Both time perspectives and impulsivity dimensions are groups of traits that are connected to self-control abilities and might be important for coping styles. However, to date, no study has systematically investigated their utility in predicting coping styles with regard to their multidimensional nature. The current study was correlational and exploratory, aiming to discover what amount of variance in each of the three coping styles, problem-oriented, active emotion-oriented, and avoidant, is accounted for by two groups of predictors: time perspectives and impulsivity dimensions. N = 397 young adults aged 18–35 from the general population took part in the study. Results of a multiple linear regression testing both groups of predictors separately and of hierarchical regression analysis introducing the two predictor groups in subsequent steps suggested that time perspectives accounted for more variance in adaptive coping styles: problem-oriented and active emotion-oriented coping. For avoidant coping, both time perspectives and impulsivity dimensions accounted for a similar amount of variance. The results provide evidence that time perspectives should be investigated in domains related to coping (e.g., mental health issues, substance abuse, and risk-taking behaviors), for which impulsivity has been considered an important predictor. Moreover, impulsivity ought to be tested with regard to its multidimensionality.
Altan-AtalayAZeytunD (2020). The association of negative urgency with psychological distress: Moderating role of proactive coping strategies. The Journal of Psychology, 154(7), 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2020.1784824.
2.
AnagnostopoulosF.GrivaF. (2012). Exploring time perspective in Greek young adults: Validation of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory and relationships with mental health indicators. Social Indicators Research, 106(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9792-y
3.
BairdH. M.WebbT. L.SiroisF. M.Gibson-MillerJ. (2021). Understanding the effects of time perspective: A meta-analysis testing a self-regulatory framework. Psychological Bulletin, 147(3):233–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000313
4.
BayardS.RaffardS.Gely-NargeotM. C. (2011). Do facets of self-reported impulsivity predict decision-making under ambiguity and risk? Evidence from a community sample. Psychiatry Research, 190(2–3), 322–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.06.01
5.
BickelW. K.MarschL. A. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: Delay discounting processes. Addiction, 96(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961736.x
6.
BlomgrenA. S.SvahnK.ÅströmE.RönnlundM. (2016). Coping strategies in late adolescence: Relationships to parental attachment and time perspective. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 177(3), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2016.1178101
7.
BodeckaM.NowakowskaI.ZajenkowskaA.RajchertJ.KaźmierczakI.JelonkiewiczI. (2021). Gender as a moderator between Present-Hedonistic time perspective and depressive symptoms or stress during COVID-19 lock-down. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110395.
8.
BolotovaA. K.HachaturovaM. R. (2012). The person and the time: Choosing coping behaviours. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 8(1), 69–76.
9.
BolotovaA. K.HachaturovaM. R. (2013). The role of time perspective in coping behavior. Psychology in Russia: State of Art, 6(3), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2013.0311
10.
BoniwellI.ZimbardoP. G. (2004). Balancing one’s time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In LinleyP. A.JosephS. (Eds), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–178). Wiley.
11.
CarverC. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6
12.
CarverC. S.JohnsonS. L. (2018). Impulsive reactivity to emotion and vulnerability to psychopathology. American Psychologist, 73(9), 1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000387
13.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1994). Situational coping and coping dispositions in a stressful transaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.184
14.
CompasB. E.Connor-SmithJ. K.SaltzmanH.ThomsenA. H.WadsworthM. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87-127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87.
15.
CoyneJ. C.RacioppoM. W. (2000). Never the Twain shall meet? Closing the gap between coping research and clinical intervention research. American Psychologist, 55(6), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.6.655
16.
CydersM. A.LittlefieldA. K.CoffeyS.KaryadiK. A. (2014). Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Addictive Behaviors, 39(9), 1372–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.02.013
17.
CydersM. A.SmithG. T. (2008). Mood-based rash action and its components: Positive and negative urgency. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 839–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.008
18.
DaughertyJ. R.BraseG. L. (2010). Taking time to be healthy: Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.007
19.
DwivediA.RastogiR. (2017). Proactive coping, time perspective and life satisfaction: A study on emerging adulthood. Journal of Health Management, 19(2), 264-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063417699689.
20.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
21.
FischerS.AndersonK. G.SmithG. T. (2004). Coping with distress by eating or drinking: Role of trait urgency and expectancies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(3), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.18.3.269
22.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.48.1.150
23.
FowlerJ.GulloM. J.ElphinstonR. A. (2020). Impulsivity traits and Facebook addiction in young people and the potential mediating role of coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 161, 109965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109965
24.
GallaB. M.WoodJ. J. (2015). Trait self‐control predicts adolescents’ exposure and reactivity to daily stressful events. Journal of Personality, 83(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12083
25.
GellertP.ZiegelmannJ. P.LippkeS.SchwarzerR. (2012). Future time perspective and health behaviors: Temporal framing of self-regulatory processes in physical exercise and dietary behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9312-y
26.
