Citizens are generally opposed to politicians receiving a high pay. We investigate the degree to which this aversion is moderated by citizens’ individual-level trust in politicians and whether institutional delegation can moderate the reactions to proposed changes in politicians’ pay. Using a survey experiment, we confirm that trust in politicians is a key predictor of attitudes regarding their pay. Distrust toward politicians seems to matter much more than general attitudes on income inequality when citizens form opinions on politicians’ pay. Furthermore, citizens’ aversion to high pay for politicians is affected by institutional delegation, but such delegation only lessen the opposition to pay raises modestly, leaving most citizens firmly against pay raises for politicians. Finally, while citizens’ trust in politicians matters greatly for their attitudes regarding politicians pay, proposed changes in politicians’ pay do not conversely affect citizen’s perceptions of the politicians.
AdriaansenMLvan PraagPde VreeseCH (2010) Substance Matters: How News Content can Reduce Political Cynicism. International Journal of Public Opinion Research22 (4): 433–457.
BartelsLM (2005) Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind. Perspectives on Politics3 (1): 15–31.
4.
BøggildT (2016) How Politicians’ Reelection Efforts Can Reduce Public Trust, Electoral Support, and Policy Approval. Political Psychology37 (6): 901–919.
5.
BøggildTPetersenMB (2016) The Evolved Functions of Procedural Fairness: An Adaptation for Politics. In: SchackelfordTKHansenRD (eds) The Evolution of Morality. New York: Springer, pp.247–275.
6.
BransMPetersBG (2012) Rewards for High Public Office in Europe and North America. London: Routledge.
7.
BraendleT (2015) Does remuneration affect the discipline and the selection of politicians? Evidence from pay harmonization in the European Parliament. Public Choice162 (1–2): 1–24.
8.
CarnesNHansenER (2016) Does paying politicians more promote economic diversity in legislatures?American Political Science Review110 (4): 699–716.
9.
CitrinJ (1974) Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government. American Political Science Review68 (3): 973–988.
10.
FeatherNT (1999) Judgments of Deservingness: Studies in the Psychology of Justice and Achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review3 (2): 86–107.
11.
FeatherNT (2015) Analyzing Relative Deprivation in Relation to Deservingness, Entitlement and Resentment. Social Justice Research28 (1): 7–26.
12.
FismanRHarmonNAKamenicaE, et al. (2015) Labor supply of politicians. Journal of the European Economic Association13 (5): 871–905.
13.
FridkinKLKenneyPJ (2011) The Role of Candidate Traits in Campaigns. Journal of Politics73 (1): 61–73.
14.
FunkCL (1999) Bringing the Candidate Into Models of Candidate Evaluation. Journal of Politics61 (3): 700–720.
15.
GilardiF (2002) Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis. Journal of European Public Policy9 (6): 873–893.
16.
HansenKJ (2018) Perceptions of Rich and Poor People’s Efforts and Public Opinion about Economic Redistribution. Aarhus: Politica.
17.
HarringN (2015) Reward or Punish? Understanding Preferences toward Economic or Regulatory Instruments in a Cross-National Perspective. Political Studies64 (3): 573–592.
18.
HibbingJRTheiss-MorseE (2002) Stealth Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HoffmanMLyonsE (2013) Do higher salaries lead to higher performance?Evidence from state politicians (October 23, 2013). Rotman School of Management Working Paper (2345085). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2345085
20.
HoodCPetersBG (1994) Understanding RHPOs. In: HoodCPetersBG (eds) Rewards at the Top: A Comparative Study of High Public Office. London: SAGE Publishing, pp.1–24.
21.
HopkinsDJSidesJCitrinJ (2018) The muted consequences of correct information about immigration. Journal of Politics81: 315–320.
22.
JonesK (2007) Daring and Discretion: Paying Australian Legislators. Journal of Legislative Studies13 (2): 235–253.
23.
JuddCMJames-HawkinsLYzerbytV, et al. (2005) Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment: Understanding the Relations Between Judgments of Competence and Warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89 (6): 899–913.
24.
KeaneMPMerloA (2010) Money, political ambition, and the career decisions of politicians. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics2 (3): 186–215.
25.
KeeleL (2007) Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government. American Journal of Political Science51 (2): 241–254.
