Individual attitudes towards immigration are powerfully driven by ethnic context, that is, size of foreign-born population. We advance the literature by examining how the change (growth) in foreign-born population, in addition to its size (level), is related to two distinct outcomes: natives’ views on legal and unauthorized immigration. By analysing a probability US sample, we find that an increase in the state-level immigration population is positively related to Americans’ approval of a policy aimed at containing the flow of undocumented immigrants. The proportion of immigrants in a state, however, is not a significant predictor of support for such restrictive policy. With respect to legal immigration, neither the amount of recent change in, nor the size of, the immigration population matters. Our study provides strong evidence for contextual effects: net of compositional factors, a dynamic change in foreign-born population has an independent impact on how Americans view unauthorized, but not legal, immigration.
AlbaRFonerN (2015) Strangers No More. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AllportGW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
AveryJMFineJAMárquezT (2017) Racial Threat and the Influence of Latino Turnout on State Immigration Policy*. Social Science Quarterly98 (2): 750–765.
4.
BarlowFKPaoliniSPedersenA, et al. (2012) The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin38 (12): 1629–1643.
5.
BerryJW (1997) Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation. Applied Psychology46 (1): 5–34.
6.
BlalockHM (1967) Toward a Theory of Minority Group Relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons
7.
BrantonRCasseseECJonesBS, et al. (2011) All Along the Watchtower: Acculturation Fear, Anti-Latino Affect, and Immigration. The Journal of Politics73 (3): 664–679.
8.
BrincksAMEndersCKLlabreMM, et al. (2017) Centering Predictor Variables in Three-Level Contextual Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research52 (2): 149–163.
9.
BucklerK (2008) Public Opinion on Illegal Immigration: A Test of Seven Core Hypotheses. Journal of Crime and Justice31 (1): 113–147.
10.
ButzAMKehrbergJE (2016) Estimating Anti-immigrant Sentiment for the American States Using Multi-level Modeling and Post-stratification, 2004–2008. Research & Politics3 (2). DOI: 10.1177/2053168016645830.
11.
CastlesSMillerMJAmmendolaG (2003) The Age of Migration: International Movements in the Modern Word. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
12.
CastroVS (2003) Acculturation and Psychological Adaptation. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
13.
CavailleCMarshallJ (2019) Education and Anti-Immigration Attitudes: Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Reforms Across Western Europe. American Political Science Review113 (1): 254–263.
14.
CitrinJSidesJ (2008) Immigration and the Imagined Community in Europe and the United States. Political Studies56 (1): 33–56.
15.
CitrinJReingoldBWaltersE, et al. (1990) The ‘Official English’ Movement and the Symbolic Politics of Language in the United States. The Western Political Quarterly43 (3): 535–559.
16.
DruckmanJNHennessyCLSt. CharlesK, et al. (2010) Competing Rhetoric Over Time: Frames Versus Cues. The Journal of Politics72 (1): 136–148.
17.
EnosRD (2014) Causal Effect of Intergroup Contact on Exclusionary Attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111 (10): 3699–3704.
18.
FacchiniGMaydaAMPuglisiR (2017) Illegal Immigration and Media Exposure: Evidence on Individual Attitudes. IZA Journal of Development and Migration7 (1): 14.
FusselE (2014) Warmth of Welcome: Attitude Toward Immigrants and Immigration Policy. Annual Review of Sociology40: 479–298.
21.
GilesHJohnsonP (1981) The Role of Language in Ethnic Group Relations. In: TurnerJCGilesH (eds) Intergroup Behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.199–243.
22.
GravelleTB (2016) Party Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward Illegal Immigration. Public Opinion Quarterly80 (1): 1–25.
23.
GravelleTB (2019) Party Identification, Local Context, and Australian Attitudes toward Immigration and Asylum Policy. Social Science Research81: 77–90.
24.
GreenDPStrolovitchDZWongJS (1998) Defended Neighborhoods, Integration, and Racially Motivated Crime. American Journal of Sociology104 (2): 372–403.
