Arming the troops: Post-translational modification of extracellular bacterial proteins

Abstract

Protein secretion is almost universally employed by bacteria. Some proteins are retained on the cell surface, whereas others are released into the extracellular milieu, often playing a key role in virulence. In this review, we discuss the diverse types and potential functions of post-translational modifications (PTMs) occurring to extracellular bacterial proteins.

Keywords

Post-translational modification protein secretion bacterial pathogens bacterial virulence factors proteomics methylation acetylation glycosylation lipidation

Introduction

Until relatively recently, the nature and effects of post-translational modifications (PTMs) were principally thought to be restricted to eukaryotic systems. However, PTM in prokaryotes is now appreciated to be just as important and diverse as it is in eukaryotes.¹ The ever-expanding catalogue of bacterial PTMs ranges from methylation and phosphorylation of residues to the addition of complex moieties including lipids and glycans (Figure 1).¹ These modifications can have profound effects on proteins, altering their conformation, activity, stability and localisation, as well as interactions with other molecules.² The specific purpose of PTMs is not always clear, although they have been shown to modulate and mediate key biological processes, including central metabolism, signal transduction and virulence.^3,4 Not surprisingly, many reversible PTMs also appear to be involved in mediating rapid responses to environmental stimuli.⁵

Figure 1.

An overview of the most common post-translational modifications in bacteria, showing the amino acid side chains which are most frequently modified. PTMs are grouped by colour according to their type; small chemical (blue), complex molecule (orange), protein cleavage (red) and amino acid side chain modifications (green).

Historically, the earliest studies focused on the PTMs associated with individual proteins, and often just on the impact of modifications at specific sites. However, advances in proteomic technologies have driven a surge in the number of large-scale global modification studies for a wide range of bacterial species.^5,6 Despite this, there are a number of clear limitations to the technology. High levels of purity and quantity of protein are generally necessary for sufficient sequence coverage and resolution to identify PTMs using mass spectrometry-based approaches.⁷ This can be bolstered through selective enrichment of post-translationally modified proteins (e.g. using antibody-based approaches) prior to mass spectrometric analysis, although this is predicated on a high degree of specificity and high binding capacity of the antibodies employed.⁸ Perhaps a more pervasive issue is that the greater the number of different types of PTM to be identified, the larger the bioinformatic search space required. This is due to an iterative search mechanism which attempts to identify the presence or absence of each PTM on every modifiable residue. This ultimately increases the rate of false discoveries.⁹ There are also limits on the mass shift window authorised for searches, so larger modifications such as glycosylation are frequently excluded.⁵ Consequently, independent approaches are often required to validate these “high throughput” technologies.^2,10 These include structural and functional studies, although as always, these too can be challenging.¹¹

Although it is now widely accepted that PTMs occur in bacteria, most studies have focused on cell-associated protein modifications, and relatively few have considered the modifications associated with proteins secreted into the extracellular milieu. Indeed, most culture supernatants are usually removed prior to mass spectrometric analysis.^6,12–14 However, recent work has revealed a wealth of unexpected PTMs associated with extracellular bacterial proteins, including phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, proteolytic processing, glycosylation and lipidation.¹⁵ In this review, we assess the diversity and likely function(s) of PTMs associated with extracellular bacterial proteins.

Phosphorylation

Protein phosphorylation is a ubiquitous and abundant PTM, usually associated with intracellular signal transduction.^16,17 The attachment and removal of phosphoryl groups on amino acid side chains is catalysed by kinases and phosphatases, respectively.² Serine, threonine and tyrosine are commonly phosphorylated in eukaryotes, whereas histidine and aspartate phosphorylation are thought to be more prevalent in prokaryotes, although this is disputed.^18,19 Microbial phosphoanhydrides (Asp-P) and phosphoramidates (His-P) are more labile than the phosphoesters that form with Ser, Thr and Tyr side chains, and this makes them more difficult to detect, especially if samples are exposed to acidic conditions during preparation.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is a global health burden. The organism is now strongly resurgent, partly due to widespread multi-drug resistance. Effector proteins are secreted directly from the donor Mtb cell cytoplasm to the recipient (host) cell cytoplasm through the multiprotein ESX-1 Type VII secretion system (T7SS). Not only are a sizeable number of these structural proteins phosphorylated; so too are some of the virulence factors which pass through this translocon, such as the immune-triggering proteins EsxB and PtpA.¹⁸ PtpA is a tyrosine phosphatase that is secreted into macrophages following phagocytosis of the bacterium, causing inhibition of phagosome maturation and thus promoting bacterial survival. PtpA is phosphorylated at several S/T/Y residues, and this has been shown to control its activity and secretion.²⁰ Interestingly, phosphorylation of multiple virulence factors is up-regulated in the hypervirulent Mtb Beijing isolate.¹⁸ Phosphorylation is also used as a regulatory mechanism to temporally control different stages of infection by other bacterial species. The Helicobacter pylori cytotoxin CagA is phosphorylated on tyrosine by host membrane-associated Abl1 and/or Src family kinases. Interestingly, CagA phosphorylation is stimulated by another H. pylori secreted product, vacuolating toxin (VacA). This effector is itself phosphorylated but also promotes the Src-mediated phosphorylation of CagA.^21,22 CagA and VacA effectors are involved in the early stages of gastric colonisation and are modified following injection into the epithelial cells lining the stomach.²³

Not all secreted effector proteins are phosphorylated by bacterial kinases. For example, host kinases can phosphorylate some of the effector proteins produced by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Citrobacter rhodentium.²⁴ At least 4 proteins secreted by the T2SS and T3SS of Chlamydial species are similarly modified, including TarP and TeP, which facilitate entry into the mucosal epithelia.²⁵ Bacteria can also hijack and control host systems through PTM. The Dot/Icm (T4SS) of Legionella pneumophila translocates over 300 effectors, including a kinase, LegK, which can phosphorylate host proteins to interfere with normal cell functioning.²⁶

Elastase (LasB) secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa has also been shown to be phosphorylated; indeed, 19 phospho-residues have been identified in the secreted form, whereas only non-phosphorylated LasB appears intracellularly.²⁷ The biological role(s) of this phosphorylation have not been elucidated, although it is possible that the modification targets the enzyme for secretion. Indeed, some 28 phospho-exoproteins with a wide range of functions and degree of modification were identified in one study of strain PA14. This suggests that there may be numerous roles for phosphorylation, particularly in P. aeruginosa virulence.²⁸

Surface-exposed bacterial proteins are also modified in many organisms. For example, flagella proteins from several P. aeruginosa strains are S/T/Y phosphorylated and this modification often occurs at a very specific growth stage.²⁹ Surprisingly, one of the main growth phase-dependent flagella PTMs (phosphorylation of the FliC N-terminus) does not affect swimming motility, but instead increases Type II Secretion System (T2SS) activity whilst concomitantly decreasing biofilm formation.³⁰ Similarly, phosphorylation of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae type IV pilus protein, PilE, at Ser68 also has little apparent effect on the motility-related function of the protein, although it does influence the morphology of the pilus, and consequently, antigenic variation.³¹ Outer membrane proteins (OMPs) from Klebsiella pneumoniae, H. pylori and Shigella flexneri are also multi-phosphorylated, although the function of these PTMs remains unclear.^32,33

Methylation

Methylation is well characterised in eukaryotes, notably the methylation of histones to control gene transcription,³⁴ but not well studied in bacteria. It involves the addition of up to two or three methyl groups to the side chain or terminal amine of arginine or lysine, respectively. Glutamine and glutamic acid residues are also modified, but to a lesser extent.¹ S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) acts as a methyl donor, working in concert with methyltransferase enzymes to catalyse these reactions.

