Extending TAM Model: The Role of Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Efficacy on Algerian EFL University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Duolingo

Abstract

Duolingo, a gamified educational digital platform, has received significant popularity in EFL education. In this context, the study purposes to explores how Algerian EFL learners respond to using Duolingo as a digital technology learning tool. Specifically, the study sought to investigate the role of Self-Efficacy (SE) and Intrinsic Motivation (IM) in shaping Algerian EFL learners’ behavioral intention (BI) to use Duolingo within an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework. Both direct and indirect effects were tested alongside the moderating roles of Digital Resource Access and Institutional Support using structural equation modeling approach. Data were collected from 319 EFL undergraduate students through a validated questionnaire. Findings revealed significant direct effect of both Self-Efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation on BI. In addition, Self-Efficacy indirectly influenced BI through perceived usefulness (PU), while Intrinsic Motivation had an indirect effect via Perceived Ease of Use (PEU). Furthermore, Institutional Support and Digital Resource access has significantly moderate the PU and PEU on BI pathways respectively. The study highlights the need for Algerian higher education to adopt local pedagogical and infrastructural strategies to optimize the use of digital language tools in EFL education.

Keywords

Duolingo EFL learners intrinsic motivation self-efficacy technology acceptance model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

S. A.

Suliman

M. A.

AL-Qadri

A. H.

Zhang

(2024). Exploring the intention to use mobile learning applications among international students for Chinese language learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(4), 1093–1116. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2023-0012

Aksakallı

Daşer

(2025). Unlocking EFL learners’ insights into ChatGPT use for L2 writing: The impacts of usage frequency and gender variations. Current Psychology, 44(9), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07437-3

Al-Adwan

A. S.

Al-Adwan

Abbasi

G. A.

Albelbisi

N. A.

Habibi

(2023). Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 15381–15413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3

Al-Emran

Teo

(2020). Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learning adoption? An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1983–1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10062-w

Alfadda

H. A.

Mahdi

H. S.

(2021). Measuring students’ use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4), 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1

Almayez

M. A.

Al-Khresheh

M. H.

Al-Qadri

A. H.

Alkhateeb

I. A.

Alomaim

T. I. M.

(2025). Motivation and English self-efficacy in online learning applications among Saudi EFL learners: Exploring the mediating role of self-regulated learning strategies. Acta Psychologica, 254, Article 104796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104796

Almousawi

S. A.

(2021). Examining English language learning apps from a second language acquisition perspective. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(5), 166. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n5p166

Al-Qadri

A. H.

Zhao

(2021). Preparation of an observation card to measure the developmental learning difficulties among primary school students in Sana’a City, Yemen. South African Journal of Education, 41(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n2a1720 and https://handle.net/10520/ejc-educat_v41_n2_a3

(2024). The relationship between technology acceptance and self-regulated learning: The mediation roles of intrinsic motivation and learning engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2605–2623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11959-3

10.

Arain

A. A.

Hussain

Rizvi

W. H.

Vighio

M. S.

(2019). Extending UTAUT2 toward acceptance of mobile learning in the context of higher education. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(3), 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00685-8

11.

Bandura

(1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. In Schwarzer

(Ed.), Self-related cognitions in anxiety and motivation (pp. 77–98). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

12.

Bandura

(1997a). Bandura (vol. 2). FrancoAngeli.

13.

Bandura

(1997b). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

14.

Bentler

P. M.

Bonett

D. G.

(1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

15.

Berns

Isla-Montes

J. L.

Palomo-Duarte

Dodero

J. M.

(2016). Motivation, students’ needs and learning outcomes: A hybrid game-based app for enhanced language learning. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2971-1

16.

Bouherar

Salem

(2025). English as a medium of instruction in practice: Exploring implementation and impact. In Sustainability in Algerian higher education: Balancing emerging reforms, outcomes, and practices (pp. 117–165): Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81347-4_5

17.

Boumechaal

(2021). English language teaching and conflicting visions of change within Algerian higher education(Doctoral dissertation). University of Leeds. Retrieved from: https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/29936/

18.

Buabeng-Andoh

(2025). Investigating student–teachers’ continuous intention to use mobile learning management system: The technology acceptance model and expectation confirmatory model. Discover Education, 4(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00447-0

19.

Chen

Jia

(2020). The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(4), 1769–1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09801-5

20.

Creswell

J. W.

(2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.): Sage Publications.

21.

Davis

F. D.

(1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. In M. N. Al-Suqri & A. S. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information seeking behavior and technology adoption (pp. 205–219). IGI Global.

22.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

23.

Derakhshan

Fathi

(2024). Grit and foreign language enjoyment as predictors of EFL learners’ online engagement: The mediating role of online learning self-efficacy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00745-x

24.

