Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The development of tunneling equipment still lags behind, limiting rapid and accurate tunneling and restricting efficient production in coal mines. Thus, improving the reliability and design of roadheaders becomes essential. As the shovel plate is an essential part of a roadheader, improving its parameters can increase the roadheader performance. The parameter optimization of roadheader shovel plate is multi-objective optimization. Because of conventional multiobjective optimization requires strong prior knowledge, often provides low-quality results, and presents vulnerability to initialization and other shortcomings when used in practice. We propose an improved particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm that takes the minimum Euclidean distance from a base value as the evaluation criterion for global and individual extreme values. The improved algorithm enables multiobjective parallel optimization by providing a non-inferior solution set. Then, the optimal solution is searched in this set using grey decision to obtain the optimal solution. To validate the proposed method, the multiobjective optimization problem of the shovel-plate parameters is formulated for its solution. Before optimization shovel-plate most important parameters l is the width of the shovel plate $l$ = 3.2 m, $β$ is the inclination angle of the shovel plate and β = ,19°. When doing optimization, set accelerated factor $c_{1} = c_{2} = 2$ , population size N = 20, and maximum number of iterations $T_{\max}$ = 100. In addition, speed V was restricted by $V = V_{i m a x} - V_{i min}$ , and inertia factor W was dynamic and linearly decreasing, $w (t) = w_{min} + \frac{w_{max} - w_{min}}{N} (N - t)$ , with $w_{max} = 0.9$ and $w_{min} = 0.4$ . In addition, $r_{1}$ and $r_{2}$ were set randomly in [0, 1], while optimization degree η was set to 30%. And then we executed the improved PSO, obtaining 2000 non-inferior solutions. Apply grey decision to find the optimal solution. The optimal roadheader shovel-plate parameters are l = 3.144 m and β = 16.88°. Comparative analysis is made before and after optimization, the optimized parameters were substituted into the model and simulated. Obtained that the optimized parameters of shovel-plate can reduce the mass of the shovel plate decreases by 14.3%, while the propulsive resistance decreases by 6.62%, and the load capacity increases by 3.68%. Thus jointly achieving the optimization goals of reducing the propulsive resistance while increasing the load capacity. The feasibility of the proposed multiobjective optimization method with improved particle swarm optimization and grey decision is verified, and the method can provide convenient multiobjective optimization in engineering practice.

Keywords

Roadheader shovel plate improved particle swarm optimization Euclidean distance base value grey decision multiobjective optimization

Introduction

Coal accounts for more than 25% of the global primary energy consumption.¹ For example, according to the statistics of the National Energy Administration in 2018, the raw coal output in China was 3.55 billion tons,² and 90% was mined by well workers, requiring extensive tunneling. In mining, tunneling and transportation are major determinants of coal production, and the performance of tunneling machines directly affects roadway tunneling. The equipment for underground mining is being continuously improved, and the mining imbalance caused by low tunneling efficiency has become the main problem in large coal mines.³ The development of tunneling equipment still lags behind, limiting rapid and accurate tunneling and restricting efficient production in coal mines. Thus, improving the reliability and design of roadheaders becomes essential.

Many scholars have studied roadheaders. Shaffer and Stentz⁴ established a mathematical relation between the working parameters of a roadheader and the roadway section size. Li et al.⁵ studied the cutting load of a roadheader. Li⁶ and Guo et al.⁷ investigated the structure, load, and motion parameters of the roadheader cutting head. Keles⁸ studied the driving machinery for constructing a coal mine in Turkey considering the instantaneous cutting rate and specific energy consumption. Bilgin et al.⁹ studied geological and geotechnical factors affecting the performance of a roadheader in an inclined tunnel. Most studies have been focused on the load and specific energy consumption of the cutting head of roadheaders. On the other hand, the shovel plate is another main working component of a roadheader, and its working efficiency and life directly affect the roadheader working performance. Thus, improving the shovel plate can increase the roadheader performance.¹⁰ Nevertheless, scarce studies are available on shovel-plate improvement.

