Prior research on the endowment effect has tended to focus on decisions made by individuals acting on their own account rather than on others’ behalf. This article reports on three experiments that modeled this “for-self” versus “for-others” distinction and measured its effects on prices. Specifically, our participants who were asked to make trading decisions for other people subsequently reported decreases in the endowment effect. We concluded that, in the context of the trading of goods, perceived ownership and differences in focus on the traded products’ positive and negative features mediated the diminished endowment effect our experiments identified.
AndersonO.HolmH. J.TyranJ.-R. K.WengströmE. R. (2016).
Deciding for others reduces loss aversion. Management Science,
62(1), 29–36. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2085
2.
ArlenJ.SpitzerM.TalleyE. (2002).
Endowment effects within corporate agency relationships. Journal of Legal Studies,
31(1), 1–37. doi:10.1086/324659
3.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986).
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
4.
BatemanI.MunroA.RhodesB.StarmerC.SugdenR. (1997).
A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics,
112(2), 479–505. doi:10.1162/003355397555262
5.
BeisswangerA. H.StoneE. R.HuppJ. M.AllgaierL. (2003).
Risk taking in relationships: Differences in deciding for oneself versus for a friend. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,
25, 121–135. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2502_3
6.
BellD. E. (1985).
Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research,
33(1), 1–27. doi:10.1287/opre.33.1.1
7.
BorresenC. R. (1987).
Decision making as a function of self and others. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
64, 1301–1302. doi:10.2466/pms.1987.64.3c.1301
8.
CannA.CalhounL. G. (2001).
Perceived personality associations with differences in sense of humor: Stereotypes of hypothetical others with high or low senses of humor. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research,
14, 117–130. doi:10.1515/humr.14.2.117
9.
CarmonZ.ArielyD. (2000).
Focusing on the forgone: Why value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research,
27, 360–370. doi:10.1086/317590
10.
ChatterjeeP.IrmakC.RoseR. (2013).
The endowment effect as self-enhancement in response to threat. Journal of Consumer Research,
40(3), 460–476. doi:10.1086/671344
11.
DavisH. L.HochS. J.RagsdaleE. (1986).
An anchoring and adjustment model of spouse predictions. Journal of Consumer Research,
13, 25–37. doi:10.1086/209045
12.
EkmanP. (2007). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life.
New York, NY:
Holt.
13.
ForgasJ. P. (1995).
Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin,
117, 39–66. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39
14.
ForgasJ. P. (2002).
Feeling and doing: Affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychological Inquiry,
13, 1–28. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1301_01
15.
FranciosiR.KujalP.MichelitschR.SmithV.DengG. (1996).
Experimental tests of the endowment effect. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,
30(2), 213–226. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00858-X
16.
FrijdaN. H. (1988).
The laws of emotion. American Psychologist,
43(5), 349–358.
17.
FüllbrunnS. C.LuhanW. J. (2017).
Decision making for others: The case of loss aversion. Economics Letters,
161, 154–156. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2017.09.037
18.
GilbertD. T. (2006). Stumbling on happiness.
New York, NY:
Knopf.
19.
GrahamJ. W.GentryK. W.GreenJ. (1981).
The self-presentational nature of emotional expression: Some evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
7, 467–474. doi:10.1177/014616728173016
20.
HarlessD. W. (1989).
More laboratory evidence on the disparity between willingness to pay and compensation demanded. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,
11(3), 359–379. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(89)90035-8
21.
HayesA. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
22.
HochS. J. (1987).
Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
53, 221–234. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.221
23.
HochS. J.LoewensteinG. F. (1991).
Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. Journal of Consumer Research,
17, 1–16. doi:10.1086/208573
24.
HoustonD. A.ShermanS. J. (1995).
Cancellation and focus: The role of shared and unique features in the choice process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
31, 357–378. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1016
25.
HoustonD. A.ShermanS. J.BakerS. M. (1989).
The influence of unique features and direction of comparison on preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
25, 121–141. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(89)90008-5
26.
InderB.O’BrienT. (2003).
The endowment effect and the role of uncertainty. Bulletin of Economic Research,
55, 289–301. doi:10.1111/1467-8586.00176
27.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ.ThalerR. (1990).
Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy,
98, 1325–1348. doi:10.1086/261737
28.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979).
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica,
47, 263–229. doi:10.2307/1914185
29.
