This article analyses ‘gaming’ in higher education as a response to performance metrics. It shows how scholars react to performance measurement systems in the form of journal lists that define appropriate outlets for their research. Two types of gaming are identified: the adaptation of research methods and topics to align with the perceived ideals of top US journals, and strategic networking with editors and potential reviewers before submitting articles to prestigious journals. We employ scripting theory to analyse performance measurement and its consequences, differentiating between three levels of scripting: cultural scripts, represented by journal lists; interactional scripts, characterised by participants’ redefinitions/enactments of these overarching scripts; and intrapsychic scripts, focusing on participants’ self-scripting and personal attitudes towards gaming in academia. The study is based on qualitative interviews with 173 associate and full professors in the social sciences in Denmark.
AboubichrBConwayN (2023) The gaming of performance management systems in British universities. Human Relations76(4): 602–628.
2.
AdlerNJHarzingAW (2009) When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning and Education8(1): 72–95.
3.
AguinisHCummingsCRamaniRS, et al. (2020) ‘An a is an a’: The new bottom line for valuing academic research. Academy of Management Perspectives34(1): 135–154.
4.
ArgentoDvan HeldenJ (2022) Are public sector accounting researchers going through an identity shift due to the increasing importance of journal rankings?Critical Perspectives on Accounting96: 102537. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235422001228 (accessed 5 October 2024).
BacciniABarabesiLKhelfaouiM, et al. (2020) Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations. Quantitative Science Studies1(1): 277–289.
BoulianneS (2019) US dominance of research on political communication: A meta-view. Political Communication36(4): 660–665.
12.
BrogaardJEngelbergJParsonsCA (2014) Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations. Journal of Financial Economics111(1): 251–270.
13.
BrooksCSchopohlL (2018) Topics and trends in finance research: What is published, who publishes it and what gets cited?British Accounting Review50(6): 615–637.
14.
BrooksCSchopohlLWalkerJT (2023) Comparing perceptions of the impact of journal rankings between fields. Critical Perspectives on Accounting90: 102381.
15.
BrymanACassellC (2006) The researcher interview: A reflexive perspective. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal1(1): 41–55.
16.
ButlerNDelaneyHSpoelstraS (2017) The grey zone: Questionable research practices in the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education16(1): 94–109.
17.
ColussiT (2018) Social ties in academia: A friend is a treasure. Review of Economics and Statistics100(1): 45–50.
18.
ErolaJReimerDRäsänenP, et al. (2015) No crisis but methodological separatism: A comparative study of Finnish and Danish publication trends between 1990 and 2009. Sociology49(2): 374–394.
19.
EspelandWNSauderM (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology113(1): 1–40.
20.
EspelandWNSauderM (2016) Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
FlemingP (2021) Dark Academia: How Universities Die. London: Pluto Press.
22.
GendronY (2008) Constituting the academic performer: The spectre of superficiality and stagnation in academia. European Accounting Review17(1): 97–127.
23.
GendronYRodrigueM (2021) On the centrality of peripheral research and the dangers of tight boundary gatekeeping. Critical Perspectives on Accounting76: 102076.
24.
GoffmanE (1956) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. Social Science Research Centre, monograph no. 2.
25.
GonzalesLDPasquePAFarrisKD, et al. (2024) Epistemic injustice and legitimacy in U.S. doctoral education: A systematic review of literature. Review of Educational Research94(3): 423–464.
26.
GoyanesMDe-MarcosL (2020) Academic influence and invisible colleges through editorial board interlocking in communication sciences: A social network analysis of leading journals. Scientometrics123(2): 791–811.
27.
GrafLWendlerWSStumpf-WollersheimJ, et al. (2019) Wanting more, getting less: Gaming performance measurement as a form of deviant workplace behavior. Journal of Business Ethics157(3): 753–773.
28.
GunasekaraC (2007) Pivoting the centre: Reflections on undertaking qualitative interviews in academia. Qualitative Research7(4): 461–475.
29.
HeckmanJJMoktanS (2020) Publishing and promotion in economics: The tyranny of the top five. Journal of Economic Literature58(2): 419–470.
30.
HelgessonKSSjögrenE (2019) No finish line: How formalization of academic assessment can undermine clarity and increase secrecy. Gender, Work & Organization26(4): 558–581.
31.
HumphreyCGendronY (2015) What is going on? The sustainability of accounting academia. Critical Perspectives on Accounting26(C): 47–66.
32.
HussainS (2011) Food for thoughts on the ABS academic journal quality guide. Accounting Education20(6): 545–559.
33.
JärvinenMMik-MeyerN (2024) Giving and receiving: Gendered service work in academia. Current Sociology. Epub ahead of print 17 January 2024. DOI: 10.1177/00113921231224754
34.
KalfaSWilkinsonAGollanPJ (2018) The academic game: Compliance and resistance in universities. Work, Employment and Society32(2): 274–291.
35.
KallioK-MKallioTJTienariJ, et al. (2016) Ethics at stake. Performance management and academic work in universities. Human Relations69(3): 685–709.
36.
KwiekM (2019) Social stratification in Higher Education: What it means at the micro-level of the individual academic scientist. Higher Education Quarterly73(4): 419–444.
37.
LynchK (2015) Control by numbers: New managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education56(2): 190–207.
38.
MacdonaldSKamJ (2007) Ring a ring o’ roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies44(4): 640–655.
39.
MertonRK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: The Free Press.
40.
MeyerMWaldkirchRWDuscherL, et al. (2018) Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in ‘top’ accounting journals. Critical Perspectives on Accounting51: 22–44.
41.
MingersJWillmottH (2013) Taylorizing business school research: On the ‘one best way’ performative effects of journal ranking lists. Human Relations66(88): 1051–1073.
42.
Ministry of Higher Education and Science (2021) The Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Denmark: Ministry of Higher Education and Science.
43.
NygaardLPPiroFNAksnesDW (2022) Gendering excellence through research productivity indicators. Gender and Education34(6): 690–704.
44.
OrupaboJMangsetM (2022) Promoting diversity but striving for excellence. Opening the ‘black box’ of academic hiring. Sociology56(2): 316–332.
45.
PelgerCGrottgeM (2015) What about the future of the academy? Some remarks on the looming colonisation of doctoral students. Critical Perspectives on Accounting26: 117–129.
46.
PollittC (2013) The logics of performance measurement. Evaluation19(4): 346–363.
47.
RamassaPAvalloneFQuagliA (2023) Can ‘publishing game’ pressures affect the research topic choice? A survey of European accounting researchers. Journal of Management and Governance28(2): 507–542.
48.
RintamäkiJAlvessonM (2023) Resisting whilst complying? A case study of a power struggle in a business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education22(2): 257–273.
49.
SantosATMendonçaS (2022) The small world of innovation studies: An ‘editormetrics’ perspective. Scientometrics127(12): 7471–7486.
50.
SchwemmerCWieczorekR (2020) The methodological divide of sociology: Evidence from two decades of journal publications. Sociology54(1): 3–21.
51.
SimonWGagnonJH (1986) Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior15(2): 97–120.
52.
SimonWGagnonJH (2003) Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology26(4): 491–497.
53.
ThomasWI (1923) The Unadjusted Girl. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Co.
54.
ThomasWThomasDS (1928) The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. Boston, MA: Knopf.
55.
TightM (2014) Working in separate silos? What citation patterns reveal about higher education research internationally. Higher Education68(3): 379–395.
56.
TourishDCraigR (2020) Research misconduct in business and management studies: Causes, consequences, and possible remedies. Journal of Management Inquiry29(2): 174–187.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