Determining the best roadheader shovel-plate parameters is a multiobjective optimization problem. As such problems are common in engineering practice, their solution is of great scientific and practical significance. Conventional multiobjective optimization methods include constraint methods, weighted combination methods, and goal programming.¹¹ These methods transform multiple objective functions into a single objective by linear aggregation, and the resulting single-objective function is optimized. Nevertheless, these methods require prior knowledge and are problem-specific, often failing to achieve satisfactory results.^12,13 Alternatively, particle swarm optimization (PSO) is an easy-tom-implement intuitive algorithm, and it has been successfully applied to various optimization problems.^14,15 However, PSO can only find one optimal solution for an optimization problem, failing to handle multiobjective optimization.¹⁶ To address this limitation, improved PSO algorithms have been devised.^17–19 Moore and Venayagamoorthy²⁰ proposed a quantum PSO for combinational logic circuits. Mikki and Kishk²¹ proposed a quantum PSO algorithm for optimizing electromagnetism problems. Leu and Yeh²² proposed two grey automation strategies for PSO. Cheng et al.²³ proposed structural reliability optimization based on chaos PSO to optimize the design of frame structures. Zhang et al.²⁴ proposed a PSO algorithm based on the mixture of priority and simulated annealing sampling to handle the problem of hybrid assembly lines. Wei et al.²⁵ improved PSO based on a globally optimal leading-particle-selection strategy with individual disturbance for rolling schedule optimization of a five-stand tandem cold mill. Table 1 summarizes various PSO methods and their characteristic. References 17∼25 all change the search strategy or particle activity to change the PSO, but this paper changes the evaluation criteria.

Table 1.

Various PSO methods and their characteristic.

PSO methods	Characteristic(advantages or disadvantages)	Ref.
Traditional PSO	Can only find one optimal solution for an optimization problem, failing to handle multiobjective optimization	Qian¹⁶
DEA PSO	Differential Evolution Algorithm and PSO algorithms for discrete lot streaming with equal sub lots	Marimuthu and Sait¹⁷
Improved quantum-behaved PSO	Employs a one-step K-means operator to effectively accelerate the convergence speed of the algorithm	Sun et al.¹⁸
Hybrid PSO	Multiple phase neighborhood search–greedy randomized adaptive search procedure	Marinakis et al.¹⁹
Quantum PSO	Permits all particles to have a quantum behavior instead of the classical Newtonian dynamics	Moore and Venayagamoorthy²⁰ and Mikki and Kishk²¹
Grey PSO	Each particle has its own inertia weight and acceleration coefficients whose values are dependent upon the corresponding grey relational grade	Leu and Yeh²²
Chaos PSO	Dynamically contracted search fields	Cheng²³
Hybrid PSO	Probabilistic jumping property of simulated annealing algorithm is adopted	Zhang²⁴
Select PSO	Disturbance vector strategy was proposed for selecting global best	Wei et al.²⁵
Improved PSO(this paper)	Takes the minimum Euclidean distance from a base value as the evaluation criterion for global and individual extreme values	This paper

We propose it innovatively that an improved PSO algorithm based on the minimum Euclidean distance from a base value. The proposed algorithm provides the non-inferior solution set for multiobjective parallel optimization, and the optimal solution is searched in the set through grey decision. Multi-objective optimization is realized by combining two steps. It is only necessary to obtain the non-inferior solution by using improved PSO algorithm, rather than the current pursuit of obtaining the optimal solution by using PSO algorithm. In order to verify the validity of the above two-step optimization method (obtaining non-inferior and then grey decision), we apply this method to the multiobjective optimization of roadheader shovel-plate parameters, aiming to improve the load capacity and reduce the propulsive resistance. We analyze the roadheader performance before and after optimization, demonstrating the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method for multiobjective optimization. After multiobjective optimization combining the improved PSO algorithm and grey decision, the mass of the shovel plate decreases by 14.3%, while the propulsive resistance decreases by 6.62%, and the load capacity increases by 3.68%.

Multiobjective optimization model of roadheader shovel-plate parameters

Roadheader structure and operation

A roadheader consists of cutting, transportation, and displacement components as well as a fuselage, shovel plate, rear support, and other components, as shown in Figure 1. The cutting head rotates to cut through coal and rock, and the extracted material falls in front of the shovel plate driven by the displacement component. The shovel plate collects the coal and rock pile and moves the material to a transport component located inside the fuselage. The transportation component moves the collected material to the back of the fuselage.

Figure 1.

Roadheader structure. 1) cutting head, 2) transportation component, 3) fuselage, 4) shovel plate, 5) displacement component, 6) rear support.

The shovel plate is an essential working part of the roadheader and considerably affects the roadheader performance, which can be increased by optimizing the shovel-plate parameters.¹⁶ The cylinder lifts and lowers the shovel plate to adjust the angle of material loading and support the fuselage. Thus, the shovel-plate parameters should be properly designed to increase the roadheader performance.

