Our study explores the moderating role of loneliness in the relationship between attitude toward online relationship formation and psychological need satisfaction in online friendships. Participants included 1572 adolescents who completed self-report measures of loneliness, attitude toward online relationship formation, and psychological need satisfaction in online friendships. As hypothesized, attitude toward online relationship formation was positively related to psychological need satisfaction in online friendships. Results of moderation also demonstrated that lonely adolescents would report more positive attitude toward online relationship formation and higher psychological need satisfaction in online friendships compared to adolescents with nonlonely. Overall, these results extend self-determination theory’s contentions regarding the critical role of socialization initiatives to increase the fulfilment of psychological needs for adolescents, regardless of whether the relationship was formed through the Internet or in-person.
AngC. S. (2016).
Types of social connectedness and loneliness: The joint moderating effects of age and gender. Applied Research in Quality of Life,
11(4), 1173–1187. doi:10.1007/s11482-015-9428-5
2.
AngC.-S.Abu TalibM.TanK.-A.TanJ.-P.YaacobS. N. (2015).
Understanding computer-mediated communication attributes and life satisfaction from the perspectives of uses and gratifications and self-determination. Computers in Human Behavior,
49, 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.037
3.
AngC.-S.ChanN.-N.LeeC.-S. (2018).
Shyness, loneliness avoidance, and internet addiction: What are the relationships?The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied,
152(1), 25–35. doi:10.1080/00223980.2017.1399854
AttrillA.JalilR. (2011).
Revealing only the superficial me: Exploring categorical self-disclosure online. Computers in Human Behavior,
27(5), 1634–1642. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.001
6.
BabbieE. R. (2007). The practice of social research (12th ed.).
Boston, MA:
Cengage Learning.
7.
BardiC.BradyM. F. (2010).
Why shy people use instant messaging: Loneliness and other motives. Computers in Human Behavior,
26(6), 1722–1726. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.021
8.
BarghJ. A.McKennaK. Y. A. (2004).
The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology,
55, 573–590. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922
9.
BaymN. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.).
Malden, MA:
Polity Press.
10.
BlöteA. W.WestenbergP. M. (2007).
Socially anxious adolescents´ perception of treatment by classmates. Behaviour Research and Therapy,
45(2), 189–198. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.02.002.
11.
BonettiL.CampbellM. A.GilmoreL. (2010).
The relationship of loneliness and social anxiety with children’s and adolescents’ online communication. CyberPsychology and Behavior,
13(3), 279–285. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0215
12.
BryneB. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed).
Abingdon, England:
Routledge.
13.
CacioppoJ. T.PatrickB. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social interaction.
New York, NY:
Norton.
14.
CarlsonJ.O’CassA. (2010).
Exploring the relationships between e-service quality, satisfaction, attitudes, and behaviors in content-driven e-service web sites. Journal of Services Marketing,
24(2), 112–127. doi:10.1108/08876041011031091
15.
CernikovaM.DedkovaL.SmahelD. (2018).
Youth interaction with online strangers: Experiences and reactions to unknown people on the Internet.Information. Communication & Society,
1, 94–110. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1261169
16.
ChenQ.WellsW. D. (1999).
Attitude toward the site. Journal of Advertising Research,
39(5), 27–37.
17.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
18.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.
New York, NY:
Plenum.
19.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000).
The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry,
11(4), 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
20.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research.
Rochester, NY:
University of Rochester Press.
21.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008).
Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology,
49(1), 14–23. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
22.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007).
Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,
19(4), 855–870. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078
23.
IacobucciD.PosavacS. S.KardesF. R.SchneiderM. J.PopovichD. L. (2015).
The median split: Robust, refined, and revived. Journal of Consumer Psychology,
25(4), 690–704.
24.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(2nd ed.).
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
25.
La GuardiaJ. G.PatrickH. (2008).
Self-determination theory as a fundamental theory of close relationship. Canadian Psychology,
49(3), 201–209.
26.
