Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article takes recourse to a particular branch of French Pragmatic Sociology, namely, Boltanski and Thévenot’s ‘orders of worth’ paradigm, as a lens through which to both explore the misalignment between espoused values and retrospective discourses and illustrate the underlying motivations behind decision making in an organisation within the creative industries sector. By virtue of its contributions at the organisational, social and sectorial levels, our study contributes to extant debates pertaining to individual agency versus structural constraints as well as demonstrating the heterogeneity of modes of formal compliance to wider institutionalised legitimacy. In so doing, it builds upon recent work that seeks to broaden the notion of value in the creative industries, while, simultaneously, calling for greater heterogeneity in policy making in the sector through an ongoing process of ‘creative conflict’.

Keywords

conflict creative industries French Pragmatic Sociology legitimacy orders of worth

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baert

Carreira da Silva

(2010) Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Barthe

De Blic

Heurtin

, et al. (2013) Sociologie pragmatique: Mode d’emploi. Politix 113(3): 175–204.

BBC News (2018) Creative Scotland board members resign following funding row. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-42902976 (accessed 15 March 2021).

Belfiore

(2004) Auditing culture. International Journal of Cultural Policy 10(2): 183–202.

Belfiore

(2015) ‘Impact’, ‘value’ and ‘bad economics’: Making sense of the problem of value in the arts and humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 14(1): 95–110.

Belfiore

(2020) Whose cultural value? Representation, power and creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy 26(3): 383–397.

Blokker

(2011) Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory 14(3): 251–261.

Boltanski

(2011 [2009]) On Critique (trans. Elliott

). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Boltanski

Chiapello

(2005 [1999]) The New Spirit of Capitalism (trans. Elliott

). London: Verso.

10.

Boltanski

Thévenot

(1999) The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory 2(3): 359–377.

11.

Boltanski

Thévenot

(2006 [1991]) On Justification: Economies of Worth (trans. Porter

). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

12.

Bourdieu

(1977 [1972]) Outline of a Theory of Practice (trans. Nice

). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Brandl

Daudigeos

Edwards

, et al. (2014) Why French pragmatism matters to organizational institutionalism. Journal of Management Inquiry 23(3): 314–318.

14.

Caves

(2000) Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

15.

Caves

(2003) Contracts between art and commerce. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(2): 73–84.

16.

Cefaï

Zimmermann

Nicola

, et al. (2015) Sociology of valuation and evaluation. Human Studies 38(1): 1–12.

17.

Cloutier

Gond

Leca

(eds) (2017) Justification, Evaluation and Critique in the Study of Organizations: Contributions from French Pragmatist Sociology. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

18.

Coffey

Atkinson

(1996) Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

19.

Cultural Commission (2005) Our Next Major Enterprise. Edinburgh: Cultural Commission.

20.

Cunningham

(2009) Trojan horse or Rorschach blot? Creative industries discourse around the world. International Journal of Cultural Policy 15(4): 375–386.

21.

Cunningham

Flew

(eds) (2019) A Research Agenda for Creative Industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

22.

De Blic

(2000) Le scandale financier du siècle, ca ne vous interesse pas? Difficile mobilisation autour de Credit Lyonnais. Politix. Revue des sciences sociales du politique 13(52): 157–181.

23.

Denzin

Lincoln

(2008) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

24.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) (1998) Creative Industries Mapping Document. London: DCMS.

25.

Devers

Dewett

Mishina

, et al. (2009) A general theory of organizational stigma. Organization Science 20(1): 154–171.

26.

DiMaggio

(1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: Zucker

(ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp.3–22.

27.

Dodier

(1993) L’expertise medicale. Paris: Metailie.

28.

Flew

(2012) The Creative Industries: Culture and Policy. London: SAGE.

29.

Frère

Jaster

(2019) French sociological pragmatism: Inheritor and innovator in the American pragmatic and sociological phenomenological traditions. Journal of Classical Sociology 19(2): 138–160.

30.

Garnham

(2005) From cultural to creative industries: An analysis of the implications of the ‘creative industries’ approach to arts and media policy making in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Cultural Policy 11(1): 15–29.

31.

Hartley

(ed.) (2005) Creative Industries. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

32.

Helms

Patterson

Hudson

(2019) Let’s not ‘taint’ stigma research with legitimacy, please. Journal of Management Inquiry 28(1): 5–10.

33.

Herald Scotland (2006) New creative Scotland blueprint unveiled. Available at: https://www.heraldscotland.com/default_content/12379227.new-creative-scotland-blueprint-unveiled/ (accessed 14 April 2021).

34.

Hesmondhalgh

(2012) The Cultural Industries. London: SAGE.

35.

Hibberd

(2009) Creative industry policy and practice: A study of BBC Scotland and Scottish Screen. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.

36.

Holden

Scerri

(2015) Justification, compromise and test: Developing a pragmatic sociology of critique to understand the outcomes of urban redevelopment. Planning Theory 14(4): 360–383.