Multiobjective optimization model

Considering the amount of material that can enter the chute of the first transport plane and the diagram of the shovel plate shown in Figure 2 and which the accumulation of coal and rock on the shovel surface. The load capacity can be obtained as follows:

Q = \frac{π D n}{2} (B + 2 D + 2 l_{x i} - l) (2 h + \frac{D}{4} \tan β) K_{z}

(1)

where Q is the load capacity in cubic meters per minute (m³/min), D is the outer diameter of the star wheel in meters (m), n is the star wheel speed in revolutions per minute (r/min), B is conveyor trough width in meters (m),

l_{x i}

is the gap between the outer edge of the wheel claw and the shovel plate in meters (m), l is the width of the shovel plate in meters (m), H is the height of the wheel claw in meters (m), β is the inclination angle of the shovel plate in degrees (°), and

K_{z} = 0.25 - 1.00

is the loading coefficient.

Figure 2.

Schematic diagram of shovel plate showing.

Consider the shovel plate pushing material, the compression, fracture, and shear resistance of coal and rock, and the migration resistance along the shovel surface. The schematic diagram for calculating the propulsive resistance is shown in Figure 3. Using material mechanics, ground mechanics, and related principles, the calculation of the propulsive resistance can be expressed as

\begin{aligned} F_{t} = & 0.001 [l_{0} δ_{0} σ_{n} + μ W_{t} \cos^{2} (β + α) + W_{t} \sin (β + α) \cos (β + α) \\ + \frac{l h_{c} τ^{2}}{G} + \frac{l δ_{0} σ_{e}^{2}}{E} + μ ρ k_{c} l A_{c} \cos^{2} (β + α)] \end{aligned}

(2)

where

F_{t}

is the propulsive resistance in kilonewtons (kN),

δ_{0}

is the front-end thickness of the shovel plate in meters (m),

l_{0}

is the cutting length of the front end of the shovel plate in meters (m),

σ_{n}

is the equivalent compressive resistance of interaction between the shovel plate and extracted material in megapascals (MPa),

W_{t}

is the weight of material on the shovel surface in newtons (N),

μ

is the friction coefficient between the collected material and shovel surface,

h_{c}

is the insertion depth of the shovel loading material in meters (m),

τ

is the shear stress of the materials in megapascals (MPa), G is the shear modulus of the material (mainly coal and rock),

E

is the bending modulus of the material,

k_{c}

is the migration length coefficient of the material,

σ_{e}

is the bending stress of the material in megapascals (MPa),

ρ

is the density of the material in kilograms per cube meter (kg/m³),

α

is the inclination angle of shovel-plate hinge with respect to the ground in degrees (°), and

A_{c}

is the sectional area of the material in square meters (m²).

Figure 3.

Schematic diagram for propulsive resistance calculation.

Considering the working characteristics and conditions and the structural characteristics of the shovel plate and the requirements of displacement are shown in Figure 4, shovel-plate structure, and drive motor installation size, the constraints of the shovel-plate parameters can be expressed as

{\begin{matrix} L_{0} \leq l \leq L \\ l - 2 D - 2 l_{x i} > 0 \\ l_{z} \tan β \geq l_{q} \\ \tan (β + \arctan \frac{l_{x}}{l_{2}}) \leq μ \end{matrix}

(3)

where

L_{0}

is the lateral width of the track along the displacement direction in meters (m), L is the maximum width for cutting in meters (m),

l_{z}

is the distance between the center line of the star wheel drive and the front end of the shovel plate in meters (m),

l_{q}

is the thickness of the star wheel drive in meters (m),

l_{x}

is the maximum undercover amount of the shovel plate in meters (m), and

l_{2}

is the length of the shovel plate in meters (m).

Figure 4.

Schematic diagram of shovel plate requirements of displacement.

Under the constraints above, we aim to increase the load capacity and reduce the propulsive resistance to optimize the roadheader shovel-plate parameters. In this study, we considered the EBZ230 roadheader, whose basic parameters are B = 0.62 m, D = 1.52 m, and n = 33 r/min. Refer to literature²⁶ to determine the values of other parameters in Equations (1)∼(3). And then the loading capacity is minimized. The resulting multiobjective optimization model is given by

{\begin{matrix} \min (- Q) = - \frac{π D n}{2} (B + 2 D + 2 l_{x i} - l) (2 h + \frac{D}{4} \tan β) K_{z} \\ \min F_{t} = 0.001 (l_{0} δ_{0} σ_{n} + μ W_{t} \cos^{2} (β + α) \\ + W_{t} \sin (β + α) \cos (β + α) \\ + \frac{l h_{c} τ^{2}}{G} + \frac{l δ_{0} σ_{e}^{2}}{E} + μ ρ k_{c} l A_{c} \cos^{2} (β + α)) \\ 3.14 < l < 6.3 \\ 14.5 < β < 19.32 \end{matrix}

(4)

Multiobjective optimization based on improved PSO and grey decision

Improved PSO algorithm with minimum Euclidean distance from base value

We propose an improved PSO algorithm for multiobjective optimization problems. For the optimization degree of the objective function and the original value of each objective function, which can be obtained from the parameter values before optimization, the minimum Euclidean distance between the population and base value is the evaluation criterion of global and individual extrema. The improved PSO allows to perform simultaneous optimization for multiple objective functions by providing a non-inferior solution set.

