In E-commerce, one of the most essential reasons of company failures is conveying the right content of their product to the customers at the wrong time. This could include the company inability to adapt to their environment dynamically. With the existence of special circumstances like COVID-19 pandemic, companies require launching new techs, if they are to grow and stay competitive, and since the technology and related factors have a major effect on marketing success, “Systems Dynamic” sounds like a suitable tool in this regard. This article discusses augmented reality (AR) roles in contextual marketing (CM) using a system dynamics approach. After the identification of the key variables in both augmented technology and CM fields, casual relationships are defined. Then, the mathematical functions between these variables are extracted and the behavior of each factor is analyzed. Finally, based on this behavioral model, various scenarios are simulated to demonstrate how augmented reality technology can enhance the CM.
Mejía-TrejoJ. COVID-19 ads on purchase intention of online consumer behavior as business innovation activity: a contribution to the uses and gratification theory. Electr Comm Res Appl2021; 49: 101086.
2.
SchiopuAFHornoiuRIPadureanAM, et al. Constrained and virtually traveling? Exploring the effect of travel constraints on intention to use virtual reality in tourism. Technol Soc2022; 71: 102091.
3.
HuangKTBallCFrancisJ. The perceived impacts of COVID-19 on users’ acceptance of virtual reality hardware: a digital divide perspective. Am Behavior Sci. Epub ahead of print 1March2023. DOI: 10.1177/00027642231156775.
4.
KalaignanamKTuliKRKushwahaT, et al. Marketing agility: the concept, antecedents, and a research agenda. J Market2021; 85: 35–58.
5.
FordSMiuccioMShirleyL, et al. Mobile augmented reality design evaluation. Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Ann Meet2022; 66: 1275–1279.
6.
FrechetteCDiasioSLuckettM, et al. Immersive technology as a social marketing tool: exploring the impact of 360-video & virtual reality on intent to help and attitudes toward the homeless. Soc Market Quarter2023; 29: 45–66.
7.
SinghVNanavatiBKarAK, et al. How to maximize clicks for display advertisement in digital marketing? A reinforcement learning approach. Inf Syst Front2023; 25: 1621–1638.
8.
LinHFTsaiHYYeoB. Augmented reality advertising in entertainment programming: an exploration across cultures. J Creat Commun2023; 18: 40–60.
9.
RogićSKašćelanLPejić BachM. Customer response model in direct marketing: solving the problem of unbalanced dataset with a balanced support vector machine. J Theor Appl Electr Comm Res2022; 17: 1003–1018.
10.
ScolereLMalininL. The building that teaches: exploring augmented reality affordances in academic incubators. J Int Des2023; 48: 64–79.
11.
KharatPPNagareMR. Business development—B2B and B2C ecommerce. Int J Res Publ Rev2021; 2582: 7421.
12.
LuoX. The performance implications of contextual marketing for electronic commerce. J Datab Market Cust Strat Manag2003; 10: 231–239.
13.
MallipeddiRRKumarSSriskandarajahC, et al. A framework for analyzing influencer marketing in social networks: selection and scheduling of influencers. Manag Sci2022; 68: 75–104.
14.
VanessaNJaputraA. Contextual marketing based on customer buying pattern in grocery e-commerce: the case of Bigbasket. com (India). ASEAN Market J2018; 9: 56–67.
15.
LuoXSeyedianM. Contextual marketing and customer-orientation strategy for e-commerce: an empirical analysis. Int J Electr Comm2003; 8: 95–118.
16.
AmoncarNDeaconJStephensP. Defining contextual advantage: exploring the contextual relation between effectuation and entrepreneurial marketing for creating new markets effectually. Asia Pac J Adv Bus Soc Stud2016; 2: 29–42.
17.
PingY. Contextual marketing in the mobile internet environment: a literature review and prospects. For Econom Manag2019; 41: 3–16.
18.
ColombiCKimPWyattN. Fashion retailing “tech-gagement”: engagement fueled by new technology. Res J Text App2018; 22: 390–406.
19.
FaqihKM. Factors influencing the behavioral intention to adopt a technological innovation from a developing country context: the case of mobile augmented reality games. Technol Soc2022; 69: 101958.
20.
ZiaieAShamiZanjaniMManianA. Systematic review of digital value propositions in the retail sector: new approach for digital experience study. Electr Comm Res Appl2021; 47: 101053.
21.
WangLWangZWangX, et al. Explaining consumer implementation intentions in mobile shopping with SEM and fsQCA: roles of visual and technical perceptions. Electr Comm Res Appl2021; 49: 101080.
22.
LiCYFangYH. Toward better purchase decision-performance: linking person-environment fit to explorative and exploitative use of branded applications. Electr Comm Res Appl2021; 48: 101063.