The P. aeruginosa secreted virulence factors CbpD (chitin binding protein) and elastase are methylated at several lysine residues. However, these lysines are methylated to different degrees, with mono-, di- and tri-methylated forms of the same lysine present. This indicates that methylation can be highly variable, even for the same protein.²⁷ Variations in side chain methylation are also seen in the Gram-positive organism Clostridium thermocellum. This bacterium degrades cellulose by secreting a complex of different proteins, known as the cellulosome. CipA, a cellulosome structural protein, is methylated at Glu1267 and trimethylated at Lys80 and Lys663, although the protein is also secreted in an unmodified form. Contrastingly, the cellulolytic CelK enzyme is consistently di-methylated at Lys652 under different experimental conditions, suggesting that certain residue modifications are invariable. This PTM is postulated to promote protein flexibility, whereas methylation of glutamic acid may aid cellulosome localisation.¹⁰

Studies closely scrutinising secreted protein methylation are limited. However, outer membrane proteins have been studied in greater detail. OMP 32 of Leptospira interrogans undergoes extensive but irregular methylation. Eleven glutamic acid residues are variably modified in response to mammalian host signals.^35,36 This leads to OMP phase variation and reduced recognition by the host immune system. Lysine methylation also alters the antigenicity of Rickettsia OMPs.³⁷ Two different lysine methyltransferases modify OmpB from Rickettsia prowazekii, with one enzyme specifically catalysing tri-methylation at consensus sequences.^38,39 Interestingly, the overall number of methylated lysine residues correlates with virulence in this strain.

One of the earliest observations of methylation as a PTM occurred in 1959 during an investigation of flagella structure and function.⁴⁰ Over half a century later, investigations have now revealed methylation of flagella proteins in a range of species.^41,42 Flagellin methylation by FliB, a component of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium flagella machinery, is necessary for swarming motility and virulence^43–45 and orthologous methyltransferases produced by other members of the Enterobacteriaceae are encoded in flagellin methylase island loci (FMIs).⁴² In addition to flagella, surface-associated pili can also be methylated. The pre-pilin peptidase (PilD) of P. aeruginosa acts as a dual modifier, by cleaving the signal peptide and then methylating the N-terminal phenylalanine of mature Type 4 pilus subunits. Methylation happens prior to pilus assembly and is dependent on the binding of zinc as a cofactor.⁴⁶ This processing also occurs in Neisseria meningitidis, although methylation is not a prerequisite for proper pilus assembly and the true function of this PTM remains unknown.^47,48

EF-Tu is an elongation factor that delivers charged tRNA to ribosomes in the cytoplasm. It is also transported to the bacterial surface where it “moonlights” as an environmental sensor and aids adherence to epithelial cells in many species.⁴⁹ A protein is described to “moonlight” when it has additional function(s) that are not relevant to its primary role within the cell. P. aeruginosa EftM exclusively tri-methylates EF-Tu on Lys5. This modification does not impact the canonical function of the protein in translation, but does mediate bacterial attachment to the respiratory epithelia by mimicking phosphorylcholine (a component of the platelet activating factor).^50,51 Methylation is a prerequisite for infection, and deletion of eftM decreases P. aeruginosa pathogenicity. Interestingly, EftM is thermoregulated, displaying increased stability at 25°C. This may suggest that methylation is critical in the early stages of infection or for survival in non-host environments.⁵⁰ This enzyme is well-conserved throughout the Pseudomonas and Vibrio genera and methylation of EF-Tu has proven indispensable for many pathogens.^51,52

Acetylation and succinylation

Acetylation predominantly occurs on the ε-amine of lysine side chains (Nε-acetylation) and at N-terminal amino acids (Nα-acetylation) in a co- or post-translational fashion.^1,53 This type of acylation can also occur on the side chains of serine, threonine and tyrosine (O-acetylation).² Acetylation can occur enzymatically via acetyltransferases (with acetyl groups also removed via the action of deacetylases) or non-enzymatically. Both pathways require an acetyl donor, commonly acetyl-CoA or acetyl-phosphate.^1,54

Despite being proven to impact upon virulence in several species, the biological significance of acetylation of extracellular proteins is not well defined.^28,55–57 Acetylation of extracellular bacterial proteins increases as cultures approach and enter the stationary phase of growth. This indicates that acetylation may impact upon protein stability, perhaps circumventing the unnecessary use of scarce resources to replenish vital proteins.⁵ The protein acetyltransferase (Pat) and deacetylase (CobB) of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium are involved in cell survival during growth following acidic stress, invasion of the host and replication within macrophages. S. enterica serovar Typhimurium mutants that are unable to acetylate proteins show reduced host inflammation, although how this relates to specific virulence factors is currently unclear.⁵⁸

In a study of the P. aeruginosa strain PA14 intracellular lysine acetylome, 522 modified proteins were identified. Additionally, acetylation was enhanced when citrate was used as the sole carbon source.⁵⁹ Notably, in addition to identifying many acetylated intracellular proteins, several P. aeruginosa virulence factors (some previously identified as methylated, such as CbpD and LasB) were also acetylated, including protease IV, haemolysin, exotoxin A and several components of the T6SS.^27,57,59

Proteins involved in central metabolism are the main targets of acetylation in Mtb. For example, malate synthase G (GlcB) is a component of the glyoxylate shunt. However, GlcB is also secreted in an acetylated form to the surface of the cell, enhancing bacterial adherence to the lung epithelium. Indeed, a further 45 secreted acetylated proteins from Mtb have been identified. Multi-acetylation of heat shock protein X (HspX) inhibits the host immune response and has been linked to the latency of Mtb infections.⁶⁰ ESAT-6 (6 kDa Early Secreted Antigenic Target) is inconsistently acetylated at the N-terminus, preventing protein-protein interactions with its cognate chaperone CFP-10.⁶¹ ESAT-6 is able function alone or in complex with CFP-10 to modulate the host immune response, and therefore the purpose of acetylation-driven segregation of these proteins is unclear.⁶² Other members of the ESAT-6 family also undergo Nα-acetylation, including EsxN, EsxO, EsxI and EsxA.^63–65 Dephosphorylation of host proteins by PtbB is also critical for Mtb infection. The phosphatase activity of PtbB is controlled by acetylation/succinylation of Lys224, which is found in the lid region that covers the active site. This PTM therefore serves as a negative regulator of enzyme activity.⁶⁵

Succinylation is another form of acylation alongside acetylation, malonylation, propionylation, butyrylation and crotonylation. Although the identification of succinylated proteins is a relatively recent area of research, the overlap between acetylation and succinylation in the secretome of PA14 is significant,⁶⁶ with around 41% of succinylation sites also susceptible to acetylation.⁵⁹ The functional significance of succinylation remains unclear, although the presence of succinyllysine within the pro-peptide of LasB indicates a potential role of this PTM in protein maturation or stability. Moreover, the number of acetylated/succinylated lysine residues in LasB increases upon secretion.²⁷ Global profiling of succinylated proteins in PA14 identified seven sequence motifs that may direct modification, with the same signatures also evident in Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Mtb.^59,66,67 This suggests that succinylation of secreted proteins may be a more widespread PTM than previously thought.

