This article uses multivariate logistic regression analyses of the 2005 General Household Survey to assess the impact of parents’ occupational and educational characteristics on occupational attainment in Britain, focusing specifically on the salariat. Differences in outcomes according to family structure are then examined, controlling for such parental characteristics. The results indicate that both parents’ characteristics are relevant, and that their effects interact. A smaller chance of a salariat occupation is evident for those who lived in a lone-mother family, lone-father family, or biological-mother stepfamily as a young teenager, reflecting different features of these family types, but consistently reflecting lower educational attainment. Both number of co-resident siblings and parental worklessness affect the odds of having a salariat occupation, this being relevant to family-type comparisons.
BellerE (2003) The Influence of Mothers on Social Origins and Occupational Mobility. Paper presented at the ASA Annual Meeting, Atlanta.
2.
BellerE (2004) The Influence of Family Structure on Social Mobility Patterns: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. Paper presented at the ASA Annual Meeting, San Francisco.
3.
BellerE (2009) Bringing intergenerational social mobility research into the twenty-first century: Why mothers matter. American Sociological Review74(4): 507–28.
4.
BiblarzTJRafteryA (1999) Family structure, educational attainment, and socio-economic success: Rethinking the pathology of matriarchy. American Journal of Sociology105(2): 321–65.
5.
BourdieuP (1997) The forms of capital. In: HalseyAHLauderHBrownPWellAS (eds) Education: Culture, Economy, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 46–58.
6.
BreenRLuijkxRMüllerWPollakR (2010) Long-term trends in educational inequality in Europe: Class inequalities and gender differences. European Sociological Review26(1): 31–48.
7.
BühlmannF (2010) Routes into the British service class: Feeder logics according to gender and occupational groups. Sociology44(2): 195–212.
8.
Cabinet Office (2009) Unleashing Aspiration: The Final Report of the Panel on Fair Access to the Professions. London: Cabinet Office.
9.
ChanTWKooA (2011) Parenting style and youth outcomes in the UK. European Sociological Review27(3): 385–99.
10.
CoxDRSnellEJ (1989) Analysis of binary data, 2nd edn.London: Chapman and Hall.
11.
CusworthL (2009) The Impact of Parental Employment: Young People, Well-Being and Educational Achievement. Aldershot: Ashgate.
12.
DowneyDB (1995) When bigger is not better: Family size, parental resources, and children’s educational performance. American Sociological Review60(5): 746–61.
13.
DronkersJ (1994) The changing effects of lone parent families on the educational attainment of their children in a European welfare state. Sociology28(1): 171–91.
14.
ElyMWestPSweetingHRichardsM (2000) Teenage family life, life chances, lifestyles and health: A comparison of two contemporary cohorts. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family14(1): 1–30.
15.
EriksonR (1984) Social class of men, women and families. Sociology18(4): 500–14.
16.
EriksonRJonssonJO (1998) Social origin as an interest-bearing asset: Family background and labour-market rewards among employees in Sweden. Acta Sociologica41(1): 19–36.
17.
ErmischJFrancesconiM (2001) Family matters: Impacts of family background on educational attainment. Economica68: 137–56.
18.
ErmischJFrancesconiMPevalinD (2004) Parental partnership and joblessness in childhood and their influence on young people’s outcomes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A)167(1): 69–101.
19.
GayleVBerridgeDDaviesR (2002) Young people’s entry into higher education: Quantifying influential factors. Oxford Review of Education28(1): 5–20.
20.
GershunyJ (2000) Social position from narrative data. In: CromptonRDevineFSavageMScottJ (eds) Renewing Class Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 43–65.
21.
GoldthorpeJH (2000) On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
GoldthorpeJHMillsC (2008) Trends in intergenerational class mobility in modern Britain: Evidence from national surveys, 1972–2005. National Institute Economic Review205(1): 83–100.
23.
IacovouM (2001) Family Composition and Children’s Educational Outcomes. ISER Working Paper 2001-12. Colchester: University of Essex.
24.
JægerMM (2008) Do large sibships really lead to lower educational attainment?Acta Sociologica51(3): 217–35.
25.
KiernanKE (1992) The impact of family disruption in childhood on transitions made in young adult life. Population Studies46(2): 213–34.
26.
KiernanK (1996) Lone motherhood, employment and outcomes for children. International Journal of Law, Policy and Family10(3): 233–49.
27.
KiernanK (1997) The Legacy of Parental Divorce: Social, Economic and Demographic Experiences in Adulthood. CASE Paper No. 1. London: LSE.
28.
KoruppSEGanzeboomHBGVan der LippeT (2002) Do mothers matter? A comparison of models of the influence of mothers’ and fathers’ educational and occupational status on children’s educational attainment. Quality and Quantity36(1): 17–42.
29.
KuhaJGoldthorpeJH (2010) Path analysis for discrete variables: The role of education in social mobility. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A)173(2): 351–69.
30.
LampardR (2007a) Is social mobility an echo of educational mobility? Parents’ educations and occupations and their children’s occupational attainment. Sociological Research Online12(5).
31.
LampardR (2007b) Family structure and family formation: Education as outcome and explanation. In: SmallwoodSWilsonB (eds) Focus on Families. London: Palgrave Macmillan/ONS, 35–54.
32.
LawsonDWMaceR (2009) Trade-offs in modern parenting: A longitudinal study of sibling competition for parental care. Evolution and Human Behavior30(3): 170–83.
33.
McKayS (2010) Where do we stand on inequality? Reflections on recent research and its implications. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice18(1): 19–33.
34.
MarksGN (2009) Modernization theory and changes over time in the reproduction of socioeconomic inequalities in Australia. Social Forces88(2): 917–44.
35.
Ní BhrolcháinMChappellRDiamondIJamesonC (2000) Parental divorce and outcomes for children: Evidence and interpretation. European Sociological Review16(1): 67–91.
36.
ONS (2005) The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification: User Manual. London: Palgrave.
37.
ONS (2007a) General Household Survey: Results for 2005. London: TSO.
38.
ONS (2007b) General Household Survey 2005 [SN:5640, computer file], 2nd edn (November). Colchester: UK Data Archive [distributor].
39.
RoseDPevalinDO’ReillyK (2005) The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification: Origins, Development and Use. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
40.
SavageMWardeADevineF (2005) Capitals, assets, and resources: Some critical issues. British Journal of Sociology56(1): 31–47.
41.
SchoonI (2008) A transgenerational model of status attainment: The potential mediating role of school motivation and education. National Institute Economic Review205(1): 72–82.
42.
ScottJ (2004) Family, gender and educational attainment in Britain: A longitudinal study. Journal of Comparative Family Studies35(4): 565–89.
43.
Van EijckKDe GraafPM (1995) The effects of family structure on the educational attainment of siblings in Hungary. European Sociological Review11(3): 273–92.