26.
KelleyJEvansMD (1993) The Legitimation of Inequality: Occupational Earnings in Nine Nations. American Journal of Sociology99 (1): 75–125.
27.
KelleyJZagorskiK (2004) Economic Change and the Legitimation of Inequality: The Transition from Socialism to the Free Market in Central-East Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility22: 319–364.
28.
KiatpongsanSNortonMI (2014) How Much (More) Should CEOs Make? A Universal Desire for More Equal Pay. Perspectives on Psychological Science9 (6): 587–593.
29.
KochTObermaierM (2016) With Heart and (No) Mind? How Recipients Negatively Infer Missing Information About Politicians and How This Affects the Assessment of the Speaker. Communication Research43 (7): 972–995.
30.
KuklinskiJHQuirkPJJeritJ, et al. (2000) Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship. Journal of Politics62 (3): 790–816.
31.
LawrenceEDSidesJ (2014) The Consequences of Political Innumeracy. Research and Politics1 (2): 1–8.
32.
LeeperTJSlothuusR (2014) Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation. Political Psychology35(Suppl. 1): 129–156.
33.
LeviMStokerL (2000) Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science3: 475–507.
34.
McCallL (2013) The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
MajoneG (1997) Independent Agencies and the Delegation Problem Theoretical and Normative Dimensions. In: SteuenbergBvan VughtF (eds) Political Institutions and Public Policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp.139–56.
36.
MauseK (2014) Self-Serving Legislators? An Analysis of the Salary-Setting Institutions of 27 EU Parliaments. Constitutional Political Economy25 (2): 154–176.
37.
MérolaVHittMP (2015) Numeracy and the Persuasive Effect of Policy Information and Party Cues. Public Opinion Quarterly80 (2): 554–562.
38.
MontgomeryJMNyhanBTorresM (2018) How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What To Do About It. American Journal of Political Science62 (3): 760–775.
39.
MutzDReevesB (2005) The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust. American Political Science Review99 (1): 1–15.
40.
OsbergLSmeedingT (2006) “Fair” Inequality? Attitudes toward Pay Differentials: The United States in Comparative Perspective. American Sociological Review71: 450–473.
41.
PedersenRT (2017) Politicians Appear More Competent When Using Numerical Rhetoric. Journal of Experimental Political Science4 (2): 129–150.
PetersenMB (2012) Social Welfare as Small-Scale Help: Evolutionary Psychology and the Deservingness Heuristic. American Journal of Political Science56 (1): 1–16.
44.
PetersenMBSznycerDCosmidesL, et al. (2012) Who Deserves Help? Evolutionary Psychology, Social Emotions, and Public Opinion about Welfare. Political Psychology33 (3): 395–418.
45.
RagusaJM (2015) Socioeconomic Stereotypes: Explaining Variation in Preferences for Taxing the Rich. American Politics Research43 (2): 327–359.
SchuelerBEWestMR (2015) Sticker Shock: How Information Affects Citizen Support for Public School Funding. Public Opinion Quarterly80 (1): 90–113.
48.
TheriaultSM (2004) Public Pressure and Punishment in the Politics of Congressional Pay Raises. American Politics Research32 (4): 444–464.
49.
TorcalM (2017) Political Trust in Western and Southern Europe. In: ZmerliSVan der MeerTW (eds) Handbook on Political Trust. Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp.418–439.
50.
TurperSAartsK (2017) Political Trust and Sophistication: Taking Measurement Seriously. Social Indicators Research130 (1): 415–434.
51.
Van ErkelPFVan Der MeerTW (2016) Macroeconomic Performance, Political Trust and the Great Recession: A Multilevel Analysis of the Effects of Within-Country Fluctuations in Macroeconomic Performance on Political Trust in 15 EU Countries, 1999–2011. European Journal of Political Research55 (1): 177–197.
52.
Vederlagskommissionen (2016) Rapport fra Vederlagskommissionen. Copenhagen: Vederlagskommissionen.
53.
WhiteleyPClarkeHDSandersD, et al. (2016) Why Do Voters Lose Trust in Governments? Public Perceptions of Government Honesty and Trustworthiness in Britain 2000–2013. British Journal of Politics and International Relations18 (1): 234–254.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