Proteolysis

Proteolytic cleavage of proteins is a common and irreversible PTM. Endoproteases cleave the polypeptide chain at specific residues within sequence motifs, whereas exoproteases cleave the N- and C- termini.

Many extracytoplasmic proteins are transported across the cytoplasmic membrane (CM) through the sec translocation machinery, guided by an N-terminal signal peptide.⁶⁸ In Gram-negative bacteria, additional secretion systems are employed to further transport proteins from the periplasm to outside of the cell.⁶⁹ Inhibition of the type 1 signal peptidases that cleave signal peptides results in the accumulation of unprocessed proteins in the cytoplasm and ultimately, cell death.^70,71 Hidden Markov models can accurately predict signal peptide sequences, although different algorithms are necessary for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.⁷² AXA motifs are common at the N-terminal cleavage site,^2,73 but this can vary greatly between species.⁷⁴ Somewhat controversially, in a study of Mtb secreted proteins, only 16% of secreted proteins had a cleaved signal peptide; this has also been seen in Bacillus subtilis.^72,75 To our knowledge, the reason(s) for these observed discrepancies in the cleavage of signal peptides have not been investigated.

The substrates of the Por (type 9 secretion system, T9SS) of periodontitis-associated Porphyromonas gingivalis contain conserved C-terminal domains (CTD) that are essential for secretion. The principal virulence factors translocated through the T9SS are cysteine protease gingipains.⁷⁶ Cleavage of the gingipain CTDs by PorU and PorZ following protein folding allows secretion through the outer membrane (OM) and subsequent glycosylation.^77–80 Current data implicate the tertiary structure of the CTD as being the key signal for secretion,^80,81 although some conserved sequence motifs have also been identified.⁸² Bordetella filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) also harbours a cleavable CTD. FHA is retained on the cell surface via anchoring of the CTD within the FhaC transporter.⁸³ Cleavage of the CTD releases FHA from the surface, allowing passage of full-length unprocessed FHA through FhaC to act as a transmembrane sensor.⁸⁴ This intriguing interplay between the two forms of FHA is tightly-regulated, ensuring successful colonisation and maintenance of infection.

An elegant cleavage cascade which activates several virulence factors has been highlighted in P. aeruginosa (Figure 2). Elastase is synthesised as a pre-pro-protein (53 kDa) which is cleaved and transported through the CM and OM by targeting and sequential cleavage of the pre- and pro-domains, respectively. The pro-domain undergoes autoproteolytic cleavage post-folding in the periplasm but remains non-covalently linked to the mature protein (33 kDa) where it inhibits intracellular protease activity.⁸⁵ Both domains are then secreted through the Xcp T2SS machinery and the pro-domain is subsequently degraded. A similar secretion pathway can be seen in the production of subtilisin by Bacillus subtilis.⁸⁶ Extracellular LasB processes CbpD at the N-terminus, yielding LasD, which in turn, cleaves LasA into its mature staphylolytic form.^85,87,88 The processing of these enzymes works as a positive feed-forward mechanism because LasA further enhances the elastolytic activity of LasB.^27,85 LasB also activates leucine aminopeptidase by cleaving the C-terminal pro-sequence, which contains an active site-inhibitory lysine residue. Substitution of this C-terminal lysine with an acidic alternative results in leucine aminopeptidase activation without the need for LasB processing.⁸⁹

Figure 2.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasB secretion pathway and subsequent proteolytic cleavage cascade. The pre-pro-protein is targeted to the periplasm through the sec translocon via the encoded signal peptide. The protein is then folded, and the pro-domain is cleaved, remaining non-covalently bound to the mature protein. Following secretion via the T2SS Xcp machinery, the pro-domain is degraded and a cleavage cascade begins. Mature LasB cleaves CbpD into LasD, which then activates LasA by proteolysis. Mature LasA enhances the elastolytic activity of LasB.

Some cleavage events produce multiple functional products. For example, autolysin synthesised by Staphylococcus aureus is cleaved at four locations to produce functionally distinct extracellular hydrolases, an amidase and a glucosaminidase.⁶⁸ In several diverse pathogens, EF-Tu is also cleaved into fragments which are then expressed on the cell surface. Here they act as adherence factors, binding a range of host substrates and mediating colonisation of different niches.⁵²

Glycosylation

Glycosylation involves the covalent attachment of a carbohydrate to the amide group of asparagine (N-linked) or the hydroxyl group of serine or threonine (O-linked).^90–95 Attachment of glycans is a multi-step process involving different enzymes,⁹⁶ which are commonly encoded within gene clusters with their substrates.⁴² Promiscuous glucosyltransferases generate extensive variability in the glycosyl moieties of modified proteins.^97,98 Two main glycosylation pathways are used in bacteria, either via the en bloc transfer of glycan chains (preassembled on lipid carriers) to proteins, or sequential attachment from nucleotide-activated sugars.⁹⁹

There are few examples of bacterial glycoproteins which are fully secreted into the extracellular milieu; most such modified proteins remain attached to the cell.^100–102 The best-studied glycoproteins are flagellins.^41,103–105 Campylobacter jejuni flagella are N-glycosylated by PglB with a nine-carbon pseudaminic acid, which transfers glycan moieties en bloc to proteins at the sequon D/E-X-N-X-S/T (X≠Pro),^106,107 although some exceptions to this rule have been found.¹⁰⁸ Functionally, glycosylation may have multiple roles. For example, adherence of Clostridium difficile in the human gut is dependent on N-acetyl-glucosamine glycosylation of flagellar proteins. This glycan-induced switch to a more sessile mode aids biofilm formation.¹⁰⁹ Flagellar glycosylation may also play a protective role. For example, the flagella of Burkholderia cepacia are modified at >10 sites, and these modifications are required for auto-agglutination, resistance to acid, and blocking of toll-like receptor 5 recognition.^110–112

Many Pseudomonads encode a genomic glycosylation island as part of the flagella regulon.^98,103 P. aeruginosa produces two types of flagellin proteins which are distinguished by their antigenicity. Both types are glycosylated, although they are modified by different machinery encoded by different gene clusters. O-linked glycosylation occurs at Thr189 and Ser260 found in the central surface-exposed domain of each A type flagellin unit.⁹⁸ Interestingly, type B flagellins are also glycosylated twice, at Ser191 and Ser195.¹⁰³ Whilst the specific role of O-linked flagella glycosylation is unclear in P. aeruginosa, glycosylation of flagella in Pseudomonas syringae is involved in bacterial recognition by plants, and can shape host specificity.¹¹³

O-glycosylation is commonly used to protect surface-associated proteins from degradation by extracellular proteases. H. pylori alpha and beta ureases, Microcystis aeruginosa microcystin-related protein C, and Streptococcus mutans binding protein Cnm all undergo O-glycosylation to increase protein stability.^97,114,115 This is also the case for EmaA, the only Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans autotransporter adhesin which is currently known to be glycosylated. The other adhesins, ApiA and AaE, are unmodified.¹¹⁶ Additional autotransporter proteins and adhesins from unrelated bacteria are also secreted as glycoproteins, including AtaC from Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, and the self-assembling TibA from E. coli.^117,118 Glycosylation of TibA by TibC enhances stability and adhesion to epithelial cells, although the modification is not known to affect invasion or aggregation of E. coli, unlike its other autotransporter glycoproteins.¹¹⁷