La GuardiaJ. G.RyanR. M.CouchmanC. E.DeciE. L. (2000).
Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
79(3), 367–384. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367
27.
LedbetterA. M.MazerJ. P.DeGrootJ. M.MeyerK. R.MaoY.SwaffordB. (2011).
Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research,
38(1), 27–53. doi:10.1177/0093650210365537
28.
LeeC.-Y.TsaoC.-H.ChangW.-C. (2015).
The relationship between attitude toward using and customer satisfaction with mobile application services. Journal of Enterprise Information Management,
28(5), 680–697. doi:10.1108/JEIM-07-2014-0077
29.
LeungL. (2011).
Loneliness, social support, and preference for online social interaction: The mediating effects of identity experimentation online among children and adolescents. Chinese Journal of Communication,
4(4), 381–399. doi:10.1080/17544750.2011.616285
30.
LeversenI.DanielsenA. G.BirkelandM. S.SamdalO. (2012).
Basic psychological need satisfaction in leisure activities and adolescents’ life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
41(12), 1588–1599. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9776-5
31.
LuoX. (2002).
Uses and gratifications theory and e-consumer behaviors: A structural equation modeling study. Journal of Interactive Advertising,
2(2), 34–41.
32.
MahonN. E.YarcheskiA.YarcheskiT. J.CannellaB. L.HanksM. M. (2006).
A meta-analytic study of predictors for loneliness during adolescence. Nursing Research,
55(5), 308–315. doi:10.1097/00006199-200611000-00009
33.
MaslowA. H. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.).
New York, NY:
Addison-Wesley.
34.
McKennaK. Y. A.GreenA. S.GleasonM. E. J. (2002).
Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction?Journal of Social Issues,
58(1), 9–31. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00246
35.
OrkibiH.RonenT. (2017).
Basic psychological needs satisfaction mediates the association between self-control skills and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology,
8, 936. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00936
36.
RafaelC.-P.CarlaR.-M.SilviaS.-B. (2013).
Social network loyalty: Evaluating the role of attitude, perceived risk and satisfaction. Online Information Review,
37(1), 61–82. doi:10.1108/14684521311311630
37.
RussellD. W. (1996).
UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment,
66(1), 20–40. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
38.
SheldonK. M.AbadN.HinschC. (2011).
A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedenss need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connectedness rewards it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
100(4), 766–775. doi:10.1037/a0022407
39.
SheldonK. M.GunzA. (2009).
Psychological needs as basic motives, not just experiential requirements. Journal of Personality,
77(5), 1467–1492. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00589.x
40.
SheldonP. (2008).
The relationship between unwillingness‐to‐communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology,
20(2), 67–75. doi:10.1027/1864‐1105.20.2.67
41.
ShklovskiI.KieslerS.KrautR. E. (2006). The Internet and social interaction: A meta-analysis and critique of studies, 1995-2003. In KrautR.BryninM.KieslerS. (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the internet: The social impact of information technology.
Oxford, England:
Oxford University Press.
42.
ŞimşekO. F.KoydemirS. (2013).
Linking metratraits of the big five to well-being and ill-being: Do basic psychological needs matter?Social Indicators Research,
112(1), 221–238. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0049-1
43.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.).
Boston, MA:
Allyn and Bacon.
44.
TianL.TianQ.HuebnerE. S. (2016).
School-related social support and adolescents’ school-related subjective well-being: The mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction at school. Social Indicators Research,
128(1), 105–129. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1021-7
45.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2008).
Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet: Consequences for social competence and self-concept unity. Communication Research,
35(2), 208–231. doi:10.1177/0093650207313164
46.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2009).
Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
18(1), 1–5. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x
47.
WaltherJ. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 443–479).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
48.
WestR.TurnerL. H. (2009). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (4th ed.).
New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
49.
WolakJ.MitchellK. J.FinkelhorD. (2003).
Escaping or connecting? Characteristics of youth who form close online relationships. Journal of Adolescence,
26(1), 105–119. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00114-8
