Whether physical activity (PA) tracking devices are associated with PA motivation in young adults is largely unknown. We compared total PA minutes per week, total minutes walking/week, meeting moderate-to vigorous PA guidelines, and past-year activity tracking across motivation cluster profiles among 799 young adults. Participants with “self-determined” profiles reported the highest total PA minutes/week followed by participants with “low intrinsic,” “controlled self-determined,” and “high external” profiles. A behavior regulation profile X activity tracking frequency interaction was not significant. Behavior regulation profiles may need to be considered in PA interventions using activity trackers.
Andajani-SutjahjoSBallKWarrenN, et al (2004) Perceived personal, social and environmental barriers to weight maintenance among young women: A community survey. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1(1): 15.
3.
AttigCFrankeT (2019) I track, therefore I walk–Exploring the motivational costs of wearing activity trackers in actual users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies127: 211–224.
4.
BanduraA (1991) Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 248–287.
5.
BanduraA (1997) Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman.
6.
BellC (2020) Wearable activity monitors and goals: Perceptions on physical activity, attitudes and motivational outcomes. Brock University. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10464/14886
7.
BravataDMSmith-SpanglerCSundaramV, et al (2007) Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: A systematic review. JAMA298(19): 2296–2304.
8.
BuschLUteschTStraussB (2020) Normalised step targets in fitness apps affect users’ autonomy need satisfaction, motivation and physical activity–A six-week RCT. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology20(1): 223–244.
9.
ChanCBRyanDATudor-LockeC (2006) Relationship between objective measures of physical activity and weather: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity3(1): 21.
10.
DeciELEghrariHPatrickBC, et al (1994) Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of personality62(1): 119–142.
DonnachieCWykeSMutrieN, et al (2017) ‘It’s like a personal motivator that you carried around wi’you’: Utilising self-determination theory to understand men’s experiences of using pedometers to increase physical activity in a weight management programme. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity14(1): 61.
13.
DuncanLRHallCRWilsonPM, et al (2010) Exercise motivation: A cross-sectional analysis examining its relationships with frequency, intensity, and duration of exercise. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity7(1): 7.
14.
DuusRCoorayMPageNC (2018) Exploring human-tech hybridity at the intersection of extended cognition and distributed agency: A focus on self-tracking devices. Frontiers in Psychology9: 1432.
15.
EllingsonLDLansingJEDeShawKJ, et al (2019) Evaluating motivational interviewing and habit formation to enhance the effect of activity trackers on healthy adults’ activity levels: Randomized intervention. JMIR mHealth and uHealth7(2): e10988.
16.
Emm-CollisonLGSebireSJSalwayR, et al (2020) Multidimensional motivation for exercise: A latent profile and transition analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise47: 101619.
17.
EtkinJ (2016) The hidden cost of personal quantification. Journal of Consumer Research42(6): 967–984.
18.
FarnellGBarkleyJ (2017) The Effect of a Wearable Physical Activity Monitor (Fitbit One) on Physical Activity Behaviour in Women: A Pilot Study. Universidad de Alicante. Área de Educación Física y Deporte.
19.
FinkelsteinEAHaalandBABilgerM, et al (2016) Effectiveness of activity trackers with and without incentives to increase physical activity (TRIPPA): A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology4(12): 983–995.
20.
FordeC (2018) Scoring the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ). University of Dublin.
21.
Freak-PoliRLCumpstonMPeetersA, et al (2013) Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews4:CD009209.
22.
FrielCPGarberCE (2020) An examination of the relationship between motivation, physical activity, and wearable activity monitor use. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology42(2): 153–160.
23.
FuezekiEEngeroffTBanzerW (2017) Health benefits of light-intensity physical activity: A systematic review of accelerometer data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Sports Medicine47(9): 1769–1793.
GoodyearVAKernerCQuennerstedtM (2019) Young people’s uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies; surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance. Sport, Education and Society24(3): 212–225.
26.
GutholdRStevensGARileyLM, et al. (2018, 1 October) Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. The Lancet Global Health6(10): e1077–e1086.
27.
HallGLadduDRPhillipsSA, et al (2021) A tale of two pandemics: How will COVID-19 and global trends in physical inactivity and sedentary behavior affect one another?Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases64: 108–110.
28.
HartmanSJNelsonSHWeinerLS (2018) Patterns of Fitbit use and activity levels throughout a physical activity intervention: Exploratory analysis from a randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth6(2): e29.
29.
KarapanosEGouveiaRHassenzahlM, et al (2016) Wellbeing in the making: Peoples’ experiences with wearable activity trackers. Psychology of Well Being6(1): 1–7.