Adherence-promoting surface fimbriae can also be modified by O-linked glycosylation. For example, unmodified fimbria-associated glycoprotein (Fap1) from Streptococcus parasanguinis mediates cell adhesion, whereas following glycosylation, the protein becomes essential for biofilm development.¹¹⁹ Variable glycosylation of Gram-negative pili is also widespread.^48,99 Two of the five type 4 pili produced by P. aeruginosa are modified by PilO via the addition of O-antigen or polymers of D-arabinofuranose. The even distribution of glycans on the pili fibrils confers protection against infection by bacteriophage which target pili as receptors for adsorption.¹²⁰ In true tit-for-tat competitive style however, phage can mutate their tail proteins and adapt their specificity to re-sensitise against the bacterial host.¹²¹ Overall glycosylation of surface proteins contributes towards enhanced protection and stability; improved adherence, invasion and immune stimulation; and increased uptake of DNA.^107,122

Lipidation

Lipidation is another complex PTM, typically involving the addition of two or three lipids to the N-terminal cysteine of lipobox sequence motifs.^123,124 The lipid moieties act as a surface anchor and tend to reflect the fatty acid composition of membrane phospholipids. This contributes to the significant antigenic variability of lipoproteins between- and within-species.^125,126 The lipoprotein biosynthesis pathway involves up to three sequential enzymatic reactions (Figure 3).^127,128 Interestingly, and despite not encoding a homologue of the final N-acyltransferase enzyme (Lnt), many low G+C Gram-positive organisms are still able to produce triacylated lipoproteins.^129–131

Figure 3.

Biosynthesis pathway of lipoproteins in E. coli. Preprolipoproteins are synthesised in the cytoplasm and targeted through the sec translocon to the periplasm via their N-terminal signal peptide. Diacylglycerol transferase (Lgt) transfers diacylglycerol to the thiol group of the last cysteine in the four-residue lipobox motif. After this, lipoprotein signal peptidase (Lsp) cleaves the signal peptide immediately before the derivatised cysteine and apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase (Lnt) transfers another acyl group to the cysteine Nα moiety. The mature lipoprotein is recognised by the Lol ABC transporter, which transfers the lipoprotein to the outer membrane.¹³²

Lipoproteins play a substantial role in bacterial growth and pathogenicity. The role(s) played by lipidation are nothing if not diverse. For example, lipidation enhances Streptococcal adherence to endothelial cells, and loss of a single S. sanguinis lipoprotein (the metal ion transporter, SsaB) drastically decreases the ability of the organism to cause endocarditis.^133–135 Lipidation is also known to affect the flagellar-driven motility of C. jejuni in the gut¹³⁶ and significantly impacts the virulence of Enterococcus faecalis. Somewhat unexpectedly, loss of the lipidation enzymes also enhances E. faecalis growth under stressed conditions.¹³⁷ In contrast, the growth of S. aureus during nutrient limitation has been reported to be dependent on lipidation.¹³⁸ Interestingly, S. aureus triacyl-lipoprotein production is strongly-dependent on environmental parameters and growth phase, with diacyl forms dominating in high-stress conditions.¹³⁹ Indeed, the role of the third fatty acid has been questioned in Gram-positive organisms as triacylation is generally thought to target lipoproteins across the outer membrane.

N. meningitidis surface antigen Factor H binding protein (FHbp) is normally tri-palmitoylated in vivo. In contrast to previous reports, deletion of Lnt (which adds the third palmitoyl group) does not prevent the surface expression of diacylated FHbp.^140,141 However, the outer membrane Lol transporter has a higher affinity for the triacylated form and accumulation of diacylated FHbp results in negative feedback and reduced overall FHbp synthesis. It is possible that production of both the di- and tri-acylated FHbp isoforms may confer a fitness advantage in terms of antigen recognition, or that sole production of the diacylated FHbp isoform leads to a fitness disadvantage (e.g. via elevated antibiotic sensitivity due to increased membrane permeability¹⁴²).

Surface dissociation of di- or triacylated lipoproteins during infection activates host TLR2/6 or TLR2/1 heterodimers respectively, which drives inflammation.^132,143,144 In S. aureus, lipoprotein release is mediated by quorum sensing-controlled expression of surfactant-like phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs). These small peptides not only promote the release of lipoprotein-containing membrane vesicles during cell turgor in hypotonic conditions, but themselves act as potent virulence factors.¹⁴⁵ Another virulence factor that is regulated by lipidation is the secreted pore-forming toxin, haemolysin, from E. coli. This toxin induces apoptosis in target host cells and is activated prior to export by the addition of fatty acids to two internal lysine residues.^146,147 Many other species also use lipidation to regulate haemolysin activity e.g., palmitoylation of B. pertussis haemolysin.^148,149

The localisation of virulence factors within host cells is important for their biological function. The HopZ family of T3SS effectors produced by P. syringae are targeted to the plant host plasma membranes via myristoylation.^150,151 Proper targeting of these effectors causes programmed cell death through immune modulation.¹⁵² In a remarkable example of molecular subterfuge, some pathogens encode a CAAX motif on their secreted proteins; this motif is lipidated by host acyltransferases, thereby targeting the effectors to distinct organelles. Palmitoylation by host cell enzymes is also essential for the proper localisation, stability and activity of the polyclonal B-cell mitogen, PrpA, produced by Brucella species.¹⁵³ Indeed, this may be a common feature of many intracellular pathogens, since secreted proteins produced by L. pneumophila and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium have also been shown to hijack the host cell machinery during targeting, thereby presumably conserving costly resources.^154–156

Concluding remarks

Since the start of the 21st century, considerable gains have been made in the field of prokaryotic PTM research. However, until recently, the importance of extracellular protein PTMs has been largely underestimated. Nonetheless, many secreted proteins from diverse bacterial species have been shown to be modified in a variety of ways. Although some of these modifications are proving essential for bacterial physiology and virulence, the purpose of many others remains unresolved. What is clear though, is that PTM is not a singular mechanism of control, and global studies of bacterial proteomes have shown considerable overlap between modifications.^2,157 This notwithstanding, the era of defining the type and extent of such PTMs now seems to be drawing to a close; the challenge for the future generation will be in defining the biology underpinning these modifications.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: SF was supported by a studentship from the BBSRC DTP and by funding from the Evelyn Trust (Cambridge). Work in the MW laboratory is supported by the Cystic Fibrosis Trust, The British Lung Foundation and the BBSRC.

ORCID iD

Martin Welch

Author biographies

Suzanne Forrest is currently a BBSRC-funded PhD student looking at the diversity and function(s) of post-translational modifications associated with the proteins secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The P. aeruginosa secretome plays a key role in pathogenicity, yet little is currently understood about how these post-translational modifications are made, or what their function is.

Martin Welch is Reader in Microbial Physiology and Metabolism at the University of Cambridge, and has a long-standing interest in Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence and biofilm formation. He is particularly interested in understanding how metabolism affects P. aeruginosa pathogenicity, and how inter-species signalling impinges upon the spectrum of secreted virulence factors.

