The current study tasked undergraduates with serving as hypothetical human resource workers to evaluate complaints of offensive and inoffensive humor used by male and female employees in a fictitious company who varied in employment status and age. Offensive humor was deemed more problematic in its usage, particularly among female perceivers. Contrary to hypotheses, its usage was more problematic for male and older employees than for female and younger employees. In addition, participants were more averse to both offensive and inoffensive humor from high-status and older men relative to women with similar characteristics. We frame results with consideration of recent social trends.
AbramsD.Randsley de MouraG.TravaglinoG. A. (2013).
A double standard when group members behave badly: Transgression credit to ingroup leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
105, 799–815.
2.
AbramsD.TravaglinoG. A.MarquesJ. M.PintoI.LevineJ. M. (2018).
Deviance credit: Tolerance of deviant ingroup leaders is mediated by their accrual of prototypicality and conferral of their right to be supported. Journal of Social Issues,
74, 36–55.
3.
AndersonC.JohnO. P.KeltnerD.KringA. M. (2001).
Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
81, 116–132.
4.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009a).
Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
96, 491–503.
5.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009b).
The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
18, 295–298.
6.
AngermeierW. F.PhelpsJ. B.MurrayS.HowanstineJ. (1968).
Dominance in monkeys: Sex differences. Psychonomic Science,
12, 344–344.
7.
BBC News. (2020). Workplace bullying: ‘Fear is the biggest factor.’
8.
BernalJ. L.CumminsS.GasparriniA. (2017).
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: A tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology,
46, 348–355.
9.
BlakerN. M.Van VugtM. (2014). The status-size hypothesis: How cues of physical size and social status influence each other. In ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.AndersonC. (Eds.). The psychology of social status (pp. 119–137).
Springer.
10.
BresslerE. R.BalshineS. (2006).
The influence of humor on desirability. Evolution and Human Behavior,
27, 29–39.
11.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 133--139.
12.
BussD. M. (1988).
The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
54, 616–628.
13.
CooperC. (2008).
Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model. Human Relations,
61, 1087–1115.
14.
CumminsD. (2015).
Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology,
2, 676–697.
15.
Decker, W. H., & Rotondo, D. M. (2001). Relationships among gender, type of humor, and perceived leader effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 450--465.
16.
DiDonatoT. E.BedminsterM. C.MachelJ. J. (2013).
My funny valentine: How humor styles affect romantic interest. Personal Relationships,
20, 374–390.
17.
EstradaM.BrownJ.LeeF. (1995).
Who gets the credit?Small Group Research,
26, 56–76.
18.
FergusonM. A.FordT. E. (2008).
Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research,
21, 283–312.
19.
FiskeS. (2010).
Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. Handbook of Social Psychology,
2, 941–982.
20.
FordT. E.BoxerC. F.ArmstrongJ.EdelJ. R. (2008).
More than “just a joke”: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
34, 159–170.
21.
FordT. E.FergusonM. A. (2004).
Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
8, 79–94.
22.
FordT. E.WoodzickaJ. A.TriplettS. R.KochersbergerA. O.HoldenC. J. (2014).
Not all groups are equal: Differential vulnerability of social groups to the prejudice-releasing effects of disparagement humor. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,
17, 178–199.
23.
FraleyB.AronA. (2004).
The effect of a shared humorous experience on closeness in initial encounters. Personal Relationships,
11, 61–78.
24.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491--512.
25.
HollanderE. P. (1958).
Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review,
65, 117–127.
26.
HollanderE. P. (2014). Leader-follower relations and the dynamics of inclusion and idiosyncrasy credit. In G. R. Geothals, S. T. Allison, R. M. Kramer, & D. M. Messick (Eds.). Conceptions of leadership (Vol.
1, pp. 201–221).
Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
HolmesJ. (2006).
Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humor and gender in the workplace. Journal of Pragmatics,
38, 26–50.
28.
JohnsonA. T.NeuendorfK. A.SkalskiP. D. (2012). Joking with an agenda: Racial disparagement humor appreciation and social power value motivation [Paper presentation]. Intercultural Communication Interest Group of the Central States Communication Association, Cleveland, OH.
29.
KantorJ.TwoheyM. (2017). Harvey Weinstein paid off sexual harassment accusers for decades. The New York Times.
30.
KlotzA. C.BolinoM. C. (2013).
Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: A moral licensing view. Academy of Management Review,
38, 292–306.
31.
KnegtmansH.DijkW. W.MooijmanM.LierN. V.RintjemaS.WassinkA. (2018).
The impact of social power on the evaluation of offensive jokes. Humor,
31, 85–104.
32.
KrasnowM. M.DeltonA. W.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2015).
Group cooperation without group selection: Modest punishment can recruit much cooperation. PLoS One,
10, e0124561.
33.
KurzbanR.LearyM. R. (2001).
Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin,
127, 187–208.
34.
LaFrance, M., & Woodzicka, J. A. (1998). No laughing matter: Women's verbal and nonverbal reactions to sexist humor. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.). Prejudice: The Target's Perspective (pp. 61--80). Academic Press: Cambridge, MA.
