Does the public disapprove of leaders who back down to initiate negotiation with non-state armed actors? This study advances our understanding of leader-public interactions during domestic security crises. First, we argue that the public disapproves of their leaders when they back down to initiate negotiations with non-state armed actors. Second, the public’s disapproval stems from their transfer of negative emotional reactions against armed groups to their leaders if they fail to escalate. Using survey experiments with Indian and Nigerian respondents, we provide novel empirical evidence to shed more light on strategic policy choices confronting leaders during domestic security crises.
AdunbiO (2015) Oil Wealth and Insurgency in Nigeria. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
2.
AsalVRethemeyerRK (2008) The Nature of the Beast: Organizational Structures and the Lethality of Terrorist Attacks. The Journal of Politics70 (2): 437–449.
3.
AsalVGustafsonDKrauseP (2019) It Comes With the Territory: Why States Negotiate With Ethno-Political Organizations. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism42 (4): 363–382.
4.
AtziliB (2007) When Good Fences Make Bad Neighbors: Fixed Borders, State Weakness, and International Conflict. International Security31 (3): 139–173.
5.
BakkerFE (2017) Do Liberal Norms Matter? A Cross-Regime Experimental Investigation of the Normative Explanation of the Democratic Peace Thesis in China and The Netherlands. Acta Politica52 (4): 521–543.
6.
BapatNA (2006) State Bargaining with Transnational Terrorist Groups. International Studies Quarterly50 (1): 213–229.
7.
BaruahS (2005) India and Its Northeast: A New Politics of Race. IIC Quarterly32 (2): 165–176.
8.
BaumMA (2004) Going Private: Public Opinion, Presidential Rhetoric, and the Domestic Politics of Audience Costs in US Foreign Policy Crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution48 (5): 603–631.
9.
BerinskyAJHuberGALenzGS (2012) Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon. Com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis20 (3): 351–368.
10.
BerinskyAJMargolisMFSancesMW (2014) Separating the Shirkers From the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys. American Journal of Political Science58 (3): 739–753.
11.
BiswasB (2014) Managing Conflicts in India: Policies of Coercion and Accommodation. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
12.
CannonBIyekekpoloW (2018) Explaining Transborder Terrorist Attacks: The Cases of Boko Haram and Al-Shabaab. African Security11 (4): 370–396.
13.
CarlsmithKMDarleyJMRobinsonPH (2002) Why Do We Punish? Deterrence and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83 (2): 284.
14.
ClaryCLalwaniSSiddiquiN (2021) Public Opinion and Crisis Behavior in a Nuclearized South Asia. International Studies Quarterly65 (4): 1064–1076.
15.
CogginsB (2016 [2014]) Power Politics and State Formation in the Twentieth Century: The Dynamics of Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DaviesGAJohnsR (2013) Audience Costs among the British Public: The Impact of Escalation, Crisis Type, and Prime Ministerial Rhetoric. International Studies Quarterly57 (4): 725–737.
17.
DruckmanJNKamCD (2011) Students As Experimental Participants. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science1: 41–57.
18.
D’SouzaSM (2017) Countering Insurgencies, Terrorism and Violent Extremism in South Asia. Small Wars & Insurgencies28: 1–11.
19.
FearonJD (1994) Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes. American Political Science Review88 (3): 577–592.
20.
FearonJD (1995) Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization49 (3): 379–414.
21.
GadarianSK (2010) The Politics of Threat: How Terrorism News Shapes Foreign Policy Attitudes. The Journal of Politics72 (2): 469–483.
22.
GatesSRoyK (2016) Unconventional Warfare in South Asia: Shadow Warriors and Counterinsurgency. New York: Routledge.
23.
GetmanskyAZeitzoffT (2014) Terrorism and Voting: The Effect of Rocket Threat on Voting in Israeli Elections. American Political Science Review108 (3): 588–604.
24.
GodefroidtA (2023) How Terrorism Does (and Does Not) Affect Citizens’ Political Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Political Science67 (1): 22–38.
25.
GoswamiN (2014) Indian National Security and Counter-Insurgency: The Use of Force Vs Non-Violent Response. New York: Routledge.
26.
HetheringtonMSuhayE (2011) Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans..’American Journal of Political Science55: 546–560.
27.
HuddyLFeldmanSTaberC, et al. (2005) Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Policies. American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 593–608.
28.
JentlesonBWBrittonRL (1998) Still Pretty Prudent: Post-cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force. Journal of Conflict Resolution42 (4): 395–417.
29.
JoshiS (2013) India’s Military Instrument: A Doctrine Stillborn. Journal of Strategic Studies36 (4): 512–540.
30.
KertzerJDBrutgerR (2016) Decomposing Audience Costs: Bringing the Audience Back into Audience Cost Theory. American Journal of Political Science60 (1): 234–249.
31.
KolåsÅ (2011) Naga Militancy and Violent Politics in the Shadow of Ceasefire. Journal of Peace Research48 (6): 781–792.
32.
KrupnikovYLevineAS (2014) Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity. Journal of Experimental Political Science1 (1): 59–80.
33.
KyddAHWalterBF (2006) The Strategies of Terrorism. International Security31 (1): 49–80.
34.
LevayKEFreeseJDruckmanJN (2016) The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples. Sage Open6 (1): 2158244016636433.
35.
LevenduskyMSHorowitzMC (2012) When Backing Down Is the Right Decision: Partisanship, New Information, and Audience Costs. The Journal of Politics74 (2): 323–338.