References

Cain

Solis

Cordwell

. Beyond gene expression: the impact of protein post-translational modifications in bacteria. J Proteomics 2014; 97: 265–286.

André

Bastos

Pinto

, et al. A glimpse into the modulation of post-translational modifications of human-colonizing bacteria. J Proteomics 2017; 152: 254–275.

Grangeasse

Stülke

Mijakovic

. Regulatory potential of post-translational modifications in bacteria. Front Microbiol 2015; 6: 2014–2015.

Michard

Doublet

. Post-translational modifications are key players of the Legionella pneumophila infection strategy. Front Microbiol 2015; 6: 1–12.

Brown

Sridhara

Boutz

, et al. Large-scale analysis of post-translational modifications in E. Coli under glucose-limiting conditions. BMC Genomics 2017; 18: 1–21.

Cao

Dai

, et al. High-coverage proteome analysis reveals the first insight of protein modification systems in the pathogenic spirochete Leptospira interrogans. Cell Res 2010; 20: 197–210.

Silva

AMN

Vitorino

Domingues

MRM

, et al. Post-translational modifications and mass spectrometry detection. Free Radic Biol Med 2013; 65: 925–941.

Zhao

Jensen

. Modification-specific proteomics: strategies for characterization of post-translational modifications using enrichment techniques. Proteomics 2009; 9: 4632–4641.

Ahrné

Müller

Lisacek

. Unrestricted identification of modified proteins using MS/MS. Proteomics 2010; 10: 671–686.

10.

Dykstra

Rodriguez

Raman

, et al. Characterizing the range of extracellular protein post-translational modifications in a cellulose-degrading bacteria using a multiple proteolyic digestion/peptide fragmentation approach. Anal Chem 2013; 85: 3144–3151.

11.

Macek

Forchhammer

Hardouin

, et al. Protein post-translational modifications in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. Epub ahead of print September 2019. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-019-0243-0.

12.

Houser

Barnhart

Boutz

, et al. Controlled measurement and comparative analysis of cellular components in E. Coli reveals broad regulatory changes in response to glucose starvation. PLoS Comput Biol 2015; 11: 1–27.

13.

Kosono

Tamura

Suzuki

, et al. Changes in the acetylome and succinylome of Bacillus subtilis in response to carbon source. PLoS One 2015; 10: 1–24.

14.

Soufi

Krug

Harst

, et al. Characterization of the E. Coli proteome and its modifications during growth and ethanol stress. Front Microbiol 2015; 6: 1–11.

15.

Maffei

Francetic

Subtil

. Tracking proteins secreted by bacteria: what’s in the toolbox? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017; 7: 1–17.

16.

Tiwari

Jamal

Hassan

, et al. Two-component signal transduction systems of pathogenic bacteria as targets for antimicrobial therapy: an overview. Front Microbiol 2017; 8: 1–7.

17.

Soares

Spät

Méndez

, et al. Ser/Thr/Tyr phosphoproteome characterization of Acinetobacter baumannii: comparison between a reference strain and a highly invasive multidrug-resistant clinical isolate. J Proteomics 2014; 102: 113–124.

18.

Fortuin

Tomazella

Nagaraj

, et al. Phosphoproteomics analysis of a clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing isolate: expanding the mycobacterial phosphoproteome catalog. Front Microbiol 2015; 6: 1–12.

19.

Junker

Maa

Otto

, et al. Spectral library based analysis of arginine phosphorylations in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Cell Proteomics. Epub ahead of print November 2018. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.RA117.000378.

20.

Zhou

Wong

, et al. Phosphorylation control of protein tyrosine phosphatase A activity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. FEBS Lett 2015; 589: 326–331.

21.

Abdullah

Greenfield

Bronte-Tinkew

, et al. VacA promotes CagA accumulation in gastric epithelial cells during Helicobacter pylori infection. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 1–9.

22.

Sun

Xiao

, et al. Phosphoproteome analysis of the pathogenic bacterium Helicobacter pylori reveals over-representation of tyrosine phosphorylation and multiply phosphorylated proteins. Proteomics 2011; 11: 1449–1461.

23.

Salama

Otto

Tompkins

, et al. Vacuolating cytotoxin of Helicobacter pylori plays a role during colonization in a mouse model of infection. Infect Immun 2001; 69: 730–736.

24.

Hansen

Chaerkady

Sharma

, et al. The Escherichia coli phosphotyrosine proteome relates to core pathways and virulence. PLoS Pathog. Epub ahead of print June 2013. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003403.

25.

Claywell

Matschke

Fisher

. The impact of protein phosphorylation on chlamydial physiology. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2016; 6: 1–8.

26.

Flayhan

Bergé

Baïlo

, et al. The structure of Legionella pneumophila LegK4 type four secretion system (T4SS) effector reveals a novel dimeric eukaryotic-like kinase. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 1–13.

27.

Gaviard

Cosette

Jouenne

, et al. LasB and CbpD virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa carry multiple post-translational modifications on their lysine residues. J Proteome Res 2019; 18: 923–933.

28.

Ouidir

Jarnier

Cosette

, et al. Extracellular Ser/Thr/Tyr phosphorylated proteins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 strain. Proteomics 2014; 14: 2017–2030.

29.

Kelly-Wintenberg

South

Montie

. Tyrosine phosphate in a- and b-type flagellins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 1993; 175: 2458–2461.

30.

Suriyanarayanan

Periasamy

Lin

, et al. Flagellin FliC phosphorylation affects type 2 protease secretion and biofilm dispersal in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. PLoS One 2016; 11: 1–19.

31.

Forest

Dunham

Koomey

, et al. Crystallographic structure reveals phosphorylated pilin from Neisseria: phosphoserine sites modify type IV pilus surface chemistry and fibre morphology. Mol Microbiol 1999; 31: 743–752.

32.

Lai

, et al. Site-specific His/Asp phosphoproteomic analysis of prokaryotes reveals putative targets for drug resistance. BMC Microbiol 2017; 17: 1–10.

33.

Standish

Teh

Tran

ENH

, et al. Unprecedented abundance of protein tyrosine phosphorylation modulates Shigella flexneri virulence. J Mol Biol 2016; 428: 4197–4208.

34.

Greer

Shi

. Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13: 343–357.

35.

Eshghi

Pinne

Haake

, et al. Methylation and in vivo expression of the surface exposed Leptospira interrogans outer-membrane protein OmpL32. Microbiology 2012; 158: 622–635.

36.

Nally

Grassmann

Planchon

, et al. Pathogenic leptospires modulate protein expression and post-translational modifications in response to mammalian host signals. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017; 7: 1–15.

37.

Abeykoon

Noinaj

Choi

, et al. Structural insights into substrate recognition and catalysis in outer membrane protein B (OmpB) by protein-lysine methyltransferases from rickettsia. J Biol Chem 2016; 291: 19962–19974.

38.

Abeykoon

Chao

Wang

, et al. Two protein lysine methyltransferases methylate outer membrane protein B from Rickettsia. J Bacteriol 2012; 194: 6410–6418.

39.

Abeykoon

Wang

Chao

, et al. Multimethylation of Rickettsia OmpB catalyzed by lysine methyltransferases. J Biol Chem 2014; 289: 7691–7701.

40.

Ambler

Rees

. ε-N-methyl-lysine in bacterial flagellar protein. Nature 1959; 184: 56–57.