25.
HaSE (2010) The Consequences of Multiracial Contexts on Public Attitudes toward Immigration. Political Research Quarterly63 (1): 29–42.
26.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2014) Public Attitudes toward Immigration. Annual Review of Political Science17: 225–249.
27.
HewstoneMBrownB (1986) Contact Is Not Enough: An Intergroup Perspective on the ‘Contact Hypothesis’. In: HewstoneMBrownR (eds) Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters. New York: Basil Blackwell, pp.1–44.
28.
HoodMVMorrisIL (1997) ¿Amigo O Enemigo?: Context, Attitudes, and Anglo Public Opinion toward Immigration. Social Science Quarterly78 (2): 309–323.
29.
HoodMVMorrisIL (1998) Give Us Your Tired, Your Poor, . . . But Make Sure They Have a Green Card: The Effects of Documented and Undocumented Migrant Context on Anglo Opinion toward Immigration. Political Behavior20 (1): 1–15.
30.
HopkinsDJ (2010) Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition. American Political Science Review104 (1): 40–60.
31.
HopkinsDJTranVCWilliamsonAF (2014) See No Spanish: Language, Local Context, and Attitudes toward Immigration. Politics, Groups, and Identities2 (1): 35–51.
32.
KarrethJSinghSPStojekSM (2015) Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration: The Role of Regional Context and Individual Predispositions. West European Politics38 (6): 1174–1202.
33.
KaufmannE (2014) ‘It’s the Demography, Stupid’: Ethnic Change and Opposition to Immigration. The Political Quarterly85 (3): 267–276.
34.
KaufmannE (2017) Levels or Changes?: Ethnic Context, immigration and the UK Independence Party Vote. Electoral Studies48: 57–69.
35.
KaufmannEGoodwinM (2018) The Diversity Wave: A Meta-Analysis of Ethnic Diversity, Perceived Threat and Native White Backlash. Social Science Research76: 120–131.
36.
KaufmannEHarrisG (2015) “White Flight” or Positive Contact? Local Diversity and Attitudes to Immigration in Britain. Comparative Political Studies48 (12): 1563–1590.
37.
KesslerAEFreemanGP (2005) Support for Extreme Right-Wing Parties in Western Europe: Individual Attributes, Political Attitudes, and National Context. Comparative European Politics3 (3): 261–288.
38.
KnollBR (2013) Implicit Nativist Attitudes, Social Desirability, and Immigration Policy Preferences. International Migration Review47 (1): 132–165.
39.
LarsenKSKrumovKVan LeH, et al. (2009) Threat Perception and Attitudes toward Documented and Undocumented Immigrants in the United States: Framing the Debate and Conflict Resolution. European Journal of Social Sciences7 (4): 115–134.
40.
LaurenceJ (2014) Reconciling the Contact and Threat Hypotheses: Does Ethnic Diversity Strengthen or Weaken Community Inter-Ethnic Relations?Ethnic and Racial Studies37 (8): 1328–1349.
41.
LaurenceJBentleyL (2018) Countervailing Contact: Community Ethnic Diversity, Anti-Immigrant Attitudes and Mediating Pathways of Positive and Negative Inter-Ethnic Contact in European Societies. Social Science Research69: 83–110.
42.
LaurenceJSchmidKRaeJR, et al. (2019) Prejudice, Contact, and Threat at the Diversity-Segregation Nexus: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of How Ethnic Out-Group Size and Segregation Interrelate for Inter-Group Relations. Social Forces97 (3): 1029–1066.
43.
MarquezTSchraufnagelS (2013) Hispanic Population Growth and State Immigration Policy: An Analysis of Restriction (2008–12). Publius: The Journal of Federalism43 (3): 347–367.
44.
MaxwellR (2019) Geographic Divides and Cosmopolitanism: Evidence from Switzerland. Comparative Political Studies53 (13): 2061–2090.
45.
