Previous research has shown that people with higher levels of Openness to Experience show higher levels of cognitive functioning. However, the mechanisms underlying this personality-cognition relation are not well understood. The goal of the current project was to examine whether strategy use mediates the relation between Openness to experience and retrospective memory, and whether the role of strategy use in the Openness-memory relation was the same in younger and older adults. Method: Two studies were conducted. In each of them, younger and older adults were administered a retrospective memory task (29 younger and 27 older in Study 1, 43 adults of all ages in Study 2). They were asked to report the strategies they used during the task, and to complete an Openness to Experience scale. Results: Consistent with previous reports, higher scores of Openness to experience and greater use of efficient memory strategies were associated with higher levels of memory performance. In addition, individual differences in memory strategy use mostly mediated the relation between Openness and memory performance. Results did not support a mediation model moderated by age. That is, the role of memory strategy use in the relation between Openness and memory was the same in younger and older adults. Conclusion: Higher levels of Openness are associated with better memory performance, mostly because people with higher levels of Openness use more efficient memory strategies.
BerkR. A.FreedmanD. A. (2003). Statistical assumptions as empirical commitments. Law, Punishment, and Social Control: Essays in Honor of Sheldon Messinger, 2, 235–254.
2.
BoninP.MéotA.AubertL.-F.MalardierN.NiedenthalP. M.Capelle-ToczekM.-C. (2003). Normes de concrétude, de valeur d'imagerie, de fréquence subjective et de valence émotionnelle pour 866 mots [Translation results Concreteness, imagery value, subjective frequency, and emotional valence standards for 866 words]. L'année Psychologique, 103(4), 655–694. https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2003.29658
3.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2008). Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1596–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.003
4.
ChapmanB.DubersteinP.TindleH. A.SinkK. M.RobbinsJ.TancrediD. J.FranksP, & Gingko Evaluation of Memory Study Investigators. (2012). Personality predicts cognitive function over 7 years in older persons. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 20(7), 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e31822cc9cb
5.
ChevalèreJ.LemaireP.CamosV. (2020). Age-related changes in verbal working memory strategies. Experimental Aging Research, 46(2), 93–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2020.1716152
6.
CurtisR. G.WindsorT. D.SoubeletA. (2015). The relationship between big-5 personality traits and cognitive ability in older adults—A review. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(1), 42–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2014.888392
7.
DeltourJ. J. (1998). Echelle de vocabulaire de mill hill. Adaptation française [Mill hill vocabulary scale. French-language adaptation]. EAP.
8.
DeYoungC. G.PetersonJ. B.HigginsD. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00330.x
9.
DuffA.BoyleE.DunleavyK.FergusonJ. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(8), 1907–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.020
10.
DunloskyJ.HertzogC. (2001). Measuring strategy production during associative learning: The relative utility of concurrent versus retrospective reports. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194918
11.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
12.
FredricksonB. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions?Review of General Psychology: Journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association, 2(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
13.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.3
14.
GregoryT.NettelbeckT.WilsonC. (2010). Openness to experience, intelligence, and successful ageing. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 895–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.017
15.
HayesA. F. (2018). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. The Guildford Press.
16.
HinaultT.LemaireP.TouronD. (2017). Aging effects in sequential modulations of poorer strategy effects during execution of memory strategies. Memory (Hove, England), 25(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1146300
JacksonJ. J.HillP. L.PayneB. R.ParisiJ. M.Stine-MorrowE. A. (2020). Linking openness to cognitive ability in older adulthood: The role of activity diversity. Aging & Mental Health, 24(7), 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1655705
19.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M.KentleR. L. (1991). The big five inventory–versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
20.
JoppD.HertzogC. (2007). Activities, self-referent memory beliefs, and cognitive performance: Evidence for direct and mediated relations. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 811–825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.811
21.
KäckenmesterW.BottA.WackerJ. (2019). Openness to experience predicts dopamine effects on divergent thinking. Personality Neuroscience, 2: e3, 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2019.3
22.
KraaykampG.van EijckK. (2005). Personality, media preferences, and cultural participation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1675–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.002
23.
LemaireP. (2016). Cognitive aging: The role of strategies. Psychology Press. ISBN 9781138121386
24.
LemaireP.RederL. (1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? an example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 22, 364–382. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211420
25.
LemaireP.SieglerR. S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children’s learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.83
26.
LemaireP.BrunF.RegnerI. (2018). Negative aging stereotypes disrupt both the selection and execution of strategies in older adults. Gerontology, 64(4), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486756
27.
LemaireP.GouraudJ.NicolasP. (2019). When older adults outperform young adults: Effects of Prior-Task success in arithmetic. Gerontology, 65(6), 649–658.
28.
MacCallumR. C.ZhangS.PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19
29.
MarcelaV. (2015). Learning strategy, personality traits and academic achievement of university students. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3473–3478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1021
30.
McCraeR. R. (1994). Openness to experience: Expanding the boundaries of factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8(4), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080404
31.
MitteK.KämpfeN. (2008). Personality and the four faces of positive affect: A multitrait-multimethod analysis using self-and peer-report. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1370–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.004
32.
NicolasP.LemaireP.RégnerI. (2020). When and how stereotype threat influences older adults’ arithmetic performance: Insight from a strategy approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 149(2), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000647
33.
PassamontiL.TerraccianoA.RiccelliR.DonzusoG.CerasaA.VaccaroM.NovellinoF.FeraF.QuattroneA. (2015). Increased functional connectivity within mesocortical networks in open people. NeuroImage, 104, 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.017
34.
PlaisantO.CourtoisR.RéveillèreC.MendelsohnG. A.JohnO. P. (2010). Validation par analyse factorielle du big five inventory français (BFIFr). analyse convergente avec le NEOPIR [Validation by factorial analysis of the French big five inventory (BFIFr). convergent analysis with NEOPIR].Annales Médicopsychologiques, Revue Psychiatrique, 168(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2009.09.003
35.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
RuffingS.HahnE.SpinathF. M.BrünkenR.KarbachJ. (2015). Predicting students’ learning strategies: The contribution of chronotype over personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.048
SalthouseT. A.BabcockR. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763
40.
ShiotaM. N.KeltnerD.JohnO. P. (2006). Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with big five personality and attachment style. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760500510833
41.
SoubeletA.SalthouseT. A. (2010). The role of activity engagement in the relations between openness/intellect and cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 896–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.026
42.
TaconnatL.RazN.ToczéC.BouazzaouiB.SauzéonH.FayS.IsingriniM. (2009). Ageing and organisation strategies in free recall: The role of cognitive flexibility. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(2–3), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802296413
43.
TournierI.PostalV. (2011). Strategy selection and aging: Impact of item concreteness in paired associate task. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 18(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2010.525623
44.
Van der LindenM.MeulemansT.MarczewskiP.ColletteF. (2000). The relationships between episodic memory, working memory, and executive functions: The contribution of the prefrontal cortex. Psychologica Belgica, 40(4), 275–297.
WegesinD. J.JacobsD. M.ZubinN. R.VenturaP. R.SternY. (2000). Source memory and encoding strategy in normal aging. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(4), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1076/1380-3395(200008)22:4;1-0;FT455
47.
YuanP.RazN. (2014). Prefrontal cortex and executive functions in healthy adults: A meta-analysis of structural neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 180–192.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
