The tech industry profoundly impacts our lives and has gained great economic and political influence. Yet, we know little about the people inside tech firms, whose actions and decisions shape technological progress and its impact on society. What is of particular relevance is their opinions and beliefs about the proper order of society and the societal role of tech firms – that is to say, their political ideologies. The few existing studies on this topic mainly concentrate on tech leaders. Our study shifts attention to the workers who develop the technology. Numerous works highlight their influence on the affordances of technology and decisions taken by their firms. Our quantitative analysis of campaign contributions shows that American tech workers exhibit a unique combination of left-wing (liberal) and anti-establishment attitudes. Moreover, we expose a substantial ideological divide between tech workers and their leaders. We discuss these findings in relation to the development of new technologies, employee activism, and tech workers as a distinct class fraction.
AbramsS. J.FiorinaM. P. (2012). ‘The big sort’ that wasn’t: A skeptical reexamination. PS: Political Science and Politics, 45(2), 203–210.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books.
3.
AltemeyerB. (1983). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
4.
AlvarezR. M.KatzJ. N.KimS. S. (2020). Hidden donors: The censoring problem in US federal campaign finance data. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 19(1), 1–18.
5.
AmiraK.JohnsonL.McCrayD.RagusaJ. (2019). Adversaries or allies? Donald Trump’s Republican support in Congress. Perspectives on Politics, 17(3), 756–771. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719001063
6.
AnsolabehereS.FigueiredoJ. M. D.SnyderJ. M. (2003). Why is there so little money in politics? (NBER Working Paper No. 9409). National Bureau of Economic Research. www.nber.org/papers/w9409
Bergvall-KårebornB.HowcroftD. (2013). ‘The future’s bright, the future’s mobile’: A study of Apple and Google mobile application developers. Work, Employment and Society, 27(6), 964–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017012474709
10.
BonicaA. (2014). Mapping the ideological marketplace. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12062
11.
BorsookP. (2001). Cyberselfish: A critical romp through the terribly libertarian culture of high tech. Public Affairs.
BroockmanD. E.FerensteinG.MalhotraN. (2019). Predispositions and the political behavior of American economic elites: Evidence from technology entrepreneurs. American Journal of Political Science, 63(1), 212–233.
16.
BurrisV. (2001). The two faces of capital: Corporations and individual capitalists as political actors. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 361–381.
CarpenterM. A.GeletkanyczM. A.SandersW. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778.
19.
CarrollR.LewisJ. B.LoJ.PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (2009). Measuring bias and uncertainty in DW-NOMINATE ideal point estimates via the parametric bootstrap. Political Analysis, 17(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpp005
20.
CarseyT. M.LaymanG. C. (2006). Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 464–477.
21.
ChinM. K.HambrickD. C.TreviñoL. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197–232.
22.
ChinM. K.SemadeniM. (2016). CEO political ideologies and pay egalitarianism within top management teams. Strategic Management Journal, 38(8), 1608–1625. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2608
23.
ChristensenR. K.WrightB. E. (2011). The effects of public service motivation on job choice decisions: Disentangling the contributions of person-organization fit and person-job fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 723–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq085
24.
CoeckelberghM. (2020). Artificial intelligence, responsibility attribution, and a relational justification of explainability. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2051–2068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00146-8
CulpepperP. D.ThelenK. (2020). Are we all Amazon primed? Consumers and the politics of platform power. Comparative Political Studies, 53(2), 288–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019852687
27.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall.
28.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
29.
DorschelR. (2021). Discovering needs for digital capitalism: The hybrid profession of data science. Big Data & Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211040760
30.
DorschelR. (2022a). Reconsidering digital labour: Bringing tech workers into the debate. New Technology, Work and Employment, 37(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12225
31.
DorschelR. (2022b). A new middle-class fraction with a distinct subjectivity: Tech workers and the transformation of the entrepreneurial self. The Sociological Review, 70(6), 1302–1320. https://doi.org/10.1177/00258172221103015
32.