23.
PetitOVelascoCSpenceC. Digital sensory marketing: Integrating new technologies into multisensory online experience. J Int Market2019; 45: 42–61.
24.
ZumbachJvon KotzebueLPirklbauerC. Does augmented reality also augment knowledge acquisition? Augmented reality compared to reading in learning about the human digestive system?J Educat Comput Res2022; 60: 1325–1346.
25.
JohnsonK. Examination of the advantages of augmented and virtual reality in marketing content; 2022.
26.
ChylinskiMHellerJHilkenT, et al. Augmented reality marketing: a technology-enabled approach to situated customer experience. Austral Market J2020; 28: 374–384.
27.
AbrarK. Impact of augmented reality on consumer purchase intention with the mediating role of customer brand engagement: moderating role of interactivity in online shopping. Bahria Univ J Manage Technol2018; 1: 64–80.
28.
YoonSOhJ. A theory-based approach to the usability of augmented reality technology: a cost-benefit perspective. Technol Soc2022; 68: 101860.
29.
WhangJBSongJHChoiB, et al. The effect of augmented reality on purchase intention of beauty products: the roles of consumers’ control. J Bus Res2021; 133: 275–284.
30.
JavornikADuffyKRokkaJ, et al. Strategic approaches to augmented reality deployment by luxury brands. J Bus Res2021; 136: 284–292.
31.
HellerJChylinskiMde RuyterK, et al. Let me imagine that for you: transforming the retail frontline through augmenting customer mental imagery ability. J Retail2019; 95: 94–114.
32.
SungEC. The effects of augmented reality mobile app advertising: viral marketing via shared social experience. J Bus Res2021; 122: 75–87.
33.
YuanaRPrasetioEASyariefR, et al. System dynamic and simulation of business model innovation in digital companies: an open innovation approach. J Open Innov Technol Mark Compl2021; 7: 219.
34.
Milić BeranIBriš AlićMAntunicaN. System dynamic model of marketing in hotel company. DIEM Dubrovnik Int Econom Meet2017; 3: 843–854.
35.
Delgado-MacielJCortés-RoblesGSánchez-RamírezC, et al. The evaluation of conceptual design through dynamic simulation: a proposal based on TRIZ and system dynamics. Comput Ind Eng2020; 149: 106785.
36.
FatehMMKousariS. Modeling the interactive future of information technology based on the system dynamic approach. J Sci Technol Pol2013; 4: 77–91.
37.
KimKHKoEKimSJ, et al. Digital service innovation, customer engagement, and customer equity in AR marketing. J Glob Schol Market Sci2021; 31: 453–466.
38.
SilvestruCIIfrimAMOncioiuI, et al. AR & VR marketing: when and where?Proc Int Conf Bus Excel2021; 15: 664–671.
39.
AzumaRBaillotYBehringerR, et al. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comp Graph Appl2001; 21: 34–47.
40.
SminkARFrowijnSvan ReijmersdalEA, et al. Try online before you buy: How does shopping with augmented reality affect brand responses and personal data disclosure. Electr Comm Res Appl2019; 35: 100854.
41.
RauschnabelPAFelixRHinschC. Augmented reality marketing: how mobile AR-apps can improve brands through inspiration. J Retail Cons Serv2019; 49: 43–53.
42.
MassaELadhariR. Augmented reality in marketing: conceptualization and systematic review. Int J Cons Stud2023; 47: 2335–2366.
43.
RejebARejebKTreiblmaierH. How augmented reality impacts retail marketing: a state-of-the-art review from a consumer perspective. J Strateg Market2023; 31: 718–748.
44.
JayaswalPParidaB. Past, present and future of augmented reality marketing research: a bibliometric and thematic analysis approach. Euro J Market2023; 57: 2237–2289.
Von der AuSRauschnabelPAFelixR, et al. Context in augmented reality marketing: does the place of use matter?Psychol Market2023; 40: 2447–2463.
47.
LeoneDPietronudoMCDeziL. Improving business models through augmented reality applications: evidence from history, theory, and practice. Int J Qual Innov2022; 6: 28–42.
48.
Huerta-TorrucoVAHernandez-UribeOCardenas-RobledoLA, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality in discrete event simulation models for manufacturing systems. Comp Indus Eng2022; 168: 108079.
49.
Gutiérrez-BatistaKCampañaJRVilaMA, et al. Building a contextual dimension for OLAP using textual data from social networks. Exp Syst Appl2018; 93: 118–133.
50.
LiuYJiangCZhaoH. Using contextual features and multi-view ensemble learning in product defect identification from online discussion forums. Decis Supp Syst2018; 105: 1–2.
51.