The improved PSO algorithm proceeds as follows, is shown in Figure 5:

Initialize the particle swarm. Given population size N, randomly generate position X of the initial particle, its velocity V, accelerated factors $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$ , inertia factor W, maximum number of iterations $T_{\max}$ , optimization degree $η_{i}$ ( $0 < η_{i} > 1$ ) of each objective function, base value $f_{i 0} (x)$ of each objective function, and number n of objective functions.

Formulate the objective functions for minimization. Transform the objective function for maximization into a minimization function by adding a negative sign. Keep the objective function for minimization unchanged.

Calculate fitness value. Substitute position X of the particle into each objective function $f_{i} (x)$ and calculate fitness value $f i t_{i} (x)$ of the particle under each objective function.

Iterative optimization.

While $f i t_{i} (x) > η_{i} f_{i 0} (x)$ and number of iterations < $T_{\max}$

For i = 1–N:

For j = 1–n:

Substitute particle swarm position X into each objective function and calculate the value of each objective function.

End for.

Compose the values of the objective function into a sequence of objective vectors. The corresponding particles form a vector series of non-inferior solutions, that is, a two-dimensional array with dimension of the population size multiplied by the number of iterations and listed as the number of objective function variables.

End for.

Calculate the corresponding particle of $\min (\sqrt{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {(f i t_{i} - η_{i} f_{i 0})}^{2}})$ and find global extremum $g b e s t$ and individual extrema $p b e s t$ .

Update particle swarm position X and velocity V using the corresponding formulas.

End while.

Stored the non-inferior solution of each generation.

Figure 5.

The improved PSO algorithm proceeds.

Grey decision

Grey decision requires few samples, provides inexpensive computations and is easily implemented, being widely used in many fields such as natural sciences, social sciences, and economics.²⁷ The grey correlation degree between various factors can be used to determine an index weight, and the weighted grey relational degree can be considered as an evaluation criterion, establishing a multiobjective decision-making model.²⁸

Grey decision proceeds as follows:

Decision matrix and its initialization. Let the scheme set be $X = {x_{1}, x_{2}, \dots, x_{n}}$ , the index set be $V = {v_{1}, v_{2}, \dots, v_{m}}$ , the relatively ideal decision scheme be $x_{0}$ , and attribute value $v_{j}$ of the indicator be $x_{0 j}$ . The factor indices are divided into benefit type, cost type, and moderate value type, and they are processed as follows:

x_{0 j} = {\begin{matrix} max (x_{1 j}, x_{2 j}, \dots, x_{n j}), b e n e f i t t y p e \\ \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} x_{i j}, m o d e r a t e v a l u e t y p e \\ min (x_{1 j}, x_{2 j}, \dots, x_{n j}), c o s t t y p e \end{matrix}

(5)

Label matrix A $= (x_{i j})_{(n + 1) \times m} (i = 0, 1, 2, \dots, n; j = 1, 2, \dots, m)$ is the decision matrix of scheme set X to index set V . For initialization, let

x_{i j}^{'} = {\begin{matrix} x_{i j} / x_{o j}, i \in b e n e f i t t y p e \\ x_{o j} / x_{i j}, i \in c o s t t y p e \\ min {x_{i j}, x_{o j}} / max {x_{i j}, x_{o j}}, i \in m o d e r a t e v a l u e t y p e \end{matrix}

(6)

with matrix

A^{'} = (x_{i j}^{'})

being the initialization of matrix A .

Calculation of scheme correlation degree. The correlation coefficient between $x_{0}^{'}$ and $x_{i}^{'}$ at point j is defined as

r_{i j} = \frac{\underset{1 \leq i \leq n_{1} \leq j \leq m}{min min} | {x^{'}}_{i j} - {x^{'}}_{o j} | + ρ_{f} \underset{1 \leq i \leq n_{1} \leq j \leq m}{max max} | {x^{'}}_{i j} - {x^{'}}_{o j} |}{| {x^{'}}_{i j} - {x^{'}}_{o j} | + ρ_{f} \underset{1 \leq i \leq n_{1} \leq j \leq m}{max max} | {x^{'}}_{i j} - {x^{'}}_{o j} |}

(7)

where

ρ_{f}

(

0 < ρ_{f} < 1

) is the resolution coefficient usually set to 0.5.

