Imagery training has been shown to improve reading comprehension. Recent research has also shown that the quality of visual mental imagery used is important for reading comprehension. A review of literature shows that there has been relatively little detailed research on the quality of imagery used by learners, especially in the case of students learning English as a foreign language (EFL). This study was designed to examine the influence of image quality on reading comprehension in EFL students, comparing the effects of training in the use of a focused, constrained imagery relative to that of a more standard form of visual mental imagery training. The study also examined the impact of individual differences such as gender, ability to make images, working memory capacity, and motivational beliefs on the training outcome. The findings provide evidence that constrained imagery strategy training helped EFL learners improve reading comprehension. Female participants showed higher comprehension performance than males. Other individual difference variables did not emerge as having a significant impact on change in reading comprehension performance over time.
AndersonJ.R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications. 6th edition.New York: Worth Publishers.
2.
AndersonJ.R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications. 7th edition.New York: Worth Publishers.
3.
AndersonJ.R.BothellD.DouglasS.LebiereC.QinY. (2004). An integrated theory of mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036–1060.
4.
AndersonJ.R.BowerG.H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.
5.
AndradeJ. (2001). The working memory model: Consensus, controversy, and future directions. New York: Psychology Press.
6.
AnmarkrudO.BråtenI. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 252–256.
7.
AtkinsonR.C.RaughM.R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 126–133.
8.
BaddeleyA.D. (2007). Working memory, thought and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
BaddeleyA.D.AndradeJ. (2000). Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 126–145.
10.
BakerL.WigfieldA. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452–477.
11.
BeatonA.GrunebergM.HydeC.ShufflebottomA.SykesR. (2005) Facilitation of receptive and productive foreign vocabulary learning using the keyword method: The role of image quality. Memory, 13, 458–471.
12.
BolliG.G.PellicciaF.HardcastleP. (2007). Using classical test theory to establish test version equivalence and stability in a European language test suite – The case of the CELI. In CarlsenC.MoeE. (Eds.), A human touch to language testing (pp. 58–75). Oslo: Novus Press.
13.
BrykA.S.RaudenbushS.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
CarrettiB.BorellaE.CornoldiC.De BeniR. (2009). Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 246–251.
15.
ConwayA.R.A.EngleR.W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 354–373.
16.
ConwayA.R.A.KaneM.J.BuntingM.F.Zach HambricD.WilhelmO.EngleR.W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 769–786.
17.
CoxK.E.GuthrieJ.T. (2001). Motivational and cognitive contributions to students’ amount of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 116–131.
18.
CraikF.I.M.TulvingE. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.
19.
FraenkelJ.R.WallenN.E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education. 4th edition.Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
20.
GanZ.HumphreysG.Hamp-LyonsL. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese universities. Modern Language Journal, 88, 229–244.
21.
GarciaT.PintrichP.R. (1996). Assessing students’ motivation and learning strategies in the classroom context: The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. In M. Brienbaum & F.J.R.C. Dochy (Series Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge series: Vol. 42. Evaluation in education and human services (pp. 319–339). doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0657-3_12
22.
JoffeV.CainK.MaricN. (2007). Comprehension problems in children with specific language impairment: Does mental imagery training help?International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42, 648–664.
23.
Johnson-GlenbergM.C. (2000). Training reading comprehension in adequate decoders/poor comprehenders: Verbal versus visual strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 772–782.
24.
KaufmanS.B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity?Intelligence, 35, 211–223.
25.
KnauffM.MayE. (2006). Mental imagery, reasoning, and blindness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 161–177.
26.
KosslynS.M.BrunnJ.CaveK.R.WallachR.W. (1984). Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis. Cognition, 18, 195–243.
27.
KosslynS.M.Van KleeckM.H.KirbyK.N. (Eds.). (1990). A neurologically plausible model of individual differences in visual mental imagery. Florence, KY: Taylor and Frances/Routledge.
28.
KrasnyK.A.SadoskiM. (2008). Mental imagery and affect in English/French bilingual readers: A cross-linguistic perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 399–428.
29.
