An accurate assessment of an individual often requires taking their potential into account. Across six studies the authors found that people are more inclined to do so when evaluating themselves than when evaluating others, such that people credit themselves for their perceived potential more than they credit others for theirs. Participants rated potential as a more telling component of the self than of others, and the importance participants placed on their own potential led to attentional biases toward information about their own future potential that did not apply to information about the potential of others. Furthermore, when assessing themselves and other people, participants required more tangible proof that someone else has a given level of potential than they required of themselves, and they relied more on how they would ideally perform in self-assessment but more on how others actually performed in judging them.
AjzenI.MaddenT. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
2.
AndersenS. M.RossL. (1984). Self-knowledge and social inference: I. The impact of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 280-293.
3.
AndersonC. A.JenningsD. L. (1980). When experiences of failure promote expectations of success: The impact of attributing failure to ineffective strategies. Journal of Personality, 48, 393-407.
4.
BalcetisE. (2009). Claiming a moral minority, saccades help create a biased majority: Tracking eye movements to base rates in social predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 970-973.
5.
BlakemoreS.-J.DecetyJ. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 561-567.
6.
BuehlerR.GriffinD.RossM. (1994). Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366-381.
7.
ChambersJ. R.EpleyN.SavitskyK.WindschitlP. D. (2008). Knowing too much: Using private knowledge to predict how one is viewed by others. Psychological Science, 19, 542-548.
8.
DillonR. L.TinsleyC. H. (2008). How near-misses influence decision making under risk: A missed opportunity for learning. Management Science, 54, 1425-1440.
9.
EpleyN.DunningD. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861-875.
10.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
GilbertD. G.MaloneP. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
12.
GordonR. A. (1990). Informational bases of behavioral intentions and behavioral expectations on self-predictions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 433-442.
13.
JohnsonJ. T. (2009). The once and future self: Beliefs about temporal change in goal importance and goal achievement. Self and Identity, 8, 94-112.
14.
KoehlerD. J.PoonC. S. K. (2006). Self-predictions overweight strength of current intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 517-524.
15.
KrugerJ.GilovichT. (2004). Actions, intentions, and self-assessment: The road to self-enhancement is paved with good intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 328-339.
16.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
17.
MatherM.CarstensenL. L. (2003). Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces. Psychological Science, 14, 409-415.
18.
ProninE. (2008). How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science, 320, 1177-1180.
19.
ProninE. (2009). The introspection illusion. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 1-67). New York, NY: Elsevier.
20.
ProninE.BergerJ.MoloukiS. (2007). Alone in a crowd of sheep: Asymmetric perceptions of conformity and their roots in an introspection illusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 585-595.
21.
ProninE.KuglerM.B. (2007). Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 565-578.
22.
RiisJ.SimmonsJ. P.GoodwinG. P. (2008). Preferences for enhancement pharmaceuticals: The reluctance to enhance fundamental traits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 495-508.
23.
SchoenemanT. J.RubanowitzD. E. (1985). Attributions in the advice columns: Actors and observers, causes and reasons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 315-325.
24.
SedikidesC. (1993). Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 317-338.
25.
SedikidesC. (2009). On self-protection and self-enhancement regulation: The role of self-improvement and social norms. In ForgasJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.TiceD. (Eds.), The psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 73-92). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
26.
TetlockP. E. (2005). Expert political judgment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
WarshawP. R.DavisF. D. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 213-228.
28.
WilliamsE. F.GilovichT. (2008). Conceptions of the self and others across time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1037-1046.
29.
WilliamsE. F.GilovichT. (2011). Stacking the deck: The relative impact of peak and typical performances in judging the self and others. Manuscript submitted for publication.
30.
WilliamsE. F.SteffelM. (2011). Double standards in the use of enhancing products by self and others. Manuscript submitted for publication.
31.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2001). From chump to champ: People’s appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 572-584.
