Sovereignism is at the crux of the current wave of radical right-wing populism. Populist parties advocate ‘taking back control’ and generally do so in the name of the ‘people’, pledging to restore economic well-being. This article argues that populism and sovereignism are inherently connected in radical right-wing populism politics through a set of values that emphasize popular and national sovereignty. To test the empirical validity of our proposition, we focus on two established European radical right-wing populist parties, namely the Rassemblement National in France and the Swiss People’s Party and use data from an original survey. We find that while Rassemblement National and Swiss People’s Party voters diverge in general economic orientations, they share similar economic populist sovereignist values that significantly shape electoral support for those parties. These findings suggest that economic populist sovereignism may represent an important driver of support for the radical right-wing populism, alongside other correlates of radical right-wing populism voting, such as perceived immigration threat.
AttewellD (2020) Deservingness Perceptions, Welfare State Support and Vote Choice in Western Europe. West European Politics. Epub ahead of print 11 February. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2020.1715704.
2.
BasileLMazzoleniO (2020) Sovereignist Wine in Populist Bottles: An Introduction. European Politics and Society21 (2): 151–162.
3.
BasileLBorriRVerzichelliL (2020) For Whom the Sovereignist Bell Tolls? Individual Determinants of Support for Sovereignism in Ten European Countries. European Politics and Society21 (2): 235–257.
BetzH-G (1994) Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BetzH-GJohnsonC (2004) Against the Current – Stemming the Tide: The Nostalgic Ideology of the Contemporary Radical Populist Right. Journal of Political Ideologies9 (3): 311–327.
7.
BetzH-GMeretS (2013) Right-Wing Populist Parties and the Working-Class Vote: What Have You Done for Us Lately? In RydgrenJ (ed.) Class Politics and the Radical Right. London: Routledge, pp.107–121.
8.
BollenKA (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
9.
BonikowskiBHalikiopoulouDKaufmannE, et al. (2019) Populism and Nationalism in a Comparative Perspective: A Scholarly Exchange. Nations and Nationalism25 (1): 58–81.
10.
BrubakerR (2020) Populism and Nationalism. Nations and Nationalism26 (1): 44–66.
11.
CanovanM (2005) The People. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
CarrierJG (2018) Moral Economy: What’s in a Name. Anthropological Theory18 (1): 18–35.
13.
Castanho SilvaBJungkunzSHelblingM, et al. (2020) An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales. Political Research Quarterly73: 409–424.
14.
ChalmersRP (2012) A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment. Journal of Statistical Software48 (6): 2–29.
15.
ChryssogelosA (2020) State Transformation and Populism: From the Internationalized to the Neo-Sovereign State?Politics40 (1): 22–37.
16.
CiukDJLuptonRNThorntonJR (2018) Values Voters: The Conditional Effect of Income on the Relationship Between Core Values and Political Attitudes and Behavior. Political Psychology39 (4): 869–888.
17.
CramerJK (2016) The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
De CleenBStavrakakisY (2017) Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism. Javnost – The Public24 (4): 301–319.
19.
DeanJMaiguashcaB (2020) Did Somebody Say Populism? Towards a Renewal and Reorientation of Populism Studies. Journal of Political Ideologies25 (1): 11–27.
20.
DubetF (2019) Le temps des passions tristes. Paris: Seuil.
21.
GestJRenyTMayerJ (2018) Roots of the Radical Right: Nostalgic Deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies51 (13): 1694–1719.
22.
GuisoLHerreraHMorelliM, et al. (2017) Demand and Supply of Populism. CEPR Discussion Paper no. DP 11871, February. Milan: IGIER, Università Bocconi.
23.
HarteveldEVan Der BrugWDahlbergS, et al. (2015) The Gender Gap in Populist Radical-Right Voting: Examining the Demand Side in Western and Eastern Europe. Patterns of Prejudice49 (1–2): 103–134.
24.
HayC (2020) Brexistential Angst and the Paradoxes of Populism: On the Contingency, Predictability and Intelligibility of Seismic Shifts. Political Studies68 (1): 187–206.
25.
HeinischRWernerAHabersackK (2020) Reclaiming National Sovereignty: The Case of the Conservatives and the Far Right in Austria. European Politics and Society21: 163–181.
26.
HochschildAR (2016) Strangers in Their Own Land. New York: The New Press.
27.
IbsenMF (2019) The Populist Conjuncture: Legitimation Crisis in the Age of Globalized Capitalism. Political Studies67 (3): 795–811.
28.
IchijoA (2009) Sovereignty and Nationalism in the Twenty-First Century: The Scottish Case. Ethnopolitics8 (2): 155–172.