30.
KernerCGoodyearVA (2017) The motivational impact of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies: A self-determination perspective on Fitbits with adolescents. American Journal of Health Education48(5): 287–297.
31.
KimYLumpkinALochbaumM, et al (2018) Promoting physical activity using a wearable activity tracker in college students: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Sports Sciences36(16): 1889–1896.
32.
LeAMitchellHZhengDJ, et al (2017) A home-based physical activity intervention using activity trackers in survivors of childhood cancer: A pilot study. Pediatric Blood & Cancer64(2): 387–394.
33.
LedgerDMcCaffreyD (2014) Inside wearables: How the science of human behavior change offers the secret to long-term engagement. Endeavour Partners200(93): 1.
34.
LeePHMacfarlaneDJLamTH, et al (2011) Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity8(1): 115.
35.
LiauAKNeihartMTeoCT, et al (2018) A Quasi-experimental study of a fitbit-based self-regulation intervention to improve physical activity, well-being, and mental health. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking21(11): 727–734.
36.
LittleJ (2017) Running, health and the disciplining of women’s bodies: The influence of technology and nature. Health & Place46: 322–327.
37.
MarklandDTobinV (2004) A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology26(2): 191–196.
38.
MatsumotoHTakenakaK (2004) Motivational profiles and stages of exercise behavior change. International Journal of Sport and Health Science2: 89–96.
39.
MattioliAVSciomerSCocchiC, et al (2020) Quarantine during COVID-19 outbreak: Changes in diet and physical activity increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases30(9): 1409–1417.
40.
O’LoughlinJDugasENBrunetJ, et al (2015) Cohort profile: The nicotine dependence in teens (NDIT) study. International Journal of Epidemiology44(5): 1537–1546.
41.
PapaliaZWilsonOBoppM, et al (2018) Technology-based physical activity self-monitoring among college students. International Journal of Exercise Science11(7): 1096.
42.
PatelMSAschDAVolppKG (2015) Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA313(5): 459–460.
43.
PenedoFJDahnJR (2005) Exercise and well-being: A review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry18(2): 189–193.
44.
PiercyKLTroianoRPBallardRM, et al (2018) The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA320(19): 2020–2028.
45.
PintrichPR (2003) A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology95(4): 667.
46.
RenfreeIHarrisonDMarshallP, et al (2016) Don’t kick the habit: The role of dependency in habit formation apps. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 2016, pp.2932–2939. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
47.
RhodesRENiggCR (2011) Advancing physical activity theory: A review and future directions. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews39(3): 113–119.
48.
RuppMAMichaelisJRMcConnellDS, et al (2018) The role of individual differences on perceptions of wearable fitness device trust, usability, and motivational impact. Applied Ergonomics70: 77–87.
49.
Saint-MauricePFTroianoRPBerriganD, et al (2018) Volume of light versus moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: Similar benefits for all-cause mortality?Journal of the American Heart Association7(7): e008815.
50.
ScheidJLWestSL (2019) Opportunities of wearable technology to increase physical activity in individuals with chronic disease: An editorial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health2019; 16(17): 3124.
51.
SchoeppeSAlleySVan LippeveldeW, et al (2016) Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity13(1): 127.
52.
SegarML (2017) Activity tracking + motivation science: Allies to keep people moving for a lifetime. ACSM’s Health & Fitness Journal21(4): 8–17.
53.
ShihPCHanKPooleES, et al (2015) Use and adoption challenges of wearable activity trackers. In: iConference 2015 proceedings, 2015. Newport Beach, California, USA, 24–27 March.
54.
SullivanANLachmanME (2017) Behavior change with fitness technology in sedentary adults: A review of the evidence for increasing physical activity. Frontiers in Public Health4: 289.
55.
TavakolMDennickR (2011) Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education2: 53.
56.
TeixeiraPJCarraçaEVMarklandD, et al (2012) Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity9(1): 78.
57.
TisonGHAvramRKuharP, et al (2020) Worldwide effect of COVID-19 on physical activity: A descriptive study. Annals of Internal Medicine173(9): 767–770.
58.
TremblayMSCarsonVChaputJ-P, et al (2016) Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: An integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism41(6): S311–S327.
59.
VansteenkisteMSierensESoenensB, et al (2009) Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology101(3): 671.
60.
WarburtonDENicolCWBredinSS (2006) Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. Canadian Medical Association Journal174(6): 801–809.
61.
ZulmanDMDamschroderLJSmithRG, et al (2013) Implementation and evaluation of an incentivized Internet-mediated walking program for obese adults. Translational Behavioral Medicine3(4): 357–369.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