41.

Bubendorfer

Ishihara

Dohlich

, et al. Analyzing the modification of the Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 flagellar filament. PLoS One 2013; 8: 19–21.

42.

De Maayer

Cowan

. Flashy flagella: flagellin modification is relatively common and highly versatile among the Enterobacteriaceae. BMC Genomics 2016; 17: 1–13.

43.

Tronick

Martinez

. Methylation of the flagellin of Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 1971; 105: 211–219.

44.

Bogomolnaya

Aldrich

Ragoza

, et al. Identification of novel factors involved in modulating motility of salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium. PLoS One. Epub ahead of print November 2014. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111513.

45.

Frye

Karlinsey

Felise

, et al. Identification of new flagellar genes of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol 2006; 188: 2233–2243.

46.

Aly

Beebe

Chan

, et al. Cell-free production of integral membrane aspartic acid proteases reveals zinc-dependent methyltransferase activity of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa prepilin peptidase PilD. Microbiologyopen 2013; 2: 94–104.

47.

Pepe

Lory

. Amino acid substitutions in PilD, a bifunctional enzyme of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: effect on leader peptidase and N-methyltransferase activities in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 19120–19129.

48.

Gault

Malosse

Machata

, et al. Complete posttranslational modification mapping of pathogenic Neisseria meningitidis pilins requires top-down mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2014; 14: 1141–1151.

49.

N’Diaye

Borrel

Racine

, et al. Mechanism of action of the moonlighting protein EfTu as a substance P sensor in Bacillus cereus. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 1–14.

50.

Prezioso

Duong

Kuiper

, et al. Trimethylation of elongation factor-Tu by the dual thermoregulated methyltransferase EftM does not impact its canonical function in translation. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 1–12.

51.

Barbier

Owings

Barbier

, et al. Lysine trimethylation of EF-Tu mimics platelet-activating factor to initiate Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Am Soc Microbiol 2013; 4: 3–10.

52.

Widjaja

Harvey

Hagemann

, et al. Elongation factor Tu is a multifunctional and processed moonlighting protein. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 1–17.

53.

Christensen

Xie

Basisty

, et al. Post-translational protein acetylation: an elegant mechanism for bacteria to dynamically regulate metabolic functions. Front Microbiol 2019; 10: 1–22.

54.

Christensen

Baumgartner

Xie

, et al. Mechanisms, detection, and relevance of protein acetylation in prokaryotes. MBio 2019; 10: 1–20.

55.

Ren

Sang

, et al. Protein acetylation and its role in bacterial virulence. Trends Microbiol 2017; 25: 768–779.

56.

Zhang

Sprung

Pei

, et al. Lysine acetylation is a highly abundant and evolutionarily conserved modification in Escherichia coli. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009; 8: 215–225.

57.

Ouidir

Cosette

Jouenne

, et al. Proteomic profiling of lysine acetylation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa reveals the diversity of acetylated proteins. Proteomics 2015; 15: 2152–2157.

58.

Ren

, et al. Protein acetylation is involved in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium virulence. J Infect Dis 2016; 213: 1836–1845.

59.

Gaviard

Broutin

Cosette

, et al. Lysine succinylation and acetylation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Proteome Res 2018; 17: 2449–2459.

60.

Liu

Yang

Wang

, et al. Acetylome analysis reveals diverse functions of lysine acetylation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014; 13: 3352–3366.

61.

Okkels

Müller

Schmid

, et al. CFP10 discriminates between nonacetylated and acetylated ESAT-6 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by differential interaction. Proteomics 2004; 4: 2954–2960.

62.

Sreejit

Ahmed

Parveen

, et al. The ESAT-6 protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis interacts with beta-2-microglobulin (β2M) affecting antigen presentation function of macrophage. PLoS Pathog. Epub ahead of print October 2014. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004446.

63.

Lange

Rosenkrands

Stein

, et al. Analysis of protein species differentiation among mycobacterial low-Mr-secreted proteins by narrow pH range Immobiline gel 2-DE-MALDI-MS. J Proteomics 2014; 97: 235–244.

64.

Berrêdo-Pinho

Kalume

Correa

, et al. Proteomic profile of culture filtrate from the Brazilian vaccine strain Mycobacterium bovis BCG Moreau compared to M. Bovis BCG Pasteur. BMC Microbiol 2011; 11: 80.

65.

Singhal

Arora

Virmani

, et al. Systematic analysis of mycobacterial acylation reveals first example of acylation-mediated regulation of enzyme activity of a bacterial phosphatase. J Biol Chem 2015; 290: 26218–26234.

66.

Xie

Liu

, et al. First succinyl-proteome profiling of extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis revealed involvement of succinylation in cellular physiology. J Proteome Res 2015; 14: 107–119.

67.

Pan

Chen

, et al. Global analysis of protein lysine succinylation profiles and their overlap with lysine acetylation in the marine bacterium Vibrio parahemolyticus. J Proteome Res 2015; 14: 4309–4318.

68.

Ravipaty

Reilly

. Comprehensive characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus COL secretome by two-dimensional liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9: 1898–1919.

69.

Green

Mecsas

. Bacterial secretion systems: an overview. Virulence Mech Bact Pathog 2016; 4: 215–239.

70.

Van Roosmalen

Geukens

Jongbloed

JDH

, et al. Type I signal peptidases of Gram-positive bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1694: 279–297.

71.

Bonnemain

Raynaud

Réglier-Poupet

, et al. Differential roles of multiple signal peptidases in the virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Mol Microbiol 2004; 51: 1251–1266.

72.

Leversen

de Souza

Målen

, et al. Evaluation of signal peptide prediction algorithms for identification of mycobacterial signal peptides using sequence data from proteomic methods. Microbiology 2009; 155: 2375–2383.

73.

Målen

Berven

Fladmark

, et al. Comprehensive analysis of exported proteins from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Proteomics 2007; 7: 1702–1718.

74.

Payne

Bonissone

, et al. Unexpected diversity of signal peptides in prokaryotes. MBio 2012; 3: 1–6.

75.

de Souza

Leversen

Målen

, et al. Bacterial proteins with cleaved or uncleaved signal peptides of the general secretory pathway. J Proteomics 2011; 75: 502–510.

76.

Glew

Veith

Peng

, et al. PG0026 is the C-terminal signal peptidase of a novel secretion system of Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Biol Chem 2012; 287: 24605–24617.

77.

Shoji

Nakayama

. Glycobiology of the oral pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis and related species. Microb Pathog 2015; 94: 35–41.

78.

Shoji

Sato

Yukitake

, et al. Por secretion system-dependent secretion and glycosylation of Porphyromonas gingivalis hemin-binding protein 35. PLoS One. Epub ahead of print June 2011. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021372.

79.

Gorasia

Veith

Chen

, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis type IX secretion substrates are cleaved and modified by a sortase-like mechanism. PLoS Pathog 2015; 11: 1–31.

80.

Lasica

Goulas

Mizgalska

, et al. Structural and functional probing of PorZ, an essential bacterial surface component of the type-IX secretion system of human oral-microbiomic Porphyromonas gingivalis. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 1–22.

81.

Lasica

Ksiazek

Madej

, et al. The type IX secretion system (T9SS): highlights and recent insights into its structure and function. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. Epub ahead of print May 2017. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00215.

