What are the possible futures for educational research? The essay concerns two intertwined agendas. The first agenda is empirical and concerns how educational policy and leadership constitute, circulate, transform and modify feelings, moods and affects. Especially, motivation, engagement and the desire for learning are targets for policy and leadership technologies. This possible scenario is an affective edu-future that has connections to new modes of governance through standards and thereby present ways of leading educational organisations and the affective fabric hereof. The second agenda concerns the identification of suitable methodologies for researching and critiquing this affective edu-future and its performative effects. This brings me to the learning laboratory as an affective methodology and the possibility of affirmative critiques.
AhmedS (2014) Willful Subjects, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
BaradK (2007a) Meeting the Universe Haldway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
BaradK (2007b) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BjergH (2013) Staging the future: Potentializing the self. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education26(9): 1169–1191.
5.
BrøggerKStaunæsD (2016) Standards and (self)implosion. How the circulation of affects accelerates the spread of standards and intensifies the embodiment of colliding, temporal ontologies. Theory & Psychology26(2): 223–242.
6.
Clough P (2016) Rethinking race, calculation, quantification and measure. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies. Epub ahead of print 26 June. DOI: 10.1177/1532708616655760.
7.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1994) What is Philosophy?, New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
FoucaultMRabinowP (1997) Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984Vol 1, New York: New Press.
9.
GrekS (2009) Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy24(1): 23–37.
10.
HarawayD (1992) The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In: GrossbergLNelsonCTreichlerPA (eds) Cultural Studies, New York: Routledge, pp. 295–337.
11.
HarawayD (1996) Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleManSage. Meets_OncoMouse. Feminism and Technoscience, New York: Routledge.
12.
HvenegaardKStaunæsD (2015) ‘…And then we do it in Norway’. Learning leadership and Nordic Whiteness through affective contact zones. In: AndreassenRVitusK (eds) Affectivity and Race: Studies from a Nordic Context, London: Ashgate, pp. 77–94.
13.
JuelskjærMStaunæsD (2016) Orchestrating intensities and rhythms: How post-psychologies are assisting new educational standards and reforming subjectivities. Theory & Pscyhology26(2): 182–201.
14.
KofoedJStaunæsD (2015) Hesitancy as ethics. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology6(1): 24–39.
15.
LuryCWakefordN (2012) Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, London: Routledge.
16.
MacLureM (2006) The bone in the throat: Some uncertain thoughts on Baroque methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education19(6): 729–745.
17.
MassumiB (2010) The future birth of the affective fact: The political ontology of threat. In: GreggMSeigworthGJ (eds) The Affect Theory Reader, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 52–70.
18.
PuarJ (2012) ‘I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess’: Becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory. philoSOPHIA2(1): 49–66.
SedgwickEK (2003) Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, Series Q, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
SellarS (2014) A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education56(1): 131–146.
22.
StaunæsD (2011) Governing the potentials of life itself. Interrogating the promises of affective educational leadership. Educational History & Administration43(3): 227–247.
23.
StaunæsDKofoedJ (2015a) Experimenting with affects and senses: A performative pop-up-laboratory (self) critically revisited. In: KnudsenBTStageC (eds) Affective Methodologies: Developing Cultural Research Strategies for the Study of Affects, Basingstoke: Hampshire Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 45–68.
24.
StaunæsDKofoedJ (2015b) Producing curious affects: Visual methodology as an affecting and conflictual wunderkammer. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education28(10): 1229–1248.
25.
StaunæsDPorsJ (2015) Thinking educational policy and management through (frictional) concepts of affects. In: GulsonKNClarkMPetersenEB (eds) Education Policy and Contemporary Theory: Implications for Research, London: Routledge99–109.
26.
TaguchiHL (2016) Deleuzo-Guattarian rhizomatics: Mapping the desiring forces and connections between educational practices and the neurosciences. In: TaylorCHughesC (eds) Posthuman Research Practices in Education, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 37–57.
