Physicists were asked the question, “What do you think are the most important qualities needed to be successful at the type of work you do?” The results demonstrate which qualities physicists value and how values vary among the qualities they identified. The results also show how physicists’ beliefs about success vary by the rank of their department, age, productivity, and gender. More generally, the findings cast light on the moral order of physics by eliciting how members of an occupation construe the structure of success in their line of work.
Albert, R. S., ed. 1992. Genius and eminence. New York: Pergamon.
2.
Cole, J. R., and S. Cole. 1973. Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Collins, H. M.1995. Science studies and machine intelligence. In Handbook of science and technology studies, ed. S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, and T. Pinch, 286-301. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Durkheim, E. [1915] 1965. The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press.
5.
Gans, J. S., and G. B. Shepherd. 1994. How are the mighty fallen: Rejected classic articles by leading economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives8:165-179.
6.
Glaser, B. G.1964. Organizational scientists: Their professional careers. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
7.
Goldberger, M. L., B. A. Maher, and P. E. Flattau, eds. 1995. Research-doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
Hermanowicz, J. C.1998. The stars are not enough: Scientists—Their passions and professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Jones, L.V., G. Lindzey, and P. E. Coggeshall, eds. 1982. An assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States: Mathematical and physical sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
Knorr Cetina, K.1995. Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In Handbook of science and technology studies, ed. S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, and T. Pinch, 140-166. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Krieger, M. H.1992. Doing physics: How Physicists take hold of the world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12.
Latour, B.1987. Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Ludwig, A. M.1995. The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford.
15.
McGinn, R. E.1991. Science, technology, and society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
Merton, R. K.1973a. The normative structure of science. In The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, ed. R. K. Merton, 267-278. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Merton, R. K.1973b. “Recognition” and “excellence”: Instructive ambiguities. In The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, ed. R. K. Merton, 419-438. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Pelz, D. C., and F. M. Andrews. 1966. Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. New York: Wiley.
19.
Pickering, A.1995. The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Shepherd, G. B., ed. 1995. Rejected: Leading economists ponder the publication process. Sun Lakes, AZ: Thomas Horton and Daughters.
21.
Simonton, D. K.1994. Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford.
22.
Sonnert, G., and G. Holton. 1995. Gender differences in science careers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
23.
Traweek, S.1988. Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Ziman, J.1984. An introduction to science studies: The philosophical and social aspects of science and technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Zuckerman, H.1977. Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.
