Teaching Adolescents EFL by Integrating Think-Pair-Share and Reading Strategy Instruction: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Abstract

Think-Pair-Share, a cooperative discussion strategy developed by Frank Lyman and colleagues (1981), is often utilized in first language contexts but rarely in second language (L2) contexts. To investigate its usefulness in the L2 context, a traditional English as a Foreign Language (EFL) reading class was transformed by integrating think-pair-share with reading strategy instruction. An intervention class was compared to a traditionally taught class to determine whether any differences in terms of motivation towards learning English and reading strategy use would be found. In addition, it was further investigated whether adolescent students are accepting of a think-pair-share integrated reading strategy method of English instruction. Results indicate that think-pair-share integrated reading strategy instruction seems to be more effective in increasing motivation than the traditional approach. However, when examined in terms of motivation type, both the traditional and intervention groups showed a statistically significant increase in intrinsic motivation. Furthermore, statistical results indicate that the think-pair-share technique combined with reading strategy instruction did not change the participants’ perceptions regarding their reading strategy use. Still, based on the responses from the closed- and open-ended questions, the students appeared to be very receptive to the think-pair-share technique. Based on the findings of this study, the think-pair-share technique combined with reading strategy instruction appears to be a plausible alternative for teaching English reading to adolescents in Taiwanese EFL classrooms. Pedagogical implications of the results and future research directions are discussed.

Keywords

Reading strategies motivation think-pair-share adolescents EFL

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderson

(2000) Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Allen

(1989) Literature as a support to language acquisition. In: Rigg

Allen

(eds) When They Don’t All Speak English: Integrating the ESL Student into the Regular Classroom. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 55–64.

Anderson

(2003) Reading. In: Nunan

(ed.) Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill, 67–86.

Bai

Y-L

(2011) The degree of freedom of reader choice and second language incidental vocabulary learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Central University, Chungli, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Bonesteel

(2011) Real Reading 1. New York: Pearson Education.

Brown

Campione

Day

(1981) Learning to learn: on training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher 10(2): 14–21.

Brown

Palincsar

(1982) Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities 2(1): 1–17.

Chamot

O’Malley

(1994) Instructional approaches and teaching procedures. In: Spangenberg-Urbschat

Pritchard

(eds) Kids Come in All Languages: Reading Instruction for ESL Students. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 82–107.

Chamot

Rubin

(1994) Comments on Janie Rees-Miller’s ‘A critical appraisal of learner training: theoretical bases and teaching implications’: two readers react. TESOL Quarterly 28(4): 771–76.

10.

Chao

M-C

(2006) A study of the attitudes and reflections of Taipei junior high school students in using three English supplementary learning materials. Unpublished master’s thesis. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

11.

Cohen

(2003) Strategy training for second language learners. ERIC Digest Available at: http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/digest_pdfs/0302cohen.pdf

12.

Cook

Mayer

(1983) Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In: Pressley

Levin

(eds) Cognitive Strategy Research: Educational Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 87–131.

13.

Creswell

(2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods (2^nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

14.

Field

(2005) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 2nd ed. London: SAGE.

15.

Gardner

(1985) Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.

16.

Guthrie

Wigfield

Perencevich

(eds) (2004) Motivating Reading Comprehension: Concept Oriented Reading Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

17.

Harrison

(2004) Understanding Reading Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

18.

Hudelson

(1989) ‘Teaching’ English through content-area activities. In: Rigg

Allen

(eds) When They Don’t All Speak English: Integrating the ESL Student into the Regular Classroom. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English,139–52.

19.

Hung

H-P

(2005) An investigation of factors that influence EFL college students’ reading strategy use. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.

20.

King

(1993) From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching 41(1): 30–35.

21.

Lambert

Walker

Zimmerman

Cooper

Lambert

Gardner

. (eds) (2002) The Constructivist Leader. New York: Teachers College Press.

22.

Lin

C.-Y.

(2011). A multi-method design to investigate the roles of reading strategy use and reading interest in comprehension of English expository texts for eighth graders in the EFL context. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.

23.

Lyman

(1981) The responsive classroom discussion: the inclusion of all students. In: Anderson

(ed.) Mainstreaming Digest. College Park: University of Maryland Press, 109–13.

24.

Mokhtari

Sheorey

(2002) Measuring ESL Students’ Awareness of Reading Strategies. Available at: http://nelson.myfastmail.com/Intensive%20Reading%20%20Content%20Based/Student%20use/MeasuringESL-stratgy.pdf

25.

Nunnally

(1978) Psychometic Theory (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

26.

Paris

Wasik

Turner

(1991) The development of strategic readers. In: Barr

Kamil

Mosenthal

Pearson

(eds) Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2). New York: Longman, 609–40.

27.

Peng

I-N

(2002) EFL motivation and strategy use among Taiwanese senior high school learners. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

28.

Pressley

El-Dinary

Brown

(1992) Skilled and not-so-skilled reading: good information processing and not-so-good information processing. In: Pressley

Harris

Guthrie

(eds) Promoting Academic Competence and Literacy in School: Cognitive Research and Instructional Innovation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 91–127.

29.

Reynolds

Wang

S-L

(2014) An investigation of the role of article commendation and criticism in Taiwanese university students’ heavy BBS usage. Computers & Education 78: 210–26. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.021

30.

Suh

Y-M

(2011) Exploring reading strategy use in English academic reading practices in an EFL context: case studies of four Korean college students. PhD thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.

31.

Taki

(2015) Metacognitive online reading strategy use: readers’ perceptions in L1 and L2. Journal of Research in Reading (forthcoming): 1–19. doi: 10.1111/1467–9817.12048

32.

Warden

Lin

(2000) Existence of integrative motivation in an Asian EFL setting. Foreign Language Annals 33(5): 535–47.

33.

West

(1937) The present position in vocabulary selection for foreign language teaching. The Modern Language Journal 21(6): 433–37. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/317364

34.

Winograd

Hare

(1988) Direct instruction of reading comprehension strategies: the nature of teacher explanation. In: Weinstein

Goetz

Alexander

(eds) Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 121–39.