35.
Le BoeufB. J.PetersonR. S. (1969).
Social status and mating activity in elephant seals. Science,
163, 91–93.
36.
LukaszewskiA. W. (2013).
Testing an adaptationist theory of trait covariation: Relative bargaining power as a common calibrator of an interpersonal syndrome. European Journal of Personality,
27, 328–345.
37.
LukaszewskiA. W.SimmonsZ. L.AndersonC.RoneyJ. R. (2016).
The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
110, 385–406.
38.
MallettR. K.FordT. E.WoodzickaJ. A. (2016).
What did he mean by that? Humor decreases attributions of sexism and confrontation of sexist jokes. Sex Roles,
75, 272–284.
39.
ManerJ. K.MeadN. L. (2010).
The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
99, 482–497.
40.
MazurA. (1985).
A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces,
64, 377.
41.
MedlinM. M.BrownM.SaccoD. F. (2018).
That’s what she said! Perceived mate value of clean and dirty humor displays. Personality and Individual Differences,
135, 192–200.
42.
MendesW. B.KoslovK. (2013).
Brittle smiles: Positive biases toward stigmatized and outgroup targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
142, 923–933.
43.
MinearM.ParkD. C. (2004).
A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,
36, 630–633.
44.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2013).
Act your (old) age: Prescriptive, ageist biases over succession, consumption, and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
39, 720–734.
45.
PackerD. J.MinersC. T.UngsonN. D. (2018).
Benefiting from diversity: How groups’ coordinating mechanisms affect leadership opportunities for marginalized individuals. Journal of Social Issues,
74, 56–74.
46.
PettyJohn, M. E., Muzzey, F. K., Maas, M. K., & McCauley, H. L. (2019). #HowIWillChange: Engaging men and boys in the #MeToo movement. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 20, 612--622.
47.
Phillips, A. E., & Hranek, C. (2012). Is beauty a gift or a curse? The influence of an offender's physical attractiveness on forgiveness. Personal Relationships, 19, 420--430.
48.
RhodesG. (2006).
The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology,
57, 199–226.
49.
RosenblumL. A. (1975). Primate behavior: Developments in field and laboratory research.
Academic Press.
50.
SaccoD. F.BrownM.MayH. D.MedlinM. (2018).
Making of an in-joke: Humor appreciation as an ingratiation strategy following ostracism. Evolutionary Psychological Science,
4, 202–211.
51.
SapolskyR. M. (2005).
The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science,
308, 648–652.
52.
ShapiroD. L.BossA. D.SalasS.TangiralaS.Von GlinowM. A. (2011).
When are transgressing leaders punitively judged? An empirical test. Journal of Applied Psychology,
96, 412–422.
53.
ShriverE. R.YoungS. G.HugenbergK.BernsteinM. J.LanterJ. R. (2008).
Class, race, and the face: Social context modulates the cross-race effect in face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
34, 260–274.
54.
SmeltzerL. R.LeapT. L. (1988).
An analysis of individual reactions to potentially offensive jokes in work settings. Human Relations,
41, 295–304.
55.
SoklaridisS.ZahnC.KuperA.GillisD.TaylorV. H.WhiteheadC. (2018).
Men’s fear of mentoring in the #MeToo era—What’s at stake for academic medicine? TheNew England Journal of Medicine,
379, 2270–2274.
56.
SteeleL. M.VandelloJ. A. (2019).
When training backfires and what can be done about it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
12, 30–33.
57.
ThomaeM.PinaA. (2015).
Sexist humor and social identity: The role of sexist humor in men’s in-group cohesion, sexual harassment, rape proclivity, and victim blame. Humor,
28, 187–204.
58.
TremblayM. (2017).
Humor in teams: Multilevel relationships between humor climate, inclusion, trust, and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology,
32, 363–378.
59.
TremblayM.GibsonM. (2016).
The role of humor in the relationship between transactional leadership behavior, perceived supervisor support, and citizenship behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,
23, 39–54.
60.
van den AkkerL.HeresL.LasthuizenK.SixF. (2009).
Ethical leadership and trust: It’s all about meeting expectations. International Journal of Leadership Studies,
5, 102–122.
61.
Van VugtM.TyburJ. M. (2015). The evolutionary foundations of status hierarchy. The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 1–22).
John Wiley & Sons,
LTD.
62.
von RuedenC.GurvenM.KaplanH. (2008).
The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior,
29, 402–415.
63.
von RuedenC.GurvenM.KaplanH.StieglitzJ. (2014).
Leadership in an egalitarian society. Human Nature,
25, 538–566.
64.
WoodzickaJ. A.FordT. E. (2010).
A framework for thinking about the (not-so-funny) effects of sexist humor. Europe’s Journal of Psychology,
6, 174–195.
65.
Zeigler-HillV.BesserA.JettS. E. (2013).
Laughing at the looking glass: Does humor style serve as an interpersonal signal?Evolutionary Psychology,
11, 201–226.