MacaroE.ErlerL. (2008). Raising the achievement of young-beginner readers of French through strategy instruction. Applied Linguistics, 29, 90–119.
30.
MarksD.F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17–24.
31.
McCallumR.D.MooreS. (1999). Not all imagery is created equal: the role of imagery in the comprehension of main ideas in exposition. Journal of Reading Psychology, 20, 21–60.
32.
McClellandJ.L. (1988). Connectionist models and psychological evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 107–123.
33.
McDanielM.A.PressleyM.DunayP.K. (1987). Long-term retention of vocabulary after keyword and context learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 87–89.
34.
MooreP.J.KirbyJ.R. (1988). Comprehension training and reading performance. Reading, 22, 126–136.
35.
MurrayJ.D.BurkeK.A. (2003). Activation and encoding of predictive inferences: The role of reading skill. Discourse Processes, 35, 81–102.
36.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. NIH Publication No. 00–4754.
37.
OakhillJ.PatelS. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems?Journal of Research in Reading, 14, 106–115.
38.
PadronY.N.WaxmanH.C. (1988). The effect of ESL students’ perceptions of their cognitive strategies on reading achievement. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 146–150.
39.
PaivioA. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
PajaresF. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
41.
PetersE.E.LevinJ.R.McGivernJ.E.PressleyM. (1985). Further comparison of representational and transformational prose-learning imagery. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 129–136.
42.
PintrichP.R.SmithD.A.F.GarciaT.MckeachieW.J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.
43.
RichardsonA. (1994). Individual differences in imagining: Their measurement, origins, and consequences. New York: Baywood.
44.
SadoskiM.McTigueE.M.PaivioA. (2012). A dual coding theoretical model of decoding in reading: Subsuming the Laberge and Samuels model. Reading Psychology, 33, 465–496.
45.
SadoskiM.PaivioA. (2007). Toward a unified theory of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 337–356.
46.
SadoskiM.WillsonV.L. (2006). Effects of a theoretically based large-scale reading intervention in a multicultural urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 137–154.
47.
SchiefeleU.SchaffnerE.MöllerJ.WigfieldA. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–463.
48.
SeigneuricA.EhrlichM-F.OakhillJ.YuillN.M. (2000). Working memory resources and children’s reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 81–103.
49.
SolheimO.J. (2011). The impact of reading self-efficacy and task value on reading comprehension scores in different item formats. Reading Psychology, 32, 1–27.
50.
Statistics Canada, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Learning a living: First results of the adult literacy and life skills survey. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/innovation-education/34867438.pdf
51.
SteffensenM.S.GoetzE.T.ChengX. (1999). The images and emotions of bilingual Chinese readers: A dual coding analysis. Reading Psychology, 20, 301–324.
52.
SteinB.S.BransfordJ.D. (1979). Constraints on effective elaboration: Effects of precision and subject generation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 18, 769–777.
53.
SteinB.S.MorrisC.D.BransfordJ.D. (1978). Constraints on effective elaboration. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 17, 707–714.
54.
TsaiY.-R.ErnstC.TalleyP.C. (2010). L1 and L2 strategy use in reading comprehension of Chinese EFL readers. Reading Psychology, 31, 1–29.
55.
UenoT.MateJ.AllenR.J.HitchG.J.BaddeleyA.D. (2011). What goes through the gate? Exploring interference with visual feature binding. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1597–1604.
56.
VogelE.K.McColloughA.W.MachizawaM.G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500–503.
57.
WangA.Y.ThomasM.H. (1995). Effect of keywords on long-term retention: Help or hindrance?Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 468–475.
58.
WangJ.H.GuthrieJ.T. (2004). Modelling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186.
59.
WatkinsM.W.CoffeyD.Y. (2004). Reading motivation: Multidimensional and indeterminate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 110–118.
60.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ.T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432.
61.
WyraM.LawsonM.J.HungiN. (2007). The mnemonic keyword method: The effects of bidirectional retrieval training and of ability to image on foreign language vocabulary recall. Learning and Instruction, 17, 360–371.
62.
ZhangL.J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science, 36, 89–116.
