Cryptocurrencies have fuelled an ideological bifurcation between utopian imaginaries of borderless individual economic sovereignty and egalitarianism among libertarian sympathizers since Hayek and more recent dystopian admonitions against financial disruption and inequality by state actors. Providing a state-of-the-art sociological account of this debate, this article conducts the first empirical study on the links between cryptocurrency adoption, individual economic sovereignty and wealth inequality using a novel 2020 cross-societal database of the population-level adoption of the six largest cryptocurrencies. Analyses show that cryptocurrency adoption neither ameliorates nor worsens wealth inequality, but that the geographical expansion of cryptocurrencies is dependent on the very political economic conditions and state permissions that their libertarian enthusiasts spurn. This article concludes by invigorating a programmatic call and agenda for the empirical, sociological study of cryptocurrencies and the methodological designs required to sustain it.
ArvidssonA. (2020). Capitalism and the commons. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(2), 3–30.
2.
BandeljN.GrigoryevaA. (2021). Investment, saving, and borrowing for children: Trends by wealth, race, and ethnicity, 1998–2016. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 7(3), 50–77.
3.
BauwensM.KostakisV. (2014). From the communism of capital to capital for the commons: Towards an open co-operativism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 12(1), 356–361.
4.
BergerE. (2018). Waveforms: Art and the revolutionary transformation in the age of blockchain. ŠUM, Journal for Contemporary Art Criticism and Theory, 10(2), Article 3.
5.
BesleyT.PerssonT. (2009). The origins of state capacity: Property rights, taxation, and politics. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1218–1244.
DavidsonJ.Rees-MoggW. (1999). The sovereign individual: Mastering the transition to the information age. Simon & Schuster.
11.
DavidsonL.BlockW. (2015). Bitcoin, the Regression Theorem, and the emergence of a new medium of exchange. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 18(3), 311–338.
DavisG. (2009). Managed by the markets. Oxford University Press.
14.
De GoedeM. (2012). Speculative security: The politics of pursuing terrorist monies. University of Minnesota Press.
15.
DekaM. (2018). Embodied commons: Knowledge and sharing in Delhi’s electronic bazaars. The Sociological Review, 66(2), 365–380.
16.
DeutschmannC. (2011). Limits to financialization: Sociological analyses of the financial crisis. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 52(3), 347–389.
17.
DoddN. (2018). The social life of Bitcoin. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(3), 35–56.
18.
DionM.BirchfieldV. (2010). Economic development, income inequality, and preferences for redistribution. International Studies Quarterly, 54(2), 315–334.
19.
DondersA.Van Der HeijdenG.StijnenT.MoonsK. (2006). A gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(10), 1087–1091.
20.
DorseyJ. (2021, July21). The B word seminar: How institutions can embrace Bitcoin [Registration only event].
21.
DwyerR. (2018). Credit, debt, and inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 237–261.
HanleyS.SikkA. (2016). Economy, corruption or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of anti-establishment reform parties in eastern Europe. Party Politics, 22(4), 522–533.
30.
HayekF. (1976). Denationalisation of money. Institute of Economics Affairs.
31.
HayesA. (2019). The socio-technological lives of bitcoin. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(4), 49–72.
32.
HowardD. (1977). Denationalization of money: A review. Journal of Monetary Economics, 102, 1–8.
LermanR.YitzhakiS. (1984). A note on the calculation and interpretation of the Gini index. Economics Letters, 15(3–4), 363–368.
36.
LiuY.TsyvinskiA. (2021). Risks and returns of cryptocurrency. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(6), 2689–2727.
37.
LynchC. (2017). ‘Vote with your feet’: Neoliberalism, the democratic nation-state, and utopian enclave libertarianism. Political Geography, 59, 82–91.
38.
MakarovI.SchoarA. (2020). Trading and arbitrage in cryptocurrency markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 135(2), 293–319.
39.
MarxK. (1867). Capital: Volume I. Verlag von Otto Meisner.
40.
MaurerB.NelmsT.SwartzL. (2013). ‘When perhaps the real problem is money itself!’: The practical materiality of Bitcoin. Social Semiotics, 23(2), 261–277.
41.
McCallL.PercheskiC. (2010). Income inequality: New trends and research directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 329–347.
42.
MengerK. (1892). On the origin of money. The Economic Journal, 2(6), 239–255.
PikettyT.SaezE. (2006). The evolution of top incomes: A historical and international perspective. American Economic Review, 96(2), 200–205
45.
RothF. (2009). The effect of the financial crisis on systemic trust. Intereconomics, 44(4), 203–208.
46.
RozasD.Tenorio-FornésA.Díaz-MolinaS.HassanS. (2021). When ostrom meets blockchain: Exploring the potentials of blockchain for commons governance. SAGE Open, 11(1), 1–14.
ShanaevS.SharmaS.GhimireB.ShuraevaA. (2020). Taming the blockchain beast? Regulatory implications for the cryptocurrency market. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, Article 101080.
49.
SwanM. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media.
50.
Van der CruijsenC.de HaanJ.JansenD. J. (2016). Trust and financial crisis experiences. Social Indicators Research, 127(2), 577–600.