82.

Veith

Nor Muhammad

Dashper

, et al. Protein substrates of a novel secretion system are numerous in the Bacteroidetes phylum and have in common a cleavable C-terminal secretion signal, extensive post-translational modification, and cell-surface attachment. J Proteome Res 2013; 12: 4449–4461.

83.

Inatsuka

Julio

Cotter

. Bordetella filamentous hemagglutinin plays a critical role in immunomodulation, suggesting a mechanism for host specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 18578–18583.

84.

Melvin

Scheller

Noël

, et al. New insight into filamentous hemagglutinin secretion reveals a role for full-length FhaB in Bordetella virulence. MBio 2015; 6: 12–15.

85.

Braun

De Groot

Bitter

, et al. Secretion of elastinolytic enzymes and their propeptides by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 1998; 180: 3467–3469.

86.

Forster

Zemansky

Portnoy

, et al. Posttranslocation chaperone PrsA2 regulates the maturation and secretion of listeria monocytogenes proprotein virulence factors. J Bacteriol 2011; 193: 5961–5970.

87.

Folders

Tommassen

Van Loon

, et al. Identification of a chitin-binding protein secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 2000; 182: 1257–1263.

88.

Park

Galloway

. Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasD processes the inactive LasA precursor to the active protease form. Arch Biochem Biophys 1998; 357: 8–12.

89.

Sarnovsky

Rea

Makowski

, et al. Proteolytic cleavage of a C-terminal prosequence, leading to autoprocessing at the N terminus, activates leucine aminopeptidase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 10243–10253.

90.

Schäffer

Messner

. Emerging facets of prokaryotic glycosylation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2017; 41: 49–91.

91.

Tytgat

HLP

Lebeer

. The sweet tooth of bacteria: common themes in bacterial glycoconjugates. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2014; 78: 372–417.

92.

Nothaft

Szymanski

. Bacterial protein n-glycosylation: new perspectives and applications. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 6912–6920.

93.

Shao

. Sweet talk: protein glycosylation in bacterial interaction with the host. Trends Microbiol 2015; 23: 630–641.

94.

Latousakis

Juge

. How sweet are our gut beneficial bacteria? A focus on protein glycosylation in Lactobacillus. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19: 1–18.

95.

Eichler

Koomey

. Sweet new roles for protein glycosylation in prokaryotes. Trends Microbiol 2017; 25: 662–672.

96.

Zhou

Zhu

, et al. Gap1 functions as a molecular chaperone to stabilize its interactive partner Gap3 during biogenesis of serine-rich repeat bacterial adhesin. Mol Microbiol 2012; 83: 866–878.

97.

Champasa

Longwell

Eldridge

, et al. Targeted identification of glycosylated proteins in the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori (Hp). Mol Cell Proteomics 2013; 12: 2568–2586.

98.

Schirm

Arora

Verma

, et al. Structural and genetic characterization of glycosylation of type a flagellin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 2004; 186: 2523–2531.

99.

Faridmoayer

Fentabil

Mills

, et al. Functional characterization of bacterial oligosaccharyltransferases involved in O-linked protein glycosylation. J Bacteriol 2007; 189: 8088–8098.

100.

Paramonov

Rangarajan

Hashim

, et al. Structural analysis of a novel anionic polysaccharide from Porphyromonas gingivalis strain W50 related to Arg-gingipain glycans. Mol Microbiol 2005; 58: 847–863.

101.

Nothaft

Scott

Vinogradov

, et al. Diversity in the protein N-glycosylation pathways within the Campylobacter genus. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012; 11: 1203–1219.

102.

Young

Brisson

Kelly

, et al. Structure of the N-linked glycan present on multiple glycoproteins in the Gram-negative bacterium, Campylobacter jejuni. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 42530–42539.

103.

Verma

Schirm

Arora

, et al. Glycosylation of b-type flagellin of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: structural and genetic basis. J Bacteriol 2006; 188: 4395–4403.

104.

Merino

Tomás

. Gram-negative flagella glycosylation. Int J Mol Sci 2014; 15: 2840–2857.

105.

Sun

Jin

Ding

, et al. Posttranslational modification of flagellin FlaB in Shewanella oneidensis. J Bacteriol 2013; 195: 2550–2561.

106.

Thibault

Logan

Kelly

, et al. Identification of the carbohydrate moieties and glycosylation motifs in Campylobacter jejuni flagellin. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 34862–34870.

107.

Alemka

Nothaft

Zheng

, et al. N-glycosylation of Campylobacter jejuni surface proteins promotes bacterial fitness. Infect Immun 2013; 81: 1674–1682.

108.

Iwashkiw

Fentabil

Faridmoayer

, et al. Exploiting the Campylobacter jejuni protein glycosylation system for glycoengineering vaccines and diagnostic tools directed against brucellosis. Microb Cell Fact 2012; 11: 13.

109.

Valiente

Bouché

Hitchen

, et al. Role of glycosyltransferases modifying type B flagellin of emerging hypervirulent Clostridium difficile lineages and their impact on motility and biofilm formation. J Biol Chem 2016; 291: 25450–25461.

110.

Guerry

Ewing

Schirm

, et al. Changes in flagellin glycosylation affect Campylobacter autoagglutination and virulence. Mol Microbiol 2006; 60: 299–311.

111.

Hanuszkiewicz

Pittock

Humphries

, et al. Identification of the flagellin glycosylation system in Burkholderia cenocepacia and the contribution of glycosylated flagellin to evasion of human innate immune responses. J Biol Chem 2014; 289: 19231–19244.

112.

Khodai-Kalaki

Andrade

Mohamed

, et al. Burkholderia cenocepacia lipopolysaccharide modification and flagellin glycosylation affect virulence but not innate immune recognition in plants. MBio 2015; 6: 1–11.

113.

Takeuchi

Taguchi

Inagaki

, et al. Flagellin glycosylation island in Pseudomonas syringae pv. Glycinea and its role in host specificity. J Bacteriol 2003; 185: 6658–6665.

114.

Zilliges

Kehr

Mikkat

, et al. An extracellular glycoprotein is implicated in cell-cell contacts in the toxic cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806. J Bacteriol 2008; 190: 2871–2879.

115.

Avilés-Reyes

Miller

Simpson-Haidaris

, et al. Modification of Streptococcus mutans Cnm by PgfS contributes to adhesion, endothelial cell invasion, and virulence. J Bacteriol 2014; 196: 2789–2797.

116.

Tang

Ruiz

Mintz

. O-polysaccharide glycosylation is required for stability and function of the collagen adhesin EmaA of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Infect Immun 2012; 80: 2868–2877.

117.

Côté

Charbonneau

MÈ

Mourez

. Glycosylation of the Escherichia coli TibA self-associating autotransporter influences the conformation and the functionality of the protein. PLoS One 2013; 8: 1–9.

118.

Cuccui

Terra

Bossé

, et al. The N-linking glycosylation system from Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is required for adhesion and has potential use in glycoengineering. Open Biol. Epub ahead of print January 2017. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.160212.

119.

Zeng

Fives-Taylor

. The glycan moieties and the N-terminal polypeptide backbone of a fimbria-associated adhesin, Fap1, play distinct roles in the biofilm development of Streptococcus parasanguinis. Infect Immun 2007; 75: 2181–2188.

120.