Determine weight of factor index. The most important factors affecting the scheme are selected as parent indices. Their index values are denoted as $Y_{0} = (v_{10}, v_{20}, \dots v_{n 0})^{T}$ , generating a parent sequence. The other factors are selected as subindices, and their index values are denoted as $Y_{j} = (v_{1 j}, v_{2 j}, \dots v_{n j})^{T}$ , generating a subsequence. $Y_{0}$ and $Y_{j}$ are initialized using $v_{i 0}^{'} = v_{i 0} / v_{10}, v_{i j}^{'} = v_{i j} / v_{1 j}$ and $Y_{0}^{'} = (v_{10}^{'}, v_{20}^{'}, \dots, v_{n 0}^{'})^{T}$ , $Y_{j}^{'} = (v_{1 j}^{'}, v_{2 j}^{'}, \dots, v_{n j}^{'})^{T}$ , and initialization index value matrix B $= (Y_{0}^{'}, Y_{j}^{'})$ .

Calculate the correlation coefficients between $Y_{j}$ and $Y_{0}$ as $y_{i j}$ using equation (8) and construct correlation coefficient matrix Y $= (y_{i j})_{n \times m}$ .

y_{i j} = \frac{\underset{1 \leq j \leq m_{1} \leq i \leq n}{min min} | {v^{'}}_{i o} - {v^{'}}_{i j} | + ρ \underset{1 \leq j \leq m_{1} \leq i \leq n}{max max} | {v^{'}}_{i o} - {v^{'}}_{i j} |}{| {v^{'}}_{i o} - {v^{'}}_{i j} | + ρ \underset{1 \leq j \leq m_{1} \leq i \leq n}{max max} | {v^{'}}_{i o} - {v^{'}}_{i j} |}

(8)

Compute the average across columns of matrix Y, $y_{j} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i = 1}^{n} r_{i j}$ , and normalize $y_{j}$ as follows:

w_{j} = y_{j} / \sum_{j = 1}^{m} y_{j}, j = 1, 2, \dots, m

(9)

Grey weights $w_{1}, w_{2}, \dots, w_{m}$ are obtained for the indicators.

Calculate the degree of weighted grey correlation between scheme $x_{i}$ and relatively ideal scheme $x_{0}$ as follows:

r_{i} = \frac{1}{m} \sum_{j = 1}^{m} w_{j} r_{i j}, i = 1, 2, \dots, n

(10)

Make the decision. Weighted grey relational degree $r_{i}$ is used to evaluate the scheme, as a higher $r_{i}$ indicates a better scheme. If $r_{i} = max (r_{1}, r_{2}, \dots, r_{m})$ , the corresponding scheme is optimal.

The non-inferior solution set for evaluation is obtained from the improved PSO. Then, grey decision is applied to the set for determining the optimal solution.

Optimization and results

We applied the proposed multiobjective optimization method combining the improved PSO and grey decision to optimize roadheader shovel-plate parameters following the procedure shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Multiobjective optimization combining PSO and grey decision.

Optimization proceeds as follows:

Set basic parameters of improved PSO algorithm. In this study, we set accelerated factor $c_{1} = c_{2} = 2$ , population size N = 20, and maximum number of iterations $T_{\max}$ = 100. In addition, speed V was restricted by $V = V_{i m a x} - V_{i min}$ , and inertia factor W was dynamic and linearly decreasing, $w (t) = w_{min} + \frac{w_{max} - w_{min}}{N} (N - t)$ , with $w_{max} = 0.9$ and $w_{min} = 0.4$ . In addition, $r_{1}$ and $r_{2}$ were set randomly in [0, 1], while optimization degree η was set to 30%, and the initial value of the objective function was set to (5.495, 4.778).

Apply improved PSO algorithm and store non-inferior solution set. In this study, we executed improved PSO, obtaining 2000 non-inferior solutions. The accumulation regularity of several non-inferior solutions obtained through optimization is shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Accumulation regularity of non-inferior solutions throughout optimization.

Figure 7 shows that the trend of non-inferior solutions. The length of the shovel plate gradually decreases from a large value until convergence, and its inclination angle changes in an approximate range of 16°–18°. Consistent with the optimization objectives, the load capacity converges after gradually increasing, and the propulsive resistance gradually decreases until convergence to a small value. The distribution of non-inferior solutions agrees with the overall optimization goal of improving the load capacity and reducing the propulsive resistance. The optimization trends are reasonable, indicating the effectiveness of the improved PSO algorithm. 3.

Apply grey decision to find the optimal solution. The load capacity is a benefit indicator, while the propulsive resistance is a cost index. In this study, we used a MathWorks MATLAB program to simultaneously process the 2000 non-inferior solutions obtained by the improved PSO algorithm. First, a decision matrix was formed and initialized. Then, we calculated the scheme correlation degree, the weights of the factor indicators, and the weighted grey correlation degree obtaining the optimal solution.