DowningJ. D. H. (2000). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. Sage.
33.
DruckmanJ. N.KiferM. J.ParkinM. (2020). Campaign rhetoric and the incumbency advantage. American Politics Research, 48(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X18822314
34.
DuffA. S. (2016). Rating the revolution: Silicon Valley in normative perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 19(11), 1605–1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1142594
35.
English-LueckJ. A. (2011). Prototyping self in Silicon Valley: Deep diversity as a framework for anthropological inquiry. Anthropological Theory, 11(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499610397115
36.
EnsmengerN. L. (2012). The computer boys take over: Computers, programmers, and the politics of technical expertise (AsprayW., Ed.). The MIT Press.
37.
ErgenT.RademacherI. (2021). The Silicon Valley imaginary: US corporate tax reform in the 1980s. Socio-Economic Review, mwab051. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab051
38.
EriksonR. S.TedinK. L. (2015). American public opinion: Its origins, content and impact (9th ed.). Routledge.
39.
FarredG. (2000). Endgame identity? Mapping the New Left roots of identity politics. New Literary History, 31(4), 627–648.
GarmanA. N.LeachD. C.SpectorN. (2006). Worldviews in collision: Conflict and collaboration across professional lines. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 829–849. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.394
GosseV. (2005). Rethinking the New Left: An interpretative history. Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
GrayM. L.SuriS. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
50.
GuptaA.BriscoeF. (2020). Organizational political ideology and corporate openness to social activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(2), 524–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219852954
51.
GuptaA.BriscoeF.HambrickD. C. (2017). Red, blue, and purple firms: Organizational political ideology and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 38(5), 1018–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2550
HashemiM. (2019). Bedouins of Silicon Valley: A neo-Khaldunian approach to sociology of technology. The Sociological Review, 67(3), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118822823
54.
HavemanH. A. (1993). Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593–627.
HinichM. J.ShawD. R.HuangT. (2010). Insiders, outsiders, and voters in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 40(2), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2010.03754.x
57.
HuckfeldtR. R. (1979). Political participation and the neighborhood social context. American Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111030
58.
InglehartR.NorrisP.RonaldI. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.
59.
IraniL. (2019). Chasing innovation. Princeton University Press.
60.
IsaacsonW. (2011). Steve Jobs: The exclusive biography (1st ed.). Simon & Schuster.
61.
JohnsonL. R.McCrayD.RagusaJ. M. (2018). #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party’s nominee in the 2016 presidential election. Research & Politics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017749383
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.
64.
KenneyM.BearsonD.ZysmanJ. (2021). The platform economy matures: Measuring pervasiveness and exploring power. Socio-Economic Review, 19(4), 1451–1483. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab014
65.
KitscheltH.RehmP. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47(12), 1670–1706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013516066
66.
KlatchR. E. (1999). A generation divided: The New Left, the New Right, and the 1960s. University of California Press.
67.
LazarsfeldP. F.BerelsonB.GaudetH. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.
68.
LeeD. J. (2014). Third-party threat and the dimensionality of major-party roll call voting. Public Choice, 159(3/4), 515–531.
LindblomC. E. (1977). Politics and markets: The world’s political economic systems. Basic Books.
72.
LitmanJ. A. (2010). Relationships between measures of I- and D-type curiosity, ambiguity tolerance, and need for closure: An initial test of the wanting-liking model of information-seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.005
73.
LiuW. (2020). Abolish Silicon Valley: How to liberate technology from capitalism. Repeater.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A. (1958). Organizations. Wiley.
76.
MarkoffJ. (2005). What the dormouse said: How the sixties counterculture shaped the personal computer industry. Penguin.
77.
McAndrewS.O’BrienD.TaylorM. (2020). The values of culture? Social closure in the political identities, policy preferences, and social attitudes of cultural and creative workers. The Sociological Review, 68(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119871401
78.
McCartyN.PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT University Press.
79.