Smedley

Jewell

Roguskie

, et al. Influence of pilin glycosylation on Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1244 pilus function. Infect Immun 2005; 73: 7922–7931.

121.

Harvey

Bondy-Denomy

Marquis

, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa defends against phages through type IV pilus glycosylation. Nat Microbiol 2018; 3: 47–52.

122.

Karlyshev

Everest

Linton

, et al. The Campylobacter jejuni general glycosylation system is important for attachment to human epithelial cells and in the colonization of chicks. Microbiology 2004; 150: 1957–1964.

123.

Sobocinska

Roszczenko-Jasinska

Ciesielska

, et al. Protein palmitoylation and its role in bacterial and viral infections. Front Immunol 2018; 8: 1–19.

124.

Kovacs-Simon

Titball

Michell

. Lipoproteins of bacterial pathogens. Infect Immun 2011; 79: 548–561.

125.

Buddelmeijer

. The molecular mechanism of bacterial lipoprotein modification—how, when and why? FEMS Microbiol Rev 2015; 39: 246–261.

126.

Bürki

Frey

Pilo

. Virulence, persistence and dissemination of Mycoplasma bovis. Vet Microbiol 2015; 179: 15–22.

127.

Sankaran

Wus

. Lipid modification of bacterial prolipoprotein. Transfer of diacylglyceryl moiety from phosphatidylglycerol. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 19701–19706.

128.

Hillmann

Argentini

Buddelmeijer

. Kinetics and phospholipid specificity of apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 27936–27946.

129.

Asanuma

Kurokawa

Ichikawa

, et al. Structural evidence of α-aminoacylated lipoproteins of Staphylococcus aureus. FEBS J 2011; 278: 716–728.

130.

Kurokawa

Ryu

Ichikawa

, et al. Novel bacterial lipoprotein structures conserved in low-GC content gram-positive bacteria are recognized by Toll-like receptor 2. J Biol Chem 2012; 287: 13170–13181.

131.

Serebryakova

Demina

Galyamina

, et al. The acylation state of surface lipoproteins of mollicute Acholeplasma laidlawii. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 22769–22776.

132.

Kang

Nan

Jin

, et al. Recognition of lipopeptide patterns by Toll-like receptor 2-Toll-like receptor 6 heterodimer. Immunity 2009; 31: 873–884.

133.

Das

Kanamoto

, et al. Contribution of lipoproteins and lipoprotein processing to endocarditis virulence in Streptococcus sanguinis. J Bacteriol 2009; 191: 4166–4179.

134.

Bray

Sutcliffe

Harrington

. Impact of lgt mutation on lipoprotein biosynthesis and in vitro phenotypes of Streptococcus agalactiae. Microbiology 2009; 155: 1451–1458.

135.

Petit

Brown

Ingraham

, et al. Lipid modification of prelipoproteins is dispensable for growth in vitro but essential for virulence in Streptococcus pneumoniae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2001; 200: 229–233.

136.

Cullen

Trent

. A link between the assembly of flagella and lipooligosaccharide of the Gram-negative bacterium Campylobacter jejuni. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 5160–5165.

137.

Reffuveille

Serror

Chevalier

, et al. The prolipoprotein diacylglyceryl transferase (Lgt) of Enterococcus faecalis contributes to virulence. Microbiology 2012; 158: 816–825.

138.

Stoll

Dengjel

Nerz

, et al. Staphylococcus aureus deficient in lipidation of prelipoproteins is attenuated in growth and immune activation. Infect Immun 2005; 73: 2411–2423.

139.

Kurokawa

Kim

Ichikawa

, et al. Environment-mediated accumulation of diacyl lipoproteins over their triacyl counterparts in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 2012; 194: 3299–3306.

140.

Kumar

Balamurali

Sankaran

. Bacterial lipid modification of proteins requires appropriate secretory signals even for expression—implications for biogenesis and protein engineering. Mol Membr Biol 2014; 31: 183–194.

141.

LoVullo

Wright

Isabella

, et al. Revisiting the Gram-negative lipoprotein paradigm. J Bacteriol 2015; 197: 1705–1715.

142.

da Silva

RAG

Churchward

Karlyshev

, et al. The role of apolipoprotein N-acyl transferase, Lnt, in the lipidation of factor H binding protein of Neisseria meningitidis strain MC58 and its potential as a drug target. Br J Pharmacol 2017; 174: 2247–2260.

143.

Luo

Friese

Runnels

, et al. The dual role of lipids of the lipoproteins in trumenba, a self-adjuvanting vaccine against meningococcal meningitis B disease. AAPS J 2016; 18: 1562–1575.

144.

Machata

Tchatalbachev

Mohamed

, et al. Lipoproteins of Listeria monocytogenes are critical for virulence and TLR2-mediated immune activation. J Immunol 2008; 181: 2028–2035.

145.

Schlatterer

Beck

Hanzelmann

, et al. The mechanism behind bacterial lipoprotein release: phenol-soluble modulins mediate Toll-like receptor 2 activation via extracellular vesicle release from Staphylococcus aureus. MBio 2018; 9: 1–13.

146.

Issartel

J-P

Koronakis

Hughes

. Activation of Escherichia coli prohaemolysin to the mature toxin by acyl carrier protein-dependent fatty acylation. Nature 1991; 351: 759–761.

147.

Greene

Crow

Hughes

, et al. Structure of a bacterial toxin-activating acyltransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112: E3058–E3066.

148.

Lee

Schneewind

. Protein secretion and the pathogenesis of bacterial infections. Genes Dev 2001; 15: 1725–1752.

149.

Bouchez

Douché

Dazas

, et al. Characterization of post-translational modifications and cytotoxic properties of the adenylate-cyclase hemolysin produced by various Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis isolates. Toxins (Basel). Epub ahead of print September 2017. DOI: 10.3390/toxins9100304.

150.

Lewis

Wilton

Mott

, et al. Immunomodulation by the Pseudomonas syringae HopZ type III effector family in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 2014; 9: 1–20.

151.

Thieme

Szczesny

Urban

, et al. New type III effectors from Xanthomonas campestris pv. Vesicatoria trigger plant reactions dependent on a conserved N-myristoylation motif. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2007; 20: 1250–1261.

152.

Lewis

Abada

, et al. The HopZ family of Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors require myristoylation for virulence and avirulence functions in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Bacteriol 2008; 190: 2880–2891.

153.

Spera

Guaimas

Corvi

, et al. Brucella hijacks host-mediated palmitoylation to stabilize and localize PrpA to the plasma membrane. Infect Immun 2018; 86: 1–8.

154.

Ivanov

Charron

Hang

, et al. Lipidation by the host prenyltransferase machinery facilitates membrane localization of Legionella pneumophila effector proteins. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 34686–34698.

155.

Reinicke

Hutchinson

Magee

, et al. A Salmonella typhimurium effector protein SifA is modified by host cell prenylation and S-acylation machinery. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 14620–14627.

156.

Schroeder

Aurass

Oates

, et al. Legionella pneumophila effector LpdA is a palmitoylated phospholipase D virulence factor. Infect Immun 2015; 83: 3989–4002.

157.

Soufi

Soares

Ravikumar

, et al. Proteomics reveals evidence of cross-talk between protein modifications in bacteria: focus on acetylation and phosphorylation. Curr Opin Microbiol 2012; 15: 357–363.