Digital technologies, particularly apps, are increasingly used to support criminal legal system-involved people (CLSIP). However, research on CLSIP's access to smartphones, data, and digital skills is limited. Our mixed methodology study, involving 41 CLSIP in Wales, UK, explored smartphone and app usage via observations and a survey. Findings reveal multifaceted barriers ranging from affordability, digital competency, literacy, and trust issues. The article advocates for training to enhance digital skills, subsidized access to smartphones/data, and the co-production of apps to improve accessibility for CLSIP. It outlines directions for future research, policy, and practice to support the digital inclusion of CLSIP.
BarnR.BarnB. (2019). Youth justice in the digital age: A case study of practitioners’ perspectives on the challenges and opportunities of social technology in their techno-habitat in the United Kingdom. Youth Justice, 19(3), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225419869568
2.
BauerM.GlennT.MonteithS.BauerR.WhybrowP.GeddesJ. (2017). Ethical perspectives on recommending digital technology for patients with mental illness. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-017-0073-9
3.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2024). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.
4.
BovairdT. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
5.
BrymanA. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
6.
CarrollJ.MoorheadA.BondR.LeBlancW.PetrellaR.FiscellaK. (2017). Who uses mobile phone health apps and does use matter? A secondary data analytics approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5604
7.
CarvalhoI. D. S.MendesR. C. M. G.LimaL. H. D. S. S.da SilvaG. P.LimaM. D. F. G.GuedesT. G.LinharesF. M. P. (2023). Effect of a board game on imprisoned women’s knowledge about sexually transmitted infections: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Public Health, 23(690), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15646-3
DiMaggioP.HargittaiE.CelesteC.ShaferS. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. Social Inequality, 1(1), 355–400.
GershonI.GonzalesA. (2021). You got a hole in your belly and a phone in your hand: How US government phone subsidies shape the search for employment. New Media &Society, 23(4), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820954184
12.
HadlingtonL.KnightV. (2022). Public acceptability of prisoners’ access and use of digital technologies in the UK. The Prison Journal, 102(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855221079290
13.
HarlowC. W. (2003). Education and correctional populations. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report.
HolmesH.BurgessG. (2022). Digital exclusion and poverty in the UK: How structural inequality shapes experiences of getting online. Digital Geography and Society, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100041
JewkesY.JohnstonH. (2009). “Cavemen in an era of speed-of-light technology”: Historical and contemporary perspectives on communication within prisons. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2009.00559.x
19.
JewkesY.ReisdorfB. (2016). A brave new world: The problems and opportunities presented by new media technologies in prisons. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(5), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816654953
20.
KipH.BoumanY.KeldersS.van Gemert-PijnenL. (2018). eHealth in treatment of offenders in forensic mental health: A review of the current state. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 42–42. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00042
21.
LeachR.CarreiroS.ShafferP. M.GabaA.SmelsonD. (2022). Digital health interventions for mental health, substance use, and co-occurring disorders in the criminal justice population: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12(1), 794785. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.794785
MayerC.McKenzieK. (2017). ‘…it shows that there’s no limits’: The psychological impact of co-production for experts by experience working in youth mental health. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25(3), 1181–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12418
24.
McDougallC.PearsonD.TorgersonD.Garcia-ReyesM. (2017). The effect of digital technology on prisoner behavior and reoffending: A natural stepped-wedge design. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(4), 455–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9303-5
MilwardJ.DayE.WadsworthE.StrangJ.LynskeyM. (2015). Mobile phone ownership, usage and readiness to use by patients in drug treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 146(1), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.11.001
27.
MorganG.JonesD.WalkerC.PrideauxG.JonesE. (2024). Co-production in the criminal justice system: Introducing the DEVICES principles. Howard Journal of Crime and Justice. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12590
28.
MorrisJ.GrahamH. (2019). Using technology and digitally enabled approaches to support desistance. In UgwudikeP.GrahamH.McNeillF.TaxmanF.TrotterC. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to rehabilitative work in criminal justice (pp. 179–192). Routledge.
29.
MorrisJ.KnightV. (2018). Co-producing digitally-enabled courses that promote desistance in prison and probation settings. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 4(4), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-07-2018-0023
30.
MusaA.AhmadA. H. B. (2015). Criminal recidivism: A conceptual analysis of social exclusion. Journal of Culture, Society & Development, 7(1), 28–34.
31.
NellisM. (2017). Setting the parameters of ‘digital (criminal) justice’ in Scotland. Probation Journal, 64(3), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550517712625
Ogbonnaya-OgburuI. F.ToyamaK.DillahuntT. R. (2019). Towards an effective digital literacy intervention to assist returning citizens with job search. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘19), New York, NY, USA, Paper 85, pp. 1–12. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300315
PestoffV.OsborneS.BrandsenT. (2006). Patterns of co-production in public services: Some concluding thoughts. Public Management Review, 8(4), 591–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030601022999
ReisdorfB. C.DeCookJ. R. (2022). Locked up and left out: Formerly incarcerated people in the context of digital inclusion. New Media & Society, 24(2), 478–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211063178
39.
ReisdorfB. C.JewkesY. (2016). (B)Locked sites: Cases of Internet use in three British prisons. Information Communication and Society, 19(6), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153124
40.
ReisdorfB. C.RikardR. V. (2018). Digital rehabilitation: A model of re-entry into the digital age. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(9), 1273–1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773817
41.
RobinsonL.CottenS. R.OnoH.Quan-HaaseA.MeschG.ChenW.SchulzJ.HaleT. M.SternM. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
42.
RossJ.CotterillS.BowerP.MurrayE. (2022). Influences on patient uptake and engagement with the NHS Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: A qualitative interview study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1), e40961. https://doi.org/10.2196/40961
43.
SourdinT.LiB.HindsT. (2020). Humans and justice machines: Emergent legal technologies and justice apps. Precedent (Sydney, NSW), (156), 20–24.
44.
SpohrS. A.TaxmanF. S.WaltersS. T. (2015). The relationship between electronic goal reminders and subsequent drug use and treatment initiation in a criminal justice setting. Addictive Behaviors, 51(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.005
45.
TaylorH.BartelsL. (2024). Should there be an app for that? Australian perspectives on the utility of a mobile app to support people in the criminal justice system. Probation Journal, 71(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505231221243
46.
TaylorH.van RooyD.BartelsL. (2022). Criminal justice mobile applications: A literature and scoping review. https://csrm.cass.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/2022/10/Justice_Mobile_Apps_Literature_Review_Report_for_JACS_2021_1.pdf
47.
TaylorH.Van RooyD.BartelsL. (2023). Digital justice: A rapid evidence assessment of the use of mobile technology for offender behavioural change. Probation Journal, 70(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505211065694
Van De SteeneS.KnightV. (2017). Digital transformation for prisons: Developing a needs-based strategy. Probation Journal, 64(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550517723722
WeisburdK. (2022). Punitive surveillance. Virginia Law Review, 108(1), 147–221.
53.
ZhangL.TuluB.JenkinsS.RichardsonN.ShoptawS.TaxmanF. (2022). Design and evaluation of the Probation/Parole and Reentry Coach App (PARCA): A platform to support a successful reentry into community. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/79797