MeiksinsP. F.WatsonJ. M. (1989). Professional autonomy and organizational constraint: The case of engineers. The Sociological Quarterly, 30(4), 561–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1989.tb01535.x
80.
MichaelsE.Handfield-JonesH.AxelrodB. (2001). The war for talent. Harvard Business Press.
81.
MooreM.TambiniD. (Eds.). (2018). Digital dominance: The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Oxford University Press.
82.
MorozovE. (2014). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism (reprint ed.). PublicAffairs.
83.
MorozovE. (2019). Digital socialism?New Left Review, 116/117, 33–67.
84.
NemkovaE.DemirelP.BainesL. (2019). In search of meaningful work on digital freelancing platforms: The case of design professionals. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12148
NoelH. (2016). Ideological factions in the Republican and Democratic parties. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 166–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662433
87.
NokkenT. P.PooleK. T. (2004). Congressional party defection in American history. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29(4), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298004X201294
88.
O’BrienD.IanniL. (2023). New forms of distinction: How contemporary cultural elites understand ‘good’ taste. The Sociological Review, 71(1), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221128144
PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (1985). A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 357–384.
93.
PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. Oxford University Press.
94.
PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (2007). Ideology and congress: A political economic history of roll call voting (2nd ed.). Routledge.
95.
RahmanK. S. (2018). The new utilities: Private power, social infrastructure, and the revival of the public utility concept. Cardozo Law Review, 39(5), 1621–1692.
RosenbergD. (2002). Cloning Silicon Valley: The next generation high-tech hotspots. Pearson Education.
100.
RubinsteinG. (1997). Authoritarianism, political ideology, and religiosity among students of different faculties. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(5), 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595478
RyanM.StahlB. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: Clarifying their content and normative implications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 19(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-12-2019-0138
104.
SchwabK. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business.
105.
SeidlT. (2022). The politics of platform capitalism: A case study on the regulation of Uber in New York. Regulation & Governance, 16(2), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12353
StoneB. (2013). The everything store: Jeff Bezos and the age of Amazon. Random House.
108.
StubagerR. (2008). Education effects on authoritarian–libertarian values: A question of socialization. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00196.x
109.
SwigartK. L.AnantharamanA.WilliamsonJ. A.GrandeyA. A. (2020). Working while liberal/conservative: A review of political ideology in organizations. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1063–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320909419
TurnerF. (2006). From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth network, and the rise of digital utopianism. The University of Chicago Press.
113.
TwineF. W. (2022). Geek girls: Inequality and opportunity in Silicon Valley. NYU Press.
114.
VanceA. (2015). Elon Musk: How the billionaire CEO of SpaceX and Tesla is shaping our future. Random House.
115.
WeakliemD. L. (2002). The effects of education on political opinions: An international study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(2), 141–157.
116.
WeaverJ. A. (2021). Electoral dis-connection: The limits of reelection in contexts of weak accountability. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1462–1477. https://doi.org/10.1086/711901
117.
WebbM. (2020). Coding democracy: How hackers are disrupting power, surveillance, and authoritarianism. MIT Press.
118.
WeilF. D. (1985). The variable effects of education on liberal attitudes: A comparative-historical analysis of anti-Semitism using public opinion survey data. American Sociological Review, 50(4), 458–474.
119.
WhittakerD. H. (2009). Comparative entrepreneurship: The UK, Japan, and the shadow of Silicon Valley. Oxford University Press.
WrightC.NybergD.GrantD. (2012). ‘Hippies on the third floor’: Climate change, narrative identity and the micro-politics of corporate environmentalism. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1451–1475.
123.
WrightE. O. (1997). Classes. Verso Books.
124.
YingerM. (1982). Countercultures: The promise and peril of a world turned upside down. Free Press.
125.
YoshinakaA.GroseC. R. (2011). Ideological hedging in uncertain times: Inconsistent legislative representation and voter enfranchisement. British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 765–794. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341100010X
