As a personality trait, collective narcissism refers to unrealistic beliefs about ingroup exceptionality. Previous literature has primarily focused on the link between agentic collective narcissism and foreign policy preferences, while largely neglecting the role of communal collective narcissism. Building on the theoretical distinction between agentic and communal collective narcissism, this study is the first to clarify their distinct associations with three forms of foreign policy preferences: offensive realism, defensive realism, and liberalism. We recruited 698 Chinese participants aged 18 to 70 years (M = 38.61, SD = 13.06) for this study. The results indicate that agentic collective narcissism is positively associated with a preference for offensive realism in foreign policy, while communal collective narcissism is positively associated with a preference for liberalism. Additionally, both agentic and communal collective narcissism are positively related to a preference for defensive realism. In addition to its theoretical contribution, the empirical case of China offers valuable insights into the study of collective narcissism in non-Western contexts and helps explain popular support for China’s “wolf warrior diplomacy”.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50(50), 195–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7
2.
CaiH.GriesP. (2013). National narcissism: Internal dimensions and international correlates. PsyCh Journal, 2(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.26
3.
ChangV. K. L. (2021). Recalling victory, recounting greatness: Second world war remembrance in Xi Jinping’s China. The China Quarterly, 248(1), 1152–1173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000497
4.
CichockaA. (2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27(1), 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530
5.
CichockaA.BocianK.WiniewskiM.AzevedoF. (2022). Not racist, but: Beliefs about immigration restrictions, collective narcissism, and justification of ethnic extremism. Political Psychology, 43(6), 1217–1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12813
6.
Dyduch-HazarK.MrozinskiB.Golec de ZavalaA. (2019). Collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction predict opposite attitudes toward refugees via attribution of hostility. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 1901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01901
7.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC. (2018). Communal narcissism: Theoretical and empirical support. In HermanA. D.BrunelA. B.FosterJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of trait narcissism. Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 69–78): Springer.
8.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.VerplankenB.MaioG. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 854–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029629
Golec de ZavalaA. (2018). Collective narcissism: Antecedents and consequences of exaggeration of the in-group image. In HermannA.BrunellA.FosterJ. (Eds.), Handbook of trait narcissism: Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 79–88): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92171-6_8
11.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2019). Collective narcissism and ingroup satisfaction are associated with different emotional profiles and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00203
12.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.BilewiczM. (2013). The paradox of in-group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group and out-group attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779.x
13.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904
14.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.Iskra-GolecI. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 1019–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032215
15.
Golec de ZavalaA.Dyduch-HazarK.LantosD. (2019). Collective narcissism: Political consequences of investing self-worth in the ingroup’s image. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 37–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12569
16.
GriffithsM.RoachS. C.SolomonM. S. (2009). Fifty key thinkers in international relations (2nd ed.): Routledge.
17.
GulevichO.OsinE. (2025). How does identifying with one’s nation predict support for wars? The role of secure national identification and national narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 235(2), Article 112970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112970
18.
HaftendornH.KeohaneR. O.WallanderC. A. (Eds.), (1999). Imperfect unions: Security institutions over time and space: Oxford University Press.
19.
HudsonV. (2007). The history and evolution of foreign policy analysis. In SmithS.HadfieldA.DunneT. (Eds.), Foreign policy: Theories, actors, cases (pp. 11–30): Oxford University Press.
20.
JervisR. (1999). Realism, neoliberalism, and cooperation: Understanding the debate. International Security, 24(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560040
21.
KeenanO.Golec de ZavalaA. (2021). Collective narcissism and weakening of American democracy. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 21(12), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/938vy
22.
KjærvikS. L.BushmanB. J. (2021). The link between narcissism and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(5), 477–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000323
23.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647
24.
LobellS. E. (2010). Structural realism/offensive and defensive realism. In SandalN.Marlin-BennettR. (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of international studies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.304
25.
MartinL. L.SimmonsB. A. (1998). Theories and empirical studies of international institutions. International Organization, 52(4), 729–757. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550734
26.
MearsheimerJ. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics: W. W. Norton.
27.
MillerJ. D.BackM. D.LynamD. R.WrightA. G. C. (2021). Narcissism today: What we know and what we need to learn. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(6), 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211044109
28.
NowakB.BrzoskaP.PiotrowskiJ.Zemojtel-PiotrowskaM.JonasonP. K.PeterK. (2023). They will (not) deceive Us! the role of agentic and communal national narcissism in shaping the attitudes to Ukrainian refugees in Poland. Personality and Individual Differences, 208(1), Article 112184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112184
29.
SnyderJ. (1991). Myths of empire: Domestic politics and international ambitions: Cornell University Press.
30.
SonodaS. (2021). Asian views of China in the age of China’s rise: Interpreting the results of pew survey and Asian student survey in chronological and comparative perspectives, 2002-2019. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 10(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2021.1943116
31.
WaltzK. N. (1979). Theory of international politics: Random House.
32.
XiaolinD. (2024). Domestic sources of China’s wolf-warrior diplomacy: Individual incentive, institutional changes and diversionary strategies. The Pacific Review, 37(3), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2023.2205163
33.
XuW. (2025). Pride and prejudice: The dual effects of “Wolf Warrior Diplomacy” on domestic and international audiences. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 69(5), 839–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027241276250
34.
YoonJ. (2024). Ten years of China’s BRI, reassessing China’s attractiveness from an Asian perspective: A critical evaluation from the perspective of the East Asian public. Asian Journal of Political Science, 32(3), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2024.2429080
35.
YuanS. (2023). Tracing China’s diplomatic transition to wolf warrior diplomacy and its implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 837. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02367-6
36.
YueY.HeN.TianT.WangM.LiM.WangZ.YouX. (2024). Too great to be more prosocial: The relationship between collective narcissism and humanitarian aid in the Chinese context. Current Psychology, 43(31), 25773–25785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06228-6
37.
ZdunekR. R.CzarnaA. Z.SedikidesC. (2022). Grandiose (communal and agentic) narcissism and predicted (dis)obedience in the milgram paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 189(6), Article 111514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111514
38.
Żemojtel-PiotrowskaM.PiotrowskiJ.SawickiA.JonasonP. K. (2022). We will rescue Italy, but we dislike the european union: Collective narcissism and the COVID-19 threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(4), 892–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211002923
39.
Żemojtel-PiotrowskaM.PiotrowskiJ.SawickiA.SkowronskiJ.JonasonP. K.CieciuchJ.StrusW.SedikidesC. (2025). Re-assessing communal narcissism: The narcissistic sanctity and heroism concept. Journal of Research in Personality, 119, Article 104651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104651
ZhaiY. (2018). The gap in viewing China’s rise between Chinese youth and their Asian counterparts. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(114), 848–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1488102
43.
ZhaiY. (2019). A peaceful prospect or a threat to global order: How Asian youth view a rising China. International Studies Review, 21(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy010
44.
ZhaiY. (2024). Populism, collective narcissism, and support for war. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 36(1), edae007. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edae007
45.
ZhaiY.XuH.WangL.LuS. (2025). Who feels hostile? National identity and attitudes toward Japan in China. Journal of Asian and AfricanStudies. Online First, https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096251369526
