In the last decade, the appointment of technocratic ministers has become more common than ever before in Europe. Yet, scholarly attention has mostly focused on the economic determinants that lead to the appointment of such political outsiders in governments. In contrast, political determinants have not been fully examined. This article aims to investigate the role of economic determinants, as well as institutional factors (e.g. electoral system), party-system characteristics (e.g. volatility, polarization) and cabinet-related factors (e.g. intra-cabinet heterogeneity, the strength of populist parties within the government). Using a novel data set comprising data for more than 7000 ministers, including around 900 technocrats, our analysis shows that the share of populist parties within the cabinets has the strongest effect on the likelihood of appointing technocrats in national government. However, institutional-level variables appear to have no effect on the levels of technocratic appointments.
AlexiadouD (2015) Ideologues, Partisans, and Loyalists: Cabinet Ministers and Social Welfare Reform in Parliamentary Democracies. Comparative Political Studies48 (8): 1051–1086.
2.
AlexiadouDGunaydinH (2019) Commitment or Expertise? Technocratic Appointments as Political Responses. European Journal of Political Research58 (3): 845–865.
3.
AlexiadouDSpanielWGunaydinH (2021) When Technocratic Appointments Signal Credibility. Comparative Political Studies55 (3): 386–419.
4.
Amorim NetoOSamuelsD (2010) Democratic Regimes and Cabinet Politics: A Global Perspective. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Legislativos1 (1): 14–27.
5.
Amorim NetoOStrømK (2006) Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Non-partisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies. British Journal of Political Science36 (4): 619–643.
6.
AndewegRB (2000) Political Recruitment and Party Government. In: BlondelJCottaM (eds) The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.119–140.
7.
BardiLBartoliniSTrechselAH (2014) Responsive and Responsible? The Role of Parties in Twenty-First Century Politics. West European Politics37 (2): 235–252.
8.
BarrenecheaRDargentE (2020) Populists and Technocrats in Latin America: Conflict, Cohabitation, and Cooperation. Politics and Governance8 (4): 509–519.
9.
BertsouE (2022) Bring in the Experts? Citizen Preferences for Independent Experts in Political Decision-Making Processes. European Journal of Political Research61 (1): 255–267.
10.
BertsouECaramaniD (2020) People Haven’t Had Enough of Experts: Technocratic Attitudes among Citizens in Nine European Democracies. American Journal of Political Science66 (1): 5–23.
11.
BertsouEPastorellaG (2017) Technocratic Attitudes: A Citizens’ Perspective of Expert Decision-Making. West European Politics40 (2): 430–458.
12.
BickertonCJInvernizzi AccettiC (2018) ‘Techno-Populism’ as a New Party Family : The Case of the Five Star Movement and Podemos Star Movement and Podemos. Contemporary Italian Politics10 (2): 132–150.
13.
BlondelJThiebaultJL (1991) The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe. Houndmills: Macmillan.
14.
BlondelJCottaM (eds) (1996) Party and Government: An Inquiry into the Relationship between Governments and Supporting Parties in Liberal Democracies. Houndmills: Macmillan.
15.
BohleD (2014) Responsible Government and Capitalism’s Cycles. West European Politics37 (2): 288–308.
16.
BrunclíkMParízekM (2019) When are technocratic cabinets formed?Comparative European Politics, 17: 759–777.
17.
CaramaniD (2017) Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government. American Political Science Review111 (1): 54–67.
18.
Casal BértoaFEnyediZ (2022) Who Governs Europe? A New Historical Dataset on Governments and Party Systems since 1848. European Political Science21: 150–164.
19.
ChiruMGherghinaS (2012) Keeping the Doors Closed: Leadership Selection in Post-communist Romania. East European Politics and Societies26 (3): 510–537.
20.
ChiruMEnyediZ (2022) Who Wants Technocrats? A Comparative Study of Citizen Attitudes in Nine Young and Consolidated Democracies. British Journal of Politics and International Relations24 (1): 95–112.
21.
ChoiE (2014) Political Corruption, Trust, and Citizen Evaluations of Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis. International Studies Review15 (2): 1–23.
22.
Costa PintoACottaMTavares de AlmeidaP (2018) Technocratic Ministers and Political Leadership in European Democracies. Cham: Macmillan Press.
23.
CottaM (2018) Technocratic Government Versus Party Government? Non-partisan Ministers and the Changing Parameters of Political Leadership in European Democracies. In: Costa PintoACottaMTavares de AlmeidaP (eds) Technocratic Ministers and Political Leadership in European Democracies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.267–288.
24.
DöringHManowP (2019) Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development Version. Available at: https://www.parlgov.org/
25.
DowdingKDumontP (2009) Structural and Strategic Factors Affecting the Hiring and Firing of Ministers. In: DowdingKDumontP (eds) The Selection of Ministers in Europe: Hiring and Firing. London: Routledge, pp.1–20.
26.
DoyleDElgieR (2016) Maximizing the Reliability of Cross-National Measures of Presidential Power. British Journal of Political Science46 (4): 731–741.
27.