29.
IgnaziP (2006) The Silent Counter-Revolution. European Journal of Political Research22 (1): 3–34.
30.
InglehartR (2018) Cultural Evolution: People’s Motivations Are Changing and Reshaping the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
IvaldiG (2018) Populism in France. In: StockemerD (ed.) Populism Around the World: A Comparative Perspective. Cham: Springer, pp.27–48.
32.
IvaldiGMazzoleniO (2020) Economic Populism and Sovereigntism: The Economic Supply of European Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties. European Politics and Society21 (2): 202–218.
33.
KallisA (2018) Populism, Sovereignism and the Unlikely Re-Emergence of the Territorial Nation-State. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences11 (3): 285–302.
34.
KlineRB (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. New York: Guilford Press.
35.
LoewNFaasT (2019) Between Thin- and Host-Ideologies: How Populist Attitudes Interact with Policy Preferences in Shaping Voting Behaviour. Representation55 (4): 493–511.
36.
LubbersMCoendersM (2017) Nationalistic Attitudes and Voting for the Radical Right in Europe. European Union Politics18 (1): 98–118.
37.
MaierCS (2016) Once within Borders: Territories of Power, Wealth, and Belonging Since 1500. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
MazzoleniO (2018) Political Achievements, Party System Changes and Government Participation: The Case of the ‘New’ Swiss People’s Party. In: ZasloveAWolinetzS (eds) Absorbing the Blow: Populist Parties and Their Impact on Parties and Party Systems. London: Rowman & Littlefield; ECPR Press, pp.83–102.
39.
MényYSurelY (2000) Par le peuple, pour le peuple. Le populisme et la démocratie. Paris: Fayard.
40.
MuddeC (2010) The Populist Radical Right: A Pathological Normalcy. West European Politics33 (6): 1167–1186.
41.
MuddeCRovira KaltwasserC (2013) Exclusionary Vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition48 (2): 147–174.
42.
NorrisPInglehartR (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
OtjesSIvaldiGRavik JupskåsA, et al. (2018) It’s Not Economic Interventionism, Stupid! Reassessing the Political Economy of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties. Swiss Political Science Review24 (3): 270–290.
44.
PutnickDLBornsteinMH (2016) Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research. Developmental Review41: 71–90.
45.
RathgebP (2020) Makers against Takers: The Socio-economic Ideology and Policy of the Austrian Freedom Party. West European Politics. Epub ahead of print 18 February. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2020.1720400.
46.
RodrikD (2018) Populism and the Economics of Globalization. Journal of International Business Policy1 (1–2): 12–33.
47.
RohanMJ (2000) A Rose by Any Name? The Values Construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review4 (3): 255–277.
48.
RooduijnM (2018a) State of the Field: How to Study Populism and Adjacent Topics? A Plea for Both More and Less Focus. European Journal of Political Research58: 362–372.
49.
RooduijnM (2018b) What Unites the Voter Bases of Populist Parties? Comparing the Electorates of 15 Populist Parties. European Political Science Review10 (3): 351–368.
50.
Rovira KaltwasserCVan HauwaertS (2020) The Populist Citizen: Empirical Evidence from Europe and Latin America. European Political Science Review12 (1): 1–18.
51.
RovnyJPolkJ (2020) Still Blurry? Economic Salience, Position and Voting for Radical Right Parties in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research59 (2): 248–268.
52.
RydgrenJ (2017) Radical Right-Wing Parties in Europe: What’s Populism Got to Do with It?Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 485–496.
53.
SassenS (2015) Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
54.
SteenvoordenEHarteveldE (2018) The Appeal of Nostalgia: The Influence of Societal Pessimism on Support for Populist Radical Right Parties. West European Politics41 (1): 28–52.
55.
ThompsonEP (1971) The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century. Past & Present50: 76–136.
56.
ToplišekA (2018) The Political Economy of the Contemporary Rise of Populism in Western Democracies (Working Paper). London: SOAS University of London.
57.
Van der BrugWVan SpanjeJ (2009) Immigration, Europe and the ‘New’ Cultural Dimension. European Journal of Political Research48 (3): 309–334.
58.
Van DethJWScarbroughE (1998) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
Van HauwaertSMSchimpfCHAzevedoF (2020) The Measurement of Populist Attitudes: Testing Cross-National Scales Using Item Response Theory. Politics40 (1): 3–21.
60.
VerzichelliL (2020) Conclusions – The Populism-Sovereignism Linkage: Findings, Theoretical Implications and a New Research Agenda. European Politics and Society21 (2): 258–270.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