To reflect the difference before and after grey decision, Table 2 lists the optimal parameters for 20 out of the 2000 non-inferior solutions.

Table 2.

Parameters obtained from 20 non-inferior solutions.

Non-inferior solution	Parameter
Non-inferior solution	$l$ (m)	$β$ (°)	Q (m³/min)	F_t (kN)
1	3.147	18.30	5.130		5.319
2	3.212	15.79	4.272		5.091
3	3.196	15.607	4.370		5.043
4	3.153	16.852	4.878		5.141
5	3.165	17.45	4.863		5.238
6	3.245	17.110	4.166		5.319
7	3.220	14.831	4.094		4.973
8	3.182	16.560	4.606		5.148
9	3.193	17.023	4.579		5.226
10	3.146	17.032	4.959		5.153
11	3.148	16.322	4.844		5.064
12	3.166	16.590	4.738		5.127
13	3.320	16.714	3.524		5.382
14	3.148	16.425	4.860		5.077
15	3.276	16.523	3.852		5.288
16	3.200	15.260	4.298		5.001
17	3.262	15.633	3.864		5.145
18	3.150	17.256	4.958		5.188
19	3.158	16.490	4.788		5.102
20	3.154	16.570	4.831		5.106

Table 2 shows that the non-inferior solution satisfies the optimization degree condition, but the optimization degree of each objective function is inconsistent, and the number of non-inferior solutions simultaneously satisfying both objectives is low.

To reflect the difference before and after optimization, Table 3 lists the optimal and initial parameter values.

Table 3.

Roadheader shovel-plate parameters before and after optimization.

	$l$ (m)	$β$ (°)	m (kg)	F_t (kN)	Q (m³/min)
Before optimization	3.2	19	4597.6	5.495	4.778
After optimization	3.144	16.88	3913.2	5.131	4.954
Optimization improvement	1.75%	11.16%	14.3%	6.62%	3.68%

Table 3 shows that grey decision allows to determine the optimal solution in the non-inferior solution set. The two objective functions are optimized simultaneously, and in the sense of the grey correlation degree, both objective functions are optimal. After multiobjective optimization combining the improved PSO algorithm and grey decision, the mass of the shovel plate decreases by 14.3%, while the propulsive resistance decreases by 6.62%, and the load capacity increases by 3.68%.

In order to analyze the mechanical properties of shovel-plate, in the environment of ANSYS-Workbench, when the propulsive resistance is at its maximum, the process of propulsiving coal rock with the shovel plate before and after optimization was simulated. The shovel plate stress nephogram before and after optimization is shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Roadheader shovel plate stress nephogram before and after optimization. (a) before optimization (b) after optimization.

Figure 8 shows that the stress nephogram before and after optimization, the maximum stress at the front of the shovel plate before optimization is 103.04 MPa, after optimization is 85.69 MPa, after optimization the maximum stress of the shovel plate decreases by 16.8%.

The EBZ230 roadheader shovel plate has been mass produced before optimization, but optimization can further improve its load capacity, reduce its propulsive resistance and reduce its maximum stress.

Conclusion

We propose a multiobjective optimization method combining improved PSO and grey decision. Considering the multiobjective optimization of roadheader shovel-plate parameters as a representative example, we apply the proposed method, achieving a proper optimization effect. We can draw the following conclusions from this study:

An improved PSO algorithm based on the minimum Euclidean distance between a base value and the global extremum and individual extrema is proposed. The improved PSO algorithm performs parallel multiobjective optimization and provides a non-inferior solution set, obtaining 2000 non-inferior solutions. Then, grey decision is applied to find the optimal among the non-inferior solutions, obtaining the optimal parameters for the EBZ230 roadheader shovel plate, being l = 3.144 m and β = 16.88°.

A comparative analysis before and after optimization reveals that the mass of the shovel plate decreases by 14.3%, its propulsive resistance decreases by 6.62%, its load capacity increases by 3.68%, and its maximum stress decreases by 16.8%. Therefore, both optimization goals, namely, increasing the load capacity and reducing the propulsive resistance, are achieved.

The optimization results confirm the feasibility of multiobjective optimization combining improved PSO and grey decision. This method can be applied to multi-objective optimization of other devices.

In this paper, the conventional parameters of PSO are used, the influence of PSO parameters on optimization results is not been studied. And the amount of data involved in grey decision making affects to the results, the specific impact is not been studied.

