

P. J.

(Eds.). (2006). Methods for disaster mental health research. The Guilford Press.

43.

Omi

Winant

(2014). Racial formation in the United States (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203076804

44.

Packenham

J. P.

Rosselli

R. T.

Ramsey

S. K.

Taylor

H. A.

Fothergill

Slutsman

Miller

(2017). Conducting science in disasters: Recommendations from the NIEHS Working Group for Special IRB Considerations in the review of disaster related research. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(9), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2378

45.

Peacock

W. G.

Kunreuther

Hooke

W. H.

Cutter

S. L.

Chang

S. E.

Berke

P. R.

(2008). Toward a resiliency and vulnerability observatory network: RAVON (Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center Reports, 08-02R). http://hrrc.arch.tamu.edu/_common/documents/08-02.pdf

46.

Peek

(2006). Transforming the field of disaster research through training the next generation. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 24(3), 371-389. http://www.ijmed.org/articles/40/download/

47.

Peek

(2018). A call to social scientists. Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado Boulder. https://hazards.colorado.edu/news/director/a-call-to-social-scientists

48.

Peek

Tobin

Adams

Mathews

(2020). A framework for convergence research in the hazards and disaster field: The natural hazards engineering research infrastructure CONVERGE facility. Frontiers in Built Environment. DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2020.00110

49.

Peek

Mathews

(2019). The 2018 Social Science Extreme Events Research (SSEER) Census. CONVERGE, Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado Boulder. https://converge.colorado.edu/research-networks/sseer/researchers-census/2018

50.

Phillips

(2014). Qualitative disaster research. Oxford University Press.

51.

Quarantelli

E. L.

(1987). Disaster studies: An analysis of the social and historical factors affecting the development of research in the area. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 5(3), 285-310.

52.

Reilly

A. C.

Dillon-Merrill

R. L.

Guikema

S. D.

(2018). Agent-based models as an integrating boundary object for interdisciplinary research. Risk Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13134

53.

Roser

Ritchie

(2019). Natural disasters. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters

54.

Stallings

R. A.

(Ed.). (2002). Methods of disaster research. Xlibris.

55.

Sterba

S. K.

Foster

E. M.

(2011). Self-selected sample. In Lavrakas

P. J.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 807-808). Sage.

56.

Sutley

E. J.

Hamideh

(2017). An interdisciplinary system dynamics model for post-disaster housing recovery. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 3(3), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1364561

57.

Sutley

E. J.

van de Lindt

J. W.

Peek

(2017). Community-level framework for seismic resiliency, Part I: Coupling socioeconomic characteristics and engineering building systems. Natural Hazards Review, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000239

58.

Thomas

D. S. K.

Phillips

B. D.

Lovekamp

W. E.

Fothergill

(Eds.). (2013). Social vulnerability to disasters (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

59.

Tierney

K. J.

(2002). The field turns fifty: Social change and the practice of disaster research. In Stallings

R. A.

(Ed.), Methods of disaster research (pp. 349-374). Xlibris.

60.

Tierney

K. J.

(2007). From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 503-525. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131743

61.

Tierney

K. J.

(2019). Disasters: A sociological approach. Polity Press.

62.

Tierney

K. J.

Lindell

M. K.

Perry

R. W.

(2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Joseph Henry Press.

63.

United Nations. (2017). Principles and recommendation for population and housing censuses, Revision 3. Author.

64.

Van Brown

. (2020). Disaster research “methics”: Ethical and methodological considerations of researching disaster-affected populations. American Behavioral Scientist, 64, 1050-1065. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220938115

65.

Wachtendorf

(2019). A case for the grand challenge of disaster science. In Kendra

Knowles

S. G.

Wachtendorf

(Eds.), Disaster research and the second environmental crisis (pp. 343-351). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04691-0_17

66.

Wallemacq

House

(2018). Economic losses, poverty, and disasters: 1998-2017. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.

67.

White

G. F.

Haas

J. E.

(1975). Assessment of research on natural hazards. MIT Press.

68.

Wilby

R. L.

Keenan

(2012). Adapting to flood risk under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography, 36(3), 348-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312438908