MerollaJRamakrishnanSKHaynesC (2013) ‘Illegal’, ‘Undocumented’, or ‘Unauthorized’: Equivalency Frames, Issue Frames, and Public Opinion on Immigration. Perspectives on Politics11 (3): 789–807.
46.
MoodC (2009) Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It. European Sociological Review26 (1): 67–82.
47.
NewmanBJ (2013) Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 374–390.
48.
NewmanBJVelezY (2014) Group Size Versus Change? Assessing Americans’ Perception of Local Immigration. Political Research Quarterly67 (2): 293–303.
49.
NewmanBJHartmanTKTaberCS (2012) Foreign Language Exposure, Cultural Threat, and Opposition to Immigration. Political Psychology33 (5): 635–657.
50.
NorrisPInglehartR (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump. Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
OliverEJWongJ (2003) Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings. American Journal of Political Science47 (4): 567–582.
52.
PaxtonPMughanA (2006) What’s to Fear from Immigrants? Creating an Assimilationist Threat Scale. Political Psychology27 (4): 549–568.
53.
PercivalGLCurrin-PercivalM (2013) Exploring the Contextual Determinants of Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants and Criminal Activity and Their Spillover Policy Implications. International Migration51 (6): 1–23.
Pottie-ShermanYWilkesR (2017) Does Size Really Matter?On the Relationship between Immigrant Group Size and Anti-Immigrant Prejudice. International Migration Review51 (1): 218–250.
58.
RochaRREspinoR (2009) Racial Threat, Residential Segregation, and the Policy Attitudes of Anglos. Political Research Quarterly62 (2): 415–426.
59.
SchildkrautDJ (2013) ‘Amnesty, Guest Workers, Fences! Oh My’. Public Opinion about ‘Comprehensive Immigration Reform’. In: FreemanGPHansenRLealDL (eds) Immigration and Public Opinion in Liberal Democracies. Routledge: Talyor & Francis Group, pp.207–231.
60.
SchlueterEScheepersP (2010) The Relationship between Outgroup Size and Anti-outgroup Attitudes: A Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Test of Group and Intergroup Contact Theory. Social Science Research39 (2): 285–295.
61.
SchlueterEWagnerU (2008) Regional Differences Matter: Examining the Dual Influence of the Regional Size of the Immigrant Population on Derogation of Immigrants in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology49 (2–3): 153–173.
62.
SemyonovMGlikmanA (2009) Ethnic Residential Segregation, social Contacts, and Anti-minority Attitudes in European Societies. European Sociological Review25 (6): 693–708.
63.
SobolewskaMGalandiniSLessard-PhillipsL (2017) The Public View of Immigrant Integration: Multidimensional and Consensual. Evidence from Survey Experiments in the UK and the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies43 (1): 58–79.
64.
StaceyMCarbone-LópezKRosenfeldR (2011) Demographic Change and Ethnically Motivated Crime: The Impact of Immigration on Anti-Hispanic Hate Crime in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice27 (3): 278–298.
65.
SteinRMPostSSRindenAL (2000) Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes. Political Research Quarterly53 (2): 285–303.
66.
Van HeerdenSRuedinD (2019) How Attitudes Towards Immigrant are Shaped by Residential Context: The Role of Ethnic Diversity Dynamics and Immigrant Visibility. Urban Studies56(2): 317–223.
67.
WagnerUOChristTFPettigrewJ, et al. (2006) Prejudice and Minority Proportion: Contact Instead of Threat Effects. Social Psychology Quarterly69 (4): 380–390.
68.
WardCKennedyA (1993) Where’s the ‘Culture’ in Cross-Cultural Transition? Comparative Studies of Sojourner Adjustment. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology24 (2): 221–249.
69.
WrightMLevyMCitrinJ (2016) Public Attitudes Toward Immigration Policy Across the Legal/Illegal Divide: The Role of Categorical and Attribute-Based Decision-Making. Political Behavior38 (1): 229–253.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