36.
LibermanP (2013) Retributive Support for International Punishment and Torture. Journal of Conflict Resolution57 (2): 285–306.
37.
LibermanP (2014) War and Torture As “Just Deserts.”Public Opinion Quarterly78 (1): 47–70.
38.
LibermanPSkitkaLJ (2017) Revenge in US Public Support for War against Iraq. Public Opinion Quarterly81 (3): 636–660.
39.
Lin-GreenbergE (2019) Backing Up, Not Backing Down: Mitigating Audience Costs through Policy Substitution. Journal of Peace Research56 (4): 559–574.
40.
MaljiA (2015) Terrain, Trains, and Terrorism: The Influence of Geography on Terrorism in India. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky.
41.
MatesanIE (2020) Failed Negotiations and the Dark Side of Ripeness: Insights from Egypt. International Negotiation25 (3): 463–494.
42.
McDermottRLopezACHatemiPK (2017) ‘Blunt Not the Heart, Enrage It’: The Psychology of Revenge and Deterrence. Texas National Security Review11: 68–88.
43.
MerollaJLZechmeisterEJ (2009) Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats. Political Psychology31: 647–650.
44.
MintzAGevaN (1993) Why Don’t Democracies Fight Each Other? An Experimental Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution37 (3): 484–503.
45.
MintzAReddSBVedlitzA (2006) Can We Generalize from Student Experiments to the Real World in Political Science, Military Affairs, and International Relations?Journal of Conflict Resolution50 (5): 757–776.
46.
MitraDM (2005) Understanding Indian Insurgencies: Implications for Counterinsurgency Operations in the Third World. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.
47.
MohammedK (2018) The Origins of Boko Haram. In: The Oxford Handbook of Nigerian Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
MuellerJStewartMG (2012) The terrorism delusion: America’s overwrought. International Security37: 81–110.
49.
MullinixKJLeeperTJDruckmanJN, et al. (2015) The Generalizability of Survey Experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science2 (2): 109–138.
50.
NarangVStanilandP (2018) Democratic Accountability and Foreign Security Policy: Theory and Evidence from India. Security Studies27 (3): 410–447.
51.
NeumannPR (2007) Negotiating with Terrorists. Foreign Affairs86: 128.
52.
NwangwuCOnuohaFCNwosuBU, et al. (2020) The Political Economy of Biafra Separatism and Post-War Igbo Nationalism in Nigeria. African Affairs119 (477): 526–551.
53.
ObiC (2014) Oil and the Post-Amnesty Programme (PAP): What Prospects for Sustainable Development and Peace in the Niger Delta?Review of African Political Economy41 (140): 249–263.
54.
ObiCRustadSA (eds) (2011) Oil and Insurgency in the Niger Delta: Managing the Complex Politics of Petro-violence. London: Zed Books.
55.
OmeniA (2017) Counter-Insurgency in Nigeria: The Military and Operations against Boko Haram, 2011–2017. New York: Routledge.
56.
OmeniA (2019) Insurgency and War in Nigeria: Regional Fracture and the Fight against Boko Haram. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
57.
PiazzaJAChoiS-W (2018) International Military Interventions and Transnational Terrorist Backlash. International Studies Quarterly62 (3): 686–695.
58.
RamakrishnanV (2005) The Naxalite Challenge. Frontline22 (21): 8–21.
59.
RaoMG (2015) The Naxal Challenge: Causes, Linkages, and Policy Options. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
60.
SkitkaLJBaumanCWAramovichNP, et al. (2006) Confrontational and Preventative Policy Responses to Terrorism: Anger Wants a Fight and Fear Wants “Them” to Go Away. Basic and Applied Social Psychology28 (4): 375–384.
61.
StanilandP (2012) Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Insurgent Fratricide, Ethnic Defection, and the Rise of Pro-state Paramilitaries. Journal of Conflict Resolution56 (1): 16–40.
62.
StanilandP (2018) Networks of Rebellion: Explaining Insurgent Cohesion and Collapse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
63.
StanilandPStommesD (2019) New Data on Indian Security Force Fatalities and Demographics. India Review18 (3): 288–323.
64.
SteinRM (2019) Vengeful Citizens, Violent States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
ThomasJ (2014) Rewarding Bad Behavior: How Governments Respond to Terrorism in Civil War. American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 804–818.
66.
TomzM (2007) Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach. International Organization61 (4): 821–840.
67.
TomzMRWeeksJL (2013) Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review107 (4): 849–865.
68.
TorosH (2008) We Don’t Negotiate with Terrorists!’: Legitimacy and Complexity in Terrorist Conflicts. Security Dialogue39 (4): 407–426.
69.
WalterBF (2006) Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others. American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 313–330.
70.
WalterBF (2009) Reputation and Civil War: Why Separatist Conflicts Are So Violent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
WatermanA (2021) Ceasefires and State Order-Making in Naga Northeast India. International Peacekeeping28 (3): 496–525.
72.
WattsM (2007) Petro-Insurgency or Criminal Syndicate? Conflict & Violence in the Niger Delta. Review of African Political Economy34 (114): 637–660.
73.
WayneC (2019) Risk or retribution: The micro-foundations of state responses to terror. (Doctoral dissertation).
74.
WayneCN (2023) Terrified or Enraged? Emotional Microfoundations of Public Counterterror Attitudes. International Organization77 (4): 824–847.
75.
ZartmanW (1989) Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