KarylowskiJ. J. (1990).
Social reference points and accessibility of trait-related information in self-other similarity judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
58(6), 975–983. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.975
30.
Keltner D., Lerner, J. (2010). Emotion. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 317–352). New York: Wiley.
31.
KeltnerD.OatleyK.JenkinsJ. M. (2014). Understanding emotions.
Hoboken, NJ:
Wiley.
32.
KnetschJ. L. (1989).
The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review,
79(5), 1277–1284.
33.
KnetschJ. L.SindenJ. A. (1984).
Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Quarterly Journal of Economics,
99(3), 507–521. doi:10.2307/1885962
34.
KrayL. J. (2000).
Contingent weighting in self-other decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
83, 82–106. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2903
35.
KühbergerA. (1997). Theoretical conceptions of framing effects in risky decisions. In CrozierW. R.SvensonO. (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 128–144).
London, England:
Routledge.
36.
LevinI. P.SchnittjerS. K.TheeS. L. (1988).
Information framing effects in social and personal decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
24, 520–529. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(88)90050-9
37.
LinC.ChuangS.KaoD. T.KungC. (2006).
The role of emotions in the endowment effect. Journal of Economic Psychology,
27, 589–597. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2005.10.001
38.
LoewensteinG.AdlerD. (1995).
A bias in the prediction of tastes. The Economic Journal,
105(431), 929–937. doi:10.2307/2235159
39.
LoewensteinG.IssacharoffS. (1994).
Source dependence in the valuation of objects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,
7(3), 157–168. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960070302
40.
MorewedgeC.GiblinC. (2015).
Explanations of the endowment effect: An integrative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
19(6), 339–348. doi:/10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.004
41.
MorrisonG. (1997).
Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: Some evidence of an endowment effect. Applied Economics,
29(4), 411–417. doi:10.1080/000368497326903
42.
NayakankuppamD.MishraH. (2005).
The endowment effect: Rose-tinted and dark-tinted glasses. Journal of Consumer Research,
32, 390–395. doi:10.1086/497550
43.
NovemskyN.KahnemanD. (2005).
The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research,
42, 119–128. doi:10.1509/jmkr.42.2.119.62292
44.
OlejnicS.AlginaJ. (2003).
Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods,
8, 434–447. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434
45.
PahlS.EiserJ. R. (2006).
The focus effect and self-positivity in ratings of self-other similarity and difference. British Journal of Social Psychology,
45, 107–116. doi:10.1348/014466605X49582
46.
PerloffL. S.FetzerB. K. (1986).
Self-other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
50, 502–510. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.502
47.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008).
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods,
40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
48.
RaymarkP. H. (2000).
Accepting and rejecting medical treatment: A comparison of decisions made for self versus those made for a significant other. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
30, 2409–2436. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02443.x
49.
RogersR. (1991). Self and other: Object relations in psychoanalysis and literature.
New York:
New York University Press.
50.
RossL.GreeneD.HouseP. (1977).
The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
13, 279–230. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
51.
SamuelsonW.ZeckhauserR. Z. (1988).
Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,
1, 7–60. doi:10.1007/BF00055564
52.
SchererK. R.EkmanP. (1984). Approaches to emotion.
Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
53.
ShafirE. (1993).
Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory and Cognition,
21, 546–556. doi:10.3758/BF03197186
54.
ShogrenJ. F.ShinS. Y.HayesD. J.KliebensteinJ. B. (1994).
Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. The American Economic Review,
84(1), 255–270.
55.
SinghH. (1991).
The disparity between willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Another look at laboratory evidence. Economics Letters,
35(3), 263–266. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(91)90141-7
56.
SnyderC. R.EndelmanJ. R. (1979).
Effects of degree of interpersonal similarity on physical distance and self-reported attraction: A comparison of uniqueness and reinforcement theory predictions. Journal of Personality,
47, 492–505. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494tb00628.x
57.
StoneE. R.YatesA.CaruthersA. S. (2002).
Risk taking in decision making for others versus the self. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
32, 1797–1824. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00260.x
58.
StrahilevitzM. A.LoewensteinG. (1998).
The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. Journal of Consumer Research,
25, 276–289. doi:10.1086/209539
59.
ThalerR. (1980).
Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,
1, 39–60. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7
60.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1991).
Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics,
106, 1039–1061. doi:10.2307/2937956
