Cross-national trends in paid and unpaid work time over the last 40 years reveal a slow and incomplete convergence of women’s and men’s work patterns. A simplistic extrapolation would indicate a 70—80 year process of gender convergence, with the year 2010 representing an approximate mid-point. However, in conformity with the expectations of gender theory, time use data show that gender segregation in domestic work is quite persistent over time. Women still do the bulk of routine housework and caring for family members while men have increased their contributions disproportionately to non-routine domestic work, suggesting that gender ideologies and the associated ‘doing’ of gender in interaction remain important features of the division of domestic labour. The effects of institutional barriers are also apparent, with differential changes in women’s proportional contribution to routine housework and caring activities related to different national policy clusters.
Bittman M. ( 1995) Recent Changes in Unpaid Work. Occasional Paper No. 4154. Australian Bureau of Statistics.
2.
Bittman M. and Wajcman J. ( 2000) The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces79(1): 165-89.
3.
Cotter DA, Hermsen JM and Vanneman R. ( 2005) Gender inequality in work. In: Cotter DA, Hermsen JM and Vanneman RThe American People. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 107-37.
4.
Esping-Andersen G. ( 1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
5.
Esping-Andersen G. ( 1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
Deutsch FM ( 2007) Undoing gender. Gender and Society21(1): 106-27.
7.
Ferrera M. ( 1996) The ‘southern’ model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy6: 17-37.
8.
Fraser N. ( 1994) After the family wage: Gender equality and the welfare state. Political Theory22(4): 591-618.
9.
Gauthier AH ( 1996) The State and the Family: A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialized Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Gershuny J. ( 1983) Social Innovation and the Division of Labour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Gershuny J. ( 2000) Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
12.
Gershuny J. ( 2004) Domestic equipment does not increase domestic work: A response to Bittman, Rice and Wajcman. British Journal of Sociology55: 425-31.
13.
Gershuny J. and Sullivan O. ( 2003) Time use, gender, and public policy regimes. Social Politics10: 205-28.
14.
Goodin RE, Headey B., Muffels R. and Driven H. ( 1999) The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Gornick JC and Meyers MK ( 2004) Welfare regimes in relation to paid work and care. In: Giele JZ and Holst E (eds) Changing Life Patterns in Western Industrial Societies . Netherlands: Elsevier Science Press, 45-67.
16.
Gornick JC, Meyers MK and Ross KE ( 1997) Supporting the employment of mothers: Policy variation across fourteen welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy7(1): 45-70.
17.
Hobson B. ( 1990) No exit, no voice: Women’s economic dependency and the welfare state. Acta Sociologica33(3): 235-50.
18.
Hook JL ( 2006) Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965-2003. American Sociological Review71(4): 639-60.
19.
Kan MY and Gershuny J. ( 2009) Gender and time use over the life-course. In: Brynin M and Ermisch J (eds) Changing Relationships. New York: Routledge.
20.
Kan MY and Gershuny J. ( 2010) Gender segregation and bargaining in domestic labour: Evidence from longitudinal time use data. In: Crompton R, Scott J and Lyonnette C (eds) Gender Inequalities in the 21st Century. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
21.
Kan MY and Lesnard L. ( 2009) Comparing working week schedules in France 1998-99 and UK 2000-01. Paper presented at the 31st International Association for Time-use Research Conference, 23-25 September, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany.
22.
Kan MY, Sullivan O. and Gershuny J. ( 2011 forthcoming) Gender Convergence in Domestic Work: Discerning the Effects of Interactional and Institutional Barriers from Large-Scale Data . Sociology Working Paper 2011. London, Oxford: Department of Sociology, University of Oxford .
23.
Lewis J. ( 1992) Gender and the development of welfare regime. Journal of European Social Policy2(3): 159-73.
24.
Lewis J. ( 1993) Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family and the State. Aldershot: Edward Elgar .
25.
O’Brien M., Brandth B. and Kvande E. ( 2007) Fathers, work and family life: Global perspectives and new insights. Community, Work & Family10(4): 375-86.
26.
O’Connor JS, Orloff AS and Shaver S. ( 1999) States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Pfau-Effinger B. ( 2004) Development of Culture, Welfare States and Women’s Employment in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
28.
Risman B. ( 2004) Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism . Gender & Society18(4): 429-50.
29.
Robinson JP and Godbey G. ( 1997) Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use their Time. Pennsylvania, PA: Pennsylvania States University Press.
30.
Sainsbury D. ( 1999) Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Sullivan O. ( 1997) Time waits for no (wo)man: An investigation of the gendered experience of domestic time. Sociology31(2): 221-39.
32.
Sullivan O. ( 2000) The division of domestic labour: Twenty years of change ? Sociology34(3): 437-56.
33.
Sullivan O. ( 2006) Changing Gender Relations, Changing Families: Tracing the Pace of Change. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
34.
Sullivan O., Coltrane S., McAnnally L. and Altintas E. ( 2009) Father-friendly policies and time use data in a cross-national context: Potential and prospects for future research. Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Science624(July): 234-54.