37.

Horkheimer

Adorno

(1972 [1947]) Dialectic of Enlightenment (trans. Cumming

). San Francisco, CA: Seabury Press.

38.

Huault

Rainelli-Weiss

(2011) A market for weather risk? Conflicting metrics, attempts at compromise, and limits to commensuration. Organization Studies 32(10): 1395–1419.

39.

Hudson

Okhuysen

(2014) Taboo topics: Structural barriers to the study of organizational stigma. Journal of Management Inquiry 23(3): 242–253.

40.

Hydra Associates (1996) Scotland on Screen: The Development of the Film and Television Industry in Scotland. Glasgow: Scott Stern Associates.

41.

Jagd

(2011) Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations. European Journal of Social Theory 14(3): 343–359.

42.

Jeffcutt

Pick

Protherough

(2000) Culture and industry: Exploring the debate. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies 6(2): 129–143.

43.

Jenkins

(2014) Pierre Bourdieu. New York, NY: Routledge.

44.

Lafaye

(1990) Situations tendues et sens ordinaire de la justice au sein d’une administration municipal. Revue francaise de sociologie 31: 199–223.

45.

Lamont

Thévenot

(eds) (2000) Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology. Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Lampel

Lant

Shamsie

(2000) Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organization Science 11(3): 263–269.

47.

Lawrence

Suddaby

(2006) Institutions and institutional work. In: Clegg

Hardy

Nord

, et al. (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 215–254.

48.

McGuigan

(2006) The politics of cultural studies and cool capitalism. Cultural Politics: An International Journal 2(2): 137–158.

49.

McInerney

(2008) Showdown at Kykuit: Field-configuring events as loci for conventionalizing accounts. Journal of Management Studies 45(6): 1089–1116.

50.

McKinlay

Smith

(eds) (2009) Creative Labour: Working in the Creative Industries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

51.

Mason

(1996) Qualitative Researching. London: SAGE.

52.

Ménard

(2004) The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 1: 345–376.

53.

Miller

(2018) Fringe lambasts ‘insulting’ creative Scotland funding methods in evidence to parliament. The Herald. Available at: https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/16248101.fringe-lambasts-insulting-creative-scotland-funding-methods-evidence-parliament/ (accessed 14 April 2021).

54.

Nyberg

Wright

(2013) Corporate corruption of the environment: Sustainability as a process of compromise. The British Journal of Sociology 64(3): 405–424.

55.

Patriotta

Gond

Schultz

(2011) Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies 48(8): 1804–1836.

56.

Ragin

(2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

57.

Ramirez

(2013) ‘We are being pilloried for something, we did not even know he had done wrong’: Quality control and orders of worth in the British audit profession. Journal of Management Studies 50(5): 845–869.

58.

Reinecke

(2010) Beyond a subjective theory of value and towards a ‘fair price’: An organizational perspective on Fairtrade minimum price setting. Organization 17(5): 563–581.

59.

Saldaña

(2015) Thinking Qualitatively: Methods of Mind. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

60.

Scottish Executive (2002) Creating our Future. . . Minding our Past: Scotland’s National Cultural Strategy. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

61.

Scottish Executive (2005) Cultural Policy Statement. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/231902/0688.pdf (accessed 11 April 2021).

62.

Scottish Screen (1997) Chief Executive’s report. Glasgow: Scottish Screen.

63.

Scottish Screen (2005) Annual report 2004/05. Glasgow: Scottish Screen.

64.

Silber

(2003) Pragmatic sociology as cultural sociology: Beyond repertoire theory? European Journal of Social Theory 6(4): 425–447.

65.

Silber

(2016) The cultural worth of ‘Economies of Worth’: French pragmatic sociology from a cultural sociological perspective. In: Inglis

Almila

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Cultural Sociology. London: SAGE, 159–177.

66.

Stiegler

(2019) ‘Il faut s’adapter’: Sur un nouvel impératif politique. Paris: Gallimard.

67.

Susen

Turner

(eds) (2014) The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’. London: Anthem Press.

68.

Taupin

(2012) The more things change. . .: Institutional maintenance as justification work in the credit rating industry. M@n@gement 15(5): 528–562.

69.

Taupin

(2015) The contribution of French pragmatic sociology to critical Management studies. Revista de Administração de Empresas 55(2): 162–174.

70.

Thévenot

(2011) Power and oppression from the perspective of the sociology of engagements: A comparison with Bourdieu’s and Dewey’s critical approaches to practical activities. Irish Journal of Sociology 19(1): 35–67.

71.

Throsby

(2010) The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

72.

Vestheim

(1994) Instrumental cultural policy in Scandinavian countries: A critical historical perspective. International Journal of Cultural Policy 1(1): 57–71.

73.

Weber

(2019 [1921]) Economy and Society (trans. Tribe

). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

What Lies Beneath: Organisational Responses to Powerful Stakeholders

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References