Ding

Zou

(2024). Automated writing evaluation systems: A systematic review of Grammarly, Pigai, and Criterion with a perspective on future directions in the age of generative artificial intelligence. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 14151–14203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12402-3

25.

Dysvik

Kuvaas

Gagné

(2013). An investigation of the unique, synergistic and balanced relationships between basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(5), 1050–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12068

26.

El-Masri

Tarhini

(2017). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educational Technology Research & Development, 65(3), 743–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8

27.

Fan

(2023). English learning motivation with TAM: Undergraduates’ behavioral intention to use Chinese indigenous social media platforms for English learning. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2260566. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2260566

28.

Fathi

Ahmad nejad

Nosrati

(2024). Investigating the impact of Duolingo on second language learning achievement and self-regulated learning among French as a foreign language learners. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 25(4), 379–413. https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/477

29.

Field

(2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (pp. 264–315): Sage Publications Ltd.

30.

Govender

Arnedo-Moreno

(2020). A survey on gamification elements in mobile language-learning applications. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 669–676). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436597

31.

Granić

Marangunić

(2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864

32.

Habib

Haider

Suleman

S. S. M.

Akmal

Khan

M. A.

(2022). Mobile assisted language learning: Evaluation of accessibility, adoption, and perceived outcome among students of higher education. Electronics, 11(7), 1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11071113

33.

Hair

J. F.

Jr. Hult

G. T. M.

Ringle

Sarstedt

(2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.): Sage Publications.

34.

Hennebry-Leung

Lamb

(2024). Language learning motivation in diverse educational contexts. English Teaching & Learning, 48(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-024-00179-8

35.

Henseler

Ringle

C. M.

Sarstedt

(2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

36.

Hsu

H. T.

Lin

C. C.

(2022). Extending the technology acceptance model of college learners' mobile‐assisted language learning by incorporating psychological constructs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13165

37.

Jeon

(2022). Exploring a self-directed interactive app for informal EFL learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5767–5787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10839-y

38.

Kaiser

H. F.

(1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

39.

Khan

Parvaiz

G. S.

Bashir

Imtiaz

Bae

(2022). Students’ key determinant structure towards educational technology acceptance at universities, during COVID 19 lockdown: Pakistani perspective. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2039088. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2039088

40.

Kic-Drgas

Kılıçkaya

(2024). Exploring novel approaches to digital self-regulated learning: A study on the use of mobile applications among Polish and Turkish EFL pre-service teachers. Educational Technology Research & Development, 72(6), 3453–3470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10374-w

41.

Lai

C. Y.

Cheung

K. Y.

Chan

C. S.

(2023). Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation in ChatGPT adoption to support active learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100178

42.

Laifa

Giglou

R. I.

Akhrouf

(2023). Blended learning in Algeria: Assessing students’ satisfaction and future preferences using SEM and sentiment analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 48(6), 879–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09658-5

43.

Lei

Fathi

Noorbakhsh

Rahimi

(2022). The impact of mobile-assisted language learning on English as a foreign language learners’ vocabulary learning attitudes and self-regulatory capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 872922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872922

44.

Jin

Chen

(2025). Understanding continued use of smart learning platforms: Psychological wellbeing in an extended TAM-ISCM model. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1521174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521174

45.

Bonk

C. J.

Zhou

(2024). Supporting learners self-management for self-directed language learning: A study within Duolingo. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0093

46.

Lin

(2023). Extending Technology Acceptance Model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8

47.

Liu

I. F.

Chen

M. C.

Sun

Y. S.

Wible

Kuo

C. H.

(2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & education, 54(2), 600–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009

48.

Maier

Thatcher

J. B.

Grover

Dwivedi

Y. K.

(2023). Cross-sectional research: A critical perspective, use cases, and recommendations for IS research. International Journal of Information Management, 70, Article 102625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102625

49.

Murtadlo

Albana

Nisa

Y. F.

Izazy

N. Q.

Sumiati

N. T.

DewiHenry

M. S. C.

(2025). Inclusive education in Africa: Transforming higher education in low-income countries. Scientific African, 28, Article e02708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02708

50.

Nunnally

J. C.

Bernstein

I. H.

(1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.): McGraw-Hill.

51.

Orçan

(2018). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Which one to use first? Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 9(4), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.394323

52.

Ouared

Ouhammou

Bellatreche

(2016). Costdl: A cost models description language for performance metrics in database. In 2016 21st international conference on engineering of complex computer systems (ICECCS) (pp. 187–190). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCS.2016.031

53.

