Social network data from class-based interviews of N = 257 10-year-old students in N = 4382 directed dyads show that the propensity for being friends is moderately affected by ethnic heterogeneity. However, the likelihood of acquaintanceship among children’s parents is strongly reduced in ethnically heterogeneous dyads. This has been referred to as ‘intergenerational openness’ of networks in the work of J.S. Coleman. It will be shown that intergenerational openness has a strong negative association with mutual invitations to birthday parties, which are assumed to play an important role in the process of cross-generational social integration. Accordingly, intergenerational openness indicates a ‘gap in social integration’ between generations and corresponds negatively with the social integration of immigrant children.
AlbaR (2008) Why we still need a theory of mainstream assimilation. In: KalterF (ed.) Migration und Integration. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 48. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 37–56.
2.
BorgattiSPCarleyKMKrackhardtD (2006) On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks28(2): 124–36.
3.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, 241–58.
4.
ClarkeAJ (2007) Consuming children and making mothers: birthday parties, gifts and the pursuit of sameness. Horizontes Antropológicos13(28): 263–87.
5.
ColemanJS (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
CrouchBWassermanS (1997) A Practical Guide to Fitting p* Social Network Models via Logistic Regression. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
7.
EsserH (2004) Does the ‘new’ immigration require a ‘new’ theory of intergenerational integration?International Migration Review38(3): 1126–59.
8.
GordonMM (1964) Assimilation in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
HaugS (2003) Interethnische Freundschaftsbeziehungen und soziale Integration. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie55(4): 716–36.
10.
JencksCMayerE (1990) The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighbourhood. In: LynnLEJrMcGearyMGH (eds) Inner-city Poverty in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 111–86.
11.
JoynerKKaoG (2000) School racial composition and adolescent racial homophily. Social Science Quarterly81(3): 810–25.
12.
LeventhalTBrooks-GunnJ (2000) The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin126(2): 309–37.
13.
LubbersMSnijdersTAB (2007) A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph models: a reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Social Networks29(4): 489–507.
14.
McPhersonJMSmith-LowinLCookJM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology27(1): 415–44.
15.
MartinovicBVan TubergenFMaasI (2008) Dynamics of interethnic contact: a panel study of immigrants in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review25(3): 303–18.
16.
MaussM (1990) Die Gabe. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
17.
MouwTEntwisleB (2006) Residential segregation and interracial friendship in schools. American Journal of Sociology112(2): 394–441.
18.
NealJW (2008) ‘Kracking’ the missing data problem: applying Krackhardt’s cognitive social structures to school-based social networks. Sociology of Education81(2): 140–62.
19.
PongS-LHaoL (2007) Neighborhood and school factors in the school performance of immigrants’ children. International Migration Review41(1): 206–41.
20.
QuillianLCampbellME (2003) Beyond black and white: the present and future multiracial friendship segregation. American Sociological Review68(4): 540–66.
21.
RobinsGPattisonPKalishYLusherD (2007) An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks29(2): 173–91.
22.
SeibertHSolgaH (2005) Gleiche Chancen dank einer abgeschlossenen Ausbildung? Zum Signalwert von Ausbildungsabschlüssen bei ausländischen und deutschen jungen Erwachsenen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie34(5): 364–82.
SnijdersTPattisonPRobinsGLHandcockMS (2006) New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology36(1): 99–153.
25.
VermeijLVan DuijnMAJBaerveldtC (2009) Ethnic segregation in context: social discrimination among native Dutch pupils and their ethnic minority classmates. Social Networks31(4): 230–9.
26.
WilsonWJ (1987) The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
ZhouM (1997) Segmented assimilation: issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation. International Migration Review31(4): 975–1008.