The name of parameters, symbols, and abbreviations

Q is the load capacity in cubic meters per minute (m³/min),

D is the outer diameter of the star wheel in meters (m),

n is the star wheel speed in revolutions per minute (r/min),

B is conveyor trough width in meters (m),

$l_{x i}$ is the gap between the outer edge of the wheel claw and the shovel plate in meters (m),

$l$ is the width of the shovel plate in meters (m), H is the height of the wheel claw in meters (m),

β is the inclination angle of the shovel plate in degrees (°),

$K_{z} = 0.25 – 1.00$ is the loading coefficient,

$F_{t}$ is the propulsive resistance in kilonewtons (kN),

$δ_{0}$ is the front-end thickness of the shovel plate in meters (m),

$l_{0}$ is the cutting length of the front end of the shovel plate in meters (m),

$σ_{n}$ is the equivalent compressive resistance of interaction between the shovel plate and extracted material in megapascals (MPa),

$W_{t}$ is the weight of material on the shovel surface in newtons (N),

$μ$ is the friction coefficient between the collected material and shovel surface,

$h_{c}$ is the insertion depth of the shovel loading material in meters (m),

$τ$ is the shear stress of the materials in megapascals (MPa),

$G$ is the shear modulus of the material (mainly coal and rock),

$E$ is the bending modulus of the material,

$k_{c}$ is the migration length coefficient of the material,

$σ_{e}$ is the bending stress of the material in megapascals (MPa),

$ρ$ is the density of the material in kilograms per cube meter (kg/m³),

$α$ is the inclination angle of shovel-plate hinge with respect to the ground in degrees (°),

$A_{c}$ is the sectional area of the material in square meters (m²),

$L_{0}$ is the lateral width of the track along the displacement direction in meters (m),

$L$ is the maximum width for cutting in meters (m),

$l_{z}$ is the distance between the center line of the star wheel drive and the front end of the shovel plate in meters (m),

$l_{q}$ is the thickness of the star wheel drive in meters (m),

$l_{x}$ is the maximum undercover amount of the shovel plate in meters (m),

$l_{2}$ is the length of the shovel plate in meters (m).

Footnotes

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Author contribution

Qiang Li wrote the manuscript and contributed significantly to the conception of the study, analysis and multiobjective optimization; Mengdi Gao revised the manuscript; Zhilin Ma helped perform the analysis of data.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

This work was supported by the Innovative Research Team in Suzhou University(2018kytd01), Scientific Research Project of Anhui Universities (KJ2021A1106, 2022AH051378), Cooperative education project of the Ministry of Education (220604583025757), Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2008085QE265, 2008085ME150), Online and offline hybrid course (szxy2022hhkc01), the Scientific Research Platform Open Project of Suzhou University (2022ykf30).

Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, Suzhou Science and Technology Project, Scientific Research Project of Anhui Universities, Scientific Research Platform Open Project of Suzhou University, (grant number 2008085QE265, 2019019, KJ2021A1106, KJ2021A1115, 2020ykf11, 2020ykf12).

ORCID iD

Qiang Li

Author biographies

Qiang Li was born in Yingshan, Hubei Province, China in 1987. He is a lecturer at Suzhou University and PhD candidate at the China University of Mining and Technology. His main research interest is rapid tunneling technology of tunnels and roadways.

Mengdi Gao was born in 1991.She received a PhD degree inmechanical and electronic engineering from the Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China, in 2017. She is currently the Head of the 3D Printing Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Suzhou University. She has published more than twenty academic papers, including in the Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control (ASME), IJAMT, and Energy Conversion and Management. Her current research interests include green design and manufacturing and 3D printing technology. Her current research interests also include manufacturing process condition monitoring, and low-carbon energy-saving optimization theory, multi-objective optimization and methods for stamping forming. She has been invited to be a reviewer for several SCI/EI journals.

Zhilin Ma was born in Bozhou City, Anhui Province, China in1991. He received a B.S. degree in mechanical design manufacture and automation from Central South University Of Forestry and Technology, Changsha in 2016, and he received a M.S. degree in mechanical design and theory from Hefei University Of Technology, Hefei in 2019.Since 2019, he has been an Assistant at the College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Suzhou University. His research interests include multi-objective optimization, motor driving, vibration and noise, and sustainable manufacturing.

References

Wang

Kang

, et al. Key technologies and equipment for a fully mechanized top-coal caving operation with a large mining height at ultra-thick coal seams. Int J Coal Sci Technol 2015; 2: 97–161.

State Statistics Bureau. In 2018, China produced 3.546 billion tons of raw coal, an increase of 5.2%. East Money Net, (2019, accessed 17 January 2022) (in Chinese). https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id = 1623429755462440140&wfr = spider&for = pc,2019-01-23.