Padilla-Meléndez

del Aguila-Obra

A. R.

Garrido-Moreno

(2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63, 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014

54.

Patil

Undale

(2023a). Willingness of university students to continue using e-Learning platforms after compelled adoption of technology: Test of an extended UTAUT model. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14943–14965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11778-6

55.

Patil

Undale

(2023b). Willingness of university students to continue using e-Learning platforms after compelled adoption of technology: Test of an extended UTAUT model. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14943–14965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11778-6

56.

Pintrich

P. R.

Smith

D. A. D.

Garcia

McKeachie

W. J.

(1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Post-Secondary Teaching and Learning.

57.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

58.

(2024). ChatGPT as a CALL tool in language education: A study of hedonic-motivation system adoption model (HMSAM). Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12598-y

59.

Ringle

C. M.

Wende

Becker

J.-M.

(2022). SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS. Available at: https://www.smartpls.com

60.

Riniati

W. O.

Akfan

S. S.

Munirah

Utami

N. D.

Fitriani

(2025). Utilizing mobile-assisted Language learning (Duolingo) to foster metacognitive awareness and self-directed learning in non-english major students. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(1), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v8i1.43453

61.

Rivers

D. J.

(2021). The role of personality traits and online academic self-efficacy in acceptance, actual use and achievement in Moodle. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4353–4378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10478-3

62.

Rizun

Strzelecki

(2020). Students’ acceptance of the COVID-19 impact on shifting higher education to distance learning in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186468 and https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6468

63.

Rosli

M. S.

Saleh

N. S.

(2023). Technology enhanced learning acceptance among university students during COVID-19: Integrating the full spectrum of self-determination theory and self-efficacy into the technology acceptance model. Current Psychology, 42(21), 18212–18231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02996-1

64.

San

C. K.

Guo

(2023). Institutional support, social support, and academic performance: Mediating role of academic adaptation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(4), 1659–1675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00657-2

65.

Saraa

Mohammed Alhaqbani

Hasan AL-Qadri

Al-Khadher

M. A.

(2025). The Development of Emotional Intelligence Scale for Algerian Higher Education EFL Students: validating the modified version of Schutte et al.’s (1998) Model. Psychological Reports, Advance Online publication. Article 00332941251390463. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251390463

66.

Shortt

Tilak

Kuznetcova

Martens

Akinkuolie

(2023). Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: A systematic review of Duolingo literature from public release of 2012 to early 2020. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3), 517–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1933540

67.

Songkram

Chootongchai

Osuwan

Chuppunnarat

Songkram

(2023). Students’ adoption towards behavioral intention of digital learning platform. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 11655–11677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11637-4

68.

Sun

Gao

(2020). An investigation of the influence of intrinsic motivation on students’ intention to use mobile devices in language learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(3), 1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09733-9

69.

Talbi

Ouared

(2022). Goal-oriented student motivation in learning analytics: How can a requirements-driven approach help? Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12083–12121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11091-8

70.

Tamilmani

Rana

N. P.

Wamba

S. F.

Dwivedi

(2021). The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation. International Journal of Information Management, 57, Article 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269

71.

Teng

M. F.

J. G.

(2024). An investigation of learners’ perceived progress during online education: Do self-efficacy belief, language learning motivation, and metacognitive strategies matter? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(2), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00727-z

72.

Teske

(2017). Duolingo. CALICO Journal, 34(3), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.3250

73.

Togaibayeva

Ramazanova

Yessengulova

Yergazina

Nurlin

Shokanov

(2022). Effect of mobile learning on students' satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and academic performance when learning a foreign language. Frontiers in Education, 7, 946–1002. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.946102

74.

Unal

Uzun

A. M.

(2021). Understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use Edmodo through the lens of an extended technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13046

75.

Venkatesh

Morris

M. G.

Davis

G. B.

Davis

F. D.

(2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

76.

Viberg

Grönlund

Å.

(2012). Mobile assisted Language learning: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn 2012).

Linköping University Electronic

Press. Retrieved from: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-10659

77.

Wang

Lin

Liu

Song

Huang

Jiang

(2022). Perceived usefulness predicts second language learners’ continuance intention toward language learning applications: A serial multiple mediation model of integrative motivation and flow. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10822-7

78.

Wohlfart

Wagner

(2024). Longitudinal perspectives on technology acceptance: Teachers’ integration of digital tools through the COVID-19 transition. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12954-y

79.

Zhang

Zou

(2022). Types, purposes, and effectiveness of state-of-the-art technologies for second and foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 696–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744666

80.

Zhang

Pan

(2024). A UTAUT2 model expansion: Investigating the effect of interactive learning environment and gamification on Duolingo user base in China. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(15), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2426736