GerbingD. W.AhadiS. A.PattonJ. H. (1987). Toward a conceptualization of impulsivity: Components across the behavioral and self-report domains. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22(3), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2203_6
27.
GreenL.MyersonJ. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769
28.
HolahanC. J.MoosR. H. (1987). Personal and contextual determinants of coping strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 946–955. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.5.946
29.
HolmanE. A. (2015). Time perspective and social relations: A stress and coping perspective. In StolarskiM.FieulaineN.van BeekW. (Eds), Time perspective theory; Review, research and application (pp. 419–436). Springer.
30.
IwanickaK.GerhantA.OlajossyM. (2017). Psychopathological symptoms, defense mechanisms and time perspectives among subjects with alcohol dependence (AD) presenting different patterns of coping with stress. PeerJ, 5, e3576. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3576
31.
JochemczykŁ.PietrzakJ.BuczkowskiR.StolarskiM.MarkiewiczŁ. (2017). You only live once: Present-hedonistic time perspective predicts risk propensity. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.010
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
34.
LempertK. M.PorcelliA. J.DelgadoM. R.TricomiE. (2012). Individual differences in delay discounting under acute stress: The role of trait perceived stress. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00251.
35.
LenningsC. J. (1991). The Schalling Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity Scales: Their relationship to time perspective and time awareness, a preliminary report. Psychological Reports, 69(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.69.1.131
36.
LiQ.DaiW.ZhongY.WangL.DaiB.LiuX. (2019). The mediating role of coping styles on impulsivity, behavioral inhibition/approach system, and internet addiction in adolescents from a gender perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2402. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02402
37.
LinH.EpsteinL. H. (2014). Living in the moment: Effects of time perspective and emotional valence of episodic thinking on delay discounting. Behavioral Neuroscience, 128(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035705
38.
LuptonD.TullochJ. (2002). ‘Life would be pretty dull without risk’: Voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health, Risk & Society, 4(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570220137015
39.
MagidV.MacLeanM. G.ColderC. R. (2007). Differentiating between sensation seeking and impulsivity through their mediated relations with alcohol use and problems. Addictive Behaviors, 32(10), 2046–2061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.01.015
40.
MaleszaM. (2019). Stress and delay discounting: The mediating role of difficulties in emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.035
41.
McKayS.SkuesJ. L.WilliamsB. J. (2018). With risk may come reward: Sensation seeking supports resilience through effective coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.030
42.
MoustafaA. A.TindleR.FrydeckaD.MisiakB. (2017). Impulsivity and its relationship with anxiety, depression and stress. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 74, 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.01.013
43.
MuchaM.WiśniewskaM.NęckaE. (2020). Time perspective and self-control: Metacognitive management of time is important for efficient self-regulation of behavior. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2020.97286
44.
NiggJ. T. (2017). Annual research review: On the relations among self‐regulation, self‐control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk‐taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(4), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12675
45.
NowerL.DerevenskyJ. L.GuptaR. (2004). The relationship of impulsivity, sensation seeking, coping, and substance use in youth gamblers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.18.1.49
46.
OchsnerK. N.GrossJ. J. (2008). Cognitive emotion regulation: Insights from social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00566.x
47.
PoprawaR. (2019). Research on the Polish short version of the Impulsive Behavior Scale UPPS-P. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania, 32(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.5114/ain.2019.85767
48.
PrzepiorkaA.Sobol-KwapinskaM.JankowskiT. (2016). A Polish short version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.047
49.
SchniderK. R.ElhaiJ. D.GrayM. J. (2007). Coping style use predicts posttraumatic stress and complicated grief symptom severity among college students reporting a traumatic loss. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(3), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.344
50.
SolomonZ.GinzburgK.NeriaY.OhryA. (1995). Coping with war captivity: The role of sensation seeking. European Journal of Personality, 9(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410090105
51.
SteinbergL.AlbertD.CauffmanE.BanichM.GrahamS.WoolardJ. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012955
52.
TeuscherU.MitchellS. H. (2011). Relation between time perspective and delay discounting: A literature review. The Psychological Record, 61(4), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395780
53.
VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Publications.
54.
WhitesideS. P.LynamD. R. (2001). The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 669–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00064-7
55.
WillsT. A.SandyJ. M.YaegerA. M. (2001). Time perspective and early-onset substance use: A model based on stress–coping theory. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164x.15.2.118
56.
WittmannM.SimmonsA. N.FlaganT.LaneS. D.WackermannJ.PaulusM. P. (2011). Neural substrates of time perception and impulsivity. Brain Research, 1406, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.048
57.
ZambianchiM. (2018). Time perspective, coping styles, perceived efficacy in affect regulation, and creative problem solving in adolescence and youth. Psicologia Educativa, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2018a1
58.
ZambianchiM.Ricci BittiP. E. (2014). The role of proactive coping strategies, time perspective, perceived efficacy on affect regulation, divergent thinking and family communication in promoting social well-being in emerging adulthood. Social Indicators Research, 116(2), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0307-x
59.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
60.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (2008). The time paradox. Free Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