DrápalováEWegrichK (2021) Technocratic Populism and Subnational Governance. Government and Opposition56 (4): 640–660.
28.
EmanueleV (2015) Dataset of Electoral Volatility and Its Internal Components in Western Europe (1945–2015). Rome, Italy: Italian Center for Electoral Studies.
29.
EmanueleVImprotaMMarinoB, et al. (2022) Going Technocratic? Diluting Governing Responsibility in Electorally Turbulent Times. West European Politics46 (5): 995–1023.
30.
EnglerS (2020) Centrist Anti-establishment Parties and Their Protest Voters: More than a Superficial Romance?European Political Science Review12 (3): 307–325.
31.
Fernández-VázquezPLavezzoloSRamiroL (2022) The technocratic side of populist attitudes: Evidence from the Spanish case. West European Politics46 (1): 73–99.
32.
GanuzaEFontJ (2020) Experts in Government: What For? Ambiguities in Public Opinion Towards Technocracy. Politics and Governance8 (4): 520–532.
33.
GarziaDKarremansJ (2021) Super Mario 2: Comparing the Technocrat-Led Monti and Draghi 0governments in Italy. Contemporary Italian Politics13 (1): 105–115.
34.
GuastiP (2020) Populism in Power and Democracy: Democratic Decay and Resilience in the Czech Republic (2013–2020). Politics and Governance8 (4): 473–484.
35.
HabermasJ (2015) The Lure of Technocracy. London: Polity.
36.
HallerbergMWehnerJ (2018) When Do You Get Economists as Policy Makers?British Journal of Political Science50 (3): 1193–1205.
37.
HelmsL (2022) Why Do Parties Select Non-partisan Ministers? The Paradox of Ministerial Selection in Austria. Representation59 (3): 513–530.
38.
HoboltSBTilleyJ (2016) Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West European Politics39 (5): 971–991.
39.
IgnaziP (2017) Party and Democracy: The Uneven Road to Party Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KaplanSB (2017) Partisan Technocratic Cycles in Latin America. Electoral Studies45: 219–229.
42.
KarremansJLefkofridiZ (2020) Responsive Versus Responsible? Party Democracy in Times of Crisis. Party Politics26 (3): 271–279.
43.
KopeckýPMeyer-SahlingJHSpirovaM (2022) (Extreme) political polarization and party patronage. Irish Political Studies37 (2): 218–243.
44.
LipsmeyerCPierceHN (2011) The eyes that bind: Junior ministers as oversight mechanisms in coalition governments. Journal of Politics73: 1152–1164.
45.
MairP (2008) The Challenge to Party Government. West European Politics31 (1–2): 211–234.
46.
McDonnellDValbruzziM (2014) Defining and Classifying Technocrat-Led and Technocratic Governments. European Journal of Political Research53 (4): 654–671.
47.
MüllerWCStrømK (Eds) (2000) Coalition governments in Western Europe. Oxford University Press.
48.
PastorellaG (2016) Technocratic Governments in Europe: Getting the Critique Right. Political Studies64 (4): 948–965.
49.
PedersenM (1979) The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility. European Journal of Political Research7 (1): 1–26.
50.
RooduijnMKesselSFroioC, et al. (2019) The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe. Available at: https://popu-list.org
51.
SartoriG (2005 [1976]) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
SemenovaE (2020) Expert Ministers in New Democracies: Delegation, Communist Legacies, or Technocratic Populism?Politics and Governance8 (4): 590–602.
53.
SiaroffA (2003) Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidential and Parliamentary Distinction. European Journal of Political Research42: 287–312.
54.
StrømK (1984) Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies17 (2): 199–227.
55.
StrømK (2000) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research37 (3): 261–289.
56.
TheisMF (2001) Keeping Tabs on Partners: The Logic of Delegation in Coalition Governments. American Journal of Political Science45 (3): 580–598.
57.
ThürkMHellströmJDöringH (2021) Institutional constraints on cabinet formation: Veto points and party system dynamics. European Journal of Political Research, 60: 295–316.
58.
Transparency International (2022) Corruption Perception Index. Available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi (accessed on 27 June 2022).
59.
van BiezenIPoguntkeT (2014) The Decline of Membership-Based Politics. Party Politics20 (2): 205–216.
60.
van der EijkCSchmittHBinderT (2005) Left–right orientations and party choice In ThomassenC (ed.), The European Voter. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–191.
61.
VittoriD (2022) Threat or Corrective? Assessing the Impact of Populist Parties in Government on the Qualities of Democracy: A 19-Country Comparison. Government and Opposition57 (4): 589–609.
62.
VittoriDPiletJBRojonS, et al. (2023) Technocratic Ministers in Office in European Countries (2000–2020): What’s New?Political Studies Review21 (4): 867–886.
63.
WooldridgeJM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
WratilCPastorellaG (2018) Dodging the Bullet: How Crises Trigger Technocrat-Led Governments. European Journal of Political Research57: 450–472.
66.
ZillerCSchubelT (2015) The Pure People Versus ‘the Corrupt Elite’? Political Corruption, Political Trust and the Success of Radical Right Parties in Europe. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties25 (3): 368–386.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