JaakonmäkiRMüllerOVom BrockeJ. The impact of content, context, and creator on user engagement in social media marketing. In: Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, January 2017, vol. 50, pp. 1152–1160. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
DorokhovaLKuusikADimitrovR, et al. Planning the digital marketing budget: computer modelling for decision making. Access J2023; 4: 248–260.
54.
NalbantKGAydinS. Development and transformation in digital marketing and branding with artificial intelligence and digital technologies dynamics in the Metaverse universe. J Metaverse2023; 3: 9–18.
55.
MalbonEParkhurstJ. System dynamics modelling and the use of evidence to inform policymaking. Pol Stud2023; 44: 454–472.
56.
RiazHKhanKIUllahF, et al. Key factors for implementation of total quality management in construction Sector: a system dynamics approach. Ain Shams Eng J2023; 14: 101903.
57.
MashayekhiA. System dynamic. Tehran: Ariyana Ghalam, 2018, Chap. 5.
58.
Mousavi HaghighiMHTajikM. A new product diffusion model: a system dynamics approach. Innov Manag J2014; 3: 77–99.
59.
MartinsJMShahSSAbreuA, et al. The impact of system dynamic employee recruitment process on organizational effectiveness. Int J Innov Res Sci Stud2023; 6: 682–693.
60.
BidgoliSDOwliaMSIsaaiMT. The impact of customer knowledge on the organizational performance: a system dynamics approach. Kybernetes2023; 52: 1463–1486.
61.
LiYLiangCYeF, et al. Designing government subsidy schemes to promote the electric vehicle industry: a system dynamics model perspective. Transp Res Part A Pol Pract2023; 167: 103558.
62.
KongDYMaSJTangWC, et al. The policy effect on automobile industry considering the relationship between technology, market and production: the dual-credit policy as an example. Transp Lett2023; 15: 163–177.
63.
SteinARamaseshanB. Towards the identification of customer experience touch point elements. J Retail Consum Serv2016; 30: 8–19.
64.
HadiSRiniESSembiringBK. The influence of perception of value, brand awareness, and customer motivation on purchasing interest at Johor Summerville Residence Medan. Int J Res Rev2020; 7: 129–136.
65.
LimCKimMJKimKH, et al. Customer process management: a framework for using customer-related data to create customer value. J Serv Manage2018; 30: 105–131.
66.
LiuPHendalianpourAHafshejaniMF, et al. System dynamics model: developing model for supplier selection with a focus on CSR criteria. Compl Intell Syst2023; 9: 99–114.
67.
LaraDVPfaffenbichlerPda SilvaAN. Modeling the resilience of urban mobility when exposed to the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative system dynamics approach. Sust Cities Soc2023; 91: 104411.
68.
BakhtievaE. B2B digital marketing strategy: a framework for assessing digital touch points and increasing customer loyalty based on Austrian companies from heating, ventilation and air conditioning industry. Oeconomia Copernicana2017; 8: 463–478.
69.
Peñalba-AguirrezabalagaCSáenzJRitalaP, et al. The role of marketers’ knowledge and motivation in the generation of positive customer experience. In: European conference on knowledge management 2020, December 2020, pp. 612–XXI. Reading: Academic Conferences International Limited.
70.
AnMAHanSL. Effects of experiential motivation and customer engagement on customer value creation: analysis of psychological process in the experience-based retail environment. J Bus Res2020; 120: 389–397.
71.
RoozkhoshPPooyaAAgarwalR. Blockchain acceptance rate prediction in the resilient supply chain with hybrid system dynamics and machine learning approach. Operat Manage Res2023; 16: 705–725.
72.
KarnoppDCMargolisDLRosenbergRC. System dynamics: modeling, simulation, and control of mechatronic systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2012.
73.
CoyleRG. System dynamics modelling: a practical approach. J Oper Res Soc1997; 48: 544.
74.
Qudrat-UllahHSeongBS. How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: the case of an energy policy model. Energ Pol2010; 38: 2216–2224.
75.
ElsawahSPierceSAHamiltonSH, et al. An overview of the system dynamics process for integrated modelling of socio-ecological systems: lessons on good modelling practice from five case studies. Environ Modell Soft2017; 93: 127–145.
76.
HendrawanRAAristioAPBulialiJL, et al. Testing methods on system dynamics: a model of reliability, average reliability, and demand of service. Procedia Comp Sci2019; 161: 968–975.
77.
StermanJD. Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
78.
SmaldinoP. Modeling social behavior: mathematical and agent-based models of social dynamics and cultural evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2023.
79.
SavinICreutzigFFilatovaT, et al. Agent-based modeling to integrate elements from different disciplines for ambitious climate policy. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang2023; 14: e811.