Wang

Ren

. 2025 Scenarios and development path of intelligent coal mine. J China Coal Soc 2018; 43: 295–305.

Shaffer

Stentz

A robotic system for underground coal mining. In: IEEE International conference on robotics and automation, Nice, France, May 1992, pp. 633–638. IEEE.

Huang

, et al. Study on roadheader cutting load at different properties of coal and rock. Sci World J 2013; 6:1–8.

Simulation study of random loads on a cutting head of roadheader. J China Coal Soc 2000; 25: 525–529 (in Chinese).

Guo

Zhang

Liu

, et al. Kinematics analysis and computer simulation on longitudinal cutting head of roadheader. J China Coal Soc 2002; 27: 68–72.

Keles

Cutting performance assessment of a medium weight roadheader at Cayirhan coal mine. Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey, 2005.

Bilgin

Dincer

Copur

, et al. Some geological and geotechnical factors affecting the performance of a roadheader in an inclined tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2004; 19: 629–636.

10.

Zhang

Huang

Yang

GD.

Design of roadheader shovel board. Coal Mine Mach 2013; 34: 5–6 (in Chinese).

11.

Xiao

Lin

, et al. Overview on multi-objective optimization problem research. Appl Res Comput 2011; 28: 805–808 (in Chinese).

12.

Liang

Study of particle swarm optimization algorithm on optimization problem. PhD Thesis, Guangxi Normal University, China, 2008 (in Chinese).

13.

Zhang

Zhou

, et al. Solutions of multi-objective optimization problems based on particle swarm optimization. J Comput Res Dev 2004; 41: 1286–1291 (in Chinese).

14.

Yang

Zhang

, et al. Application of particle swarm optimization in time-dependent parameters inversion. J Cent South Univ Sci Technol 2013; 44: 282–288.

15.

Lan

Peng

, et al. Optimization design of notches in spool valve based on PSO algorithm. China Mech Eng 2015; 26: 995–999 (in Chinese).

16.

Qian

Particle swarm optimization algorithm and its engineering application. Beijing: Science Press, 2013 (in Chinese).

17.

Marimuthu

Sait

. Performance evaluation of proposed differential evolution and particle swarm optimization algorithms for scheduling m-machine flow shops with lot streaming. J Intell Manuf 2013; 24: 175–191.

18.

Sun

Chen

Fang

, et al. Gene expression data analysis with the clustering method based on an improved quantum behaved particle swarm optimization. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2012; 25: 376–391.

19.

Marinakis

Marinaki

Dounias

A hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for the vehicle routing problem. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2010; 23: 463–472.

20.

Moore

Venayagamoorthy

GK.

Evolving combinational logic circuits using a hybrid quantum evolution and particle swarm inspired algorithm. In: Proceedings of the NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware (EH ‘05), Washington, DC, USA, 29 June–1 July 2005, pp. 97–102, July 2005. IEEE.

21.

Mikki

Kishk

AA.

Quantum particle swarm optimization for electromagnetics. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 2006; 54: 2764–2775.

22.

Leu

Yeh

MF.

Grey particle swarm optimization. Appl Soft Comput 2012; 12: 2985–2996.

23.

Cheng

Zheng

, et al. Structural reliability optimal design based on chaos particle swarm optimization. J Cent South Univ Sci Technol 2011 42: 671–676.

24.

Zhang

, et al. Hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for balancing problem of stochastic mixed-model assembly line. Mach Des Res 2013: 29: 60–63 (in Chinese).

25.

Wei

Wang

, et al. Optimization of tandem cold rolling schedule based on improved multi- objective particle swarm optimization algorithm. China Mech Eng 2015; 26: 1239–1242 (in Chinese).

26.

HZ.

The measurement and analysis and application on the mechanical property of coal seam. Geol Prospec 2000; 36: 85–88 (in Chinese).

27.

Zhou

XW.

The research and application of gray correlation degree. PhD Thesis. Mathematics School & Institute of Jilin University, China, 2007, pp. 1–11 (in Chinese).

28.

XH.

A model based on the grey relation grade for multi-objective decision-making and its application. J Shandong Univ Nat Sci Ed 2007; 42: 131–135 (in Chinese).

Multiobjective optimization of roadheader shovel-plate parameters based on improved particle swarm optimization and grey decision

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Multiobjective optimization model of roadheader shovel-plate parameters

Roadheader structure and operation

Multiobjective optimization model

Multiobjective optimization based on improved PSO and grey decision

Improved PSO algorithm with minimum Euclidean distance from base value

Grey decision

Optimization and results

Conclusion

The name of parameters, symbols, and abbreviations

Footnotes

Availability of data and material

Author contribution

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Author biographies

References